Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 22 May 2017, 09:43

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Mr. Janeck: I don t believe Stevenson will win the election

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

SVP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1513
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 629 [0], given: 6

Mr. Janeck: I don t believe Stevenson will win the election [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Mar 2010, 12:31
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

48% (02:21) correct 52% (01:07) wrong based on 246 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Mr. Janeck: I don’t believe Stevenson will win the election for governor. Few voters are willing to elect a businessman with no political experience to such a responsible public office.
Ms. Siuzdak: You’re wrong. The experience of running a major corporation is a valuable preparation for the task of running a state government.

M. Siuzdak’s response shows that she has interpreted Mr. Janeck’s remark to imply which of the following?
(A) Mr. Janeck considers Stevenson unqualified for the office of governor.
(B) No candidate without political experience has ever been elected governor of a state.
(D) A career spent in the pursuit of profit can be an impediment to one’s ability to run a state government fairly.
(E) Voters generally overestimate the value of political experience when selecting a candidate
If you have any questions
New!
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7368
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 2281

Kudos [?]: 15069 [7] , given: 224

### Show Tags

23 Nov 2010, 07:37
7
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
seekmba wrote:
Mr. Janeck: I don’t believe Stevenson will win the election for governor. Few voters are willing to elect a businessman with no political experience to such a responsible public office.
Ms. Siuzdak: You’re wrong. The experience of running a major corporation is a valuable preparation for the task of running a state government.

M. Siuzdak’s response shows that she has interpreted Mr. Janeck’s remark to imply which of the following?
(A) Mr. Janeck considers Stevenson unqualified for the office of governor.
(B) No candidate without political experience has ever been elected governor of a state.
(D) A career spent in the pursuit of profit can be an impediment to one’s ability to run a state government fairly.
(E) Voters generally overestimate the value of political experience when selecting a candidate

It is a good idea to first read the question stem. It prepares you to analyze the stimulus according to the question. Plus, in a complicated question, you don't have to go back and read the entire stimulus again (part of SWIMMER strategy of Veritas)

Here I first read the question: Ms. Siuzdak’s response shows that she has interpreted Mr. Janeck’s remark to imply which of the following?
I see there are two speakers. I know that Ms. Siuzdak interprets Mr. Janeck’s remark to imply something. Great, lets go ahead and read the stimulus.

Mr Janeck talks about the unwillingness of voters to elect a businessman without political experience to such a position.

Ms Siuzdak says, "You are wrong." and goes on to elaborate how experience of running a business prepares one to run the government.

When I read Ms. Siuzdak's response, I think, "She is interpreting an implication in Mr Janeck's remark. What is it?"
It does strike me as odd that he only mentioned how voters feel. He did not say that Stevenson was unsuitable for office while Ms. Siuzdak tries to convince him why Stevenson is suitable. She doesn't say something like, "You are wrong. Voters understand that the experience of running a major corporation is a valuable preparation for the task of running a state government."

Now I look at the options. It is pretty clear that she interpreted that Mr Janeck believes Stevenson is not suitable for office. (A) is the correct answer.
(D) is incorrect. The issue is experience here. Not how profit chasing affects the character of a person and makes him unsuitable for government office.
(E) is incorrect because she overlooked voters completely and responded to Mr Janeck as if he had said the following: "A businessman with no political experience should not be elected to such a responsible public office."
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199 Veritas Prep Reviews Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor Joined: 16 Oct 2010 Posts: 7368 Location: Pune, India Followers: 2281 Kudos [?]: 15069 [2] , given: 224 Re: Mr. Janeck [#permalink] ### Show Tags 30 Apr 2012, 08:51 2 This post received KUDOS Expert's post imhimanshu wrote: Hi Karishma, Request you to explain the question stem. Is it Inference question or Method of Reasoning? Also, Can we say that Option E would have been correct if question had asked for the assumption that Mr Janeck's argument making? Thanks H It's kind of an inference question (not conclusion though, inference as we know it in RC). You have to infer what Ms S inferred from Mr J's statement. Say, forget Mr J's statement. Think of only Ms S's statement. Ms S says 'You are wrong. Running a business prepares you for running a state.' What do you think someone would have said to make Ms S reply like this? Something on the lines of 'Running a business doesn't prepare you for running a state.' Right? So Ms. S inferred that Mr J is saying that Stevenson will not win the election because running a business hasn't taught him how to run a state. i.e. option (A) Also whether (E) is an assumption of Mr J's argument - Look at Mr J argument closely: Mr. Janeck: I don’t believe Stevenson will win the election for governor. Few voters are willing to elect a businessman with no political experience to such a responsible public office. Premise: Few voters are willing to elect a businessman with no political experience to such a responsible public office. (Premises are assumed to be true) Conclusion: I don’t believe Stevenson will win the election for governor. Assumption: No one can win an election with few votes. (An assumption links the stimulus with the conclusion) Mr J doesn't make any assumptions about voters - do they overestimate political experience, underestimate business experience etc. _________________ Karishma Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor My Blog Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Intern
Joined: 22 Nov 2009
Posts: 31
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 23 [1] , given: 1

### Show Tags

01 Mar 2010, 14:12
1
KUDOS
I am confused between A and E
_________________

kudos +1 ?

