It is currently 23 Nov 2017, 06:32

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separate

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2004
Posts: 102

Kudos [?]: 121 [1], given: 0

Location: san jose , CA
Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separate [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2005, 17:37
1
KUDOS
8
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Question 1
00:00

Question Stats:

54% (02:53) correct 46% (02:33) wrong based on 300

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00

Question Stats:

17% (00:32) correct 83% (00:49) wrong based on 309

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00

Question Stats:

66% (00:27) correct 34% (00:34) wrong based on 288

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 4
00:00

Question Stats:

72% (00:49) correct 28% (00:48) wrong based on 273

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 5
00:00

Question Stats:

46% (01:03) correct 54% (00:46) wrong based on 270

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 6
00:00

Question Stats:

47% (00:51) correct 53% (00:51) wrong based on 252

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 7
00:00

Question Stats:

63% (00:41) correct 37% (00:28) wrong based on 249

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 8
00:00

Question Stats:

88% (00:39) correct 12% (00:21) wrong based on 230

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 9
00:00

Question Stats:

42% (02:08) correct 58% (02:03) wrong based on 211

### HideShow timer Statistics

Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separated an invertebrate animal embryo into two parts at an early stage of its life, it would survive and develop as two normal embryos. This led them to believe that the cells in the early embryo are undetermined in the sense that each cell has the potential to develop in a variety of different ways. Later biologists found that the situation was not so simple. It matters in which plane the embryo is cut. If it is cut in a plane different from the one used by the early investigators, it will not form two whole embryos.

A debate arose over what exactly was happening. Which embryo cells are determined, just when do they become irreversibly committed to their fates, and what are the “morphogenetic determinants” that tell a cell what to become? But the debate could not be resolved because no one was able to ask the crucial questions in a form in which they could be pursued productively. Recent discoveries in molecular biology, however, have opened up prospects for a resolution of the debate. Now investigators think they know at least some of the molecules that act as morphogenetic determinants in early development. They have been able to show that, in a sense, cell determination begins even before an egg is fertilized.

Studying sea urchins, biologist Paul Gross found that an unfertilized egg contains substances that function as morphogenetic determinants. They are located in the cytoplasm of the egg cell; i.e., in that part of the cell’s protoplasm that lies outside of the nucleus. In the unfertilized egg, the substances are inactive and are not distributed homogeneously. When the egg is fertilized, the substances become active and, presumably, govern the behavior of the genes they interact with. Since the substances are unevenly distributed in the egg, when the fertilized egg divides, the resulting cells are different from the start and so can be qualitatively different in their own gene activity.

The substances that Gross studied are maternal messenger RNA’s—products of certain of the maternal genes. He and other biologists studying a wide variety of organisms have found that these particular RNA’s direct, in large part, the synthesis of histones, a class of proteins that bind to DNA. Once synthesized, the histones move into the cell nucleus, where section of DNA wrap around them to form a structure that resembles beads, or knots, on a string. The beads are DNA segments wrapped around the histones; the string is the intervening DNA. And it is the structure of these beaded DNA strings that guide the fate of the cells in which they are located.
1. The passage is most probably directed at which kind of audience?

(A) State legislators deciding about funding levels for a state-funded biological laboratory
(B) Scientists specializing in molecular genetics
(D) Marine biologists studying the processes that give rise to new species
(E) Undergraduate biology majors in a molecular biology course

[Reveal] Spoiler:
E

2. It can be inferred from the passage that the morphogenetic determinants present in the early embryo are

(A) located in the nucleus of the embryo cells
(B) evenly distributed unless the embryo is not developing normally
(C) inactive until the embryo cells become irreversibly committed to their final function
(D) identical to those that were already present in the unfertilized egg
(E) present in larger quantities than is necessary for the development of a single individual

[Reveal] Spoiler:
E

3. The main topic of the passage is

(A) the early development of embryos of lower marine organisms
(B) the main contribution of modern embryology to molecular biology
(C) the role of molecular biology in disproving older theories of embryonic development
(D) cell determination as an issue in the study of embryonic development
(E) scientific dogma as a factor in the recent debate over the value of molecular biology

[Reveal] Spoiler:
D

4. According to the passage, when biologists believed that the cells in the early embryo were undetermined, they made which of the following mistakes?

