Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 27 May 2017, 07:14

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Officer nominations

Author Message
Director
Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 584
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 228 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Apr 2005, 15:36
20. The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an organization was circulated to its members for comment.

When more than one nominee is to be named for an office, prospective nominees must consent to nomination and before giving such consent must be told who the other nominees will be.

Which of the following comments concerning the logic of the proposal is accurate if it cannot be known who the actual nominees are until prospective nominees have given their consent to be nominated?

(A) The proposal would make it possible for each of several nominees for an office to be aware of who all of the other nominees are.
(B) The proposal would widen the choice available to those choosing among the nominees.
(C) If there are several prospective nominees, the proposal would deny the last nominee equal treatment with the first.
(D) The proposal would enable a prospective nominee to withdraw from competition with a specific person without making that withdrawal known.
(E) If there is more than one prospective nominee, the proposal would make it impossible for anyone to become a nominee.

If you have any questions
New!
SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1790
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Apr 2005, 15:48
This is a chicken-n-egg problem
I guess the answer is (E)

The nominees will consent only if they know who else is contesting. They wont tell that they will contest if they dont know who else is contesting. Since no one will tell about their desire non one will ever know.
Director
Joined: 05 Jul 2004
Posts: 898
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Apr 2005, 17:48
Full Bouncer for me .

anandnk wrote:
This is a chicken-n-egg problem
I guess the answer is (E)

The nominees will consent only if they know who else is contesting. They wont tell that they will contest if they dont know who else is contesting. Since no one will tell about their desire non one will ever know.

Anand!! Can you please explain assuming that I did not understand even a bit of the question.
Thanks
Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 847
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 108 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Apr 2005, 20:59
agree with Anand

say, A, B, C are prospective nominees and C doesn't want to be in competition with A or B

now when we approach A to file the nomination, he needs to be told that B will be the nominee for the post. But, at this point we don't know if B will agree to get nominated - therefore, it is not possible, ever, to get the first nomination - this is what E states
Director
Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 584
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 228 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Apr 2005, 06:30
OA is E.
SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1790
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Apr 2005, 06:41
Hi JPV,

Vithal wrote:
agree with Anand

say, A, B, C are prospective nominees and C doesn't want to be in competition with A or B

now when we approach A to file the nomination, he needs to be told that B will be the nominee for the post. But, at this point we don't know if B will agree to get nominated - therefore, it is not possible, ever, to get the first nomination - this is what E states

What if B also wants to know if (A) is contesting before saying whether he/she will contest.

Let me know if you need more explanation.
Anand.
Director
Joined: 05 Jul 2004
Posts: 898
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Apr 2005, 10:14
yeah makes sense..

Thanks Anand/Vithal
Manager
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 184
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Apr 2005, 12:56
time eater-- could not get the matter in it.
real logic involved.

but the explanation makes sense.
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Nov 2004
Posts: 455
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Apr 2005, 14:41
anandnk wrote:
This is a chicken-n-egg problem
I guess the answer is (E)

Anandnk, nice explanation. I was shooting for D, now I am more clear.

IMO, the key to this questions is who will be the first one to be nominated? Like you mentioned, Chicken first or Egg first?

btw, Good Question!!!
Director
Joined: 05 Jul 2004
Posts: 898
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Apr 2005, 17:16
anandnk wrote:
Let me know if you need more explanation.
Anand.

I totally agree with gmat2me2. This type of questions sucks. It takes alot of time to understand the question itself and in this process, one (like I) can become impatient and can loose the grip of the question. What is the best approach for this kind of problem?
25 Apr 2005, 17:16
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Need clarification on "Noun Clause as Predicate Nominative" 0 12 Mar 2011, 22:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by