It is currently 18 Nov 2017, 09:23

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Multi-party initiatives are becoming increasingly popular

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 09 Jan 2007
Posts: 240

Kudos [?]: 40 [2], given: 0

Multi-party initiatives are becoming increasingly popular [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Mar 2007, 09:48
2
KUDOS
23
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

38% (02:00) correct 62% (02:16) wrong based on 467 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Multi-party initiatives are becoming increasingly popular among the members of the parliament of Country W. Although legislation proposed under the auspices of more than one party may not adhere as strictly to the agenda of each of the parties involved as legislation proposed by only one party, the political backing of the voting blocs represented by the cooperating parties make such proposals more likely to pass than proposals that come from a single faction alone. The benefit of multi-party initiatives is that legislation important to the general welfare of Country W that might otherwise have foundered in inter-party disagreements can effectively be enacted.

Which of the following statements by a minister of Party C in the government of Country W is most consistent with the beliefs of an individual political party in the situation described above?

A) "Our party would rather compromise on some of our issues and also see other parties compromise on their issues than run the risk of not having legislation that we propose pass."
B) "Our party would rather give up a few minor points of ideology than risk having the issues important to our constituents not be addressed as a result of the government's inability to pass any new laws. "
C) "Our party would rather participate in an environment that fosters inter-party cooperation than persist in constant conflict with other parties."
D) "Our party would rather have other parties join in support of our legislation than join in supporting the proposals of other parties."
E) "Our party would rather have our proposals passed because they represent what is best for the welfare of our country than to become engaged in the agendas of other parties."
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by Nevernevergiveup on 19 Dec 2015, 07:49, edited 1 time in total.
incomplete information

Kudos [?]: 40 [2], given: 0

Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1126

Kudos [?]: 3549 [9], given: 123

Location: United States
Re: Multi-party initiatives are becoming increasingly popular [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jun 2013, 23:16
9
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
mattce wrote:
Bump...

Can't anyone please clarify why A is wrong?

I understand why B is correct; and might even agree that it could possibly be better than A... But I don't understand why A is incorrect.

.. Or is A correct but just less correct than B?

Any clarification would be great

Because the original question has some errors, I will quote the complete version below for more discussion.

Quote:
Multi-party initiatives are becoming increasingly popular among the members of the parliament of Country W. Although legislation proposed under the auspices of more than one party may not adhere as strictly to the agenda of each of the parties involved as legislation proposed by only one party, the political backing of the voting blocs represented by the cooperating parties make such proposals more likely to pass than proposals that come from a single faction alone. The benefit of multi-party initiatives is that legislation important to the general welfare of Country W that might otherwise have foundered in inter-party disagreements can effectively be enacted.

Which of the following statements by a minister of Party C in the government of Country W is most consistent with the beliefs of an individual political party in the situation described above?

A) "Our party would rather compromise on some of our issues and also see other parties compromise on their issues than run the risk of not having legislation that we propose pass."
B) "Our party would rather give up a few minor points of ideology than risk having the issues important to our constituents not be addressed as a result of the government's inability to pass any new laws. "
C) "Our party would rather participate in an environment that fosters inter-party cooperation than persist in constant conflict with other parties."
D) "Our party would rather have other parties join in support of our legislation than join in supporting the proposals of other parties."
E) "Our party would rather have our proposals passed because they represent what is best for the welfare of our country than to become engaged in the agendas of other parties."

ANALYZE THE STIMULUS:

Proposal X under the multi-parties initiatives may not adhere as strictly to the agenda of each of the parties involved as legislation proposed by only one party.
However, this proposal is more likely to pass than proposals that come from a single faction alone.
==> The benefit of multi-party initiatives is that legislation X can effectively be enacted.
==> Multi-party initiatives are becoming increasingly popular

The correct answer will have to demonstrate the relationship: Proposal X [under multi-parties initiatives] that comprise issues of multi-parties ==> Proposal X may not adhere as strictly to the agenda of each of the parties ==> have benefit for multi-parties ==> more likely to pass

C, D, E are out immediately because:
C) "Our party would rather participate in an environment that fosters inter-party cooperation than persist in constant conflict with other parties."
Wrong. Clearly out of scope.

D) "Our party would rather have other parties join in support of our legislation than join in supporting the proposals of other parties."
Wrong. Clearly out of scope.

E) "Our party would rather have our proposals passed because they represent what is best for the welfare of our country than to become engaged in the agendas of other parties.
Wrong. Does not show the benefit for multi-parties.

Between A & B, which one is correct?
A is WRONG. Only B is correct. Please see explanation in the image attached.
Attachments

Untitled1.png [ 42.66 KiB | Viewed 7029 times ]

_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Kudos [?]: 3549 [9], given: 123

VP
Joined: 06 Feb 2007
Posts: 1020

Kudos [?]: 202 [2], given: 0

Re: Multi-party initiatives are becoming increasingly popular [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Mar 2007, 09:02
2
KUDOS
I would go with B.
I was debating between A and B for a while but think that B addresses the points that a paragraph makes better than A does.
B actually addresses the statement "legislation important to the general welfare of Country W" while A only addresses a concern of a Party C minister about legislation proposed by his own party as opposed to the importance of the legislation for the country.

Kudos [?]: 202 [2], given: 0

Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1201

Kudos [?]: 893 [1], given: 75

Location: India
Re: Multi-party initiatives are becoming increasingly popular [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Feb 2016, 07:18
1
KUDOS
rukna wrote:
Need clarification b.w A and B. Still not clear.

A) "Our party would rather compromise on some of our issues and also see other parties compromise on their issues than run the risk of not having legislation that we propose pass."
Nowhere it is mentioned that the party will see that other parties issues are compromised. Also no such risk is mentioned in the argument

B) "Our party would rather give up a few minor points of ideology than risk having the issues important to our constituents not be addressed as a result of the government's inability to pass any new laws. "
So their prominence is to pass legislation important to the general welfare of Country W that might otherwise have foundered in inter-party disagreements can effectively be enacted.

rukna

A contains few new information which is a strict no-no for inference questions.
I hope this clears the air.
_________________

The only time you can lose is when you give up. Try hard and you will suceed.
Thanks = Kudos. Kudos are appreciated

http://gmatclub.com/forum/rules-for-posting-in-verbal-gmat-forum-134642.html
When you post a question Pls. Provide its source & TAG your questions
Avoid posting from unreliable sources.

My posts
http://gmatclub.com/forum/beauty-of-coordinate-geometry-213760.html#p1649924
http://gmatclub.com/forum/calling-all-march-april-gmat-takers-who-want-to-cross-213154.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/possessive-pronouns-200496.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/double-negatives-206717.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-greatest-integer-function-223595.html#p1721773

Kudos [?]: 893 [1], given: 75

VP
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1115

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 1

Location: India
Re: Multi-party initiatives are becoming increasingly popular [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Mar 2007, 09:05
Between A and B, picking A.

All the parties compromise and the legislation is easier to pass than not pass at all as is probable in the case of single party.
_________________

Trying hard to conquer Quant.

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 09 Jan 2007
Posts: 240

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 0

Re: Multi-party initiatives are becoming increasingly popular [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Mar 2007, 14:48
OA is (B)

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 0

Manager
Status: Training
Joined: 03 Jun 2013
Posts: 90

Kudos [?]: 210 [0], given: 3

GPA: 3.7
Re: Multi-party initiatives are becoming increasingly popular [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jun 2013, 16:20
Bump...

Can't anyone please clarify why A is wrong?

I understand why B is correct; and might even agree that it could possibly be better than A... But I don't understand why A is incorrect.

.. Or is A correct but just less correct than B?

Any clarification would be great
_________________

KUDOS please if my post was useful!

Kudos [?]: 210 [0], given: 3

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10145

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Re: Multi-party initiatives are becoming increasingly popular [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jul 2014, 01:29
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1201

Kudos [?]: 893 [0], given: 75

Location: India
Multi-party initiatives are becoming increasingly popular [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Aug 2015, 08:40
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Multi-party initiatives are becoming increasingly popular among the members of the parliament of Country W. Although legislation proposed under the auspices of more than one party may not adhere as strictly to the agenda of each of the parties involved as legislation proposed by only one party, the political backing of the voting blocs represented by the cooperating parties make such proposals more likely to pass than proposals that come from a single faction alone. The benefit of multi-party initiatives is that legislation important to the general welfare of Country W that might otherwise have foundered in inter-party disagreements can effectively be enacted.

Quote:
Which of the following statements by a minister of Party C in the government of Country W is most consistent with the beliefs of an individual political party in the situation described above?

what does he refer when he said individual political party, is it a part of Multi-party initiatives(Left hand side of the table) or individual party(Right hand side of the table) on its own?
Since the argument referred to the latter one as single faction alone I understand individual party in above situation refers to one of the multi-parties.

Attachment:

2.jpg [ 53.28 KiB | Viewed 5036 times ]

A) "Our party would rather compromise on some of our issues and also see other parties compromise on their issues than run the risk of not having legislation that we propose pass."
Nowhere it is mentioned that the party will see that other parties issues are compromised. Also no such risk is mentioned in the argument

B) "Our party would rather give up a few minor points of ideology than risk having the issues important to our constituents not be addressed as a result of the government's inability to pass any new laws. "
So their prominence is to pass legislation important to the general welfare of Country W that might otherwise have foundered in inter-party disagreements can effectively be enacted.

