Ms. Rose argued that time & money invested in acquiring : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 21 Feb 2017, 16:57

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Ms. Rose argued that time & money invested in acquiring

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Feb 2004
Posts: 414
Location: Lungi
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Ms. Rose argued that time & money invested in acquiring [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2004, 23:38
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Ms. Rose argued that time & money invested in acquiring a professional degree are totally wasted.As evidence supporting her argument, she offered the case of a manwho at considerable expense of time and money, completed his law degree & then married & lived as a house-husband,taking care of the children & working part-time at a day-care center so that his wife could pursue her career.
The logical reasoning in Ms. Rose' argument is closely parallel to which of the following:

A)A juvenile delinquent who insists that his behaviour is attributable to the fact that his parents didn't love him.
B)A conscientous objector who bases his draft resistance on the premise that there can be no moral wars.
C)A senator who votes large sums of money for military equipment,but who votes against programs designed to help the poor.
D) When a policeman is found guilty of murdering his wife,an opponent of police brutality who says "Thats what these people mean by law and order"
E) A high school senator who decides that rather than go to college he'll enroll in a vocational program to learn to be an electrician.
If you have any questions
New!
Director
Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 893
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2004, 23:55
Wow, wherever you got this from. Interesting one - but I am fairly clueless. Let me embarass myself with some crude logic here..

Stimulus says 'Invests in X, but does Y, wasting X'. I am rewriting it slightly to read it as 'lawyer to house hubby, wasted lawyer'

Looking for a similar logic. D says 'Policeman to criminal, wasted Policeman'.
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 339
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Nov 2004, 13:44
I too think that the answer is D.

My reasoning:

A statement or a conclusion is based on observing just one example.
*Time an money is wasted on prof education bcoz the man became a house husband.

*One policmen killing his wife makes one conclude that this is what law and order means.

Nice question!
_________________

510 on my first GMAT. 610 on second GMAT.!
The struggle continues.

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4302
Followers: 40

Kudos [?]: 438 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Nov 2004, 13:57
You spoke my mind Newkid
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

02 Nov 2004, 13:57
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Ms. Evangeline Rose argued that the money and time invested in... 3 14 Aug 2016, 09:32
Movie Money 0 01 Sep 2014, 23:30
Now is an excellent time to invest in the catering business. 9 25 Dec 2010, 11:02
1 Jordan: If a business invests the money necessary to 5 09 Dec 2010, 12:40
Now is an excellent time to invest in the catering business. 9 25 May 2010, 05:53
Display posts from previous: Sort by