Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 43896

New Set: Number Properties!!! [#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Mar 2013, 03:50
24
This post received KUDOS
Expert's post
170
This post was BOOKMARKED
The next set of medium/hard DS number properties questions. I'll post OA's with detailed explanations on Friday. Please, post your solutions along with the answers.1. If x is an integer, what is the value of x?(1) 23x is a prime number (2) \(2\sqrt{x^2}\) is a prime number. Solution: newsetnumberproperties14977540.html#p12053412. If a positive integer n has exactly two positive factors what is the value of n?(1) n/2 is one of the factors of n (2) The lowest common multiple of n and n + 10 is an even number. Solution: newsetnumberproperties14977540.html#p12053553. If 0 < x < y and x and y are consecutive perfect squares, what is the remainder when y is divided by x?(1) Both x and y is have 3 positive factors. (2) Both \(\sqrt{x}\) and \(\sqrt{y}\) are prime numbers Solution: newsetnumberproperties14977560.html#p12053584. Each digit of the threedigit integer K is a positive multiple of 4, what is the value of K?(1) The units digit of K is the least common multiple of the tens and hundreds digit of K (2) K is NOT a multiple of 3. Solution: newsetnumberproperties14977560.html#p12053615. If a, b, and c are integers and a < b < c, are a, b, and c consecutive integers?(1) The median of {a!, b!, c!} is an odd number. (2) c! is a prime number Solution: newsetnumberproperties14977560.html#p12053646. Set S consists of more than two integers. Are all the numbers in set S negative?(1) The product of any three integers in the list is negative (2) The product of the smallest and largest integers in the list is a prime number. Solution: newsetnumberproperties14977560.html#p12053737. Is x the square of an integer?(1) When x is divided by 12 the remainder is 6 (2) When x is divided by 14 the remainder is 2 Solution: newsetnumberproperties14977560.html#p12053788. Set A consist of 10 terms, each of which is a reciprocal of a prime number, is the median of the set less than 1/5?(1) Reciprocal of the median is a prime number (2) The product of any two terms of the set is a terminating decimal Solution: newsetnumberproperties14977560.html#p12053829. If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x for any number x, is [a] + [b] = 1 ?(1) ab = 2 (2) 0 < a < b < 2 Solution: newsetnumberproperties14977560.html#p120538910. If N = 3^x*5^y, where x and y are positive integers, and N has 12 positive factors, what is the value of N?(1) 9 is NOT a factor of N (2) 125 is a factor of N Solution: newsetnumberproperties14977560.html#p1205392BONUS QUESTION: 11. If x and y are positive integers, is x a prime number?(1) x  2 < 2  y (2) x + y  3 = 1y Solution: newsetnumberproperties14977560.html#p1205398Kudos points for each correct solution!!!
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 43896

Re: New Set: Number Properties!!! [#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Apr 2013, 21:17
imhimanshu wrote: Bunuel wrote: 11. If x and y are positive integers, is x a prime number?
(1) x  2 < 2  y . The left hand side of the inequality is an absolute value, so the least value of LHS is zero, thus 0 < 2  y, thus y < 2 (if y is more than or equal to 2, then \(y2\leq{0}\) and it cannot be greater than x  2). Next, since given that y is a positive integer, then y=1.
Answer: D. Hi Bunuel, Thanks for the awesome questions that you ve posted. I have a doubt in the above question. Could you please elaborate why can't we solve the Statement A as below  x  2 < 2  y > y2< X2 < 2y I tried solving above, by removing the Modulus, however I am not getting any specific value. Kindly respond. Thanks Yes, to get the value of y its better to use the approach shown in my solution.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7960
Location: Pune, India

Re: New Set: Number Properties!!! [#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Apr 2013, 19:13
imhimanshu wrote: Bunuel wrote: 11. If x and y are positive integers, is x a prime number?
(1) x  2 < 2  y . The left hand side of the inequality is an absolute value, so the least value of LHS is zero, thus 0 < 2  y, thus y < 2 (if y is more than or equal to 2, then \(y2\leq{0}\) and it cannot be greater than x  2). Next, since given that y is a positive integer, then y=1.
Answer: D. Hi Bunuel, Thanks for the awesome questions that you ve posted. I have a doubt in the above question. Could you please elaborate why can't we solve the Statement A as below  x  2 < 2  y > y2< X2 < 2y I tried solving above, by removing the Modulus, however I am not getting any specific value. Kindly respond. Thanks Responding to a pm: If you must solve it using algebra, then do this: x  2 < 2  y Take the two cases: Case 1: x  2 >= 0 i.e. x >= 2 x  2 < 2  y x + y < 4 Since x must be 2 or greater than 2 and x and y both are positive integers, x must be 2 and y must be 1 (x cannot be 3 or greater since y must be at least 1 but the sum of x and y in that case will not be less than 4). Case 2: x  2 < 0 i.e. x < 2 The only value that x can take in this case is 1. 1  2 < 2  y 1 < 2  y y < 1 But we know that y must be a positive integer so x cannot take value 1. The only value that x can take is 2 which is prime. Hence this statement alone is sufficient. Mind you, using algebra too you will have to use logic so you might as well look at Bunuel's solution again.
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep  GMAT Instructor My Blog
Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199
Veritas Prep Reviews



Intern
Joined: 17 Jul 2011
Posts: 7

Re: New Set: Number Properties!!! [#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Apr 2013, 03:18
Bunuel wrote: 5. If a, b, and c are integers and a < b < c, are a, b, and c consecutive integers?
Note that: A. The factorial of a negative number is undefined. B. 0!=1. C. Only two factorials are odd: 0!=1 and 1!=1. D. Factorial of a number which is prime is 2!=2.
(1) The median of {a!, b!, c!} is an odd number. This implies that b!=odd. Thus b is 0 or 1. But if b=0, then a is a negative number, so in this case a! is not defined. Therefore a=0 and b=1, so the set is {0!, 1!, c!}={1, 1, c!}. Now, if c=2, then the answer is YES but if c is any other number then the answer is NO. Not sufficient. (2) c! is a prime number. This implies that c=2. Not sufficient.
(1)+(2) From above we have that a=0, b=1 and c=2, thus the answer to the question is YES. Sufficient.
Answer: C. A small question, when the outcome of {a!, b!, c!} is an odd number ...is ...{1, 1, c!}, should we need to check what C is ? as whatever the C is it cant be consecutive integers. Regards Sanjiv



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 43896

Re: New Set: Number Properties!!! [#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Apr 2013, 03:31
casanjiv wrote: Bunuel wrote: 5. If a, b, and c are integers and a < b < c, are a, b, and c consecutive integers?
Note that: A. The factorial of a negative number is undefined. B. 0!=1. C. Only two factorials are odd: 0!=1 and 1!=1. D. Factorial of a number which is prime is 2!=2.
(1) The median of {a!, b!, c!} is an odd number. This implies that b!=odd. Thus b is 0 or 1. But if b=0, then a is a negative number, so in this case a! is not defined. Therefore a=0 and b=1, so the set is {0!, 1!, c!}={1, 1, c!}. Now, if c=2, then the answer is YES but if c is any other number then the answer is NO. Not sufficient. (2) c! is a prime number. This implies that c=2. Not sufficient.
(1)+(2) From above we have that a=0, b=1 and c=2, thus the answer to the question is YES. Sufficient.
Answer: C. A small question, when the outcome of {a!, b!, c!} is an odd number ...is ...{1, 1, c!}, should we need to check what C is ? as whatever the C is it cant be consecutive integers. Regards Sanjiv If we knew for sure that the set is {1, 1, c!}, then yes we would have a definite NO answer to the question. But {1, 1, c!} is not possible since a < b < c implies that the integers in the set are distinct. (1) implies that the set is {0, 1, c!} ({0!=1, 1!=1, c!}) and if c=2, then the answer would be YES, but if c=3, then the answer would be NO. Hope it's clear.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Manager
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 78
Location: United States

Re: New Set: Number Properties!!! [#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Apr 2013, 19:02
amazing set bunuel!



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 43896

Re: New Set: Number Properties!!! [#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Jul 2013, 23:35



Manager
Status: Got Bling! Joined Phd Finance at IIML
Affiliations: IIMB, advantages.us, IIML
Joined: 03 Jul 2013
Posts: 94
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: iimbangalore  Class of 1994
GPA: 3.12
WE: Research (Investment Banking)

Re: New Set: Number Properties!!! [#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Jul 2013, 05:41
Thanks Bunuel,
ONE CORRECTION:
set queston no. 9 the option should be D because you are using the condition given in II 0<a<b<2 to sufficient



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 43896

Re: New Set: Number Properties!!! [#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Jul 2013, 05:52



Manager
Joined: 31 Mar 2013
Posts: 70
Location: India
GPA: 3.02

Re: New Set: Number Properties!!! [#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Sep 2013, 03:02
Bunuel wrote: 9. If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x for any number x, is [a] + [b] = 1 ?
Given that some function [] rounds DOWN a number to the nearest integer. For example [1.5]=1, [2]=2, [1.5]=2, ...
(1) ab = 2. First of all this means that a and b are of the same sign.
If both are negative, then the maximum value of [a] + [b] is 2, for any negative a and b. So, this case is out.
If both are positive, then in order [a] + [b] = 1 to hold true, must be true that [a]=0 and [b]=1 (or viseversa). Which means that \(0\leq{a}<1\) and \(1\leq{b}<2\) (or viseversa). But in this case ab cannot be equal to 2. So, this case is also out.
We have that the answer to the question is NO. Sufficient.
(2) 0 < a < b < 2. If a=1/2 and b=1, then [a] + [b] = 0 + 1 = 1 but if a=1/4 and b=1/2, then [a] + [b] = 0 + 0 = 0. Not sufficient.
Answer: A. Hi Bunuel, Could you please tell me (with sample numbers) how you arrived at the maximum value of [a] + [b] = 2 for any negative a and b? i took the case of a=2 and b=1 and hence ab=2. In this case i am getting [a]+[b] = (2) + (1) = 3 Let me know if i am missing something.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 43896

Re: New Set: Number Properties!!! [#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Sep 2013, 03:06
emailmkarthik wrote: Bunuel wrote: 9. If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x for any number x, is [a] + [b] = 1 ?
Given that some function [] rounds DOWN a number to the nearest integer. For example [1.5]=1, [2]=2, [1.5]=2, ...
(1) ab = 2. First of all this means that a and b are of the same sign.
If both are negative, then the maximum value of [a] + [b] is 2, for any negative a and b. So, this case is out.
If both are positive, then in order [a] + [b] = 1 to hold true, must be true that [a]=0 and [b]=1 (or viseversa). Which means that \(0\leq{a}<1\) and \(1\leq{b}<2\) (or viseversa). But in this case ab cannot be equal to 2. So, this case is also out.
We have that the answer to the question is NO. Sufficient.
(2) 0 < a < b < 2. If a=1/2 and b=1, then [a] + [b] = 0 + 1 = 1 but if a=1/4 and b=1/2, then [a] + [b] = 0 + 0 = 0. Not sufficient.
Answer: A. Hi Bunuel, Could you please tell me (with sample numbers) how you arrived at the maximum value of [a] + [b] = 2 for any negative a and b? i took the case of a=2 and b=1 and hence ab=2. In this case i am getting [a]+[b] = (2) + (1) = 3 Let me know if i am missing something. "If both are negative, then the maximum value of [a] + [b] is 2, for any negative a and b." Since, 3<2, then this statement holds for this set of numbers too. Does this make sense?
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Manager
Joined: 31 Mar 2013
Posts: 70
Location: India
GPA: 3.02

Re: New Set: Number Properties!!! [#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Sep 2013, 03:08
1
This post was BOOKMARKED
Bunuel wrote: emailmkarthik wrote: Bunuel wrote: 9. If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x for any number x, is [a] + [b] = 1 ?
Given that some function [] rounds DOWN a number to the nearest integer. For example [1.5]=1, [2]=2, [1.5]=2, ...
(1) ab = 2. First of all this means that a and b are of the same sign.
If both are negative, then the maximum value of [a] + [b] is 2, for any negative a and b. So, this case is out.
If both are positive, then in order [a] + [b] = 1 to hold true, must be true that [a]=0 and [b]=1 (or viseversa). Which means that \(0\leq{a}<1\) and \(1\leq{b}<2\) (or viseversa). But in this case ab cannot be equal to 2. So, this case is also out.
We have that the answer to the question is NO. Sufficient.
(2) 0 < a < b < 2. If a=1/2 and b=1, then [a] + [b] = 0 + 1 = 1 but if a=1/4 and b=1/2, then [a] + [b] = 0 + 0 = 0. Not sufficient.
Answer: A. Hi Bunuel, Could you please tell me (with sample numbers) how you arrived at the maximum value of [a] + [b] = 2 for any negative a and b? i took the case of a=2 and b=1 and hence ab=2. In this case i am getting [a]+[b] = (2) + (1) = 3 Let me know if i am missing something. "If both are negative, then the maximum value of [a] + [b] is 2, for any negative a and b." Since, 3<2, then this statement holds for this set of numbers too. Does this make sense? Oh yes! It does make sense. I understand that the statement does not fall apart. But I was just interested in knowing if there is a case possible where we can get 2 as the maximum value.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 43896

Re: New Set: Number Properties!!! [#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Sep 2013, 03:20
emailmkarthik wrote: Bunuel wrote: emailmkarthik wrote: 9. If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x for any number x, is [a] + [b] = 1 ?
Given that some function [] rounds DOWN a number to the nearest integer. For example [1.5]=1, [2]=2, [1.5]=2, ...
(1) ab = 2. First of all this means that a and b are of the same sign.
If both are negative, then the maximum value of [a] + [b] is 2, for any negative a and b. So, this case is out.
If both are positive, then in order [a] + [b] = 1 to hold true, must be true that [a]=0 and [b]=1 (or viseversa). Which means that \(0\leq{a}<1\) and \(1\leq{b}<2\) (or viseversa). But in this case ab cannot be equal to 2. So, this case is also out.
We have that the answer to the question is NO. Sufficient.
(2) 0 < a < b < 2. If a=1/2 and b=1, then [a] + [b] = 0 + 1 = 1 but if a=1/4 and b=1/2, then [a] + [b] = 0 + 0 = 0. Not sufficient.
Answer: A.
Hi Bunuel,
Could you please tell me (with sample numbers) how you arrived at the maximum value of [a] + [b] = 2 for any negative a and b?
i took the case of a=2 and b=1 and hence ab=2. In this case i am getting [a]+[b] = (2) + (1) = 3
Let me know if i am missing something. "If both are negative, then the maximum value of [a] + [b] is 2, for any negative a and b." Since, 3<2, then this statement holds for this set of numbers too. Does this make sense? Oh yes! It does make sense. I understand that the statement does not fall apart. But I was just interested in knowing if there is a case possible where we can get 2 as the maximum value. What I meant was that generally if a and b are negative, then the maximum value of [a] + [b] is 1+(1)=2. But you cannot get 2, if ab=2.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Manager
Joined: 31 Mar 2013
Posts: 70
Location: India
GPA: 3.02

Re: New Set: Number Properties!!! [#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Sep 2013, 03:24
Thanks for the clarification and also for the really good questions!



Manager
Joined: 30 May 2013
Posts: 186
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GPA: 3.82

Re: New Set: Number Properties!!! [#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Sep 2013, 05:43
Bunuel wrote: 11. If x and y are positive integers, is x a prime number?
(1) x  2 < 2  y . The left hand side of the inequality is an absolute value, so the least value of LHS is zero, thus 0 < 2  y, thus y < 2 (if y is more than or equal to 2, then \(y2\leq{0}\) and it cannot be greater than x  2). Next, since given that y is a positive integer, then y=1.
So, we have that: \(x  2 < 1\), which implies that \(1 < x2 < 1\), or \(1 < x < 3\), thus \(x=2=prime\). Sufficient.
(2) x + y  3 = 1y. Since y is a positive integer, then \(1y\leq{0}\), thus \(1y=(1y)\). So, we have that \(x + y  3 = (1y)\), which gives \(x=2=prime\). Sufficient.
Answer: D. Hi Can any one explain me the Why Statement 1 is not sufficient. . I am not able to fellow the Bunuel concept and i doubt even in exam will i be able to think like it. Please explain in algebric method. Thanks in advance, Rrsnathan.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 43896

Re: New Set: Number Properties!!! [#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Sep 2013, 08:01
rrsnathan wrote: Bunuel wrote: 11. If x and y are positive integers, is x a prime number?
(1) x  2 < 2  y . The left hand side of the inequality is an absolute value, so the least value of LHS is zero, thus 0 < 2  y, thus y < 2 (if y is more than or equal to 2, then \(y2\leq{0}\) and it cannot be greater than x  2). Next, since given that y is a positive integer, then y=1.
So, we have that: \(x  2 < 1\), which implies that \(1 < x2 < 1\), or \(1 < x < 3\), thus \(x=2=prime\). Sufficient.
(2) x + y  3 = 1y. Since y is a positive integer, then \(1y\leq{0}\), thus \(1y=(1y)\). So, we have that \(x + y  3 = (1y)\), which gives \(x=2=prime\). Sufficient.
Answer: D. Hi Can any one explain me the Why Statement 1 is not sufficient. . I am not able to fellow the Bunuel concept and i doubt even in exam will i be able to think like it. Please explain in algebric method. Thanks in advance, Rrsnathan. The first statement is sufficient. Alternative explanation is here: newsetnumberproperties14977580.html#p1209577Hope it helps.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Intern
Joined: 12 Sep 2013
Posts: 4

Re: New Set: Number Properties!!! [#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Sep 2013, 06:54
Quote: 6. Set S consists of more than two integers. Are all the integers in set S negative?
(1) The product of any three integers in the set is negative. If the set consists of only 3 terms, then the set could be either {negative, negative, negative} or {negative, positive, positive}. If the set consists of more than 3 terms, then the set can only have negative numbers. Not sufficient.
(2) The product of the smallest and largest integers in the set is a prime number. Since only positive numbers can be primes, then the smallest and largest integers in the set must be of the same sign. Thus the set consists of only negative or only positive integers. Not sufficient.
(1)+(2) Since the second statement rules out {negative, positive, positive} case which we had from (1), then we have that the set must have only negative integers. Sufficient.
Answer: C. Dear Bunuel, First of all,i would like to thank you for all your sincere efforts that help innumerable gMAT takers like me. In the explanation provided for statement 2,i did not quite understand how all the numbers of the set would have the same sign,if the smallest and largest terms have the same sign.The set contains>2 terms and from statement,we can comment only about 2 terms.Can you help me understand? Thank you, Fido



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 43896

Re: New Set: Number Properties!!! [#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Sep 2013, 07:34
fido wrote: Quote: 6. Set S consists of more than two integers. Are all the integers in set S negative?
(1) The product of any three integers in the set is negative. If the set consists of only 3 terms, then the set could be either {negative, negative, negative} or {negative, positive, positive}. If the set consists of more than 3 terms, then the set can only have negative numbers. Not sufficient.
(2) The product of the smallest and largest integers in the set is a prime number. Since only positive numbers can be primes, then the smallest and largest integers in the set must be of the same sign. Thus the set consists of only negative or only positive integers. Not sufficient.
(1)+(2) Since the second statement rules out {negative, positive, positive} case which we had from (1), then we have that the set must have only negative integers. Sufficient.
Answer: C. Dear Bunuel, First of all,i would like to thank you for all your sincere efforts that help innumerable gMAT takers like me. In the explanation provided for statement 2,i did not quite understand how all the numbers of the set would have the same sign,if the smallest and largest terms have the same sign.The set contains>2 terms and from statement,we can comment only about 2 terms.Can you help me understand? Thank you, Fido (2) says: The product of the smallest and largest integers in the set is a prime number. Since only positive numbers can be primes, then the smallest and largest integers in the set must be of the same sign. So either: smallest * greatest = negative * negative and in this case as both the smallest and the greatest are negative then ALL integers in the list are negative OR smallest * greatest = positive * positive and in this case as both the smallest and the greatest are positive then ALL integers in the list are positive. Hope it's clear.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Intern
Joined: 12 Sep 2013
Posts: 4

Re: New Set: Number Properties!!! [#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Sep 2013, 10:43
Yes,Bunuel.Thank you



Intern
Affiliations: Member Senate UoP
Joined: 05 Jul 2011
Posts: 5
Location: Peshawar
Schools: Harvard

Re: New Set: Number Properties!!! [#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Sep 2013, 06:09
Bunuel wrote: SOLUTIONS:
1. If x is an integer, what is the value of x?
(1) \(23x\) is a prime number. From this statement it follows that x=1 or x=1. Not sufficient.
(2) \(2\sqrt{x^2}\) is a prime number. The same here: x=1 or x=1. Not sufficient.
(1)+(2) x could be 1 or 1. Not sufficient.
Answer: E. Bunuel A question, in Statement 1 if we take the value of x = 1, than 23x = 23 I think 23 is not a prime. So x can only and only be +1 Therefore, Statement (1) is sufficient. What's your take on it. Regards



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 43896

Re: New Set: Number Properties!!! [#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Sep 2013, 07:24




Re: New Set: Number Properties!!!
[#permalink]
26 Sep 2013, 07:24



Go to page
Previous
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Next
[ 200 posts ]



