It is currently 20 Nov 2017, 20:13

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

OG2016-There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amph

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

3 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 26 Oct 2014
Posts: 16

Kudos [?]: 21 [3], given: 12

Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: Finance, Technology
Schools: Stanford '19 (S)
GMAT 1: 720 Q51 V36
GPA: 2.9
WE: Project Management (Retail Banking)
OG2016-There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amph [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Aug 2015, 06:09
3
This post received
KUDOS
10
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Question 1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Question Stats:

55% (02:18) correct 45% (02:17) wrong based on 426

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Question Stats:

59% (00:53) correct 41% (00:51) wrong based on 429

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Question Stats:

52% (00:57) correct 48% (00:53) wrong based on 699

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 4
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Question Stats:

65% (00:37) correct 35% (00:50) wrong based on 374

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 5
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Question Stats:

66% (00:39) correct 34% (00:33) wrong based on 367

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 6
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Question Stats:

56% (01:57) correct 44% (01:53) wrong based on 357

HideShow timer Statistics

Declines in amphibian populations

There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian populations and of extinctions of a number of the world's endangered amphibian species. These declines, if real, may be signs of a general trend toward extinction, and many environmentalists have claimed that immediate environmental action is necessary to remedy this "amphibian crisis", which, in their view, is an indicator of general and catastrophic environmental degradation due to human activity.

To evaluate these claims, it is useful to make a preliminary distinction that is far too often ignored. A declining population should not be confused with an endangered one. An endangered population is always rare, almost always small, and, by definition, under constant threat of extinction even without a proximate cause in human activities. Its disappearance, however unfortunate, should come as no great surprise. Moreover, chance events—which may indicate nothing about the direction of trends in population size—may lead to its extinction. The probability of extinction due to such random factors depends on the population size and is independent of the prevailing direction of change in that size.

For biologists, population declines are potentially more worrisome than extinctions. Persistent declines, especially in large populations, indicate a changed ecological context. Even here, distinctions must again be made among declines that are only apparent (in the sense that they are part of habitual cycles or of normal fluctuations), declines that take a population to some lower but still acceptable level, and those that threaten extinction (e.g., by taking the number of individuals below the minimum viable population). Anecdotal reports of population decreases cannot distinguish among these possibilities, and some amphibian populations have shown strong fluctuations in the past.

It is Indisputably true that there is simply not enough long-term scientific data on amphibian populations to enable researches to identify real declines in amphibian populations. Many fairly common amphibian species declared all but extinct after severe declines in the 1950s and 1960s have subsequently recovered, and so might the apparently declining populations that have generated the current appearance of an amphibian crisis. Unfortunately, long-term data will not soon be forthcoming, and postponing environmental action while we wait for it may doom species and whole ecosystems to extinction.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
A

1. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) assess the validity of a certain view
(B) distinguish between two phenomena
(C) identify the causes of a problem
(D) describe a disturbing trend
(E) allay concern about a particular phenomenon


[Reveal] Spoiler:
D

2. It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes which of the following to be true of the environmentalists mentioned in lines 5-6?

(A) They have wrongly chosen to focus on anecdotal reports rather than on the long-term data that are currently available concerning amphibians.
(B) Their recommendations are flawed because their research focuses too narrowly on a single category of animal species.
(C) Their certainty that population declines in general are caused by environmental degradation is not warranted.
(D) They have drawn premature conclusions concerning a crisis in amphibian populations from recent reports of declines.
(E) They have overestimated the effects of chance events on trends in amphibian populations.


[Reveal] Spoiler:
E

3. It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes which of the following to be true of the amphibian extinctions that have recently been reported?

(A) They have resulted primarily from human activities causing environmental degradation.
(B)They could probably have been prevented if timely action had been taken to protect the habitats of amphibian species.
(C) They should not come as a surprise, because amphibian populations generally have been declining for a number of years.
(D) They have probably been caused by a combination of chance events.
(E) They do not clearly constitute evidence of general environmental degradation.


