Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

On a certain sight-seeing tour, the ratio of the number of [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Aug 2008, 01:09

2

This post received KUDOS

31

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

68% (01:41) correct
32% (00:45) wrong based on 1376 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

On a certain sight-seeing tour, the ratio of the number of women to the number of children was 5 to 2. What was the number of men on the sight-seeing tour?

(1) On the sight-seeing tour, the ratio of the number of children to the number of men was 5 to 11. (2) The number of women on the sight-seeing tour was less than 30.

On a certain sight-seeing tour, the ratio of the number of women to the number of children was 5 to 2. What was the number of men on the sight-seeing tour?

(1) On the sight-seeing tour, the ratio of the number of chilren to the number of men was 5 to 11. (2) The number of women on the sight-seeing tour was less than 30.

Thanks!

C.

w:c = 5:2

1) c:m = 5:11

w:c:m = 25:10:22

But this does not give us exact number of men

2) this itself does not tell anything about number of men.

Toegther, since number of women is less than 30 and since the number of ppl will always be an integer and also that 25:10:22 can not be reduced further => there will be 25 women => there will be 22 men. thus suff

could someone explain this differently please
_________________

But there’s something in me that just keeps going on. I think it has something to do with tomorrow, that there is always one, and that everything can change when it comes. http://aimingformba.blogspot.com

On a certain sight-seeing tour, the ratio of the number of women to the number of children was 5 to 2. What was the number of men on the sight-seeing tour?

Given: \(\frac{w}{c}=\frac{5}{2}\) --> \(w=5x\) and \(c=2x\) for some integer \(x\). Q: \(m=?\)

(1) on the sight-seeing tour, the ratio of the number of children to the number of men was 5 to 11 --> \(\frac{c}{m}=\frac{5}{11}\) --> \(c=5y\) and \(m=11y\), for some integer \(y\). Not sufficient to calculate \(m\).

(2) the number of women on the sight-seeing tour was less than 30 --> \(w<30\). Not sufficient to calculate \(m\).

(1)+(2) \(w=5x<30\) --> \(x<6\). \(c=2x\) and as \(c=5y\), \(c\) is a multiple of 5 --> \(x=5\) --> \(c=10=5y\) --> \(y=2\) --> \(m=11y=22\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

OR: \(\frac{\frac{w}{c}}{m}=\frac{\frac{25}{10}}{22}\) --> \(\frac{w}{m}=\frac{25}{22}\) and as \(w<30\), then \(w=25\) because for other values of \(w<30\), \(m\) (and \(c\)) are not integers --> \(m=22\).

My answer is C from 1 statement we can find out the whole ratio W to Child and Men alone insuf because we need not ratio but number from statement 2 alone we dn't get anything

1 and 2 together do the job!My approuch to DS may be wrong but why to solve further if you already know that from 1 and 2 we can figure out the answer!IMHO

Further calculations may be needed because the lowest number of women needed to satisfy the ratio may be > 30, in which case the answer would've been E. So just changing the ratios a bit can change the answer.

Another specific way of answering: Given w/c= 5/2, c = 2/5(w) (1) c/m = 5/11, m = 11/5(c) insufficient (2) w < 30, no information about men, insufficient.

Considering C: m = 11/5c = 11/5 * 2/5(w) = 22/25(w) and w < 30 here only 25 is a multiple of 25. so w = 5 = 22 Ans. C.
_________________

Another specific way of answering: Given w/c= 5/2, c = 2/5(w) (1) c/m = 5/11, m = 11/5(c) insufficient (2) w < 30, no information about men, insufficient.

Considering C: m = 11/5c = 11/5 * 2/5(w) = 22/25(w) and w < 30 here only 25 is a multiple of 25. so w = 5 = 22 Ans. C.

Hi

Sorry I got a bit lost in the logic. Also, i completely do understand the significance of the sentence below in this Q

2. The number of women on the sightseeing tour was less than 30.

Would appreciate your help.

I get how m = 22/25(w)

but then you have mentioned only 25 is a multiple of 25. so w = 5. If we replace 5 with w in this eq -> m = 22/25(w) then m would be 22/5 and not 22? Did you mean to say w = 25 (and mistyped 5)?

Re: On a certain sightseeing tour, the ratio of the number of [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Jan 2012, 16:24

This is how I solved it :

Given - W/C = 5/2

From statement 1 we get C/M = 5/11

with this we can get W/M = 25/22

Since we dont the number it wont help so insiffucient.

Statement 2 - we get Women less than 30. wont help So insufficnet.

Combining.

We know that W/M = 25/22 and women # is less that 30 it will be possible only if men are 22 in number based on the ratio we derived from statement 1. so answer C

Re: On a certain sight-seeing tour, the ratio of the number of [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Jun 2014, 18:16

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Brunel, why can the number not of women not be 0. 25x:10x:22x with x=0 both statements would still told true.

That's not true. If x=0, then w = m = c = 0. But in this case none of the ratios given is true because 0/0 is undefined and not 5:2 or 5:11.
_________________

Re: On a certain sight-seeing tour, the ratio of the number of [#permalink]

Show Tags

19 Oct 2014, 03:29

One small doubt regarding this. When it says that the number of women is less than 30, wouldn't 0 be a valid scenario? In that case number of men would be 0 too .. so it could either be 22 men or 0 men.

Hence option E.

I know 0 sounds a bit illogical but in mathematical terms, it is possible I guess. Please advise.

One small doubt regarding this. When it says that the number of women is less than 30, wouldn't 0 be a valid scenario? In that case number of men would be 0 too .. so it could either be 22 men or 0 men.

Hence option E.

I know 0 sounds a bit illogical but in mathematical terms, it is possible I guess. Please advise.

Re: On a certain sight-seeing tour, the ratio of the number of [#permalink]

Show Tags

27 Sep 2015, 20:37

I got this question wrong because based on the givens, the number of women could have been 5, 10, 15 or any number under 30, which would leave to an indeterminate amount of children and further an indeterminate amount of men.

An answer choice of C is based on an assumption that was not specified in the question. Must we always make assumptions like this? This is frustrating. Sometimes I think the language on some of these questions is a little too vague (not necessarily saying that is true of this one).

Re: On a certain sight-seeing tour, the ratio of the number of [#permalink]

Show Tags

02 Oct 2016, 07:42

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Re: On a certain sight-seeing tour, the ratio of the number of [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 May 2017, 05:27

On a certain sight-seeing tour, the ratio of the number of women to the number of children was 5 to 2. What was the number of men on the sight-seeing tour?

(1) On the sight-seeing tour, the ratio of the number of children to the number of men was 5 to 11. (2) The number of women on the sight-seeing tour was less than 30.

Solution: Given: W/C = 5/2 Asked: M = ? Make sure to mark your AD/BCE

Considering statement (1) alone: C/M = 5/11 This statement does mention something about M, but just provides a ratio. A ration by itself is not sufficient to provide the actual number. But, you can now get a relation between W and C. (W/C) * (C/M) = (5/2)*(5/11) => W/M = 25/22 So, you get that M is a multiple of 22, but doesn't help to get to the real value. INSUFFICIENT. Eliminate AD.

Considering Statement (2) alone: W < 30 Doesn't even talk about M. INSUFFICIENT. Eliminate B.

Considering both the statements together: W/M = 25/22 and W < 30

You know that W is a multiple of 25 and it has to be less than 30. The only value that satisfies the two conditions is 25. If W = 25, then M = 22

There’s something in Pacific North West that you cannot find anywhere else. The atmosphere and scenic nature are next to none, with mountains on one side and ocean on...

This month I got selected by Stanford GSB to be included in “Best & Brightest, Class of 2017” by Poets & Quants. Besides feeling honored for being part of...

Joe Navarro is an ex FBI agent who was a founding member of the FBI’s Behavioural Analysis Program. He was a body language expert who he used his ability to successfully...