(A) They did not attempt to replicate the original experiment of separating an embryo into two parts.

(B) They did not realize that there was a connection between the issue of cell determination and the outcome of the separation experiment.

(C) They assumed that the results of experiments on embryos did not depend on the particular animal species used for such experiments.

(D) They assumed that it was crucial to perform the separation experiment at an early stage in the embryo's life.

(E) They assumed that different ways of separating an embryo into two parts would be equivalent as far as the fate of the two parts was concerned.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
E

5. It can be inferred from the passage that the initial production of histones after an egg is fertilized takes place

(A) in the cytoplasm
(B) in the maternal genes
(C) throughout the protoplasm
(D) in the beaded portions of the DNA strings
(E) in certain sections of the cell nucleus

[Reveal] Spoiler:
A

6. It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following is dependent on the fertilization of an egg?

(A) Copying of maternal genes to produce maternal messenger RNA
(B) Synthesis of proteins called histones
(C) Division of a cell into its nucleus and the cytoplasm
(D) Determination of the egg cell's potential for division
(E) Generation of all of a cell's morphogenetic determinants

[Reveal] Spoiler:
B

7. According to the passage, the morphogenetic determinants present in the unfertilized egg cell are which of the following?

(A) Proteins bound to the nucleus
(B) Histones
(C) Maternal messenger RNA's
(D) Cytoplasm

[Reveal] Spoiler:
C

8. The passage suggests that which of the following plays a role in determining whether an embryo separated into two parts will develop as two normal embryos?

I. The stage in the embryo's life at which the separation occurs
II. The instrument with which the separations is accomplished
III. The plane in which the cut is made that separates the embryo

(A) I only
(B) II only
(C) I and II only
(D) I and III only
(E) I, II, and III

[Reveal] Spoiler:
D

9. Which of the following circumstances is most comparable to the impasse biologists encountered in trying to resolve the debate about cell determination (as in the highlighted portion)?

(A) The problems faced by a literary scholar who wishes to use original source materials that are written in an unfamiliar foreign language

(B) The situation of a mathematician who in preparing a proof of a theorem for publication detects a reasoning error in the proof

(C) The difficulties of a space engineer who has to design equipment to function in an environment in which it cannot first be tested

(D) The predicament of a linguist trying to develop a theory of language acquisition when knowledge of the structure of language itself is rudimentary at best

(E) The dilemma confronting a foundation when the funds available to it are sufficient to support one of two equally deserving scientific projects but not both

[Reveal] Spoiler:
D

[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #1 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #2 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #3 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #4 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #5 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #6 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #7 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #8 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #9 OA

_________________

---- Hero never chooses Destiny
Destiny chooses Him ......

Last edited by broall on 25 Jul 2017, 08:56, edited 3 times in total.
Formatting

Kudos [?]: 121 [1], given: 0

Director
Joined: 18 Feb 2005
Posts: 666

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separate [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Feb 2005, 14:49
19 mins

6/9 correct.

Biology is a scare for me anyday....

Thanks for sharing the time and your score. I was shaken by the answers initially and then by my timing and ofcourse my score too.

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 171

Kudos [?]: 211 [9], given: 9

Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separate [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jun 2010, 06:34
9
KUDOS
19
This post was
BOOKMARKED
I am starting one thread where I will post seemingly difficult RCs. Please Participate actively. Make sure you post your time taken along with the answers. The OAs are available with me but not sure how much authenticated. So lets defete the RCs. Together We Can. I will try to post my resoning while posting answers.

Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separated an invertebrate animal embryo into two parts at an early stage of its life, it would survive and develop as two normal embryos. This led them to believe that the cells in the early embryo are undetermined in the sense that each cell has the potential to develop in a variety of different ways. Later biologists found that the situation was not so simple. It matters in which plane the embryo is cut. If it is cut in a plane different from the one used by the early investigators, it will not form two whole embryos.

A debate arose over what exactly was happening. Which embryo cells are determined, just when do they become irreversibly committed to their fates, and what are the “morphogenetic determinants” that tell a cell what to become? But the debate could not be resolved because no one was able to ask the crucial questions in a form in which they could be pursued productively. Recent discoveries in molecular biology, however, have opened up prospects for a resolution of the debate. Now investigators think they know at least some of the molecules that act as morphogenetic determinants in early development. They have been able to show that, in a sense, cell determination begins even before an egg is fertilized.

Studying sea urchins, biologist Paul Gross found that an unfertilized egg contains substances that function as morphogenetic determinants. They are located in the cytoplasm of the egg cell; i.e., in that part of the cell’s protoplasm that lies outside of the nucleus. In the unfertilized egg, the substances are inactive and are not distributed homogeneously. When the egg is fertilized, the substances become active and, presumably, govern the behavior of the genes they interact with. Since the substances are unevenly distributed in the egg, when the fertilized egg divides, the resulting cells are different from the start and so can be qualitatively different in their own gene activity.
The substances that Gross studied are maternal messenger RNA’s—products of certain of the maternal genes. He and other biologists studying a wide variety of organisms have found that these particular RNA’s direct, in large part, the synthesis of histones, a class of proteins that bind to DNA. Once synthesized, the histones move into the cell nucleus, where section of DNA wrap around them to form a structure that resembles beads, or knots, on a string. The beads are DNA segments wrapped around the histones; the string is the intervening DNA. And it is the structure of these beaded DNA strings that guide the fate of the cells in which they are located.
1. The passage is most probably directed at which kind of audience?
(A) State legislators deciding about funding levels for a state-funded biological laboratory
(B) Scientists specializing in molecular genetics
(D) Marine biologists studying the processes that give rise to new species
(E) Undergraduate biology majors in a molecular biology course

[Reveal] Spoiler:
E

2. It can be inferred from the passage that the morphogenetic determinants present in the early embryo are
(A) located in the nucleus of the embryo cells
(B) evenly distributed unless the embryo is not developing normally
(C) inactive until the embryo cells become irreversibly committed to their final function
(D) identical to those that were already present in the unfertilized egg
(E) present in larger quantities than is necessary for the development of a single individual

[Reveal] Spoiler:
E

3. The main topic of the passage is
(A) the early development of embryos of lower marine organisms
(B) the main contribution of modern embryology to molecular biology
(C) the role of molecular biology in disproving older theories of embryonic development
(D) cell determination as an issue in the study of embryonic development
(E) scientific dogma as a factor in the recent debate over the value of molecular biology

[Reveal] Spoiler:
D

4. According to the passage, when biologists believed that the cells in the early embryo were undetermined, they made which of the following mistakes?
(A) They did not attempt to replicate the original experiment of separating an embryo into two parts.
(B) They did not realize that there was a connection between the issue of cell determination and the outcome of the separation experiment.
(C) They assumed that the results of experiments on embryos did not depend on the particular animal species used for such experiments.
(D) They assumed that it was crucial to perform the separation experiment at an early stage in the embryo’s life.
(E) They assumed that different ways of separating an embryo into two parts would be equivalent as far as the fate of the two parts was concerned.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
E

5. It can be inferred from the passage that the initial production of histones after an egg is fertilized takes place
(A) in the cytoplasm
(B) in the maternal genes
(C) throughout the protoplasm
(D) in the beaded portions of the DNA strings
(E) in certain sections of the cell nucleus

[Reveal] Spoiler:
A

6. It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following is dependent on the fertilization of an egg?
(A) Copying of maternal genes to produce maternal messenger RNA’s
(B) Synthesis of proteins called histones
(C) Division of a cell into its nucleus and the cytoplasm
(D) Determination of the egg cell’s potential for division
(E) Generation of all of a cell’s morphogenetic determinants

[Reveal] Spoiler:
B

7. According to the passage, the morphogenetic determinants present in the unfertilized egg cell are which of the following?
(A) Proteins bound to the nucleus
(B) Histones
(C) Maternal messenger RNA’s
(D) Cytoplasm

[Reveal] Spoiler:
C

8. The passage suggests that which of the following plays a role in determining whether an embryo separated into two parts will develop as two normal embryos?
I. The stage in the embryo’s life at which the separation occurs
II. The instrument with which the separations is accomplished
III. The plane in which the cut is made that separates the embryo
(A) I only
(B) II only
(C) I and II only
(D) I and III only
(E) I, II, and III

[Reveal] Spoiler:
D

9. Which of the following circumstances is most comparable to the impasse biologists encountered in trying to resolve the debate about cell determination (lines 12-18)?
(A) The problems faced by a literary scholar who wishes to use original source materials that are written in an unfamiliar foreign language
(B) The situation of a mathematician who in preparing a proof of a theorem for publication detects a reasoning error in the proof
(C) The difficulties of a space engineer who has to design equipment to function in an environment in which it cannot first be tested
(D) The predicament of a linguist trying to develop a theory of language acquisition when knowledge of the structure of language itself is rudimentary at best
(E) The dilemma confronting a foundation when the funds available to it are sufficient to support one of two equally deserving scientific projects but not both

[Reveal] Spoiler:
D

Kudos [?]: 211 [9], given: 9

Forum Moderator
Status: mission completed!
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 1391

Kudos [?]: 966 [0], given: 621

GPA: 3.77
Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separate [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2010, 01:28
very difficult for me.
I would post the text again to show number of lines:

Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they
separated an invertebrate animal embryo into two parts
at an early stage of its life, it would survive and develop
as two normal embryos. This led them to believe that the
(5) cells in the early embryo are undetermined in the sense
that each cell has the potential to develop in a variety of
different ways. Later biologists found that the situation
was not so simple. It matters in which plane the embryo
is cut. If it is cut in a plane different from the one used
(10) by the early investigators, it will not form two whole
embryos.
A debate arose over what exactly was happening.
Which embryo cells are determined, just when do they-
become irreversibly committed to their fates, and what
(15) are the “morphogenetic determinants” that tell a cell
what to become? But the debate could not be resolved
because no one was able to ask the crucial questions
in a form in which they could be pursued productively.
Recent discoveries in molecular biology, however, have
(20) opened up prospects for a resolution of the debate.
Now investigators think they know at least some of the
molecules that act as morphogenetic determinants in
early development. They have been able o show that,
in a sense, cell determination begins even before an egg
(25) is fertilized.
Studying sea urchins, biologist Paul Gross found
that an unfertilized egg contains substances that func-
tion as morphogenetic determinants. They are located
in the cytoplasm of the egg cell; i.e., in that part of the
(30) cell’s protoplasm that lies outside of the nucleus. In the
unfertilized egg, the substances are inactive and are not
distributed homogeneously. When the egg is fertilized,
the substances become active and, presumably, govern
the behavior of the genes they interact with. Since the
(35) substances are unevenly distributed in the egg, when the
fertilized egg divides, the resulting cells are different
from the start and so can be qualitatively different in
their own gene activity.
The substances that Gross studied are maternal
(40) messenger RNA’s --products of certain of the maternal
genes. He and other biologists studying a wide variety
of organisms have found that these particular RNA’s
direct, in large part, the synthesis of histones, a class
of proteins that bind to DNA. Once synthesized, the
(45) histones move into the cell nucleus, where section of
DNA wrap around them to form a structure that resem-
segments wrapped around the histones; the string is the
intervening DNA. And it is the structure of these beaded
(50) DNA strings that guides the fate of the cells in which
they are located.

OA:

[Reveal] Spoiler:
E
E
D
E
A
B
C
D
D

_________________

Audaces fortuna juvat!

