It is currently 18 Nov 2017, 14:57

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Mr. Janeck: I don t believe Stevenson will win the election

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

VP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1471

Kudos [?]: 789 [1], given: 6

Mr. Janeck: I don t believe Stevenson will win the election [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Mar 2010, 12:31
1
KUDOS
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

85% (hard)

Question Stats:

46% (01:10) correct 54% (01:27) wrong based on 483 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Mr. Janeck: I don’t believe Stevenson will win the election for governor. Few voters are willing to elect a businessman with no political experience to such a responsible public office.
Ms. Siuzdak: You’re wrong. The experience of running a major corporation is a valuable preparation for the task of running a state government.

M. Siuzdak’s response shows that she has interpreted Mr. Janeck’s remark to imply which of the following?
(A) Mr. Janeck considers Stevenson unqualified for the office of governor.
(B) No candidate without political experience has ever been elected governor of a state.
(D) A career spent in the pursuit of profit can be an impediment to one’s ability to run a state government fairly.
(E) Voters generally overestimate the value of political experience when selecting a candidate
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 789 [1], given: 6

Manager
Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 203

Kudos [?]: 133 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

01 Mar 2010, 13:26
A - as Siuzdak thinks that Janeck is saying that Stevenson cannot be governor as he doenst have political experience and Siuzdak counters by saying running major corporation exp is somewhat of an experience to run for a politician and he is qualified.

Kudos [?]: 133 [0], given: 1

Intern
Joined: 22 Nov 2009
Posts: 30

Kudos [?]: 24 [1], given: 1

### Show Tags

01 Mar 2010, 14:12
1
KUDOS
I am confused between A and E
_________________

kudos +1 ?

Kudos [?]: 24 [1], given: 1

Director
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 926

Kudos [?]: 1543 [0], given: 40

WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain

### Show Tags

04 May 2010, 06:50
Is it A?

Ms. J conclusion - Steve wont win.
Facts - Business person for a political job.

Ms. S conclusion - You are wrong (Steve will win).
Facts - An analogy is presented to support her claim.

A is simply reitrating Ms. S claim.

seekmba wrote:
Mr. Janeck: I don’t believe Stevenson will win the election for governor. Few voters are willing to elect a businessman with no political experience to such a responsible public office.
Ms. Siuzdak: You’re wrong. The experience of running a major corporation is a valuable preparation for the task of running a state government.

M. Siuzdak’s response shows that she has interpreted Mr. Janeck’s remark to imply which of the following?
(A) Mr. Janeck considers Stevenson unqualified for the office of governor.
(B) No candidate without political experience has ever been elected governor of a state.
(D) A career spent in the pursuit of profit can be an impediment to one’s ability to run a state government fairly.
(E) Voters generally overestimate the value of political experience when selecting a candidate

_________________

Tricky Quant problems: http://gmatclub.com/forum/50-tricky-questions-92834.html
Important Grammer Fundamentals: http://gmatclub.com/forum/key-fundamentals-of-grammer-our-crucial-learnings-on-sc-93659.html

Kudos [?]: 1543 [0], given: 40

Intern
Joined: 07 May 2010
Posts: 9

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Mr. Janeck: I don t believe Stevenson will win the election [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Jun 2010, 11:11
Mr. Janeck: I don’t believe Stevenson will win the election for governor. Few voters are willing to elect a businessman with no political experience to such a responsible public office.
Ms. Siuzdak: You’re wrong. The experience of running a major corporation is a valuable preparation for the task of running a state government.
M. Siuzdak’s response shows that she has interpreted Mr. Janeck’s remark to imply which of the following?
(A) Mr. Janeck considers Stevenson unqualified for the office of governor.
(B) No candidate without political experience has ever been elected governor of a state.
(D) A career spent in the pursuit of profit can be an impediment to one’s ability to run a state government fairly.
(E) Voters generally overestimate the value of political experience when selecting a candidate.

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Nov 2009
Posts: 311

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 44

### Show Tags

03 Jun 2010, 19:57
A.
_________________

"Success is going from failure to failure without a loss of enthusiam." - Winston Churchill

As vs Like - Check this link : http://www.grammar-quizzes.com/like-as.html.

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 44

Intern
Joined: 07 May 2010
Posts: 9

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Jun 2010, 22:36
The OA is A

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 926

Kudos [?]: 1543 [0], given: 40

WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain

### Show Tags

03 Jun 2010, 23:57
It's b/w A and D.

(D) A career spent in the pursuit of profit can be an impediment to one’s ability to run a state government fairly.

Ms. Siuzdak: You’re wrong [means Mr. J's conculsion is wrong]. The experience of running a major corporation is a valuable preparation for the task of running a state government.

Here, experience and valuable preparation doesnt indicate any impediment to running the govt. Rather these point indicate that Mr. S thought Mr. J is not suitable to the task.

pheonix wrote:
Mr. Janeck: I don’t believe Stevenson will win the election for governor. Few voters are willing to elect a businessman with no political experience to such a responsible public office.
Ms. Siuzdak: You’re wrong. The experience of running a major corporation is a valuable preparation for the task of running a state government.
M. Siuzdak’s response shows that she has interpreted Mr. Janeck’s remark to imply which of the following?
(A) Mr. Janeck considers Stevenson unqualified for the office of governor.
(B) No candidate without political experience has ever been elected governor of a state.
(D) A career spent in the pursuit of profit can be an impediment to one’s ability to run a state government fairly.
(E) Voters generally overestimate the value of political experience when selecting a candidate.

_________________

Tricky Quant problems: http://gmatclub.com/forum/50-tricky-questions-92834.html
Important Grammer Fundamentals: http://gmatclub.com/forum/key-fundamentals-of-grammer-our-crucial-learnings-on-sc-93659.html

Kudos [?]: 1543 [0], given: 40

Intern
Joined: 12 Mar 2010
Posts: 31

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Location: Vancouver, BC
Schools: Kellog, Haas, Ross, Yale
WE 1: R&D - Product Design
WE 2: EPC

### Show Tags

05 Jun 2010, 17:26
I feel that eliminating wrong answers may be the best way to go, leaving us with A as the best option out of the possible answers.

(A) Mr. Janeck considers Stevenson unqualified for the office of governor.

(B) No candidate without political experience has ever been elected governor of a state.
- Mr. J does not say this. He does imply that Many voters would not vote for a businessman with no political experience. What about a Lawyer with no political experience? This statement says No Candidate, regardless of previous work/career experience, has been elected without political experience.

- Mr. J says the exact opposite

(D) A career spent in the pursuit of profit can be an impediment to one’s ability to run a state government fairly.
- This implies a bit much and could be argued that pursuit of profits could lead to a better run government or corruption. Either way out of scope.

(E) Voters generally overestimate the value of political experience when selecting a candidate.
- Mr. J does not speak for the voters, here he is giving his own reasoning and not that of general voters.

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1438

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 13

Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2010, 08:47
A... do we have OA?

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 13

Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2010
Posts: 101

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 9

### Show Tags

02 Aug 2010, 23:40
I went with E .. Whats the OA? And explanations please..

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 9

Manager
Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Posts: 77

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 22

Location: United States (AL)
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2010, 00:10
A for me...

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 22

Manager
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 155

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2010, 01:19
I Went for D

OA ?
_________________

R E S P E C T

Finally KISSedGMAT 700 times 450 to 700 An exprience

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2010
Posts: 299

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 7

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2010, 06:12
I went for D too...What is the OA?!?!

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 7

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Sep 2009
Posts: 391

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 5

GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V38

### Show Tags

22 Nov 2010, 21:14
A
C is opposite
E is too general. Cant use a general statement to prove a specific result.

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 5

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7736

Kudos [?]: 17780 [8], given: 235

Location: Pune, India

### Show Tags

23 Nov 2010, 07:37
8
KUDOS
Expert's post
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
seekmba wrote:
Mr. Janeck: I don’t believe Stevenson will win the election for governor. Few voters are willing to elect a businessman with no political experience to such a responsible public office.
Ms. Siuzdak: You’re wrong. The experience of running a major corporation is a valuable preparation for the task of running a state government.

M. Siuzdak’s response shows that she has interpreted Mr. Janeck’s remark to imply which of the following?
(A) Mr. Janeck considers Stevenson unqualified for the office of governor.
(B) No candidate without political experience has ever been elected governor of a state.
(D) A career spent in the pursuit of profit can be an impediment to one’s ability to run a state government fairly.
(E) Voters generally overestimate the value of political experience when selecting a candidate

It is a good idea to first read the question stem. It prepares you to analyze the stimulus according to the question. Plus, in a complicated question, you don't have to go back and read the entire stimulus again (part of SWIMMER strategy of Veritas)

Here I first read the question: Ms. Siuzdak’s response shows that she has interpreted Mr. Janeck’s remark to imply which of the following?
I see there are two speakers. I know that Ms. Siuzdak interprets Mr. Janeck’s remark to imply something. Great, lets go ahead and read the stimulus.

Mr Janeck talks about the unwillingness of voters to elect a businessman without political experience to such a position.

Ms Siuzdak says, "You are wrong." and goes on to elaborate how experience of running a business prepares one to run the government.

When I read Ms. Siuzdak's response, I think, "She is interpreting an implication in Mr Janeck's remark. What is it?"
It does strike me as odd that he only mentioned how voters feel. He did not say that Stevenson was unsuitable for office while Ms. Siuzdak tries to convince him why Stevenson is suitable. She doesn't say something like, "You are wrong. Voters understand that the experience of running a major corporation is a valuable preparation for the task of running a state government."

Now I look at the options. It is pretty clear that she interpreted that Mr Janeck believes Stevenson is not suitable for office. (A) is the correct answer.
(D) is incorrect. The issue is experience here. Not how profit chasing affects the character of a person and makes him unsuitable for government office.
(E) is incorrect because she overlooked voters completely and responded to Mr Janeck as if he had said the following: "A businessman with no political experience should not be elected to such a responsible public office."
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for \$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Kudos [?]: 17780 [8], given: 235

Manager
Joined: 30 Apr 2009
Posts: 133

Kudos [?]: 125 [0], given: 9

### Show Tags

24 Nov 2010, 21:54
I think its A, other choices are irrelevant
_________________

Trying to make CR and RC my strong points

Kudos [?]: 125 [0], given: 9

Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 387

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 13

Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V32

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2011, 00:30
I got it as E as well.
But I can see why A is the answer.

BTW is this GMAT style or more LSAT style type of question?

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 13

Manager
Joined: 13 Nov 2009
Posts: 118

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 16

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 4
WE: General Management (Insurance)

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2011, 00:36
A.

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 16

Manager
Status: GMAT BATTLE - WIN OR DIE
Joined: 02 May 2011
Posts: 163

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 13

Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GMAT Date: 12-22-2011
GPA: 3.81
WE: General Management (Hospitality and Tourism)

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2011, 09:09
+1 FOR A

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 13

Re: Mr. Janeck   [#permalink] 24 Jul 2011, 09:09

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 39 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by