Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 27 May 2017, 08:50

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

OG13, Q 26

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 07 Apr 2012
Posts: 126
Location: United States
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Operations
Schools: ISB '15
GMAT 1: 590 Q48 V23
GPA: 3.9
WE: Operations (Manufacturing)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 45

Show Tags

25 Oct 2013, 09:46
Tropical bats play important roles in the rain forest
ecosystem, aiding in the dispersal of cashew, date,
and fig seeds; pollinating banana, breadfruit, and
mango trees: and indirectly help produce tequila by
pollinating agave plants.
(A) pollinating banana, breadfruit* and mango trees;
and indirectly help produce
(B) pollinating banana, breadfruit, and mango trees;
and indirectly helping to produce
(C) pollinating banana, breadfruit, and mango trees;
and they indirectly help to produce
(D) they pollinate banana, breadfruit, and mango
trees; and indirectly help producing
(E) they pollinate banana, breadfruit, and mango
trees; indirectly helping the producing of

Hello experts, please opine on my analysis:

Option A: aiding in / pollinating is not parallel with indirectly.....
so incorrect
Option B : contender, looks fine
Option C: parallelism error as in A, after semicolon it should be independent clause, so incorrect
Option D E: semicolon is not followed by Independent Clause.

Hence B is correct.

My doubt is, is it necessary always to spot meaning errors first?
In this question I could not locate any meaning error. Also "if we are able to spot some grammar rules error easily, is it still necessary to go back and start elimination as per intended meaning of original question ?"
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2022
Followers: 2217

Kudos [?]: 7757 [0], given: 291

Show Tags

30 Oct 2013, 12:30
5553
Hi there,

Thanks for posting your query here, as requested!

Yes, we recommend that you identify errors before eliminating answer choices. In this case, your reason for eliminating option A is not entirely accurate; this choice is not wrong because of the adverb ‘indirectly’. This word is just a modifier for the verb ‘help’. Here, option A is wrong because ‘help’ should be ‘helping’ in order to be parallel to ‘aiding’ and ‘pollinating’.

Secondly, when you say that there should be an independent clause after a semicolon, note that this rule applies only when a semicolon is used to separate independent clauses. In this sentence, this is not the function of the semicolons. It is being used to separate the parallel items: that is, the items are listed as ‘X; Y; and Z’. In such a context, the items separated by the semicolon do not need to be independent clauses. A useful way to find out the function of the semicolon is that if there are multiple semicolons in a sentence, they are usually used to separate items on a list, whereas a single semicolon usually separates two independent clauses. However, it is always safest to be sure of the meaning and to complete your error analysis before you start eliminating options, so that you don’t accidentally eliminate the correct answer.

I hope this helps!

Regards,
Meghna
_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Manager
Joined: 07 Apr 2012
Posts: 126
Location: United States
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Operations
Schools: ISB '15
GMAT 1: 590 Q48 V23
GPA: 3.9
WE: Operations (Manufacturing)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 45

Show Tags

30 Oct 2013, 21:28
egmat wrote:
5553
Hi there,

Thanks for posting your query here, as requested!

Yes, we recommend that you identify errors before eliminating answer choices. In this case, your reason for eliminating option A is not entirely accurate; this choice is not wrong because of the adverb ‘indirectly’. This word is just a modifier for the verb ‘help’. Here, option A is wrong because ‘help’ should be ‘helping’ in order to be parallel to ‘aiding’ and ‘pollinating’.

Secondly, when you say that there should be an independent clause after a semicolon, note that this rule applies only when a semicolon is used to separate independent clauses. In this sentence, this is not the function of the semicolons. It is being used to separate the parallel items: that is, the items are listed as ‘X; Y; and Z’. In such a context, the items separated by the semicolon do not need to be independent clauses. A useful way to find out the function of the semicolon is that if there are multiple semicolons in a sentence, they are usually used to separate items on a list, whereas a single semicolon usually separates two independent clauses. However, it is always safest to be sure of the meaning and to complete your error analysis before you start eliminating options, so that you don’t accidentally eliminate the correct answer.

I hope this helps!

Regards,
Meghna

Thanks:)
Re: OG13, Q 26   [#permalink] 30 Oct 2013, 21:28
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
OG13 #36 1 02 May 2016, 13:07
og 13 102 0 21 Jul 2015, 03:32
OG13 Q 68 0 26 Nov 2013, 09:01
1 OG 13 Q 38 : Bengal-born writer, philosopher, and educator.. 1 29 Nov 2013, 13:24
OG13 Q14 2 31 Jul 2013, 10:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by

OG13, Q 26

Moderator: egmat

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.