Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 24 May 2017, 08:51

# Live Now:

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Nursing-home residents have the right to refuse treatment.

Author Message
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4289
Followers: 43

Kudos [?]: 468 [0], given: 0

Nursing-home residents have the right to refuse treatment. [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2004, 13:40
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (01:24) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Nursing-home residents have the right to refuse treatment. Forcing a resident to take sedatives, unless that person threatens the well-being of others, is a clear affront to human dignity, an illegal invasion of privacy, and an intolerable violation of the individual's right to think and make decisions about one's own welfare.

A major assumption in this argument is that
A) residents in nursing homes are no threat to the well-being of others
B) treatment in nursing homes is clearly harmful to residents
C) sedating drugs should not be used as a treatment in nursing homes
D) nursing-home residents are capable of making decisions about their own welfare
E) the privacy rights of most residents of nursing homes are not protected
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Senior Manager
Joined: 25 May 2004
Posts: 281
Location: Ukraine
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2004, 14:03
Saying that nursing-home residents have the right to refuse treatment the author assumes that they are capable of actually exercising that right. Hence D.
SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1790
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2004, 14:24
Hell yeah

the dot is on (D)
Director
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 575
Location: San Jose, CA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2004, 14:40
D for Darden ... thats my choice
Intern
Joined: 07 Jun 2004
Posts: 33
Location: Boston
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Jun 2004, 00:05
I vote for D
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Posts: 402
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Jun 2004, 03:36
Tough choice between (A) and (D).
Bending more towards (A),

(D) says that "residents are capable of making their own decision" now lets say that they are capable of making their own decision but they are also threat to the society, then in this case even if they can make their own decision but still they will need sedatives.

On the other hand If we assume that "residents are no threat to the well beings of other", Negate this and you will get that residents are threat to well being of other which essentially means that they should be given sedatives, and hence author's conclusion falls apart.
So I believe (A) should be the answer,

Any suggesitons??
Manager
Joined: 02 Jun 2004
Posts: 184
Location: Kiev, Ukraine
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Jun 2004, 07:33
Paul wrote:
Nursing-home residents have the right to refuse treatment. Forcing a resident to take sedatives, unless that person threatens the well-being of others, is a clear affront to human dignity, an illegal invasion of privacy, and an intolerable violation of the individual's right to think and make decisions about one's own welfare.

A major assumption in this argument is that
A) residents in nursing homes are no threat to the well-being of others
B) treatment in nursing homes is clearly harmful to residents
C) sedating drugs should not be used as a treatment in nursing homes
D) nursing-home residents are capable of making decisions about their own welfare
E) the privacy rights of most residents of nursing homes are not protected

I agree that the best answer is D.

A is not the best assumption. The author says that residents in nursing homes may be a threat [sometimes] to the well-being of others. If and when they are a threat, he warrants the use of sedatives. So, clearly, we can't say that "Residents in nursing homes are no threat to the well-being of others"

D, on the other hand, assumes that if residents have the right to refuse treatment, then they are capable of making a decision whether to exercise that right or not.
_________________

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4289
Followers: 43

Kudos [?]: 468 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Jun 2004, 08:59
OA is D. Great discussion guys!
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

11 Jun 2004, 08:59
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Residents of an apartment complex are considering two 5 14 Apr 2011, 05:34
Residents of an apartment complex are considering two 1 20 Aug 2009, 20:02
4 Left-handed persons have an advantage over right-handed 27 27 Nov 2008, 23:36
Residents of an apartment complex are considering two 2 16 Mar 2008, 09:43
Between 1975 and 1985, nursing-home occupancy rates averaged 2 10 Dec 2007, 21:35
Display posts from previous: Sort by