It is currently 23 Nov 2017, 10:07

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

nuclear power stations

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Retired Moderator
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1628

Kudos [?]: 1126 [0], given: 109

Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
nuclear power stations [#permalink]

Show Tags

04 May 2010, 13:08
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

50% (00:47) correct 50% (01:48) wrong based on 10 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Maybe you have seen this question, but please your help I have some doubts about it:

13. A majority of the international journalists surveyed view nuclear power stations as unsafe at present but that they will, or could, be made sufficiently safe in the future.
(A) that they will, or could,
(B) that they would, or could,
(C) they will be or could
(D) think that they will be or could
(E) think the power stations would or could

OA is...(I will tell you later hehe). However, for example in D, "think" is in its plural form. So, it is refering to nuclear power stations. It cannot refer to journalists because the subject is "a majority of". Am I right? Maybe I'm missing something, English is not my native language
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1126 [0], given: 109

Intern
Joined: 17 Jan 2010
Posts: 28

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 3

Schools: SSE, LSE
Re: nuclear power stations [#permalink]

Show Tags

04 May 2010, 15:26
In my opinion E must be right. A to C seem ambigious and it is not clear what "they" refers to. Furthemore parallelism with "view" is only provided in D and E.

I would prefer E to D since the ambigious "they" is avoided and the more probable "will" makes no sense in combination with the less probale "could".

Therefore I would choose E.

Concerning "think", it is not supposed to be in the singular form since it has to be parallel to "view", which is also not in the singular form "views".

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 3

VP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1471

Kudos [?]: 793 [0], given: 6

Re: nuclear power stations [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 May 2010, 08:11
E it is.

good explanation by vonshuriz.

Kudos [?]: 793 [0], given: 6

Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Posts: 448

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 10

Re: nuclear power stations [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 May 2010, 12:46
I think its D not E

(D) subject: "think" verb, hence "they" can be clearly referred to power stations.

(E) "that" is needed to connect dependent clause.

A majority of the international journalists surveyed view nuclear power stations
as unsafe at present but think (that) "the power stations would or could , be made sufficiently safe in the future".

Again Usage of would is confusing.

IMO D
_________________

GGG (Gym / GMAT / Girl) -- Be Serious

Its your duty to post OA afterwards; some one must be waiting for that...

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 10

Intern
Joined: 06 Mar 2010
Posts: 19

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 1

Re: nuclear power stations [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 May 2010, 13:16
IMO E

Eliminate D:

"they" is ambiguous even after think.
"that" is not required as think as a verb do not take command subjunctive or in other way it is not a bossy verb

OA Please!!

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 04 Feb 2010
Posts: 61

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

Schools: IESE '13
WE 1: Engineer
Re: nuclear power stations [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 May 2010, 21:38
D for me

"would" seems unnecessary - it is the conditional tense, but there is no condition to speak of. On the other hand, "will be" is the simple future, and the sentence clearly states "in the future."

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Posts: 448

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 10

Re: nuclear power stations [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 May 2010, 08:35
Looks like a Close Call between D & E.

Still i go with D 'as explained in my previous post'

OA please?
_________________

GGG (Gym / GMAT / Girl) -- Be Serious

Its your duty to post OA afterwards; some one must be waiting for that...

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 10

VP
Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Posts: 1467

Kudos [?]: 307 [0], given: 31

Re: nuclear power stations [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 May 2010, 09:13
metallicafan wrote:
Maybe you have seen this question, but please your help I have some doubts about it:

13. A majority of the international journalists surveyed view nuclear power stations as unsafe at present but that they will, or could, be made sufficiently safe in the future.
(A) that they will, or could,
(B) that they would, or could,
(C) they will be or could
(D) think that they will be or could
(E) think the power stations would or could

OA is...(I will tell you later hehe). However, for example in D, "think" is in its plural form. So, it is refering to nuclear power stations. It cannot refer to journalists because the subject is "a majority of". Am I right? Maybe I'm missing something, English is not my native language

Collective nouns can be plural, depending on the subject matter of the sentence. Here, it is assumed a majority of is plural because of the verb "view". Think would be incorrect if "view" were "views" because then you would go from singular to plural. In this case, they are both plural. In addition, "that" is needed to introduce the clause. E would be incorrect because to say "something would be safe in the future" sounds rather awkward. "something will be safe in the future" sounds better. Regardless, "that" is needed.

So answer D.

Kudos [?]: 307 [0], given: 31

Re: nuclear power stations   [#permalink] 06 May 2010, 09:13
Display posts from previous: Sort by

nuclear power stations

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.