It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 14:39

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# On average, residents of City X devote a greater percentage of their y

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

CEO
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2554

Kudos [?]: 516 [0], given: 0

On average, residents of City X devote a greater percentage of their y [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Sep 2007, 19:07
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

73% (01:18) correct 27% (01:29) wrong based on 273 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

On average, residents of City X devote a greater percentage of their yearly incomes to housing costs than do residents of City Y, though the costs of insurance and fuel generally are exorbitant in both commuter-heavy cities. Yet in Wealth Magazine's annual list of the country's least affordable cities, City Y is deemed less affordable than City X.

Which of the following, if true, best explains the contrast described above?

(A) A greater percentage of residents of City Y send their children to private schools than is the case in City X.

(B) Unlike City Y, City X has an efficient and inexpensive public transportation system.

(C) The average price of a new house is higher in City X than in City Y.

(D) A number of high-priced restaurants and boutiques have recently opened in City Y.

(E) Several large businesses have recently relocated from City Y to City X.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 516 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 04 Sep 2007
Posts: 210

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Re: On average, residents of City X devote a greater percentage of their y [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Sep 2007, 20:48
My answer would be choice B. The critical element in the passage both commuter-heavy cities implies that residents spent money on transportation, a key element of surveys. Choice B implies that residents of City X have more public transportation choices, which tend to be cheaper, thus making it more affordable. Whereas in the case of City Y, the implied inefficiency of the public transportation could push commuters to use their automobiles often, leading to higher gas expenditures.

I know what I came up with definitely qualify for a wild reasoning but I think it is still valid given the circumstances explained the problem. Let me know if this logic is correct.

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 07 Aug 2005
Posts: 124

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: On average, residents of City X devote a greater percentage of their y [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Sep 2007, 21:05
GMATBLACKBELT wrote:
On average, residents of City X devote a greater percentage of their yearly incomes to housing costs than do residents of City Y, though the costs of insurance and fuel generally are exorbitant in both commuter-heavy cities. Yet in Wealth Magazine's annual list of the country's least affordable cities, City Y is deemed less affordable than City X.

Which of the following, if true, best explains the contrast described above?

A. A greater percentage of residents of City Y send their children to private schools than is the case in City X.

B. Unlike City Y, City X has an efficient and inexpensive public transportation system.

C. The average price of a new house is higher in City X than in City Y.

D. A number of high-priced restaurants and boutiques have recently opened in City Y.

E. Several large businesses have recently relocated from City Y to City X.

A, D and E - Out of scope.
C - weakens the conclusion
B - Cost of fuel and insurance is exorbitant in both the cities. Public transportation of city Y is inefficient and expensive, so people either use expensive public transportation or spend more on fuel.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1434

Kudos [?]: 350 [0], given: 0

Re: On average, residents of City X devote a greater percentage of their y [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Sep 2007, 21:16
GMATBLACKBELT wrote:
On average, residents of City X devote a greater percentage of their yearly incomes to housing costs than do residents of City Y, though the costs of insurance and fuel generally are exorbitant in both commuter-heavy cities. Yet in Wealth Magazine's annual list of the country's least affordable cities, City Y is deemed less affordable than City X.

Which of the following, if true, best explains the contrast described above?

A. A greater percentage of residents of City Y send their children to private schools than is the case in City X.

B. Unlike City Y, City X has an efficient and inexpensive public transportation system.

C. The average price of a new house is higher in City X than in City Y.

D. A number of high-priced restaurants and boutiques have recently opened in City Y.

E. Several large businesses have recently relocated from City Y to City X.

B is best.
Transportation cost makes city Y less affordable.

Kudos [?]: 350 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2554

Kudos [?]: 516 [0], given: 0

Re: On average, residents of City X devote a greater percentage of their y [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Sep 2007, 21:36

I just didn't see this one when I was taking the test. I hate time pressure >:-X

Kudos [?]: 516 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 867

Kudos [?]: 265 [0], given: 7

Schools: University of Chicago, Wharton School
Re: On average, residents of City X devote a greater percentage of their y [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Sep 2007, 22:24
GMATBLACKBELT wrote:
On average, residents of City X devote a greater percentage of their yearly incomes to housing costs than do residents of City Y, though the costs of insurance and fuel generally are exorbitant in both commuter-heavy cities. Yet in Wealth Magazine's annual list of the country's least affordable cities, City Y is deemed less affordable than City X.

Which of the following, if true, best explains the contrast described above?

A. A greater percentage of residents of City Y send their children to private schools than is the case in City X.
B. Unlike City Y, City X has an efficient and inexpensive public transportation system.
C. The average price of a new house is higher in City X than in City Y.
D. A number of high-priced restaurants and boutiques have recently opened in City Y.
E. Several large businesses have recently relocated from City Y to City X.

I agree with B but E could also explain the parodox. if x has several large business companies, then it has higher purchasing power than city y so x can afford the housing as compared to y.

Kudos [?]: 265 [0], given: 7

Manager
Joined: 01 Aug 2007
Posts: 73

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Re: On average, residents of City X devote a greater percentage of their y [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Sep 2007, 10:06
GMATBLACKBELT wrote:
Fistail wrote:
GMATBLACKBELT wrote:
On average, residents of City X devote a greater percentage of their yearly incomes to housing costs than do residents of City Y, though the costs of insurance and fuel generally are exorbitant in both commuter-heavy cities. Yet in Wealth Magazine's annual list of the country's least affordable cities, City Y is deemed less affordable than City X.

Which of the following, if true, best explains the contrast described above?

A. A greater percentage of residents of City Y send their children to private schools than is the case in City X.
B. Unlike City Y, City X has an efficient and inexpensive public transportation system.
C. The average price of a new house is higher in City X than in City Y.
D. A number of high-priced restaurants and boutiques have recently opened in City Y.
E. Several large businesses have recently relocated from City Y to City X.

I agree with B but E could also explain the parodox. if x has several large business companies, then it has higher purchasing power than city y so x can afford the housing as compared to y.

This is what I thought, but owell.

But this option "E" uses wide assumptions which r not mentioned in argument above. I think one has to add his own asumption for purchasing power reasoning. Any takers pls??

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Status: D-Day is on February 10th. and I am not stressed
Affiliations: American Management association, American Association of financial accountants
Joined: 12 Apr 2011
Posts: 255

Kudos [?]: 359 [0], given: 52

Location: Kuwait
Schools: Columbia university
Re: On average, residents of City X devote a greater percentage of their y [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2011, 12:54
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
On average, residents of City X devote a greater percentage of their yearly incomes to housing costs than do residents of City Y, though the costs of insurance and fuel generally are exorbitant in both commuter-heavy cities. Yet in Wealth Magazine's annual list of the country's least affordable cities, City Y is deemed less affordable than City X.

Which of the following, if true, best explains the contrast described above?

a)A greater percentage of residents of City Y send their children to private schools than is the case in City X.
b)Unlike City Y, City X has an efficient and inexpensive public transportation system.
c)The average price of a new house is higher in City X than in City Y.
d)A number of high-priced restaurants and boutiques have recently opened in City Y.
e)Several large businesses have recently relocated from City Y to City X.
_________________

Sky is the limit

Kudos [?]: 359 [0], given: 52

Manager
Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Posts: 74

Kudos [?]: 11 [1], given: 96

Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Human Resources
GPA: 3.33
WE: Consulting (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: On average, residents of City X devote a greater percentage of their y [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Nov 2011, 19:48
1
KUDOS
situation :
House Price X > Y
Fuel and Insurance cost X = Y
Total Living cost X < Y
both cities are commuter-heavy
so, public transport of city X is a logical and related explanation

Kudos [?]: 11 [1], given: 96

VP
Status: Far, far away!
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 1120

Kudos [?]: 2327 [1], given: 219

Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Re: On average, residents of City X devote a greater percentage of their y [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jun 2013, 01:50
1
KUDOS
fozzzy wrote:
Can someone explain this one stuck between A and B...

On average, residents of City X devote a greater percentage of their yearly incomes to housing costs than do residents of City Y, though the costs of insurance and fuel generally are exorbitant in both commuter-heavy cities. Yet in Wealth Magazine's annual list of the country's least affordable cities, City Y is deemed less affordable than City X.

Which of the following, if true, best explains the contrast described above?

A. A greater percentage of residents of City Y send their children to private schools than is the case in City X.
B. Unlike City Y, City X has an efficient and inexpensive public transportation system.

The conclusion talks about "least affordable cities", and the passage says that the cost of fuel is exorbitant in both cities.

With B, we can conclude that X's residents can avoid fuel expenses by taking their transportation system, which is also cheap (so will not increase their taxes for example).

In A, even if more parents of Y send their childern to private school, this does not mean that the city is less affordable then X. Paying more for provate school is a choice and does not affect the overall "level of affordability" of the city. The affordability of a city must reflect the expenses necessary to live in that city, not the expenses that each one makes "above" that level.

Hope that what I mean is clear
_________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Kant , Critique of Pure Reason

Tips and tricks: Inequalities , Mixture | Review: MGMAT workshop
Strategy: SmartGMAT v1.0 | Questions: Verbal challenge SC I-II- CR New SC set out !! , My Quant

Rules for Posting in the Verbal Forum - Rules for Posting in the Quant Forum[/size][/color][/b]

Kudos [?]: 2327 [1], given: 219

MBA Section Director
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4484

Kudos [?]: 17028 [0], given: 1963

Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: On average, residents of City X devote a greater percentage of their y [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Mar 2015, 20:38
This question is part of the GMAT Club Critical Reasoning : Paradox Revision Project.

On average, residents of City X devote a greater percentage of their yearly incomes to housing costs than do residents of City Y, though the costs of insurance and fuel generally are exorbitant in both commuter-heavy cities. Yet in Wealth Magazine’s annual list of the country’s least affordable cities, City Y is deemed less affordable than City X. Which of the following, if true, best explains the contrast described above?

A. A greater percentage of residents of City Y send their children to private schools than is the case in City X.

B. Unlike City Y, City X has an efficient and inexpensive public transportation system.

C. The average price of a new house is higher in City X than in City Y.

D. A number of high-priced restaurants and boutiques have recently opened in City Y.

E. Several large businesses have recently relocated from City Y to City X.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 17028 [0], given: 1963

Manager
Joined: 25 Mar 2014
Posts: 167

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 48

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GMAT Date: 05-10-2015
GPA: 3.51
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Re: On average, residents of City X devote a greater percentage of their y [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Mar 2015, 22:43
Situation: Despite the fact that people of city X pay greater percent of their income for housing, City Y is more expensive than X.
A city does not become expensive only because of costly housing; there are other parameters too. Option B correctly mentions other parameters which makes City X less expensive.
_________________

Please give Kudos to the post if you liked.

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 48

Intern
Joined: 08 Feb 2015
Posts: 25

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 244

Re: On average, residents of City X devote a greater percentage of their y [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Mar 2015, 06:40
Torn between C or B.
B makes more sense because it states that City Y is less affordable than X. Beside this can reconcile the contrast with the fact that fuel are exorbitant (could it be that City Y is spending more on the transportation?)
C is opposite with what the premise given which makes City Y NOT less affordable than X...

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 244

Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 4981

Kudos [?]: 5486 [0], given: 112

Re: On average, residents of City X devote a greater percentage of their y [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Mar 2015, 06:56
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
antztheman wrote:
Torn between C or B.
B makes more sense because it states that City Y is less affordable than X. Beside this can reconcile the contrast with the fact that fuel are exorbitant (could it be that City Y is spending more on the transportation?)
C is opposite with what the premise given which makes City Y NOT less affordable than X...

hi antztheman,
you are correct both give something to tell us one being more affordable than the other, but both say opposite of each other...
lets see the options..

B. Unlike City Y, City X has an efficient and inexpensive public transportation system...
here it tells us that city x is more affordable than city Y and this is what question asks us...

C. The average price of a new house is higher in City X than in City Y.. this makes city Y more affordable , which is opposite of what is asked...
_________________

Absolute modulus :http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolute-modulus-a-better-understanding-210849.html#p1622372
Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html

Kudos [?]: 5486 [0], given: 112

Intern
Joined: 18 Sep 2015
Posts: 4

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: On average, residents of City X devote a greater percentage of their y [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2015, 11:45
Fistail wrote:
GMATBLACKBELT wrote:
On average, residents of City X devote a greater percentage of their yearly incomes to housing costs than do residents of City Y, though the costs of insurance and fuel generally are exorbitant in both commuter-heavy cities. Yet in Wealth Magazine's annual list of the country's least affordable cities, City Y is deemed less affordable than City X.

Which of the following, if true, best explains the contrast described above?

A. A greater percentage of residents of City Y send their children to private schools than is the case in City X.
B. Unlike City Y, City X has an efficient and inexpensive public transportation system.
C. The average price of a new house is higher in City X than in City Y.
D. A number of high-priced restaurants and boutiques have recently opened in City Y.
E. Several large businesses have recently relocated from City Y to City X.

I agree with B but E could also explain the parodox. if x has several large business companies, then it has higher purchasing power than city y so x can afford the housing as compared to y.

correct: option B
A) out of scope... private school is not discussed in the argument...Hence wrong
B) Fuel costs in both cities are high and city X uses it efficiently and hence making it more affordable by decreasing the cost. Correct Answer
C) This is not explaining rather weakening the argument. Hence wrong
D) Restaurants and boutiques have no relation with the argument. Moreover, it is Wealth Magazine's annual list, and Restaurants and boutiques have recently opened. So, its anyway won't explain the paradox with recently while it covers for entire year. Hence wrong
E) It is similar to option D. It is Wealth Magazine's annual list, and large businesses have recently relocated. So, its anyway won't explain the paradox with recently while it covers for entire year. Hence wrong

Kudos if it helped you

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Verbal Expert
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3157

Kudos [?]: 3304 [1], given: 22

Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Re: On average, residents of City X devote a greater percentage of their y [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2016, 14:01
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
meetmba91 wrote:
Why is option D not correct?? Restaurants and Boutiques will make the overall living costs higher..

1. On average, residents of City X devote a greater percentage of their yearly incomes to housing costs than do residents of City Y, though the costs of insurance and fuel generally are exorbitant in both commuter-heavy cities.

2. Yet in Wealth Magazine’s annual list of the country’s least affordable cities, City Y is deemed less affordable than City X.

Option D only states a different reason for the statement 2, but it does not relate statement 1 to statement 2. Option B establishes the relation better by relating the high "fuel" cost mentioned in statement 1 to less fuel usage in city X (because of efficient and inexpensive public transport).

(Moreover expensive restaurants and boutiques are results of high expenditures rather the cause. They do not imply that there are not enough affordable restaurants or boutiques in a city.)

Kudos [?]: 3304 [1], given: 22

Director
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 899

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 865

Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Re: On average, residents of City X devote a greater percentage of their y [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Apr 2017, 17:53
aniteshgmat1101 wrote:
Situation: Despite the fact that people of city X pay greater percent of their income for housing, City Y is more expensive than X.
A city does not become expensive only because of costly housing; there are other parameters too. Option B correctly mentions other parameters which makes City X less expensive.

if so, my question is when we should include the parameters, and 1 parameter is enough to justify the answer?

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 865

Director
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 899

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 865

Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Re: On average, residents of City X devote a greater percentage of their y [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Sep 2017, 20:03
Using POE => B is correct.
Surprisingly, although this question is relating to percentage and numbers, the right answer just concerns with something else.

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 865

Re: On average, residents of City X devote a greater percentage of their y   [#permalink] 08 Sep 2017, 20:03
Display posts from previous: Sort by