Manager
Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 207
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 122 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

01 Mar 2010, 13:26
A - as Siuzdak thinks that Janeck is saying that Stevenson cannot be governor as he doenst have political experience and Siuzdak counters by saying running major corporation exp is somewhat of an experience to run for a politician and he is qualified.
Director
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 943
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain
Followers: 77

Kudos [?]: 1327 [0], given: 40

### Show Tags

04 May 2010, 06:50
Is it A?

Ms. J conclusion - Steve wont win.
Facts - Business person for a political job.

Ms. S conclusion - You are wrong (Steve will win).
Facts - An analogy is presented to support her claim.

A is simply reitrating Ms. S claim.

seekmba wrote:
Mr. Janeck: I don’t believe Stevenson will win the election for governor. Few voters are willing to elect a businessman with no political experience to such a responsible public office.
Ms. Siuzdak: You’re wrong. The experience of running a major corporation is a valuable preparation for the task of running a state government.

M. Siuzdak’s response shows that she has interpreted Mr. Janeck’s remark to imply which of the following?
(A) Mr. Janeck considers Stevenson unqualified for the office of governor.
(B) No candidate without political experience has ever been elected governor of a state.
(D) A career spent in the pursuit of profit can be an impediment to one’s ability to run a state government fairly.
(E) Voters generally overestimate the value of political experience when selecting a candidate

_________________

Tricky Quant problems: http://gmatclub.com/forum/50-tricky-questions-92834.html
Important Grammer Fundamentals: http://gmatclub.com/forum/key-fundamentals-of-grammer-our-crucial-learnings-on-sc-93659.html

VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1457
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 195 [0], given: 13

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2010, 08:47
A... do we have OA?
Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2010
Posts: 106
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 9

### Show Tags

02 Aug 2010, 23:40
I went with E .. Whats the OA? And explanations please..
Manager
Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Posts: 81
Location: United States (AL)
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 22

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2010, 00:10
A for me...
Manager
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 170
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2010, 01:19
I Went for D

OA ?
_________________

R E S P E C T

Finally KISSedGMAT 700 times 450 to 700 An exprience

Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2010
Posts: 317
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 7

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2010, 06:12
I went for D too...What is the OA?!?!
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Sep 2009
Posts: 393
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V38
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 5

### Show Tags

22 Nov 2010, 21:14
A
C is opposite
E is too general. Cant use a general statement to prove a specific result.
Manager
Joined: 30 Apr 2009
Posts: 134
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 9

### Show Tags

24 Nov 2010, 21:54
I think its A, other choices are irrelevant
_________________

Trying to make CR and RC my strong points

Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 392
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V32
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 93 [0], given: 13

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2011, 00:30
I got it as E as well.
But I can see why A is the answer.

BTW is this GMAT style or more LSAT style type of question?
Manager
Joined: 13 Nov 2009
Posts: 119
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 4
WE: General Management (Insurance)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 16

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2011, 00:36
A.
Manager
Status: GMAT BATTLE - WIN OR DIE
Joined: 02 May 2011
Posts: 167
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GMAT Date: 12-22-2011
GPA: 3.81
WE: General Management (Hospitality and Tourism)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 89 [0], given: 13

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2011, 09:09
+1 FOR A
Manager
Joined: 26 Sep 2010
Posts: 113
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.65
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2011, 03:10
A for me
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 329
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 766 [0], given: 136

### Show Tags

30 Apr 2012, 07:54
Hi Karishma,

Request you to explain the question stem. Is it Inference question or Method of Reasoning?

Also, Can we say that Option E would have been correct if question had asked for the assumption that Mr Janeck's argument making?
Thanks
H

VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
seekmba wrote:
Mr. Janeck: I don’t believe Stevenson will win the election for governor. Few voters are willing to elect a businessman with no political experience to such a responsible public office.
Ms. Siuzdak: You’re wrong. The experience of running a major corporation is a valuable preparation for the task of running a state government.

M. Siuzdak’s response shows that she has interpreted Mr. Janeck’s remark to imply which of the following?
(A) Mr. Janeck considers Stevenson unqualified for the office of governor.
(B) No candidate without political experience has ever been elected governor of a state.
(D) A career spent in the pursuit of profit can be an impediment to one’s ability to run a state government fairly.
(E) Voters generally overestimate the value of political experience when selecting a candidate

It is a good idea to first read the question stem. It prepares you to analyze the stimulus according to the question. Plus, in a complicated question, you don't have to go back and read the entire stimulus again (part of SWIMMER strategy of Veritas)

Here I first read the question: Ms. Siuzdak’s response shows that she has interpreted Mr. Janeck’s remark to imply which of the following?
I see there are two speakers. I know that Ms. Siuzdak interprets Mr. Janeck’s remark to imply something. Great, lets go ahead and read the stimulus.