[Reveal] Spoiler:
D

4. According to the passage, each of the following is true of endangered amphibian species EXCEPT:

(A) They are among the rarest kinds of amphibians.
(B) They generally have populations that are small in size.
(C) They are in constant danger of extinction.
(D) Those with decreasing populations are the most likely candidates for immediate extinction.
(E) The are in danger of extinction due to events that sometimes have nothing to do with human activities.


[Reveal] Spoiler:
B

5. Which of the following most accurately describes the organization of the passage?

(A) A question is raised, a distinction regarding it is made, and the question is answered.
(B) An interpretation is presented, its soundness is examined, and a warning is given.
(C) A situation is described, its consequences are analyzed, and a prediction is made.
(D) Two interpretations of a phenomenon are described, and one of them is rejected as invalid.
(E) Two methods for analyzing a phenomenon are compared, and further study of the phenomenon is recommended.


[Reveal] Spoiler:
C

6. Which of the following best describes the function of the sentence in lines 35-38 [Anecdotal reports of population decreases cannot distinguish among these possibilities, and some amphibian populations have shown strong fluctuations in the past.]?

(A) To give an example of a particular kind of study
(B) To cast doubt on an assertion made in the previous sentence
(C) To raise an objection to a view presented in the first paragraph
(D) To provide support for a view presented in the first paragraph
(E) To introduce an idea that will be countered in the following paragraph

[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #1 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #2 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #3 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #4 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #5 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #6 OA

Last edited by hazelnut on 25 Sep 2017, 05:47, edited 4 times in total.
Added OA for Question#3 as per OG

Kudos [?]: 21 [3], given: 12

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 27 Jul 2011
Posts: 61

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 15

Re: OG2016-There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amph [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Sep 2015, 19:33
This is my interpretation and approach for Q

3. It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes which of the following to be true of the amphibian extinctions that have recently been reported?

(A) They have resulted primarily from human activities causing environmental degradation.
(B)They could probably have been prevented if timely action had been taken to protect the habitats of amphibian species.
(C) They should not come as a surprise, because amphibian populations generally have been declining for a number of years.
(D) They have probably been caused by a combination of chance events.
(E) They do not clearly constitute evidence of general environmental degradation.

These declines, if real, may be signs of a general trend toward extinction, and many environmentalists have claimed that immediate environmental action is necessary to remedy this "amphibian crisis", which, in their view, is an indicator of general and catastrophic environmental degradation due to human activity. (P1)
Explanation: The author then explains the possible causes for the decline and those causes might not lead to general and catastrophic environmental degradation.
i.e. Since the author does not agree with the environmentalists --- EXPECT ANSWER TO BE FLIPPED OF WHAT THE PASSAGE STATES
(Environmentalist believes the decline is an indicator of general and catastrophic environmental degradation.)
(ANS EXPECTED: Author DOES NOT believe the decline is an indicator of general and catastrophic environmental degradation)

6. Which of the following best describes the function of the sentence in lines 35-38?

(A) To give an example of a particular kind of study
(B) To cast doubt on an assertion made in the previous sentence
(C) To raise an objection to a view presented in the first paragraph
(D) To provide support for a view presented in the first paragraph
(E) To introduce an idea that will be countered in the following paragraph.

POE:
The BOLD STATEMENTS is a support of the preceding and the latter sentence.
P2, P3 and P4 goes against the idea that is presented in P1 that state that the decline leads to extinction.

By the way , if anyone has explanation for Q2, please post because I am stuck between C and D, and please further explain how to use the flipped method on this inference question. Thanks.

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 15

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 22 Aug 2014
Posts: 48

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 5

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: OG2016-There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amph [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Oct 2015, 12:05
I think the answer should be D, since it is definitely a support saying( "...strong fluctuations in the past") for P1 ("These declines, if real, may be signs of a general trend toward extinction,..").

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 5

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2014
Posts: 21

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 6

GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V33
Re: OG2016-There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amph [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Nov 2015, 02:12
many environmentalists have claimed that immediate environmental action is necessary to remedy this "amphibian crisis", which, in their view, is an indicator of general and catastrophic environmental degradation due to human activity.

To evaluate these claims, it is useful to make a preliminary distinction that is far too often ignored.


2. It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes which of the following to be true of the environmentalists mentioned in lines 5-6?

(A) They have wrongly chosen to focus on anecdotal reports rather than on the long-term data that are currently available concerning amphibians.
(B) Their recommendations are flawed because their research focuses too narrowly on a single category of animal species.
(C) Their certainty that population declines in general are caused by environmental degradation is not warranted.
(D) They have drawn premature conclusions concerning a crisis in amphibian populations from recent reports of declines.---that is why,correct
(E) They have overestimated the effects of chance events on trends in amphibian populations.

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 6

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Nov 2011
Posts: 39

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 245

Location: Kenya
Re: OG2016-There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amph [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Mar 2016, 11:33
After a slight doubt in the first question (between A and E), easily cruised through this one....ADEDBC
Although, the author does try to allay some fears of the "environmentalists" pertaining to their fear of the extinction of the Amphibian species, the last paragraph confirms that the author is merely assessing the validity of a point of view.

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 245

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 24 Feb 2015
Posts: 5

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: OG2016-There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amph [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jul 2016, 14:24
Many thanks for the help! Here some additional tips:

For OG 109: The author suggests throughout the passage that recently reported amphibian
extinctions may have several different causes: they may be due to any number of
chance events, for example, or may simply be the result of a small population that
finds itself unable to continue under difficult conditions, whatever causes those
conditions.

For OG 110: This question asks what the passage does not say is true of endangered amphibian
species. The second paragraph discusses endangered species, stating that they are
always rare, almost always small, and, by definition, under constant threat of
extinction, which may be caused by chance events. The possibility of their
extinction, the passage states, depends only on the population size, and not
whether that population is increasing or decreasing.

For OG 111: This question asks about the organization of the passage as a whole. In the first
paragraph, the author tells about a situation that has been interpreted in a
particular way by environmentalists. The passage then proceeds to consider
whether that interpretation is valid, and while it does not come to a definitive
conclusion on that point, the final paragraph warns about the possible
consequences of not taking the action recommended by the environmentalists.

I hope this will be of some help!

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Oct 2016
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: OG2016-There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amph [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Oct 2016, 01:56
for Q3...im confused between D and E

for choice D, the explanation on OG said:
Quote:
the author suggests that the extinctions may have been caused by chance events, but there is not enough data to know whether or not this is probable.


but in passage:
Quote:
Moreover, chance events--which......--may lead to its extinction.


may = probably

so why we need to have enough data to know whether it was probable?

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Top Contributor
Board of Directors
User avatar
G
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3378

Kudos [?]: 9290 [0], given: 1169

Re: OG2016-There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amph [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Oct 2016, 02:22
Top Contributor
I think you miss the overall sense of the reading.

here we are talking of endangered species and that some of them recovered and some other are still on the border line. And that the environment could be wiped out where they live or not or blah blah.........but not is stated about option D.

Infact, if you notice a lot of species have recovered, which mean that their environment is not compromised after all.

Hope this helps
_________________

COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS AND RESOURCES
Quant: 1. ALL GMATPrep questions Quant/Verbal 2. Bunuel Signature Collection - The Next Generation 3. Bunuel Signature Collection ALL-IN-ONE WITH SOLUTIONS 4. Veritas Prep Blog PDF Version 5. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Quant Videos
Verbal:1. Verbal question bank and directories by Carcass 2. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Verbal Videos 3. Critical Reasoning_Oldy but goldy question banks 4. Sentence Correction_Oldy but goldy question banks 5. Reading-comprehension_Oldy but goldy question banks

Kudos [?]: 9290 [0], given: 1169

Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 05 Jul 2017
Posts: 171

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 176

Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
GPA: 4
Re: OG2016-There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amph [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Sep 2017, 05:29
Hey GMATNinja GMATNinjatwo

Can you help explain Q3 and Q6?

3. It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes which of the following to be true of the amphibian extinctions that have recently been reported?

(A) They have resulted primarily from human activities causing environmental degradation.
(B)They could probably have been prevented if timely action had been taken to protect the habitats of amphibian species.
(C) They should not come as a surprise, because amphibian populations generally have been declining for a number of years.
(D) They have probably been caused by a combination of chance events.
(E) They do not clearly constitute evidence of general environmental degradation.

I was confused between D and E. Both seem to be correct. Can you let me know your thoughts here?

6. Which of the following best describes the function of the sentence in lines 35-38?

(A) To give an example of a particular kind of study
(B) To cast doubt on an assertion made in the previous sentence
(C) To raise an objection to a view presented in the first paragraph
(D) To provide support for a view presented in the first paragraph
(E) To introduce an idea that will be countered in the following paragraph

I clearly thought the answer is Option B, below is my reasoning

Quote:
Anecdotal reports of population decreases cannot distinguish among these possibilities, and some amphibian populations have shown strong fluctuations in the past


- The report cannot distinguish among the possibilities
- Now the possibilities is mentioned in the above the bold statement

Quote:
Even here, distinctions must again be made among declines that are only apparent (in the sense that they are part of habitual cycles or of normal fluctuations), declines that take a population to some lower but still acceptable level, and those that threaten extinction (e.g., by taking the number of individuals below the minimum viable population).


- with the above reasoning, i thought the answer should be clearly option B because the anecdotal report says it cannot distinguish among them.

Can you help me understand where I'm going wrong?

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 176

Chat Moderator
avatar
G
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 589

Kudos [?]: 92 [0], given: 140

Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)
Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: OG2016-There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amph [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Sep 2017, 04:53
pikolo2510 wrote:
Hey GMATNinja GMATNinjatwo

Can you help explain Q3 and Q6?

3. It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes which of the following to be true of the amphibian extinctions that have recently been reported?

(A) They have resulted primarily from human activities causing environmental degradation.
(B)They could probably have been prevented if timely action had been taken to protect the habitats of amphibian species.
(C) They should not come as a surprise, because amphibian populations generally have been declining for a number of years.
(D) They have probably been caused by a combination of chance events.
(E) They do not clearly constitute evidence of general environmental degradation.

I was confused between D and E. Both seem to be correct. Can you let me know your thoughts here?

6. Which of the following best describes the function of the sentence in lines 35-38?

(A) To give an example of a particular kind of study
(B) To cast doubt on an assertion made in the previous sentence
(C) To raise an objection to a view presented in the first paragraph
(D) To provide support for a view presented in the first paragraph
(E) To introduce an idea that will be countered in the following paragraph

I clearly thought the answer is Option B, below is my reasoning

Quote:
Anecdotal reports of population decreases cannot distinguish among these possibilities, and some amphibian populations have shown strong fluctuations in the past


- The report cannot distinguish among the possibilities
- Now the possibilities is mentioned in the above the bold statement

Quote:
Even here, distinctions must again be made among declines that are only apparent (in the sense that they are part of habitual cycles or of normal fluctuations), declines that take a population to some lower but still acceptable level, and those that threaten extinction (e.g., by taking the number of individuals below the minimum viable population).


- with the above reasoning, i thought the answer should be clearly option B because the anecdotal report says it cannot distinguish among them.

Can you help me understand where I'm going wrong?




Hello pikolo2510,

My 2 cents:

Quote:
3. It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes which of the following to be true of the amphibian extinctions that have recently been reported?

(A) They have resulted primarily from human activities causing environmental degradation.
(B)They could probably have been prevented if timely action had been taken to protect the habitats of amphibian species.
(C) They should not come as a surprise, because amphibian populations generally have been declining for a number of years.
(D) They have probably been caused by a combination of chance events.
(E) They do not clearly constitute evidence of general environmental degradation.

I was confused between D and E. Both seem to be correct. Can you let me know your thoughts here?


Though the author does suggest that extinctions could have occurred due to chance events, we don't have sufficient data to prove that and also the options lists that it occurred due to a combination of chance events. May or may not be true.

The author does make a point that several factors could have led to this effect but clearly there ain't enough evidence to prove that this is case of environmental degradation.

Between D and E, E seems more plausible.




Quote:
6. Which of the following best describes the function of the sentence in lines 35-38?

(A) To give an example of a particular kind of study
(B) To cast doubt on an assertion made in the previous sentence
(C) To raise an objection to a view presented in the first paragraph
(D) To provide support for a view presented in the first paragraph
(E) To introduce an idea that will be countered in the following paragraph


The main point was to raise an objection to the claim made in the first paragraph. The author uses modifiers such as 'if real, claims, which, in their view,' etc to show that he doesn't buy that theory. Also, he doesn't question the preceding sentence.

Kudos [?]: 92 [0], given: 140

Senior SC Moderator
User avatar
D
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1239

Kudos [?]: 1297 [0], given: 434

Location: Malaysia
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
OG2016-There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amph [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Sep 2017, 05:52
idkksh wrote:
Declines in amphibian populations

There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian populations and of extinctions of a number of the world's endangered amphibian species. These declines, if real, may be signs of a general trend toward extinction, and many environmentalists have claimed that immediate environmental action is necessary to remedy this "amphibian crisis", which, in their view, is an indicator of general and catastrophic environmental degradation due to human activity.

To evaluate these claims, it is useful to make a preliminary distinction that is far too often ignored. A declining population should not be confused with an endangered one. An endangered population is always rare, almost always small, and, by definition, under constant threat of extinction even without a proximate cause in human activities. Its disappearance, however unfortunate, should come as no great surprise. Moreover, chance events—which may indicate nothing about the direction of trends in population size—may lead to its extinction. The probability of extinction due to such random factors depends on the population size and is independent of the prevailing direction of change in that size.

For biologists, population declines are potentially more worrisome than extinctions. Persistent declines, especially in large populations, indicate a changed ecological context. Even here, distinctions must again be made among declines that are only apparent (in the sense that they are part of habitual cycles or of normal fluctuations), declines that take a population to some lower but still acceptable level, and those that threaten extinction (e.g., by taking the number of individuals below the minimum viable population). Anecdotal reports of population decreases cannot distinguish among these possibilities, and some amphibian populations have shown strong fluctuations in the past.

It is Indisputably true that there is simply not enough long-term scientific data on amphibian populations to enable researches to identify real declines in amphibian populations. Many fairly common amphibian species declared all but extinct after severe declines in the 1950s and 1960s have subsequently recovered, and so might the apparently declining populations that have generated the current appearance of an amphibian crisis. Unfortunately, long-term data will not soon be forthcoming, and postponing environmental action while we wait for it may doom species and whole ecosystems to extinction.
3. It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes which of the following to be true of the amphibian extinctions that have recently been reported?

(A) They have resulted primarily from human activities causing environmental degradation.
(B)They could probably have been prevented if timely action had been taken to protect the habitats of amphibian species.
(C) They should not come as a surprise, because amphibian populations generally have been declining for a number of years.
(D) They have probably been caused by a combination of chance events.
(E) They do not clearly constitute evidence of general environmental degradation.



Passage: Amphibian Populations

Question: Inference–Extinctions

The Simple Story

According to reports, certain amphibian populations are undergoing drastic decline or even extinction. Environmentalists believe that these changes are due to human activity. The passage explains how to evaluate these claims. First, it draws a distinction between a declining population and an endangered population. Then, it explains that a decline may be worse than an extinction, but may also be harmless. Finally, it concludes that there is not enough data to determine whether the amphibian population is actually declining, and whether that decline represents a crisis. However, since there is limited data, and inaction could cause serious problems, the passage argues that people should still act to protect the amphibians.

Sample Passage Map

Here is one way to map this passage. (Note: abbreviate as desired!)

P1:

- Amph declines & extinctions: bad sign?
- Env.: action needed, declines caused by humans

P2:

- Evaluate env. Claims
- Decline doesn’t = endangered

P3:

- Declines worse than extinctions
- But, some declines are okay

P4:

- Limited data
- Don’t know if amphibians are really declining?
- But: should take action now anyways

Step 1: Identify the Question

The word inferred in the question stem indicates that this is an Inference question.

Step 2: Find the Support

The entire passage deals with the amphibian extinctions, and with the author’s views on population decline and extinction. Check the answer choices to see if they provide more guidance on where to find the answer. The answer choices seem to represent general claims about the author’s beliefs, so review your passage map briefly and be prepared to find support in various places in the passage.

Step 3: Predict an Answer

It’s difficult to predict a specific answer to this question, since the author makes a number of statements about the extinctions and about extinctions in general. Focus on eliminating answer choices that don’t match the author’s claims.

Step 4: Eliminate and Find a Match

(A) This is the viewpoint of the environmentalists mentioned in the first paragraph, not of the author. The author agrees with the environmentalists that action should be taken, but does not commit to a specific viewpoint on why (or even whether) the declines occurred.

(B) The author calls for environmental action in this passage, but does not specify whether this action would involve protecting amphibian habitats.

(C) The author does state that the extinction of an endangered species is not a surprise. However, the author does not apply this statement to amphibians, and in fact, the amphibian population decline is described as recent.

(D) The author states that chance events can lead to extinction. However, the author does not speculate on whether this is true in the case of the amphibians. It most likely is not, since the author claims that chance events can lead to extinction specifically in the case of endangered species, and does not state that the amphibians were previously endangered.

(E) CORRECT. The environmentalists mentioned in the first paragraph claim that the “amphibian crisis”…is an indicator of general and catastrophic environmental degradation due to human activity. However, the author states that declines can have multiple causes, and that in the case of the amphibians, there is too little data to distinguish between these causes.
_________________

"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Rules for posting in verbal forum | Please DO NOT post short answer in your post!

Kudos [?]: 1297 [0], given: 434

2 KUDOS received
Senior SC Moderator
User avatar
D
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1239

Kudos [?]: 1297 [2], given: 434

Location: Malaysia
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
OG2016-There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amph [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Sep 2017, 06:08
2
This post received
KUDOS
idkksh wrote:
Declines in amphibian populations

There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian populations and of extinctions of a number of the world's endangered amphibian species. These declines, if real, may be signs of a general trend toward extinction, and many environmentalists have claimed that immediate environmental action is necessary to remedy this "amphibian crisis", which, in their view, is an indicator of general and catastrophic environmental degradation due to human activity.

To evaluate these claims, it is useful to make a preliminary distinction that is far too often ignored. A declining population should not be confused with an endangered one. An endangered population is always rare, almost always small, and, by definition, under constant threat of extinction even without a proximate cause in human activities. Its disappearance, however unfortunate, should come as no great surprise. Moreover, chance events—which may indicate nothing about the direction of trends in population size—may lead to its extinction. The probability of extinction due to such random factors depends on the population size and is independent of the prevailing direction of change in that size.

For biologists, population declines are potentially more worrisome than extinctions. Persistent declines, especially in large populations, indicate a changed ecological context. Even here, distinctions must again be made among declines that are only apparent (in the sense that they are part of habitual cycles or of normal fluctuations), declines that take a population to some lower but still acceptable level, and those that threaten extinction (e.g., by taking the number of individuals below the minimum viable population). Anecdotal reports of population decreases cannot distinguish among these possibilities, and some amphibian populations have shown strong fluctuations in the past.

It is Indisputably true that there is simply not enough long-term scientific data on amphibian populations to enable researches to identify real declines in amphibian populations. Many fairly common amphibian species declared all but extinct after severe declines in the 1950s and 1960s have subsequently recovered, and so might the apparently declining populations that have generated the current appearance of an amphibian crisis. Unfortunately, long-term data will not soon be forthcoming, and postponing environmental action while we wait for it may doom species and whole ecosystems to extinction.
[Reveal] Spoiler:
C

6. Which of the following best describes the function of the sentence in lines 35-38 [Anecdotal reports of population decreases cannot distinguish among these possibilities, and some amphibian populations have shown strong fluctuations in the past.]?

(A) To give an example of a particular kind of study
(B) To cast doubt on an assertion made in the previous sentence
(C) To raise an objection to a view presented in the first paragraph
(D) To provide support for a view presented in the first paragraph
(E) To introduce an idea that will be countered in the following paragraph



Passage: Amphibian Populations

Question: Purpose

The Simple Story


According to reports, certain amphibian populations are undergoing drastic decline or even extinction. Environmentalists believe that these changes are due to human activity. The passage explains how to evaluate these claims. First, it draws a distinction between a declining population and an endangered population. Then, it explains that a decline may be worse than an extinction, but may also be harmless. Finally, it concludes that there is not enough data to determine whether the amphibian population is actually declining, and whether that decline represents a crisis. However, since there is limited data, and inaction could cause serious problems, the passage argues that people should still act to protect the amphibians.

Sample Passage Map

Here is one way to map this passage. (Note: abbreviate as desired!)

P1:

- Amph declines & extinctions: bad sign?
- Env.: action needed, declines caused by humans

P2:

- Evaluate env. Claims
- Decline doesn’t = endangered

P3:

- Declines worse than extinctions
- But, some declines are okay

P4:

- Limited data
- Don’t know if amphibians are really declining?
- But: should take action now anyways


Step 1: Identify the Question

The phrase function of the sentence in the question stem indicates that this is a Purpose question.

Step 2: Find the Support

Reread the sentence mentioned in the question stem and enough of the surrounding passage to provide context.

“Distinctions must again be made among declines that are only apparent…declines that take a population to some lower but still acceptable level, and those that threaten extinction. Anecdotal reports of population decreases cannot distinguish among these possibilities, and some amphibian populations have shown strong fluctuations in the past.”

The bolded sentence above is the sentence that the question stem refers to.

Step 3: Predict an Answer

The sentence describes being unable to distinguish among possibilities. The possibilities mentioned are the various possible scenarios in which a population declines. The author describes these multiple scenarios in order to express that the environmentalists’ worst-case scenario might or might not be correct: the population decline could be dangerous, but it could also be a random fluctuation. The function of this sentence is to summarize one possible reason that the environmentalists’ belief is too pessimistic.

Step 4: Eliminate and Find a Match

(A) The sentence addresses anecdotal reports, not studies.

(B) The previous sentence serves the same purpose as the sentence referenced in the question: to note that there are multiple possible scenarios under which a population could decline.

(C) CORRECT. This sentence raises an objection to the environmentalists’ view. The environmentalists believe that there is only one possible scenario in the case of the amphibians, that of a dangerous decline caused by human activity. The sentence claims that there are multiple different possible situations, only some of which are dangerous.

(D) In this sentence, the author disagrees with the environmentalists’ view by asserting that their analysis is not the only possible one.

(E) The following paragraph agrees with the sentiment of this sentence, which is that there is not enough data available to fully analyze the causes and extent of population declines.
_________________

"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Rules for posting in verbal forum | Please DO NOT post short answer in your post!

Kudos [?]: 1297 [2], given: 434

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 19 Oct 2012
Posts: 335

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 103

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V35
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V38
GPA: 3.81
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
CAT Tests
Re: OG2016-There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amph [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Oct 2017, 07:13
Time: 10:50mins. All correct. Let me know if someone is looking for detailed explanations regarding any question besides what is already covered in above posts.
_________________

Citius, Altius, Fortius

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 103

Manager
Manager
avatar
P
Joined: 17 May 2017
Posts: 146

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 226

GPA: 3
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: OG2016-There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amph [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Oct 2017, 23:23
TheMechanic

Explain 2
C vs D

also 6
B vs C

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 226

Re: OG2016-There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amph   [#permalink] 24 Oct 2017, 23:23
Display posts from previous: Sort by

OG2016-There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amph

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.