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Last edited by PTK on 22 Jul 2010, 20:41, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 966 [0], given: 621

Intern
Joined: 10 Jan 2011
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separate [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jan 2011, 12:51

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 621

Kudos [?]: 284 [1], given: 51

Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separate [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Apr 2011, 03:13
1
KUDOS
i still have a damn problem with the inference questions . i cant tolerate this kind of questions spoiling my score . it can be inferred... cow dung that inference.

need to develop some strategy to handle this inference creep .
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

Kudos [?]: 284 [1], given: 51

Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 621

Kudos [?]: 284 [0], given: 51

Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separate [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Apr 2011, 03:17
and one more question... what exactly in this passage hints about the target audience ? undergraduate students as the target audience , how come ?

and 1 more pattern , in questions which i get wrong ... i narrow down to 2 options out of which 1 is correct answer... and i choose the incorrect of the two.

in this passage 1 and 2 i got wrong, rest were correct. time was 12 mins without anything to take notes.
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

Kudos [?]: 284 [0], given: 51

Manager
Status: Bunuel's fan!
Joined: 08 Jul 2011
Posts: 226

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 55

Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separate [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jun 2012, 06:57
I got number 1, 2 and 5 wrong in 12 mins.

And yes, I don't agree with number 1 and 2. How come the target audience is undergraduate student?

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 55

Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 96

Kudos [?]: 121 [1], given: 62

Location: India
GMAT Date: 10-25-2012
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separate [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Sep 2012, 04:51
1
KUDOS
Can someone please xeplain answers to Question# 1(how can we infer who is the targetted audience), # 6 & #9(bw B & D) ...
_________________

if my post helped you, let me know by pressing Kudos...

Kudos [?]: 121 [1], given: 62

Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 96

Kudos [?]: 121 [3], given: 62

Location: India
GMAT Date: 10-25-2012
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separate [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Sep 2012, 04:55
3
KUDOS
And Guys, it will not be of much use to just post RCs and their OAs, lets keep on explaining our reasoning for the benefit of ours and others ..
_________________

if my post helped you, let me know by pressing Kudos...

Kudos [?]: 121 [3], given: 62

Manager
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 224

Kudos [?]: 263 [0], given: 56

Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separate [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Oct 2012, 21:41
can anyone explain why not C

It can be inferred from the passage that the morphogenetic determinants present in the early embryo are
(A) located in the nucleus of the embryo cells
(B) evenly distributed unless the embryo is not developing normally
(C) inactive until the embryo cells become irreversibly committed to their final function
(D) identical to those that were already present in the unfertilized egg
(E) present in larger quantities than is necessary for the development of a single individual

i got C from this text. . . . When the egg is fertilized, the substances become active and, presumably, govern the behavior of the genes they interact with. . i hope substances refer to mgt dtrmnts
_________________

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, I kinda need some =)

Kudos [?]: 263 [0], given: 56

Manager
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 224

Kudos [?]: 263 [0], given: 56

Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separate [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Oct 2012, 21:48
It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following is dependent on the fertilization of an egg?
(A) Copying of maternal genes to produce maternal messenger RNA’s
(B) Synthesis of proteins called histones
(C) Division of a cell into its nucleus and the cytoplasm
(D) Determination of the egg cell’s potential for division
(E) Generation of all of a cell’s morphogenetic determinants

how can we infer B from this thing

He and other biologists studying a wide variety of organisms have found that these particular RNA’s direct, in large part, the synthesis of histones, a class of proteins that bind to DNA.
_________________

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, I kinda need some =)

Kudos [?]: 263 [0], given: 56

Manager
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 224

Kudos [?]: 263 [0], given: 56

Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separate [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Oct 2012, 21:50
The main topic of the passage is
(A) the early development of embryos of lower marine organisms
(B) the main contribution of modern embryology to molecular biology
(C) the role of molecular biology in disproving older theories of embryonic development
(D) cell determination as an issue in the study of embryonic development
(E) scientific dogma as a factor in the recent debate over the value of molecular biology

i was confused b/w C and D for this atlast I marked C because it takes first para into consideration too and i think D does not represent whole passage. . any clarification please
_________________

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, I kinda need some =)

Kudos [?]: 263 [0], given: 56

Manager
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 224

Kudos [?]: 263 [0], given: 56

Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separate [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Oct 2012, 21:54
@ anshunadir 9th I can explain . . The scientists were not able to resolve because of lack of knowledge. molecular biology had not advanced that much and they were totally without any knowledge on subject. there was no issue of a theory being discovered and then some errors found in there . first para might suggest that but this was the issue before the real problem in 2nd para. the issue of first para had been resolved there itself.
_________________

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, I kinda need some =)

Kudos [?]: 263 [0], given: 56

Manager
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 224

Kudos [?]: 263 [0], given: 56

Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separate [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Oct 2012, 21:59

and target audience is like tone of passage. find tone and also check key words like so many scientific terms used here. . the tone is just informing, there are no sides to take at all, nothing to criticize or nothing to support. its just knowledge sharing . some knowledge being given to a person interested in this subject. we are down to B and E. I eliminated B because scientists specializing in subject will be already knowing all this but this looks nice like a lecture to students. just a brief introduction before a lesson on subject. so E. other options are easily eliminated. kindly revert back if u have doubt with any of those ??
_________________

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, I kinda need some =)

Kudos [?]: 263 [0], given: 56

Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3381

Kudos [?]: 9310 [0], given: 1169

Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separate [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2013, 04:27
Complete discussion is given at the below mentioned link
nearly-a-century-ago-biologists-found-that-if-they-separate-96221.html

Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separated an invertebrate animal embryo into two parts at an early stage of its life, it would survive and develop as two normal embryos. This led them to believe that the cells in the early embryo are undetermined in the sense that each cell has the potential to develop in a variety of different ways. Later biologists found that the situation was not so simple. It matters in which plane the embryo is cut. If it is cut in a plane different from the one used by the early investigators, it will not form two whole embryos.
A debate arose over what exactly was happening. Which embryo cells are determined, just when do they become irreversibly committed to their fates, and what are the “morphogenetic determinants” that tell a cell what to become? But the debate could not be resolved because no one was able to ask the crucial questions in a form in which they could be pursued productively. Recent discoveries in molecular biology, however, have opened up prospects for a resolution of the debate. Now investigators think they know at least some of the molecules that act as morphogenetic determinants in early development. They have been able to show that, in a sense, cell determination begins even before an egg is fertilized.
Studying sea urchins, biologist Paul Gross found that an unfertilized egg contains substances that function as morphogenetic determinants. They are located in the cytoplasm of the egg cell, i.e., in that part of the cell’s protoplasm that lies outside of the nucleus. In the unfertilized egg, the substances are inactive and are not distributed homogeneously. When the egg is fertilized, the substances become active and, presumably, govern the behavior of the genes they interact with. Since the substances are unevenly distributed in the egg, when the fertilized egg divides, the resulting cells are different from the start and so can be qualitatively different in their own gene activity.
The substances that Gross studied are maternal messenger RNA’s—products of certain of the maternal genes. He and other biologists studying a wide variety of organisms have found that these particular RNA’s direct, in large part, the synthesis of histones, a class of proteins that bind to DNA. Once synthesized, the histones move into the cell nucleus, where sections of DNA wrap around them to form a structure that resembles beads, or knots, on a string. The beads are DNA segments wrapped around the histones; the string is the intervening DNA. And it is the structure of these beaded DNA strings that guides the fate of the cells in which they are located.

It can be inferred from the passage that the morphogenetic determinants present in the early embryo are

1 located in the nucleus of the embryo cells

2 evenly distributed unless the embryo is not developing normally

3 inactive until the embryo cells become irreversibly committed to their final function

4 identical to those that were already present in the unfertilized egg

5 present in larger quantities than is necessary for the development of a single individual

E is the OA
_________________

Kudos [?]: 9310 [0], given: 1169

VP
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1378

Kudos [?]: 1706 [1], given: 62

Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separate [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2013, 06:00
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
a toughie...!
@carcass...you must be playing at 40+ when such a passage had appeared. Jealous!!!
Coming back to question.
Its given in the passage that if one cuts an early embryo in proper plane, then the resulting parts may yield two individual beings. This "yielding" is helped by morphogenetic elements. (Sorry for bad English).
For the production of a single individual being, one morphogenetic element is sufficient but since even if you cut an early embryo into two, the two parts become respective individuals then the entire process seems to tell that morphogenetic elements are more than what is required for one individual.
+1E
Regards.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 1706 [1], given: 62

Manager
Joined: 07 May 2008
Posts: 79

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 11

Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separate [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Feb 2013, 03:49
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
C is indeed a close call, if not for a re-read this would have been the (incorrect) choice.
Md's are inactive until the egg fertilization not until the cell determination. Once the egg is fertilized, Md's become active and govern the fate of the cells.
D is just an assertion with no facts. A and B are incorrect choices derived from facts mentioned in the passage moreover either of the choices would not classify as 'inference'.

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 11

Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3381

Kudos [?]: 9310 [0], given: 1169

Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separate [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Feb 2013, 10:37
Marcab wrote:
a toughie...!
@carcass...you must be playing at 40+ when such a passage had appeared. Jealous!!!
Coming back to question.
Its given in the passage that if one cuts an early embryo in proper plane, then the resulting parts may yield two individual beings. This "yielding" is helped by morphogenetic elements. (Sorry for bad English).
For the production of a single individual being, one morphogenetic element is sufficient but since even if you cut an early embryo into two, the two parts become respective individuals then the entire process seems to tell that morphogenetic elements are more than what is required for one individual.
+1E
Regards.

good job man
_________________

Kudos [?]: 9310 [0], given: 1169

e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2355

Kudos [?]: 9296 [0], given: 342

Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separate [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Mar 2013, 11:49
Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separated an invertebrate animal embryo into two parts at an early stage of its life, it would survive and develop as two normal embryos. This led them to believe that the cells in the early embryo are undetermined in the sense that each cell has the potential to develop in a variety of different ways. Later biologists found that the situation was not so simple. It matters in which plane the embryo is cut. If it is cut in a plane different from the one used by the early investigators, it will not form two whole embryos.

A debate arose over what exactly was happening. Which embryo cells are determined, just when do they become irreversibly committed to their fates, and what are the "morphogenetic determinants" that tell a cell what to become? But the debate could not be resolved because no one was able to ask the crucial questions in a form in which they could be pursued productively. Recent discoveries in molecular biology, however, have opened up prospects for a resolution of the debate. Now investigators think they know at least some of the molecules that act as morphogenetic determinants in early development. They have been able to show that, in a sense, cell determination begins even before an egg is fertilized.

Studying sea urchins, biologist Paul Gross found that an unfertilized egg contains substances that function as morphogenetic determinants. They are located in the cytoplasm of the egg cell, i.e., in that part of the cell's protoplasm that lies outside of the nucleus. In the unfertilized egg, the substances are inactive and are not distributed homogeneously. When the egg is fertilized, the substances become active and, presumably, govern the behavior of the genes they interact with. Since the substances are unevenly distributed in the egg, when the fertilized egg divides, the resulting cells are different from the start and so can be qualitatively different in their own gene activity.

The substances that Gross studied are maternal messenger RNA's products of certain of the maternal genes. He and other biologists studying a wide variety of organisms have found that these particular RNA's direct, in large part, the synthesis of histones, a class of proteins that bind to DNA. Once synthesized, the histones move into the cell nucleus, where sections of DNA wrap around them to form a structure that resembles beads, or knots, on a string. The beads are DNA segments wrapped around the histones; the string is the intervening DNA. And it is the structure of these beaded DNA strings that guides the fate of the cells in which they are located.

According to the passage, the morphogenetic determinants present in the unfertilized egg cell are which of the following?

A. Proteins bound to the nucleus
B. Histones
C. Maternal messenger RNA's
D. Cytoplasm

[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA: C

_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Last edited by egmat on 09 Apr 2013, 13:06, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 9296 [0], given: 342

Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separate   [#permalink] 28 Mar 2013, 11:49

Go to page    1   2   3   4    Next  [ 62 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by