GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

 It is currently 24 May 2020, 19:03

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

On an aerial photograph, the surface of a pond appears as

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 22 Jun 2010
Posts: 24
On an aerial photograph, the surface of a pond appears as  [#permalink]

Show Tags

Updated on: 20 May 2012, 11:17
4
13
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

67% (02:03) correct 33% (02:03) wrong based on 266 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

On an aerial photograph, the surface of a pond appears as circular region of radius 7/16 inch. If a distance of 1 inch on the photograph corresponds to an actual distance of 2 miles, which of the following is the closest estimate of the actual surface area of the pond, in square miles?

A. 1.3
B. 2.4
C. 3.0
D. 3.8
E. 5.0

Originally posted by mehdiov on 07 Sep 2010, 14:13.
Last edited by Bunuel on 20 May 2012, 11:17, edited 1 time in total.
Edited the question and added the OA
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 64068

Show Tags

07 Sep 2010, 14:31
5
6
mehdiov please post the questions in their original form and provide answer choice with them.

On an aerial photograph, the surface of a pond appears as circular region of radius 7/16 inch. If a distance of 1 inch on the photograph corresponds to an actual distance of 2 miles, which of the following is the closest estimate of the actual surface area of the pond, in square miles?

A. 1.3
B. 2.4
C. 3.0
D. 3.8
E. 5.0

As 1 inch = 2 miles, then 7/16 inches = 2*7/16 = 7/8 miles. So actual radius is 7/8 miles. $$Area=\pi{r^2}\approx{\frac{22}{7}*\frac{49}{64}}\approx{2.4}$$ (as we are asked about the approximate value we can take $$\pi\approx{\frac{22}{7}}$$).

_________________
General Discussion
Intern
Joined: 22 Jun 2010
Posts: 24

Show Tags

07 Sep 2010, 14:35
Bunuel wrote:
mehdiov please post the questions in their original form and provide answer choice with them.

On an aerial photograph, the surface of a pond appears as circular region of radius 7/16 inch. If a distance of 1 inch on the photograph corresponds to an actual distance of 2 miles, which of the following is the closest estimate of the actual surface area of the pond, in square miles?

A. 1.3
B. 2.4
C. 3.0
D. 3.8
E. 5.0

As 1 inch = 2 miles, then 7/16 inches = 2*7/16 = 7/8 miles. So actual radius is 7/8 miles. $$Area=\pi{r^2}\approx{\frac{3.14*49}{64}}\approx{2.4}$$.

thanks. appoligies for that
Intern
Joined: 06 Apr 2017
Posts: 28
Location: United States (OR)
Schools: Haas EWMBA '21
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V44
GMAT 2: 730 Q49 V40
GPA: 3.98
WE: Corporate Finance (Health Care)
Re: On an aerial photograph, the surface of a pond appears as  [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Aug 2017, 11:42
1
Why doesn't converting the area to square inches and then converting from inches to miles work?

$$(\frac{7}{16})^2=\frac{49}{256}$$
$$\frac{49}{256}*\frac{22}{7}=\frac{77}{128}$$
$$\frac{77}{12}*2\approx1.2$$

I chose 1.3 because it's the closest answer, but obviously the conversion to miles needs to happen before calculating the area. Why does this matter, and is there a decent framework to do conversions of this sort that involve squaring and cubing? This seems to pop up often, and I find it slightly confusing. Thanks!

SR
Current Student
Joined: 09 Oct 2016
Posts: 85
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.49
Re: On an aerial photograph, the surface of a pond appears as  [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Aug 2017, 04:55
I chose 1.3miles as well but I think they key word here is "square miles". That's the indicator that you need to convert before using the area formula
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Posts: 3844
On an aerial photograph, the surface of a pond appears as  [#permalink]

Show Tags

31 Aug 2017, 12:17
2
1
spence11 wrote:
Why doesn't converting the area to square inches and then converting from inches to miles work?

$$(\frac{7}{16})^2=\frac{49}{256}$$
$$\frac{49}{256}*\frac{22}{7}=\frac{77}{128}$$
$$\frac{77}{12}*2\approx1.2$$

I chose 1.3 because it's the closest answer, but obviously the conversion to miles needs to happen before calculating the area. Why does this matter, and is there a decent framework to do conversions of this sort that involve squaring and cubing? This seems to pop up often, and I find it slightly confusing. Thanks!

SR

spence11 , these problems can be confusing. We have a "scale factor" issue, as you note.

In one sense, however, when scaling up or down, linear change is one kind of step (ONE change in one length), and area change is a different kind of step (TWO changes, one for each length).

"...converting finding the area to in square inches and then converting from inches to miles [does not] work" because you are not converting from inches to miles.

You need to convert square inches (in the area you found for the pond on the photo) to square miles.

The scale factor here is
(2 miles: 1 inch) = 2

When converting an area, you have to use the scale factor, $$k$$, twice.

Area conversion requires $$k^2$$ because
-- the area of any two dimensional figure, circles included, is (length times length)

To convert area using the change from one linear unit to another (distance in inches -> distance in miles) ...
what you do to one length (scale it up), you must do to the other.

And to calculate area, we use two lengths. You converted only one of the two lengths.

You chose the correct scale factor of 2. But you need to multiply the area you found by $$k^2=2^2=4$$.
You are short one factor of $$k$$. Close!

($$\frac{77}{128}$$ * 4) = $$\frac{77}{32}$$ = 2.4 (sq mi - see below)

Here is one way to look at it:

$$\frac{1in}{2mi}$$ -- those are one-dimensional lengths. Lines.

Convert them to two-dimensional areas by squaring the number and the unit:

(1 in)$$^2$$ = (1 in)*(1 in) = 1 sq. inch, or 1 in$$^2$$

(2 mi)$$^2$$ = (2 mi)(2 mi) = 4 square miles, or 4mi$$^2$$

Below, area in square inches is converted to area in square miles.
Square inches cancel, leaving square miles as the desired result, but only because I multiply the original area by the scale factor twice:

$$\frac{77}{128}(in*in)$$ * $$\frac{2mi}{1in}$$ * $$\frac{2mi}{1in}$$ = $$\frac{77}{32}$$(mi*mi) =

2.4 miles$$^2$$

So for any conversion from area to area: if you find the original area in small units, multiply that area by the scale factor squared to get the larger actual area.

Bunuel sidestepped the whole issue by
-- multiplying one length (radius in inches) by one scale factor (2) to get [another] one length: the radius in miles.
Then he found the area in square miles with normal calculations for a circle's area.

Length: multiply by one scale factor $$k$$

Area = length * length, so multiply by two scale factors $$k^2$$

Volume: multiply by three scale factors $$k^3$$ (b/c V = L * L * L)

It depends on the problem, but often it is easier to convert one length of the smaller figure to one length of the larger figure (here, radius), and then calculate area or volume.
If you do it that way, you only deal with the scale factor once: length --> length.

Hope that helps.
_________________
Visit SC Butler, here! Get two SC questions to practice, whose links you can find by date.

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. -- Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
Target Test Prep Representative
Status: Head GMAT Instructor
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Joined: 04 Mar 2011
Posts: 2799
Re: On an aerial photograph, the surface of a pond appears as  [#permalink]

Show Tags

02 Sep 2017, 06:09
1
mehdiov wrote:
On an aerial photograph, the surface of a pond appears as circular region of radius 7/16 inch. If a distance of 1 inch on the photograph corresponds to an actual distance of 2 miles, which of the following is the closest estimate of the actual surface area of the pond, in square miles?

A. 1.3
B. 2.4
C. 3.0
D. 3.8
E. 5.0

We can create a proportion in which n is the radius of the pond in miles:

1/2 = (7/16)/n

n = 2(7/16)

n = 7/8

Thus, the area of the pond is (7/8)^2 x π. Recall that the fractional approximation of π is 22/7. Thus, we have:

(7/8)^2 x π ≈ 49/64 x 22/7 = 7/32 x 11/1 = 77/32 = 2 13/32 ≈ 2 12/30 = 2 2/5 = 2.4

_________________

Jeffrey Miller

Head of GMAT Instruction

Jeff@TargetTestPrep.com
202 Reviews

5-star rated online GMAT quant
self study course

See why Target Test Prep is the top rated GMAT quant course on GMAT Club. Read Our Reviews

If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Kudos" button.

Manager
Joined: 30 Jul 2014
Posts: 103
GPA: 3.72
Re: On an aerial photograph, the surface of a pond appears as  [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Sep 2017, 04:56
Did a very silly calculation mistake -> 8*4 = 64
How to avoid such careless mistakes?
_________________
A lot needs to be learned from all of you.
Manager
Joined: 26 Apr 2019
Posts: 147
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 700 Q49 V36
GMAT 3: 720 Q50 V37
GPA: 3.99
Re: On an aerial photograph, the surface of a pond appears as  [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Mar 2020, 07:09
first convert 7/16 inch into miles by multiplying with 2 then find surface are of pond using formula pie r^2
Re: On an aerial photograph, the surface of a pond appears as   [#permalink] 15 Mar 2020, 07:09

On an aerial photograph, the surface of a pond appears as

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne