Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 03:31 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 03:31

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Director
Director
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 778
Own Kudos [?]: 396 [0]
Given Kudos: 2198
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 Oct 2020
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 118
Send PM
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Sep 2021
Posts: 53
Own Kudos [?]: 101 [3]
Given Kudos: 9
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V49
GMAT 2: 790 Q51 V50 (Online)
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 15 Aug 2020
Posts: 30
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 15
Send PM
Re: One of Ronald Reagans first acts as President was to rescind Presiden [#permalink]
thangvietnam wrote:
I summarize.

prohibit+that-clause is wrong. choice d is wrong
"prohibit somebody from doing " is idiomatic. choice a is wrong. we dont need to know that "prohibit X from doing" require X is person.
"directive +that clause" require subjuctive, so, choice e is wrong

one more thing

"directive+that-clause" make "that-clause' a content clause. that-clause as content clause goes with relatively a few noun. most nouns with go with relative clause or doing. so, we have reason to suspect that " directive + that-clause" is wrong.

content that-clause reports a proposition. this mean we need an idea with subject and verb after noun. if the noun is subject of action, we dont use content that-clause.

here , "directive" prohibit and is subject of "prohibit'. so , "directive prohibiting" is correct.

if we use "directive that the chemical be prohibited from being sold" . we dont know what prohibit . the correct meaning is that the directive prohibit but not other thing prohibit. so, "directive that..." is wrong in choice E.


Not sure what are you mumbling. They just dont make sense to me
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Oct 2021
Posts: 29
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [0]
Given Kudos: 38
Send PM
Re: One of Ronald Reagans first acts as President was to rescind Presiden [#permalink]
I have a question regarding the usage of subjunctive. I know that it was normally used with bossy verb such as require, demand, suggest etc. However, in this case, that bossy verb appears in form of noun (directive). The question is "Shouldn't we use subjunctive mood on this as well?"
Director
Director
Joined: 16 Jul 2019
Posts: 524
Own Kudos [?]: 197 [0]
Given Kudos: 146
Send PM
Re: One of Ronald Reagans first acts as President was to rescind Presiden [#permalink]
KarishmaB GMATNinja

Pls explain Option A, C, D in detail.

What is the difference in sunjunctive format "directive" vs "directed"?

How can option A & D be corrected?

TanyaJ
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14822
Own Kudos [?]: 64907 [2]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: One of Ronald Reagans first acts as President was to rescind Presiden [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
bmwhype2 wrote:
One of Ronald Reagan’s first acts as President was to rescind President Carter’s directive that any chemical banned on medical grounds in the United States be prohibited from sale to other countries.


(A) that any chemical banned on medical grounds in the United States be prohibited from sale to other countries

(B) that any chemical be prohibited from sale to other countries that was banned on medical grounds in the United States

(C) prohibiting the sale to other countries of any chemical banned on medical grounds in the United States

(D) prohibiting that any chemical banned on medical grounds in the United States is sold to other countries

(E) that any chemical banned in the United States on medical grounds is prohibited from being sold to other countries



The verb 'prohibit' is used to prohibit an action or a person from doing an action.

Smoking is prohibited in this country.
The policy prohibits the residents from doing X.

Simplifying our original sentence,

His first act was to rescind the directive that prohibited the sale of A to B. - works
'that clause' modifies 'the directive.'

We can also use a present participle modifier to modify the noun 'directive'
e.g. His first act was to rescind the directive prohibiting the sale of A to B. - works

Also acceptable is a prohibition on individuals from doing a certain action.
e.g.
His first act was to rescind the directive that prohibited the US companies from selling A to B.
His first act was to rescind the directive prohibiting the US companies from selling A to B.

But the following is not acceptable:
His first act was to rescind the directive that prohibited A from sale to B.

Prohibition is not on 'A' and neither is A doing the sale. Prohibition is on 'sale of A to B'
Even if we were to replace 'prohibited A from sale to B' with 'prohibited A from being sold to B,' it would still not be good. The prohibition is not on A or A's action.

(A) that any chemical banned on medical grounds in the United States be prohibited from sale to other countries
(B) that any chemical be prohibited from sale to other countries that was banned on medical grounds in the United States

Incorrect, as discussed above.

(E) that any chemical banned in the United States on medical grounds is prohibited from being sold to other countries


As discussed above, not acceptable.

(D) prohibiting that any chemical banned on medical grounds in the United States is sold to other countries

'that clause' after prohibiting doesn't work. It acts on an action or a person.

(C) prohibiting the sale to other countries of any chemical banned on medical grounds in the United States


We are prohibiting the sale. That's correct.

Answer (C)
Director
Director
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Posts: 624
Own Kudos [?]: 31 [0]
Given Kudos: 21
Send PM
One of Ronald Reagans first acts as President was to rescind Presiden [#permalink]
One of Ronald Reagan’s first acts as President was to rescind President Carter’s directive that any chemical banned on medical grounds in the United States be prohibited from sale to other countries.

Option elimination - Use the meaning to eliminate, as there are so many forms of idiom usage that it is easy for GMAT to deceive. For some of you who'll rely on "prohibit" idiom usage. Here are some of the possible usages.

Prohibit X from Y: This structure is used to indicate that something is forbidden from doing or being part of something else. For example: "The regulations prohibit companies from dumping waste in the river."

Prohibit X (direct object): This usage indicates that something is forbidden or not allowed. For example: "The school policy prohibits students from using cell phones during class."

Prohibit X by Y: This structure implies that the prohibition is enforced or implemented by a specific entity or authority. For example: "The law prohibits the sale of alcohol to minors by licensed establishments."

Prohibit X on Y grounds: This phrase is used to specify the reasons or grounds for which something is prohibited. For example: "The company policy prohibits discrimination on the grounds of race, gender, or religion."

Prohibit X to Y: This construction indicates that something is forbidden or not allowed for a specific purpose or group. For example: "The sign at the entrance prohibits entry to unauthorized personnel."

Again, this is too much and may not be all. :) So use other ways to eliminate options; try using idiom as a last resort.


(A) that any chemical banned on medical grounds in the United States be prohibited from sale to other countries - "prohibit" is used for actions or living things and not for inanimate. The chemical can't be prohibited. The usage or sale of chemicals can be prohibited.

(B) that any chemical be prohibited from sale to other countries that was banned on medical grounds in the United States - the relative clause can't jump over the verb to refer to a noun. Here, the relative clause "that was banned on medical grounds in the United States" has to jump over the verb "be prohibited" to refer to chemicals. Wrong.

(C) prohibiting the sale to other countries of any chemical banned on medical grounds in the United States - ok.

(D) prohibiting that any chemical banned on medical grounds in the United States is sold to other countries - Here, technically, "that" is a connector and not a relative pronoun. So, it introduces a clause that can be adverbial. And "prohibiting" is a verbal to modify directive. So, the adverbial modifier can modify the adjectival modifier (prohibiting). Caution: Had "that" been acting as a relative pronoun, the story would have been different as the relative clauses are adjectival, and adjectives can't modify adjectives. The issue here is that we need "be" instead of "is," though the resultant sentence will still not make sense meaning-wise. Moreover, whatever is prohibited must come directly after the prohibition, as in option C. The more we dig into this sentence, the more mess we find. :) Anyway, it's not a good pedigree for a correct answer. So ditch it and keep moving.

(E) that any chemical banned in the United States on medical grounds is prohibited from being sold to other countries- "being sold to other countries" used as a modifier is avoided because it creates a wrong meaning as it's happening now.
GMAT Club Bot
One of Ronald Reagans first acts as President was to rescind Presiden [#permalink]
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne