WillGetIt wrote:
Most of the year, the hermit thrush, a North American songbird, eats a diet consisting mainly of insects, but in autumn, as the thrushes migrate to their Central and South American wintering grounds, they feed almost exclusively on wild berries. Wild berries, however, are not as rich in calories as insects, yet thrushes need to consume plenty of calories in order to complete their migration. One possible explanation is that berries contain other nutrients that thrushes need for migration and that insects lack.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously calls into question the explanation given for the thrush’s diet during migration?
(A) Hermit thrushes, if undernourished, are unable to complete their autumn migration before the onset of winter.
(B) Insect species contain certain nutrients that are not found in wild berries.
(C) For songbirds, catching insects requires the expenditure of significantly more calories than eating wild berries does.
(D) Along the hermit thrushes’ migration routes, insects are abundant throughout the migration season.
(E) There are some species of wild berries that hermit thrushes generally do not eat, even though these berry species are exceptionally rich in calories.
Elite097Most of the other posts in this thread label the explanation as the conclusion. I think that if we apply the "Why Test," we can see that probably isn't the case. If we use the explanation as the conclusion and ask "why," we can't use the rest of the argument as the premise(s). Quite the opposite; the explanation is exactly that: the explanation. And that means it isn't the conclusion. Okay, so what's the conclusion? Must be the thing that's being explained.
Conclusion:
Rest of year: eat insects while not migrating
Autumn: eat wild berries while migrating even though insects have more calories
WHY?
The premise offered by the argument is that berries contain nutrients needed for migration that insects lack.
We are asked what might call that premise into question.
There are two things in play here: calories and nutrients. We are told that calories are needed for migration. We are trying to call into question the explanation for why the birds eat berries instead of insects during migration. Is it that berries have other nutrients? Or is there some other explanation?
Since the questions in this thread mostly hinge on B, C, and D, I'll stick to those:
(B) Insect species contain certain nutrients that are not found in wild berries.
Are those nutrients necessary for migration? If not, and if the nutrients in berries are necessary for migration, it would certainly make sense for the birds to switch to berries during migration.(C) For songbirds, catching insects requires the expenditure of significantly more calories than eating wild berries does.
Calories are critical for migration. Insects contain more calories but also cost SIGNIFICANTLY more calories to acquire (be alert when GMAC uses intensity words like "significant" - it's usually not just a filler word for them). Chasing insects might not be the way the birds want to use their energy while migrating. Take the (pun intended) low-hanging fruit and keep moving. (D) Along the hermit thrushes’ migration routes, insects are abundant throughout the migration season.
This does the opposite of providing an explanation for why they eat berries. If there are so many insects, how do we get to the conclusion that they eat berries during migration?Answer choice C