It is currently 21 Nov 2017, 21:27

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Of the people who moved from one state to another when they

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 May 2007
Posts: 218

Kudos [?]: 129 [0], given: 0

Of the people who moved from one state to another when they [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jun 2008, 05:47
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

57% (00:57) correct 43% (01:21) wrong based on 695 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Of the people who moved from one state to another when they retired, the proportion who retired to SunState has decreased by 10 percent over the past five years. Since many local businesses in SunState cater to retirees, this decline is likely to have a noticeably negative economic effect on these businesses.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A)SunState attracts more people who move from one state to another when they retire than does any other state.
B)There are far more local businesses in SunState that cater to tourists than there are local businesses that cater to retirees.
C)The number of retirees who have moved out of SunState to accept re-employment in other states has increased over the past five years.
D)SunState has lower property taxes than any other state, making the state a magnet for retirees.
E)The total number of people who retired and moved to another state for their retirement has increased significantly over the past five years.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 129 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 684

Kudos [?]: 618 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-Sunstate [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jun 2008, 06:00
Quote:
Since many local businesses in SunState cater to retirees, this decline is likely to have a noticeably negative economic effect on these businesses


Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

So we need to search for an option that shows the businesses are dependent on anything but for retirees

A)SunState attracts more people who move from one state to another when they retire than does any other state.-> irrelevant to business.
B)There are far more local businesses in SunState that cater to tourists than there are local businesses that cater to retirees.->directly contradicts thus perfect!
C)The number of retirees who have moved out of SunState to accept re-employment in other states has increased over the past five years.-> irrelevant
D)SunState has lower property taxes than any other state, making the state a magnet for retirees.->irrelevant
E)The total number of people who retired and moved to another state for their retirement has increased significantly over the past five years.-> irrelevant
_________________

Persistence+Patience+Persistence+Patience=G...O...A...L

Kudos [?]: 618 [0], given: 0

Expert Post
GMAT Tutor
avatar
B
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1344

Kudos [?]: 2010 [0], given: 6

Re: CR-Sunstate [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jun 2008, 07:08
aaron22197 wrote:
Of the people who moved from one state to another when they retired, the proportion who retired to SunState has decreased by 10 percent over the past five years. Since many local businesses in SunState cater to retirees, this decline is likely to have a noticeably negative economic effect on these businesses.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A)SunState attracts more people who move from one state to another when they retire than does any other state.
B)There are far more local businesses in SunState that cater to tourists than there are local businesses that cater to retirees.
C)The number of retirees who have moved out of SunState to accept re-employment in other states has increased over the past five years.
D)SunState has lower property taxes than any other state, making the state a magnet for retirees.
E)The total number of people who retired and moved to another state for their retirement has increased significantly over the past five years.


This is testing a concept common in the Quant section of the GMAT- the difference between ratios and absolute quantities. We know that there has been a slight decline in the percentage of people retiring to SunState. That does not mean there has been a decline in the number of people retiring to SunState. If more people are retiring to other states than ever before, it remains possible that the number of retirees to SunState has increased, even if the percentage of the total has declined slightly. E tells us precisely this.

B is tempting here, since it suggests that the economic effect might not be "noticeably negative". Still, the question tells us that "many local businesses cater to retirees", which suggests that these businesses are important to the local economy. It remains possible, even assuming B to be true, that tourism-related businesses make up half the local economy, and retirement-related businesses make up a quarter of the local economy.
_________________

GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

Kudos [?]: 2010 [0], given: 6

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Posts: 726

Kudos [?]: 220 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-Sunstate [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jun 2008, 08:35
aaron22197 wrote:
Of the people who moved from one state to another when they retired, the proportion who retired to SunState has decreased by 10 percent over the past five years. Since many local businesses in SunState cater to retirees, this decline is likely to have a noticeably negative economic effect on these businesses.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A)SunState attracts more people who move from one state to another when they retire than does any other state.
B)There are far more local businesses in SunState that cater to tourists than there are local businesses that cater to retirees.
C)The number of retirees who have moved out of SunState to accept re-employment in other states has increased over the past five years.
D)SunState has lower property taxes than any other state, making the state a magnet for retirees.
E)The total number of people who retired and moved to another state for their retirement has increased significantly over the past five years.


E for me

Kudos [?]: 220 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1258

Kudos [?]: 541 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-Sunstate [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jun 2008, 08:54
I think this questionhas already been discussed. A typical B trap. The question asks the effect on bussinesses catering to retirees in particular so B is out.
E seems to be the best option,its a ratio question
bcos if the total number of people who retired and moved to another state for their retirement has increased significantly over the past five years(AS E states), then definitely the no of people coming to state will increase.


aaron22197 wrote:
Of the people who moved from one state to another when they retired, the proportion who retired to SunState has decreased by 10 percent over the past five years. Since many local businesses in SunState cater to retirees, this decline is likely to have a noticeably negative economic effect on these businesses.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A)SunState attracts more people who move from one state to another when they retire than does any other state.
B)There are far more local businesses in SunState that cater to tourists than there are local businesses that cater to retirees.
C)The number of retirees who have moved out of SunState to accept re-employment in other states has increased over the past five years.
D)SunState has lower property taxes than any other state, making the state a magnet for retirees.
E)The total number of people who retired and moved to another state for their retirement has increased significantly over the past five years.

Kudos [?]: 541 [0], given: 0

Current Student
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3345

Kudos [?]: 322 [0], given: 2

Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12
Re: CR-Sunstate [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jun 2008, 09:49
E is the best option...

Kudos [?]: 322 [0], given: 2

2 KUDOS received
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1339

Kudos [?]: 864 [2], given: 10

Reviews Badge
Re: CR-Sunstate [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jun 2008, 09:57
2
This post received
KUDOS
Tot number of retiress = T
number of retirees moving to sunsstate = x
% of retirees moving to sunstate p = (x/T)*100
p decreases , if T increases ,x is constant
p decreases , if x decreases , T is constant
p deceases , if T increases , X increases (but the increase is not very high compared to T)

in 20007, T =100,x =20 , p= 20 %
in 2008, t =1000, , p = 10 %

to calculate x in 2008 : x = (1000*10)/100 = 100

The percentage of people moving is decreased but the actual number of people (x) moving has increased.

E

Kudos [?]: 864 [2], given: 10

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 May 2007
Posts: 218

Kudos [?]: 129 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-Sunstate [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jun 2008, 19:22
Thanks goals +1. OA is E

Kudos [?]: 129 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Oct 2008
Posts: 267

Kudos [?]: 550 [0], given: 22

Of the people who moved from one state to another when they [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2009, 06:20
Of the people who moved from one state to another when they retired, the proportion who retired to SunState has decreased by 10 percent over the past five years. Since many local businesses in SunState cater to retirees, this decline is likely to have a noticeably negative economic effect on these businesses.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. SunState attracts more people who move from one state to another when they retire than does any other state.

B. There are far more local businesses in SunState that cater to tourists than there are local businesses that cater to retirees.

C. The number of retirees who have moved out of SunState to accept re-employment in other states has increased over the past five years.

D. SunState has lower property taxes than any other state, making the state a magnet for retirees.

E. The total number of people who retired and moved to another state for their retirement has increased significantly over the past five years.

Kudos [?]: 550 [0], given: 22

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 538

Kudos [?]: 618 [0], given: 2

Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2009, 07:52
I guess this is a trap, and I guess ans should be A....here is why

C, D and E are out....

Since many local businesses in SunState cater to retirees, this decline is likely to have a noticeably negative economic effect on these businesses.

it means that businesses those serve to retirees will have -ve impact and not entire catering business....

A. SunState attracts more people who move from one state to another when they retire than does any other state.

B. There are far more local businesses in SunState that cater to tourists than there are local businesses that cater to retirees. - states other businesses, which are catering to tourists and not to retirees, I would go for B if it has been stated as businesses switched catering from retirees to tourist...but it is not so

therefore IMO A....

Kudos [?]: 618 [0], given: 2

1 KUDOS received
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1258

Kudos [?]: 541 [1], given: 0

Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2009, 09:20
1
This post received
KUDOS
This is a perfect example of percentage trap. The ans shld b E.
Suppose earlier no of ppl who migrated was 100 and % who retired to suncity was 10%. then their no is 10. But if the total no of ppl increased say to 1000 but % migrated to suncity decreased to 5%. so no of ppl retiring 2 suncity is 50 which is definitely more than earlier. I hope it is clear now

Kudos [?]: 541 [1], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2009
Posts: 237

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2009, 09:57
ritula wrote:
This is a perfect example of percentage trap. The ans shld b E.
Suppose earlier no of ppl who migrated was 100 and % who retired to suncity was 10%. then their no is 10. But if the total no of ppl increased say to 1000 but % migrated to suncity decreased to 5%. so no of ppl retiring 2 suncity is 50 which is definitely more than earlier. I hope it is clear now


A:just says that it attracts more people than any other states. but the question states that it has decreased by 10%.
B:says nothing abt the impact on the businesses that cater to retirees.
C:totally unrelated
D:unrelated
E: proportion has decreased but actual has increased=>means total would have increased=>no impact on businesses.
hence E.
_________________

-----------------------
tusharvk

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 01 Apr 2008
Posts: 872

Kudos [?]: 861 [0], given: 18

Name: Ronak Amin
Schools: IIM Lucknow (IPMX) - Class of 2014
Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2009, 10:18
tusharvk wrote:
ritula wrote:
This is a perfect example of percentage trap. The ans shld b E.
Suppose earlier no of ppl who migrated was 100 and % who retired to suncity was 10%. then their no is 10. But if the total no of ppl increased say to 1000 but % migrated to suncity decreased to 5%. so no of ppl retiring 2 suncity is 50 which is definitely more than earlier. I hope it is clear now


A:just says that it attracts more people than any other states. but the question states that it has decreased by 10%.
B:says nothing abt the impact on the businesses that cater to retirees.
C:totally unrelated
D:unrelated
E: proportion has decreased but actual has increased=>means total would have increased=>no impact on businesses.
hence E.


B > the argument doesnt talk about businesses that cater to retirees...it talks about 'local' businesses.
B says that there might be other local businesses like travel related which will not be impacted and hence may not have a negative impact on local businesses.

what is OA?

Kudos [?]: 861 [0], given: 18

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 727

Kudos [?]: 867 [0], given: 99

Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2009, 12:16
good explanation ritula. +1 for you.

Kudos [?]: 867 [0], given: 99

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Posts: 486

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 13

Schools: Kellogg, MIT, Michigan, Berkeley, Marshall, Mellon
Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2009, 14:34
Hi mates,

IMO E

E. The total number of people who retired and moved to another state for their retirement has increased significantly over the past five years.

Althoug the figure as relative value has decreased by 10%, thanks to E it is possible that the total number of retirees that have moved to that state has increased, which is positive for the local business

OA and Source?

Cheers
_________________

mates, please visit my profile and leave comments
http://gmatclub.com/forum/johnlewis1980-s-profile-feedback-is-more-than-welcome-80538.html

I'm not linked to GMAT questions anymore, so, if you need something, please PM me

I'm already focused on my application package :)

My experience in my second attempt
http://gmatclub.com/forum/p544312#p544312
My experience in my third attempt
http://gmatclub.com/forum/630-q-47-v-28-engineer-non-native-speaker-my-experience-78215.html#p588275

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 13

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
Posts: 276

Kudos [?]: 119 [0], given: 2

Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2009, 17:14
tusharvk wrote:
ritula wrote:
This is a perfect example of percentage trap. The ans shld b E.
Suppose earlier no of ppl who migrated was 100 and % who retired to suncity was 10%. then their no is 10. But if the total no of ppl increased say to 1000 but % migrated to suncity decreased to 5%. so no of ppl retiring 2 suncity is 50 which is definitely more than earlier. I hope it is clear now


A:just says that it attracts more people than any other states. but the question states that it has decreased by 10%.
B:says nothing abt the impact on the businesses that cater to retirees.
C:totally unrelated
D:unrelated
E: proportion has decreased but actual has increased=>means total would have increased=>no impact on businesses.
hence E.


E is the correct response for the reason mentioned above. Proportion tells us nothing about the actual number. If 50% of 100 retirees moved to SunState in the past (total 50 retirees) and now only 10% of the 10,000 retirees move to SunState, then obviously 10% of 1000 (lower proportion) > 50% of 100. Hope this helps,

Kudos [?]: 119 [0], given: 2

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1534

Kudos [?]: 280 [0], given: 0

Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2009, 17:57
yep, E.

Why B cannot be right is because number of local tourism businesses may be more but their contribution to the economy may be negligible.

Kudos [?]: 280 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Oct 2008
Posts: 267

Kudos [?]: 550 [0], given: 22

Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2009, 22:06
Good explanation.

OA is E

Kudos [?]: 550 [0], given: 22

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Aug 2010
Posts: 260

Kudos [?]: 791 [1], given: 11

Of the people who moved from one state to another when they [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jan 2011, 16:06
1
This post received
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Of the people who moved from one state to another when they retired, the proportion who retired to SunState has decreased by 10 percent over the past five years. Since many local businesses in SunState cater to retirees, this decline is likely to have a noticeably negative economic effect on these businesses.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

a. SunState attracts more people who move from one state to another when they retire than does any other state.
b. There are far more local businesses in SunState that cater to tourists than there are local businesses that cater to retirees.
c. The number of retirees who have moved out of SunState to accept re-employment in other states has increased over the past five years.
d. SunState has lower property taxes than any other state, making the state a magnet for retirees.
e. The total number of people who retired and moved to another state for their retirement has increased significantly over the past five years.

Can someone tell me how to improve on my CR. Apparently i am doing ok in OG but I am being battered in mgmat exams. Please could someone help me out here. Thanks
_________________

Verbal:new-to-the-verbal-forum-please-read-this-first-77546.html
Math: new-to-the-math-forum-please-read-this-first-77764.html
Gmat: everything-you-need-to-prepare-for-the-gmat-revised-77983.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ajit

Kudos [?]: 791 [1], given: 11

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Feb 2010
Posts: 73

Kudos [?]: 139 [0], given: 4

Re: Of the people who moved from one state [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jan 2011, 11:55
Please read the POWER SCORE CRITICAL REASONING BIBLE

I have been doing it and what i have realized is that it makes you channelize your focus as you can
look for answers based on the question type.

It has nicely divided all the question types into three families. Its a very good book to increase accuracy and speed in CR.

Kudos [?]: 139 [0], given: 4

Re: Of the people who moved from one state   [#permalink] 18 Jan 2011, 11:55

Go to page    1   2   3    Next  [ 47 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Of the people who moved from one state to another when they

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.