GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 18 Dec 2018, 07:58

Expecting Soon:

R1 Admission Decisions from McCombs - Join Chat Room for Latest Updates


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in December
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345
Open Detailed Calendar
  • Happy Christmas 20% Sale! Math Revolution All-In-One Products!

     December 20, 2018

     December 20, 2018

     10:00 PM PST

     11:00 PM PST

    This is the most inexpensive and attractive price in the market. Get the course now!
  • Key Strategies to Master GMAT SC

     December 22, 2018

     December 22, 2018

     07:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Attend this webinar to learn how to leverage Meaning and Logic to solve the most challenging Sentence Correction Questions.

Oil companies argue strenuously that no further restrictions should be

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 06 Sep 2018
Posts: 171
Location: Pakistan
Concentration: Finance, Operations
GPA: 2.87
WE: Engineering (Other)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Oil companies argue strenuously that no further restrictions should be  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Sep 2018, 07:09
1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

69% (01:32) correct 31% (18:33) wrong based on 150 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Oil companies argue strenuously that no further restrictions should be placed on offshore drilling due to our country’s need for energy resources, and the possible serious consequences if new energy reserves are not located and explored now. Of course, the vast sums of money the oil companies stand to reap as a result of these drilling efforts completely invalidates any such arguments.

The questionable pattern of reasoning above is most similar to which of the following?

(A) Everyone in town was wearing boots yesterday, and everyone in town was also carrying an umbrella. Based on this evidence it is obvious that wearing boots causes one to carry an umbrella.

(B) The owner of a local gas station claims to be losing money, but everyone knows that the oil industry is earning record profits, which undoubtedly proves that the gas station’s owner must be lying.

(C) The mayor has argued strenuously in favor of a government housing subsidy. Since such a move would benefit some town residents more than others, this plan should not be implemented.

(D) Although the board claims that their vote in favor of the merger is in the best interest of all shareholders, the fact that the merger will be most beneficial to the board’s members themselves shows that other shareholders should object to the board’s decision.

(E) The individual who cheated on yesterday’s test surely could have answered every question correctly. Mary answered every question on the test correctly, so she must have been the student who cheated.

_________________

Hitting Kudos is the best way of appreciation. :)

Eric Thomas, "When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe, then you'll be successful."

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 23 Jun 2012
Posts: 382
Location: Pakistan
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GPA: 3.76
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Oil companies argue strenuously that no further restrictions should be  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Sep 2018, 07:21
Its D
Oil companies argue no further restrictions on offshore drilling else serious consequences will be faced
But actually this drilling will have positive impact largely on Oil Companies so this argument isn't valid

Similarly Board members say merger will work for shareholders but actually it is beneficial for board of members so shareholders should object.

A is not relevant
C talks about benefit to some town members but not the mayor who claims so its not the parallel reasoning
E is wrong too
who cheated answer every question right, marry cheated so she must have cheated
B has same pattern of reasoning as E
_________________

Push yourself again and again. Don't give an inch until the final buzzer sounds. -Larry Bird
Success isn't something that just happens - success is learned, success is practiced and then it is shared. -Sparky Anderson
-S

SVP
SVP
User avatar
V
Status: Preparing GMAT
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 1933
Location: Pakistan
GPA: 3.39
Premium Member CAT Tests
Oil companies argue strenuously that no further restrictions should be  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Nov 2018, 00:53
HasnainAfxal wrote:
Oil companies argue strenuously that no further restrictions should be placed on offshore drilling due to our country’s need for energy resources, and the possible serious consequences if new energy reserves are not located and explored now. Of course, the vast sums of money the oil companies stand to reap as a result of these drilling efforts completely invalidates any such arguments.

The questionable pattern of reasoning above is most similar to which of the following?

(A) Everyone in town was wearing boots yesterday, and everyone in town was also carrying an umbrella. Based on this evidence it is obvious that wearing boots causes one to carry an umbrella.

(B) The owner of a local gas station claims to be losing money, but everyone knows that the oil industry is earning record profits, which undoubtedly proves that the gas station’s owner must be lying.

(C) The mayor has argued strenuously in favor of a government housing subsidy. Since such a move would benefit some town residents more than others, this plan should not be implemented.

(D) Although the board claims that their vote in favor of the merger is in the best interest of all shareholders, the fact that the merger will be most beneficial to the board’s members themselves shows that other shareholders should object to the board’s decision.

(E) The individual who cheated on yesterday’s test surely could have answered every question correctly. Mary answered every question on the test correctly, so she must have been the student who cheated.


Difficulty Level: 600

Official Explanation

The stimulus is followed by a Parallel Flaw question, which means that we need to find the answer choice which employs the same flawed reasoning. The correct answer in this case will likely reflect a similarly flawed assertion, that any conflicting incentives take away all credibility from an argument or decision.

Answer choice (A): The causal flaw represented here is different from that reflected in the stimulus. In this answer choice, the author mistakenly presumes a causal relationship where only a correlation has been shown. Clearly there is probably a third variable (such as the weather) that might cause one both to wear boots and to carry an umbrella.

Answer choice (B): Although this answer also deals with the oil industry, this choice reflects a flaw that is different from that found in the stimulus. The mistake here is in the presumption that a successful industry must mean success for everyone involved with that industry. What is true of the whole, in this case, is not necessarily true of each component part. Note also that answers that deal with the same topic as the stimulus tend to be incorrect.

Answer choice (C): The author of this answer asserts that a subsidy which benefits some more than others is not a good idea. The implication of this questionable argument is that such a subsidy would be justified only in cases where everyone benefits exactly equally. While this argument is indeed questionable, it does not reflect the same flaw as that found in the stimulus, so this answer choice should be eliminated.

Answer choice (D): This is the correct answer choice, displaying a similarly flawed line of reasoning based on a Source argument. The board members may benefit more than other shareholders from the merger approval, and that may provide some reason to scrutinize the board’s decision, but it still does not prove that the decision lacks all reasonable basis or should be rejected outright.

Answer choice (E): This choice is incorrect because the flaw represented here is the classic conditional flaw of Mistaken Reversal: Just because the cheater would have known all the answers, this obviously doesn’t mean that those who know all the answers are necessarily cheaters.

Hope it help
_________________

Final days of the GMAT Exam? => All GMAT Flashcards.
This Post Helps = Press +1 Kudos
Best of Luck on the GMAT!!

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 17 Sep 2016
Posts: 257
Re: Oil companies argue strenuously that no further restrictions should be  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Nov 2018, 05:09
Hi experts,

it is hard for me to understand the stimulus, I cannot understand what the stimulus says, let alone the structure,

Would you please help

Thanks in advance
Intern
Intern
avatar
S
Joined: 12 Dec 2017
Posts: 23
Location: India
Schools: Yale '19, GMBA '20, XLRI
GMAT 1: 660 Q46 V35
GPA: 3.8
Re: Oil companies argue strenuously that no further restrictions should be  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Dec 2018, 23:56
zoezhuyan wrote:
Hi experts,

it is hard for me to understand the stimulus, I cannot understand what the stimulus says, let alone the structure,

Would you please help

Thanks in advance


Oil companies argue strenuously that no further restrictions should be placed on offshore drilling due to our country’s need for energy resources, and the possible serious consequences if new energy reserves are not located and explored now. Of course, the vast sums of money the oil companies stand to reap as a result of these drilling efforts completely invalidates any such arguments.


The argument states the company's claim that restrictions on off shore drilling should be stopped because the country needs resources and there will be serious problems if restrictions are put. The conclusion basically points that these companies tend to incur huge profits from off shore drilling, so these companies' claims are invalidated. In other words these companies are disguising the actual motive (profit earning) under general benefits (country's benefits).


Only D has a similar line of reasoning.

KUDOS if the post helped! :angel:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 17 Sep 2016
Posts: 257
Re: Oil companies argue strenuously that no further restrictions should be  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Dec 2018, 06:47
kanakdaga wrote:
zoezhuyan wrote:
Hi experts,

it is hard for me to understand the stimulus, I cannot understand what the stimulus says, let alone the structure,

Would you please help

Thanks in advance


Oil companies argue strenuously that no further restrictions should be placed on offshore drilling due to our country’s need for energy resources, and the possible serious consequences if new energy reserves are not located and explored now. Of course, the vast sums of money the oil companies stand to reap as a result of these drilling efforts completely invalidates any such arguments.


The argument states the company's claim that restrictions on off shore drilling should be stopped because the country needs resources and there will be serious problems if restrictions are put. The conclusion basically points that these companies tend to incur huge profits from off shore drilling, so these companies' claims are invalidated. In other words these companies are disguising the actual motive (profit earning) under general benefits (country's benefits).


Only D has a similar line of reasoning.

KUDOS if the post helped! :angel:



thanks so much kanakdaga
I got what I missed, I thought the claim and the conclusion are both from the author. then i total confused the logic of the argument.

Have a nice day
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Oil companies argue strenuously that no further restrictions should be &nbs [#permalink] 18 Dec 2018, 06:47
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Oil companies argue strenuously that no further restrictions should be

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.