C) "Our party would rather participate in an environment that fosters inter-party cooperation than persist in constant conflict with other parties."
It is true that Party cooperates but it is not mentioned that it does so to avoid conflict. Their goal is to pass legislation that do some welfare to state.

D) "Our party would rather have other parties join in support of our legislation than join in supporting the proposals of other parties."
This is something which goes completely awry and cannot be inferred at all. This is contradictory to the argument—both parties seem to give and take equally in a multi-party initiative in the argument.

E) "Our party would rather have our proposals passed because they represent what is best for the welfare of our country than to become engaged in the agendas of other parties."
As per argument they say that they compromise for welfare and nowhere it is mentioned that only their proposal do welfare to the country and especially it is mentioned they have to compromise regarding their individual agendas. This negates the premises.
_________________

The only time you can lose is when you give up. Try hard and you will suceed.
Thanks = Kudos. Kudos are appreciated

http://gmatclub.com/forum/rules-for-posting-in-verbal-gmat-forum-134642.html
When you post a question Pls. Provide its source & TAG your questions
Avoid posting from unreliable sources.

My posts
http://gmatclub.com/forum/beauty-of-coordinate-geometry-213760.html#p1649924
http://gmatclub.com/forum/calling-all-march-april-gmat-takers-who-want-to-cross-213154.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/possessive-pronouns-200496.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/double-negatives-206717.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-greatest-integer-function-223595.html#p1721773

Kudos [?]: 893 [0], given: 75

Manager
Joined: 11 Feb 2015
Posts: 119

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 70

GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V38
Re: Multi-party initiatives are becoming increasingly popular [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Sep 2015, 06:52
Need clarification b.w A and B. Still not clear.

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 70

Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2015
Posts: 323

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 101

Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V29
Re: Multi-party initiatives are becoming increasingly popular [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Feb 2016, 08:52
B it is, well explained in the posts above
_________________

" The few , the fearless "

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 101

Director
Joined: 12 Nov 2016
Posts: 794

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 165

Multi-party initiatives are becoming increasingly popular [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2017, 21:57
rdg wrote:
Multi-party initiatives are becoming increasingly popular among the members of the parliament of Country W. Although legislation proposed under the auspices of more than one party may not adhere as strictly to the agenda of each of the parties involved as legislation proposed by only one party, the political backing of the voting blocs represented by the cooperating parties make such proposals more likely to pass than proposals that come from a single faction alone. The benefit of multi-party initiatives is that legislation important to the general welfare of Country W that might otherwise have foundered in inter-party disagreements can effectively be enacted.

Which of the following statements by a minister of Party C in the government of Country W is most consistent with the beliefs of an individual political party in the situation described above?

A) "Our party would rather compromise on some of our issues and also see other parties compromise on their issues than run the risk of not having legislation that we propose pass."
B) "Our party would rather give up a few minor points of ideology than risk having the issues important to our constituents not be addressed as a result of the government's inability to pass any new laws. "
C) "Our party would rather participate in an environment that fosters inter-party cooperation than persist in constant conflict with other parties."
D) "Our party would rather have other parties join in support of our legislation than join in supporting the proposals of other parties."
E) "Our party would rather have our proposals passed because they represent what is best for the welfare of our country than to become engaged in the agendas of other parties."

While "A" seems to be an attractive answer choice with the whole "than run risk of not having legislation that we propose pass' it is actually not accurate based on the stimulus. Albeit, it's one of the hardest critical questions I've seen- like something on the LSAT- but what the stimulus is basically saying is that within a country if you have four factions, say "party a, b, c ,d" or tribes and we run a multi-party initiative then it would be more likely for a piece of legislation to pass even if it leaves out some the ideas and beliefs of those factions- it just has to compromise the most important ideas . That being said, if get one person to do it or just one faction then that person's suggested legislation would of course confide with their values but it may not actually be passed. So it's better to get a bunch of people or multiple political factions to agree on something because it increases the likelihood of a piece of legislation, say a ban on gas powered cars, to be passed. A is too ambitious and contradicts the conclusion - the last sentence in the stimulus. What B is more accurately stating is that it's fine to give up some of our issues "ideology" if that ultimately means agreeing on the most important issues with other factions so as to propose legislation that is conducive or beneficial to the welfare of Country W. The few minor points of ideology are essentially what the last is sentence is asserting when it says "that might have otherwise foundered in inter-party disagreements"

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 165

Multi-party initiatives are becoming increasingly popular   [#permalink] 10 Aug 2017, 21:57
Display posts from previous: Sort by