Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 27 May 2017, 17:55

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# ms. smith, an adoptive mother, recently read an article

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 09 Jun 2003
Posts: 187
Location: work chair
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

ms. smith, an adoptive mother, recently read an article [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jan 2004, 07:24
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (01:49) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 4 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

ms. smith, an adoptive mother, recently read an article about a birth father who is suing the adoptive parents for custody of his child, who had been offered up for adoption without the birth father's permission. ms. smith adopted her child several years later through the same agency, but she should not be worried that her child's birth father will sue her for custody.

which of the following, if true, would lend the most support to the conclusion above?

1. the birth mother of ms. smith's child never informed the birth father that she was pregnant, so the birth father does not know of the child's existence.
2. in the last twenty years in the state in which ms. smith lives, adoptive parents have won 90 percent of the cases in which birth parents have sued for custody of an adoptive child.
3. the adoption in the article was completed two months before a policy was instituted by the agency requiring the signature of both parents on the paperwork releasing the child for adoption.
4. the birth father in the case described in the article was over the age of 18 at the time the adoption was completed.
5. ms. smith adopted one child through the agency mentioned in the article and another child through a lawyer specializing in adoptions.
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2003
Posts: 247
Location: USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Jan 2004, 07:32
3.

1 - father does not know today, but could come to know in future.
2 - she cud be among the unlucky 10%, anyway out of scope
4 - out of scope
5 - how does it matter, out of scope
Director
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 961
Location: Florida
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 145 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Jan 2004, 08:35
only after reading the replies, I think it is 3
Manager
Joined: 09 Jun 2003
Posts: 187
Location: work chair
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Jan 2004, 08:36
dj wrote:
only after reading the replies, I think it is 3

so only after reading the replies, huh?

answer is indead (c), although i have chosen (a). we can not assume anything, right? we are given a fact: father does not know anything about child. if not (a), then it means we are digging deeper than we have to. okey, let's dig deeper in case of (c). there are a lot of high-qualified lawyers out there, who can prove you that father is the victim of this policy and now he has all rights to get his child back, since he is the born father of his son and he really loves him bla bla bla...

okey, here is the explanation:

you are looking for the best reason why ms. s. should not be worried, and (c) provides it. the new policy that the adoption agency has put into place requires that all adoptions be approved by the birth father, so he has signed away his right to sue for custody. if (a) and (b) are true, then the father could still sue if he wanted. (d) and (e) are irrelevant, because age was never mentioned as an issue, and neither was the number of children that ms. s. has adopted.
Intern
Joined: 05 Aug 2014
Posts: 10
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: ms. smith, an adoptive mother, recently read an article [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Apr 2016, 05:31
I also think that right answer is 3
Re: ms. smith, an adoptive mother, recently read an article   [#permalink] 14 Apr 2016, 05:31
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Columnist: In a recent article an economist argues 3 04 Jun 2016, 22:32
The state of California recently adopted legislation that requires 1 06 Nov 2014, 05:06
1 Perkins: According to an article I read, the woolly mammoth‘ 1 10 Aug 2014, 20:37
35 Perkins: According to an article I read, the woolly mammoth‘ 13 19 Oct 2016, 08:28
7 A recent series of newspaper articles revealed that 3 12 Oct 2016, 18:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# ms. smith, an adoptive mother, recently read an article

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.