GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 21 Oct 2018, 23:12

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Mount Diablo, near San Francisco, CA, is not a very high peak, with

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 1212
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Mount Diablo, near San Francisco, CA, is not a very high peak, with  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Sep 2018, 16:46
1
2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

82% (01:00) correct 18% (01:43) wrong based on 119 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Mount Diablo, near San Francisco, CA, is not a very high peak, with an elevation under 4000 ft., but due to its being adjacent to such a large expanse of low flat land in California's Central Valley, its viewshed being one of the largest in western United States.

A. due to its being adjacent to such a large expanse of low flat land in California's Central Valley, its viewshed being
B. it is adjacent to a large expanse of low flat land in California's Central Valley, with the result that it has a viewshed that is
C. because it is adjacent to such a large expanse of low flat land in California's Central Valley, its viewshed is
D. it is adjacent to a large expanse of low flat land in California's Central Valley, and this results in a viewshed that is
E. because of its being adjacent to a large expanse of low flat land in California's Central Valley, and its viewshed is

_________________

Thanks!
Do give some kudos.

Simple strategy:
“Once you’ve eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

Want to improve your Score:
GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 1| GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 2

My Notes:
Reading comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Absolute Phrases

Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 24 Mar 2017
Posts: 142
Location: India
Schools: ISB '20, IIMA
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.98
Re: Mount Diablo, near San Francisco, CA, is not a very high peak, with  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Sep 2018, 00:21
IMO C

A. due to its being adjacent to such a large expanse of low flat land in California's Central Valley, its viewshed being
B. it is adjacent to a large expanse of low flat land in California's Central Valley, with the result that it has a viewshed that is
C. because it is adjacent to such a large expanse of low flat land in California's Central Valley, its viewshed is.Clear and concise
D. it is adjacent to a large expanse of low flat land in California's Central Valley, and this results in a viewshed that is
E. because of its being adjacent to a large expanse of low flat land in California's Central Valley, and its viewshed is
_________________

Sailing through rough waters. Stars & few kudos will steer me past.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
P
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Posts: 477
Location: Malaysia
Schools: INSEAD Jan '19
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V33
GPA: 3.95
WE: Consulting (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Mount Diablo, near San Francisco, CA, is not a very high peak, with  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Sep 2018, 09:53
aragonn wrote:
Mount Diablo, near San Francisco, CA, is not a very high peak, with an elevation under 4000 ft., but due to its being adjacent to such a large expanse of low flat land in California's Central Valley, its viewshed being one of the largest in western United States.

A. due to its being adjacent to such a large expanse of low flat land in California's Central Valley, its viewshed being
B. it is adjacent to a large expanse of low flat land in California's Central Valley, with the result that it has a viewshed that is
C. because it is adjacent to such a large expanse of low flat land in California's Central Valley, its viewshed is
D. it is adjacent to a large expanse of low flat land in California's Central Valley, and this results in a viewshed that is
E. because of its being adjacent to a large expanse of low flat land in California's Central Valley, and its viewshed is


Demonstrative Pronouns in non-comparison sentences must be followed by noun. hence, the usage of this is wrong.

Hence, C
_________________

If my Post helps you in Gaining Knowledge, Help me with KUDOS.. !!

SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 1212
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Mount Diablo, near San Francisco, CA, is not a very high peak, with  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Sep 2018, 17:07
1
aragonn wrote:
Mount Diablo, near San Francisco, CA, is not a very high peak, with an elevation under 4000 ft., but due to its being adjacent to such a large expanse of low flat land in California's Central Valley, its viewshed being one of the largest in western United States.

A. due to its being adjacent to such a large expanse of low flat land in California's Central Valley, its viewshed being
B. it is adjacent to a large expanse of low flat land in California's Central Valley, with the result that it has a viewshed that is
C. because it is adjacent to such a large expanse of low flat land in California's Central Valley, its viewshed is
D. it is adjacent to a large expanse of low flat land in California's Central Valley, and this results in a viewshed that is
E. because of its being adjacent to a large expanse of low flat land in California's Central Valley, and its viewshed is

Official Explanation


A question about Mount Diablo in northern California.

The prompt has one independent clause before the underlining, then the conjunction “but.” This implies that we need another independent clause after the word “but.”

Choice (A) is a mess. First of all, it begins with a “due to” mistake. Furthermore, there are absolutely no full verbs after the word “but,” so no independent clauses. Choice (A) is incorrect.

Choice (B) is grammatically correct but logically flawed. Before the underlining, we have the fact that Mt. Diablo is not very tall, then the strong contrast word “but.” We are expecting a contrast in the next independent clause. What does choice (B) give us? It’s adjacent to low flat land. Overall:

Mt. Diablo is not very tall but it’s adjacent to low flat land.

In that sentence, the word “but” is playing no useful role at all, because there’s no contrast between those two facts. It’s incorrect to use a strong contrast word when there’s no contrast! Choice (B) is incorrect.

Choice (C) is elegant and well organized.

Choice (D) repeats the logical problem of (B) and also has a pronoun problem. The pronoun “this” refers to the action of the previous clause. That’s a pronoun mistake: pronouns can refer only to nouns, not to the action of clauses. Choice (D) is incorrect.

Choice (E) has the following organization:

[ind. clause #1] “but” [prepositional phrase] “and” [ind. clause #2]

Grammatically, this is a train wreck. The conjunctions “but” and “and” are parallelism markers and need to link equivalent elements. We would need another independent clause between “but” and “and.” As is, choice (E) is incorrect.

The only possible choice is (C).
_________________

Thanks!
Do give some kudos.

Simple strategy:
“Once you’ve eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

Want to improve your Score:
GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 1| GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 2

My Notes:
Reading comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Absolute Phrases

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 22 Jun 2018
Posts: 16
Re: Mount Diablo, near San Francisco, CA, is not a very high peak, with  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Oct 2018, 05:17
I got confused with parallelism. not X but Y form. In the options, none of them is following the parallelism rule. Am I wrong ?

Mount Diablo, near San Francisco, CA, isnot a very high peak, with an elevation under 4000 ft., but due to its being adjacent to such a large expanse of low flat land in California's Central Valley

The two bold parts should be parallel to each other, isn't it ?
SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 1212
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Mount Diablo, near San Francisco, CA, is not a very high peak, with  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Oct 2018, 05:41
anse - I am sorry mate but the structure you referred is not followed here. If you see a comma before 'but' then look for two things it is combining (acts as conjunctive).Here two independent clauses are connected by ', but'. The structure, followed here , is - "Mt. Diablo is not very tall but it’s adjacent to low flat land. "

Detail official solution is given in above post. you can raise any doubt if you have.
_________________

Thanks!
Do give some kudos.

Simple strategy:
“Once you’ve eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

Want to improve your Score:
GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 1| GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 2

My Notes:
Reading comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Absolute Phrases

GMAT Club Bot
Re: Mount Diablo, near San Francisco, CA, is not a very high peak, with &nbs [#permalink] 12 Oct 2018, 05:41
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Mount Diablo, near San Francisco, CA, is not a very high peak, with

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.