Mr Janeck talks about the unwillingness of voters to elect a businessman without political experience to such a position.

Ms Siuzdak says, "You are wrong." and goes on to elaborate how experience of running a business prepares one to run the government.

When I read Ms. Siuzdak's response, I think, "She is interpreting an implication in Mr Janeck's remark. What is it?"
It does strike me as odd that he only mentioned how voters feel. He did not say that Stevenson was unsuitable for office while Ms. Siuzdak tries to convince him why Stevenson is suitable. She doesn't say something like, "You are wrong. Voters understand that the experience of running a major corporation is a valuable preparation for the task of running a state government."

Now I look at the options. It is pretty clear that she interpreted that Mr Janeck believes Stevenson is not suitable for office. (A) is the correct answer.
(D) is incorrect. The issue is experience here. Not how profit chasing affects the character of a person and makes him unsuitable for government office.
(E) is incorrect because she overlooked voters completely and responded to Mr Janeck as if he had said the following: "A businessman with no political experience should not be elected to such a responsible public office."

_________________

+1 Kudos me, Help me unlocking GMAT Club Tests

Manager
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 197
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 22

Re: Mr. Janeck: I don t believe Stevenson will win the election [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 May 2012, 02:54
Was sure about A but picked E because of reference to voters which Mr. J introduces.

Thanks a lot for the detailed explanation Karishma.
Intern
Joined: 13 Jul 2012
Posts: 8
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

23 Jun 2013, 02:00
I would have definitely gone with A if 'unqualified' was not the word. unqualified is too strong a word. Ms Siuzdak does not feel Mr Janeck thinks something disqualifies him from contesting for the office. Nothing disqualifies him. Its just that voters will feel he is incompetent to run a state

But I guess the OA is A.

VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
seekmba wrote:
Mr. Janeck: I don’t believe Stevenson will win the election for governor. Few voters are willing to elect a businessman with no political experience to such a responsible public office.
Ms. Siuzdak: You’re wrong. The experience of running a major corporation is a valuable preparation for the task of running a state government.

M. Siuzdak’s response shows that she has interpreted Mr. Janeck’s remark to imply which of the following?
(A) Mr. Janeck considers Stevenson unqualified for the office of governor.
(B) No candidate without political experience has ever been elected governor of a state.
(D) A career spent in the pursuit of profit can be an impediment to one’s ability to run a state government fairly.
(E) Voters generally overestimate the value of political experience when selecting a candidate

It is a good idea to first read the question stem. It prepares you to analyze the stimulus according to the question. Plus, in a complicated question, you don't have to go back and read the entire stimulus again (part of SWIMMER strategy of Veritas)

Here I first read the question: Ms. Siuzdak’s response shows that she has interpreted Mr. Janeck’s remark to imply which of the following?
I see there are two speakers. I know that Ms. Siuzdak interprets Mr. Janeck’s remark to imply something. Great, lets go ahead and read the stimulus.

Mr Janeck talks about the unwillingness of voters to elect a businessman without political experience to such a position.

Ms Siuzdak says, "You are wrong." and goes on to elaborate how experience of running a business prepares one to run the government.

When I read Ms. Siuzdak's response, I think, "She is interpreting an implication in Mr Janeck's remark. What is it?"
It does strike me as odd that he only mentioned how voters feel. He did not say that Stevenson was unsuitable for office while Ms. Siuzdak tries to convince him why Stevenson is suitable. She doesn't say something like, "You are wrong. Voters understand that the experience of running a major corporation is a valuable preparation for the task of running a state government."

Now I look at the options. It is pretty clear that she interpreted that Mr Janeck believes Stevenson is not suitable for office. (A) is the correct answer.
(D) is incorrect. The issue is experience here. Not how profit chasing affects the character of a person and makes him unsuitable for government office.
(E) is incorrect because she overlooked voters completely and responded to Mr Janeck as if he had said the following: "A businessman with no political experience should not be elected to such a responsible public office."
Re: Mr. Janeck   [#permalink] 23 Jun 2013, 02:00

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 25 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 Mr. Janeck, a permanent resident of a remote island called Hypothetica 10 17 Mar 2016, 23:15
21 If Shero wins the election, McGuinness will be appointed hea 7 10 Apr 2017, 08:16
The newly elected prime minister of Cyberia, Mr O, prefers u 2 05 Jun 2014, 01:45
5 Mr. Janeck: I don t believe Stevenson will win the election 7 23 Aug 2016, 22:15
Mr. Janeck: I don t believe Stevenson will win the election 5 26 May 2012, 20:55
Display posts from previous: Sort by