GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 12 Nov 2018, 15:02

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in November
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
28293031123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526272829301
Open Detailed Calendar
  • Essential GMAT Time-Management Hacks

     November 14, 2018

     November 14, 2018

     08:00 PM MST

     09:00 PM MST

    Join the webinar and learn time-management tactics that will guarantee you answer all questions, in all sections, on time. Save your spot today! Nov. 14th at 7 PM PST
  • $450 Tuition Credit & Official CAT Packs FREE

     November 15, 2018

     November 15, 2018

     10:00 PM MST

     11:00 PM MST

    EMPOWERgmat is giving away the complete Official GMAT Exam Pack collection worth $100 with the 3 Month Pack ($299)

Nutritionist: Because humans have evolved very little since

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 23 Oct 2010
Posts: 353
Location: Azerbaijan
Concentration: Finance
Schools: HEC '15 (A)
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V38
GMAT ToolKit User
Nutritionist: Because humans have evolved very little since  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 11 Jun 2017, 04:14
2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

72% (01:27) correct 28% (01:29) wrong based on 220 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Nutritionist: Because humans have evolved very little since the development of agriculture, it is clear that humans are still biologically adapted to a diet of wild foods, consisting mainly of raw fruits and vegetables, nuts and seeds, lean meat, and seafood. Straying from this diet has often resulted in chronic illness and other physical problems. Thus, the more our diet consists of wild foods, the healthier we will be.

The boldface portion plays which one of the following roles in the argument?

A) It is a conclusion for which the only support offered is the claim that straying from a diet of wild foods has often resulted in chronic illness and other physical problems.

b) It is a premise for which no justification is provided, but which is used to support the argument’s main conclusion.

c) It is a phenomenon for which the main conclusion of the nutritionist’s argument is cited as an explanation.

d) It is an intermediate conclusion for which one claim is offered as support, and which is used in turn to support the argument’s main conclusion.

e) It is a premise offered in support of the claim that humans have evolved very little since the development of agriculture.

_________________

Happy are those who dream dreams and are ready to pay the price to make them come true

I am still on all gmat forums. msg me if you want to ask me smth


Originally posted by LalaB on 27 Sep 2011, 07:43.
Last edited by broall on 11 Jun 2017, 04:14, edited 1 time in total.
Reformatted question
Most Helpful Community Reply
Board of Directors
User avatar
P
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3312
Nutritionist: Because humans have evolved very little since  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 May 2013, 14:39
2
3
Nutritionist: Because humans have evolved very little since the development of agriculture, it is clear that humans
are still biologically adapted to a diet of wild foods
, consisting mainly of raw fruits and vegetables, nuts and
seeds, lean meat, and seafood. Straying from this diet has often resulted in chronic illness and other physical
problems. Thus, the more our diet consists of wild foods, the healthier we will be.

The boldface portion plays which one of the following roles in the argument?

A. It is a conclusion for which the only support offered is the claim that straying from a diet of wild foods has often
resulted in chronic illness and other physical problems.
B. It is a premise for which no justification is provided, but which is used to support the argument’s main conclusion.
C. It is a phenomenon for which the main conclusion of the nutritionist’s argument is cited as an explanation.
D. It is an intermediate conclusion for which one claim is offered as support, and which is used in turn to support the
argument’s main conclusion.
E. It is a premise offered in support of the claim that humans have evolved very little since the development of
agriculture.
_________________

COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS AND RESOURCES
Quant: 1. ALL GMATPrep questions Quant/Verbal 2. Bunuel Signature Collection - The Next Generation 3. Bunuel Signature Collection ALL-IN-ONE WITH SOLUTIONS 4. Veritas Prep Blog PDF Version 5. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Quant Videos
Verbal:1. Verbal question bank and directories by Carcass 2. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Verbal Videos 3. Critical Reasoning_Oldy but goldy question banks 4. Sentence Correction_Oldy but goldy question banks 5. Reading-comprehension_Oldy but goldy question banks

General Discussion
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Retaking next month
Affiliations: None
Joined: 05 Mar 2011
Posts: 152
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V27
GPA: 3.01
WE: Sales (Manufacturing)
Re: Nutritionist: Because humans have evolved very little since  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Sep 2011, 21:24
Nutritionist: Because humans have evolved very little since the development of agriculture,
it is clear that humans are still biologically adapted to a diet of wild foods

The boldface part is clearly an intermediate conclusion .The main conclusion is Eat wild to stay healthy.

So D only fits the role

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Bell the GMAT!!!
Affiliations: Aidha
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 143
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V37
GMAT 2: 620 Q49 V27
GMAT 3: 700 Q49 V36
WE: Other (Other)
Re: Nutritionist: Because humans have evolved very little since  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Sep 2011, 02:19
D it is. After POE, I came down to B and D and eliminated B because its a premise for which justification is indeed provided---> that's the first line of stimulus.

LalaB wrote:
Nutritionist: Because humans have evolved very little since the development of agriculture,
it is clear that humans are still biologically adapted to a diet of wild foods, consisting
mainly of raw fruits and vegetables, nuts and seeds, lean meat, and seafood. Straying from
this diet has often resulted in chronic illness and other physical problems. Thus, the more our
diet consists of wild foods, the healthier we will be. The boldface portion plays which one of
the following roles in the argument?
A) It is a conclusion for which the only support offered is the claim that straying from a diet of
wild foods has often resulted in chronic illness and other physical problems.
b) It is a premise for which no justification is provided, but which is used to support the
argument’s main conclusion.
c) It is a phenomenon for which the main conclusion of the nutritionist’s argument is cited as
an explanation.
d) It is an intermediate conclusion for which one claim is offered as support, and which is used
in turn to support the argument’s main conclusion.
e) It is a premise offered in support of the claim that humans have evolved very little since the
development of agriculture.


_________________

If my post did a dance in your mind, send me the steps through kudos :)

My MBA journey at http://mbadilemma.wordpress.com/

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Prepping for the last time....
Joined: 28 May 2010
Posts: 130
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GPA: 3.2
Re: Nutritionist: Because humans have evolved very little since  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Sep 2011, 03:49
This one's a lot better than the pedigree bold face :)

D it is.
_________________

Two great challenges: 1. Guts to Fail and 2. Fear to Succeed

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 May 2011
Posts: 241
WE 1: IT 1 Yr
WE 2: Supply Chain 5 Yrs
Re: Nutritionist: Because humans have evolved very little since  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Apr 2012, 22:42
Nutritionist: Because humans have evolved very little since the development of agriculture,
it is clear that humans are still biologically adapted to a diet of wild foods, consisting
mainly of raw fruits and vegetables, nuts and seeds, lean meat, and seafood. Straying from
this diet has often resulted in chronic illness and other physical problems. Thus, the more our
diet consists of wild foods, the healthier we will be. The boldface portion plays which one of
the following roles in the argument?

Identifying the red phrase/word will do: i. e. the bold part is either conclusion or sub-conclusion. So B, C and E Out. The main conclusion is drawn at the end. So, the bold part is sub/intermediate conclusion.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Apr 2013
Posts: 21
Re: Nutritionist: Because humans have evolved very little since  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 May 2013, 19:15
1
carcass wrote:
Nutritionist: Because humans have evolved very little since the development of agriculture, it is clear that humans
are still biologically adapted to a diet of wild foods
, consisting mainly of raw fruits and vegetables, nuts and
seeds, lean meat, and seafood. Straying from this diet has often resulted in chronic illness and other physical
problems. Thus, the more our diet consists of wild foods, the healthier we will be.

The boldface portion plays which one of the following roles in the argument?

A. It is a conclusion for which the only support offered is the claim that straying from a diet of wild foods has often
resulted in chronic illness and other physical problems.
B. It is a premise for which no justification is provided, but which is used to support the argument’s main conclusion.
C. It is a phenomenon for which the main conclusion of the nutritionist’s argument is cited as an explanation.
D. It is an intermediate conclusion for which one claim is offered as support, and which is used in turn to support the
argument’s main conclusion.
E. It is a premise offered in support of the claim that humans have evolved very little since the development of
agriculture.



The portion under consideration here is "humans are still biologically adapted to a diet of wild foods".

Option A: It is a conclusion for which the only support offered is the claim that straying from a diet of wild foods has often resulted in chronic illness and other physical problems.
This is clearly wrong because the support offered to this conclusion is that straying away from a diet of wild food has often resulted in chronic illness and other problems.
Hence Option A is incorrect.

Option B: It is a premise for which no justification is provided, but which is used to support the argument’s main conclusion.
There is actually a supporting statement to justify this. (Straying away from a diet of wild food........)
Hence Option B is incorrect.

Option C: It is a phenomenon for which the main conclusion of the nutritionist’s argument is cited as an explanation.
In fact it is the other way around. The main conclusion of the argument is supported by the bold faced statement.
Hence Option C is incorrect.

Option D: It is an intermediate conclusion for which one claim is offered as support, and which is used in turn to support the argument’s main conclusion.
This is true. The bold faced statement is supported by the statement "humans have evolved very little since the development of agriculture".
Also the bold faced statement is used to draw the final conclusion of the argument. Hence it is an intermediate conclusion.
Option D is correct.

Option E: It is a premise offered in support of the claim that humans have evolved very little since the development of agriculture.
Actually, it doesn't support the claim that humans have evolved very little since the development of agriculture. It is the other way around.
Hence Option E is incorrect.

Therefore Option D is the correct answer
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 14 Apr 2013
Posts: 42
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
Re: Nutritionist: Because humans have evolved very little since  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 May 2013, 09:17
2
Analysis of Argument:
Nutritionist view: Humans are still biologically adapted to a diet of wild foods
Nutritionist reason for this view: humans have evolved very little since the development of agriculture
Nutritionist observation: Straying from this diet has often resulted in chronic illness and other physical problems.
Nutritionist conclusion based on his view and observation: The more our diet consists of wild foods, the healthier we will be.

Pre thinking:
Nutritionist is using his view that Humans are still biologically adapted to a diet of wild foods which he supports with the reason that because humans have evolved very little since the development of agriculture to support his main and final conclusion that the more our diet consists of wild foods, the healthier we will be.

Analysis of Answer choices:
A. It is a conclusion for which the only support offered is the claim that straying from a diet of wild foods has often resulted in chronic illness and other physical problems.
Incorrect: The support offered for this claim is that humans have evolved very little since the development of agriculture
B. It is a premise for which no justification is provided, but which is used to support the argument’s main conclusion.
Incorrect: A justification is provided for this.
C. It is a phenomenon for which the main conclusion of the nutritionist’s argument is cited as an explanation.
Incorrect: It is actually reverse of this. It is used to explain the main conclusion.
D. It is an intermediate conclusion for which one claim is offered as support, and which is used in turn to support the argument’s main conclusion.
Correct: Correct as the Nutritionist first concludes that Humans are still biologically adapted to a diet of wild foods using the first line of argument and then used this view to reach the final conclusion.

E. It is a premise offered in support of the claim that humans have evolved very little since the
development of agriculture.
Incorrect: It is the other way round.
_________________

The Kudo please :)

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Apr 2017
Posts: 57
Re: Nutritionist: Because humans have evolved very little since  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 May 2017, 02:24
so, are there any questions with 3 bold phrases in a passage?
Board of Directors
User avatar
V
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3613
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Nutritionist: Because humans have evolved very little since  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 May 2017, 09:00
chessgiants wrote:
so, are there any questions with 3 bold phrases in a passage?


I don't think those can ever be asked unless you are solving 780-800 level questions. :P :)
_________________

My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40
My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream
My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub | Importance of an Error Log!
Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place | All CR Resources at one place
Blog: Subscribe to Question of the Day Blog
GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality - View More.
New Visa Forum - Ask all your Visa Related Questions - here.
New! Best Reply Functionality on GMAT Club!
Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free
Check our new About Us Page here.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2018
Posts: 1
Re: Nutritionist: Because humans have evolved very little since  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Oct 2018, 11:05
I am not able to decide which one is conclusion "humans
are still biologically adapted to a diet of wild foods" or Thus, the more our diet consists of wild foods, the healthier we will be
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Nutritionist: Because humans have evolved very little since &nbs [#permalink] 31 Oct 2018, 11:05
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Nutritionist: Because humans have evolved very little since

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.