It is currently 20 Feb 2018, 01:35

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Of the three major candidates for President in 2004

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 21 Nov 2016
Posts: 45
Of the three major candidates for President in 2004 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Mar 2017, 21:20
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

96% (00:52) correct 4% (01:22) wrong based on 316 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Of the three major candidates for President in 2004, Ralph Nader, an independent who had represented the Green Party in the 2000 election, received the least media coverage and ultimately the fewest votes.
(A) received the least media coverage and ultimately the fewest votes
(B) received less media coverage and ultimately fewer votes
(C) received less media coverage and ultimately less votes
(D) received the least media coverage and ultimately less votes than did the other candidates
(E) received the smallest amount of media coverage and ultimately the smallest number of votes

OA : not known. Please help

Last edited by mikemcgarry on 17 Mar 2017, 14:07, edited 1 time in total.
added underlining
Expert Post
2 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4680
Re: Of the three major candidates for President in 2004 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Mar 2017, 14:30
2
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
reachskishore wrote:
Of the three major candidates for President in 2004, Ralph Nader, an independent who had represented the Green Party in the 2000 election, received the least media coverage and ultimately the fewest votes.
(A) received the least media coverage and ultimately the fewest votes
(B) received less media coverage and ultimately fewer votes
(C) received less media coverage and ultimately less votes
(D) received the least media coverage and ultimately less votes than did the other candidates
(E) received the smallest amount of media coverage and ultimately the smallest number of votes

OA : not known. Please help

Dear reachskishore,

I'm happy to help. :-)

This is not the most impressive question.

One of the ideas this questions tries to explore is the distinction of countable vs. uncountable. See
GMAT Grammar: Less vs. Fewer
GMAT Comparisons: More vs. Greater and Less vs. Fewer

More importantly, we use comparatives (more, fewer, bigger, smaller) for situations with just two elements, and we use superlatives (most, least, biggest, smallest) for cases with 3+ elements. We are discussing three candidates, so we need superlatives.

(B) & (C) use comparatives, not superlatives. (D) says "less votes," rather than "fewer votes." (E) seems to be trying to win a contest for the longest and most awkward answer possible, and it definitely could be a finalist in that competition--that's how wrong it is.

(A) is flawless and correct.

The incorrect answers can be eliminated in a relatively straightforward manner. The subject is also somewhat contrived: the 2004 US Presidential Election was a contest primarily between two major candidates, who won all of the electoral votes and 99% of the popular vote between them. Nader and the others merely were rounding errors in the big picture.

Here's a much more challenging question exploring some similar themes:
Johannes Brahms lived

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 21 Nov 2016
Posts: 45
Re: Of the three major candidates for President in 2004 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Mar 2017, 08:23
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
mikemcgarry wrote:
reachskishore wrote:
Of the three major candidates for President in 2004, Ralph Nader, an independent who had represented the Green Party in the 2000 election, received the least media coverage and ultimately the fewest votes.
(A) received the least media coverage and ultimately the fewest votes
(B) received less media coverage and ultimately fewer votes
(C) received less media coverage and ultimately less votes
(D) received the least media coverage and ultimately less votes than did the other candidates
(E) received the smallest amount of media coverage and ultimately the smallest number of votes

OA : not known. Please help

Dear reachskishore,

I'm happy to help. :-)

This is not the most impressive question.

One of the ideas this questions tries to explore is the distinction of countable vs. uncountable. See
GMAT Grammar: Less vs. Fewer
GMAT Comparisons: More vs. Greater and Less vs. Fewer

More importantly, we use comparatives (more, fewer, bigger, smaller) for situations with just two elements, and we use superlatives (most, least, biggest, smallest) for cases with 3+ elements. We are discussing three candidates, so we need superlatives.

(B) & (C) use comparatives, not superlatives. (D) says "less votes," rather than "fewer votes." (E) seems to be trying to win a contest for the longest and most awkward answer possible, and it definitely could be a finalist in that competition--that's how wrong it is.

(A) is flawless and correct.

The incorrect answers can be eliminated in a relatively straightforward manner. The subject is also somewhat contrived: the 2004 US Presidential Election was a contest primarily between two major candidates, who won all of the electoral votes and 99% of the popular vote between them. Nader and the others merely were rounding errors in the big picture.

Here's a much more challenging question exploring some similar themes:
Johannes Brahms lived

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)



Hi Mike,

Thanks a lot for your response. It helped me to understand the question better.

+1 Kudos to you.

-
Kishore
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 20 Aug 2016
Posts: 59
GMAT 1: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 2: 670 Q45 V36
GMAT 3: 680 Q47 V35
GMAT 4: 720 Q49 V40
Re: Of the three major candidates for President in 2004 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Mar 2017, 09:30
When comparing 3 or more superlative must be used. Only A and D remain.

A is clear in establishing the chronology. I fewer is correct.

Hence A.

This is my understanding. Experts fell free to correct me if I logic is wrong.

Sent from my XT1562 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Re: Of the three major candidates for President in 2004   [#permalink] 20 Mar 2017, 09:30
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Of the three major candidates for President in 2004

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.