Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 05:54 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 05:54

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 Dec 2021
Posts: 108
Own Kudos [?]: 15 [0]
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT 1: 630 Q45 V31
Send PM
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Posts: 1691
Own Kudos [?]: 14673 [0]
Given Kudos: 766
Send PM
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6920
Own Kudos [?]: 63665 [1]
Given Kudos: 1773
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Director
Director
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Posts: 625
Own Kudos [?]: 31 [0]
Given Kudos: 21
Send PM
Re: Most of the world's supply of uranium currently comes from the mines. [#permalink]
Understanding the argument -
Most uranium comes from mines.
Extracting Uranium from seawater is more expensive than the price it fetches on the market.
Therefore, until the cost of extraction comes down, the extraction from seawater is unlikely to be commercially viable.

We need to evaluate the argument, and in evaluation, we check the validity of the argument. The correct answers are framed along the lines of assumptions.
What if next year, every country is going to build nuclear power plants to generate electricity, and the mines in mines are not sufficient to cover the exponential surge in demand? The assumption is that if demand is exponentially high beyond what mines can cover, then whatever the cost of extraction is, we'll extract from the sea.

Or what happens if the mines are diminishing at a fast rate? In that case, the supply will plummet while demand is still high. So we can still extract from the sea whatever the cost is. We assume that knowing about supply is essential.

As you can see, there are many questions we can ask. We need to see out of these five options which one is the best of the lot.

Option Elimination -

(A) Whether the uranium in deposits on land is rapidly being depleted - OK. Let's take it to two extremes
1. Yes, the uranium in deposits on land is rapidly being depleted. It makes us believe less in the conclusion.
2. No, the uranium in deposits on land is not rapidly being depleted. It makes us believe more in the conclusion.

(B) Whether most uranium is used near where it is mined - doesn't matter. Distortion.

(C) Whether there are any technological advances that show promise of reducing the costs of extracting uranium from seawater - practically says what we already know from the argument. "until the cost of extracting uranium from seawater can somehow be reduced." Distortion.

(D) Whether the total amount of Uranium in seawater is significantly greater than the total amount of uranium on land - It doesn't matter. Out of scope.

(E) Whether uranium can be extracted from freshwater at a cost similar to the cost of extracting it from seawater - Out of scope.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Most of the world's supply of uranium currently comes from the mines. [#permalink]
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne