GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 19 Sep 2019, 18:30

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Status: GMAT Instructor
Joined: 23 Jun 2013
Posts: 131
Location: India
GRE 1: Q790 V710
GPA: 3.3
WE: Editorial and Writing (Education)

### Show Tags

04 Jul 2014, 10:01
If you want "continually increasing" to modify the amount and the number at the same time, you cannot have the "the" before "number of satellites". Think of it as a parallelism thing -- "the" X amount and "the" number. The parallel structure and the conjunction suggest that there are two independent entities, so the adjective of the first (increasing) cannot apply to the second.

In B, you cannot have "amount" with the countable "satellites".

_________________
EnterMBA
Verbal Forum Moderator
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2384
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)

### Show Tags

31 Dec 2016, 21:43
Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been put into orbit around the Earth, and the chances of a collision involving such material increase greatly as the amount of both space debris and satellites continue to rise.

(A) as the amount of both space debris and satellites continue to rise - Amount(uncountable )can't be used for satellites (countable )

(B) as the rise continues in both the amount of satellites and space debris - Amount(uncountable )can't be used for satellites (countable ) . the rise continues sounds awkward

(C) as the amount of space debris and the number of satellites continue to rise - Correct

(D) with the continually increasing amount of space debris and the number of satellites - usage of with fails to establish the causal relationship

(E) with the amount of space debris continuing to increase along with the number of satellites - usage of with fails to establish the causal relationship . The intended meaning is different

_________________
When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
Manager
Joined: 17 Feb 2014
Posts: 98
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
GMAT 2: 740 Q48 V42
WE: Programming (Computer Software)

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2017, 12:57
Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been put into orbit around the Earth, and the chances of a collision involving such material increase greatly as the amount of both space debris and satellites continue to rise.

Issues: Modifier

(A) as the amount of both space debris and satellites continue to rise
- "the amount of ... satellites" is incorrect as "satellites" is countable and "amount" is used for non-countable.

(B) as the rise continues in both the amount of satellites and space debris
- "the amount of ... satellites" is incorrect as "satellites" is countable and "amount" is used for non-countable.
- "amount of satellites" and "space debris" are not comparable object, whereas they should be as they are following "both"

(C) as the amount of space debris and the number of satellites continue to rise

(D) with the continually increasing amount of space debris and the number of satellites

- "continually" is redundant
- "with" fails to establish causal relationship

(E) with the amount of space debris continuing to increase along with the number of satellites
- changes meaning
- "with" fails to establish causal relationship

Intern
Joined: 28 Nov 2017
Posts: 17
Location: India
Concentration: General Management
GPA: 3.16
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)

### Show Tags

13 Apr 2018, 08:57
sayantanc2k, mikemcgarry Please explain what is the error in option D. My reasoning is that "with .....satellites" doesnot indicate the reason for the chances of collision. Instead, the modifier presents additional information.
scheol79 wrote:
Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been put into orbit around the Earth, and the chances of a collision involving such material increase greatly as the amount of both space debris and satellites continue to rise.

(A) as the amount of both space debris and satellites continue to rise

(B) as the rise continues in both the amount of satellites and space debris

(C) as the amount of space debris and the number of satellites continue to rise

(D) with the continually increasing amount of space debris and the number of satellites

(E) with the amount of space debris continuing to increase along with the number of satellites
Intern
Joined: 28 Nov 2017
Posts: 17
Location: India
Concentration: General Management
GPA: 3.16
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)

### Show Tags

14 Apr 2018, 20:39
egmat, sayantanc2k, mikemcgarry
1) How to ascertain that this OA has used 'as" for the simultaneity of actions. I feel that the OA has used "as" for providing the reason for increase in the chances of collision. Please correct my understanding.
2) If we ignore parallelism error in option D, then what does the modifier "with.....satellites" modify and what difference in the meaning it creates resulting in wrong option.
3) I am really not crystal clear with the use of "with modifier". The following official incorrect sentence also uses "with modifier". But unable to get the reasoning of error.
Before 1988, insurance companies in California were free to charge whatever rates the market would bear, [u]with no approval needed from regulators before the raising of rates.[/u]
please explain that what meaning error is created by "with modifier"
IIMA, IIMC School Moderator
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Posts: 1371
Location: India
WE: Engineering (Other)

### Show Tags

10 May 2018, 19:09
GMATNinja VeritasPrepKarishma egmat

Can experts comment on AS in (C) vs WITH in (D)?
_________________
It's the journey that brings us happiness not the destination.

Feeling stressed, you are not alone!!
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Dec 2017
Posts: 380
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
GMAT 1: 630 Q44 V33
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 3: 710 Q50 V37
GPA: 3.25
WE: Marketing (Telecommunications)

### Show Tags

10 May 2018, 19:44
I don't want to be too neardy, but since we are here two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel HAS, but not have
VP
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 1443
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31

### Show Tags

10 May 2018, 23:23
Hero8888 wrote:
I don't want to be too neardy, but since we are here two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel HAS, but not have

Hi Hero8888, in general, we use singular verbs with Time, Money, and Weight, when a linking verb (is/are/was/were) is used.

So, following would be correct:

Two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel is a lot.

However, here since we have an action verb (put) in the sentence under consideration, the subject two tons would be considered plural. Hence, have is the correct usage.
_________________
Thanks,
Ashish
EducationAisle, Bangalore

Sentence Correction Nirvana available on Amazon.in and Flipkart

Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi.com
Manager
Joined: 01 Jan 2018
Posts: 155

### Show Tags

15 May 2018, 02:14
egmat wrote:
thangvietnam wrote:
pls, explain fully why D is wrong. I think D is wrong because of meaning problem.

"with phrase" can modify noun a a clause. why "with phrase " is wrong in D.

Hi there,

Choice D: with the continually increasing amount of space debris and the number of satellites
Notice the parallel list in this sentence – chances increase greatly with
a. The continually increasing amount of space debris
b. The number of satellites.
This is not the intended meaning of the sentence. Per the sentence both are increasing and this choice fails to communicate that.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.

Hi egmat,
I am unable to understand why we cant frame the parallel structure of option-D as I shown below:

with the continually increasing 1.amount of space debris and 2.number of satellites

_________________
kudos please if it helped you.
Manager
Joined: 24 Sep 2018
Posts: 138

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2018, 01:21

Can experts comment on AS in (C) vs WITH in (D)?

I'm certainly not an expert here, but I may try to help with my 2 cents of input.
As and With aren't the distinction/split that makes a do or die decision for this sentence.
The use of As in this sentence is not in connection with "SUCH" in the non-underlined portion of the sentence.
If at all, the only subtle shift that I see with the usage of with in option D and E is in the meaning.
In the context of the sentence "As" and "With" seem to convey the similar meaning.
The major distinction on this sentence is based on 2 things:
1. Countable Vs Uncountable Nouns.
2. Parallelism
I hope this helps.

GMATNinja, would love hear (see in the context of the chat ) your thoughts....
_________________
Please award kudos, If this post helped you in someway.
Director
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 901

### Show Tags

15 Oct 2018, 01:58
scheol79 wrote:
Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been put into orbit around the Earth, and the chances of a collision involving such material increase greatly as the amount of both space debris and satellites continue to rise.

(A) as the amount of both space debris and satellites continue to rise

(B) as the rise continues in both the amount of satellites and space debris

(C) as the amount of space debris and the number of satellites continue to rise

(D) with the continually increasing amount of space debris and the number of satellites

(E) with the amount of space debris continuing to increase along with the number of satellites

look at choice D and E. ignore the grammar with phrase "with+...". we can still find the error in choice D and E.

in choice D, "the number" is too far from increasing, so we can not apply "increasing" to "amount" and "number".
increasing temporature and humidity is bad.
this is correct because "humidity" is near "increasing"

in choice E, "along with the number..." should be close to " amount of space debris".

the intended meaning is "as" meaning "when". the time relation here is best and most logic. with+noun phrase can modify a main clause, showing reason, context and effect of main clause.
"with +noun phrase" can be said to be versatile because it can show many meaning relation with the main clause. but "with+noun"phrase can not show all meaning relations with main clause. it can not show time relation as "as" or "when" do. so, "with+noun phrase " can not replace "as"
Director
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 901

### Show Tags

21 Dec 2018, 01:55
scheol79 wrote:
Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been put into orbit around the Earth, and the chances of a collision involving such material increase greatly as the amount of both space debris and satellites continue to rise.

(A) as the amount of both space debris and satellites continue to rise

(B) as the rise continues in both the amount of satellites and space debris

(C) as the amount of space debris and the number of satellites continue to rise

(D) with the continually increasing amount of space debris and the number of satellites

(E) with the amount of space debris continuing to increase along with the number of satellites

D suffer 2 problems.
first, it is not paralel. we can not consider amount of debris and number of satellites are paralel because in creasing working as an adjective is too far from the number.

second. D suffer grammatical error. there is no grammatical structure of D in english/
with+noun+noun modifier works as adverb to show context, reason or effect of the main verb.
I learn gmat with many of my friends going out for gambling at the casino.
with+noun can be used to show a means of the main verb
I write with a pen
the meaning of the sentence is that in the context of increasing of debris and satalites , the chance of collision is higher. so, the pattern in choice D is incorrect to show this meaning.
Director
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 901

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2019, 07:47
[quote="scheol79"]Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been put into orbit around the Earth, and the chances of a collision involving such material increase greatly as the amount of both space debris and satellites continue to rise.

(A) as the amount of both space debris and satellites continue to rise

(B) as the rise continues in both the amount of satellites and space debris

(C) as the amount of space debris and the number of satellites continue to rise

(D) with the continually increasing amount of space debris and the number of satellites

(E) with the amount of space debris continuing to increase along with the number of satellites[/quote

if we see a split between dependent clause and absolute phrase, focus on the difference between them.
absolute phrase show 2 relations with the main clause. the first relation is time relation, a simultaneousness with the main action. the second relation is meaning relations which can be a reason, effect or conditions of the main verb. absolute phrase show both relations at the same time

in contrast, dependent clause show only 1 relation: time relation shown by "as", or meaning relation shown by "because".

the dependent clause here is "as....". the absolute phrase here is " with the amount..."

the intended meaning is that there is only time relation between two actions. so, we do not need absolute phrase, . choice D and E are gone
VP
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Posts: 1025
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
Schools: LBS '22
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
WE: Management Consulting (Consulting)

### Show Tags

02 May 2019, 18:57
A lot of responses in this thread unnecessarily overcomplicate how (D) changes the meaning, so I'm going to be simple:

Meaning: the chances of a collision increase when both the amount of space debris and the number of satellites increase. That means we need both of them to be increasing. None of this "causal" crap

Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been put into orbit around the Earth, and the chances of a collision involving such material increase greatly (C) as the amount of space debris and the number of satellites continue to rise -->conveys the meaning that the chance of a collision increases only when both the amount of debris and the number of satellites increase.

Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been put into orbit around the Earth, and the chances of a collision involving such material increase greatly (D) with the continually increasing amount of space debris and the number of satellites -->conveys that only the amount of space debris needs to increase for the chance of a collision to increase.
_________________
Goal: Q49, V41

+1 Kudos if you like my post pls!
Re: Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been   [#permalink] 02 May 2019, 18:57

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 34 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by