One sure way you can tell how quickly a new idea for : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 22 Feb 2017, 19:32

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# One sure way you can tell how quickly a new idea for

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 947
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 290 [0], given: 0

One sure way you can tell how quickly a new idea for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2008, 11:09
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (02:32) wrong based on 3 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

One sure way you can tell how quickly a new idea—for example, the idea of “privatization”—is taking hold among the population is to monitor how fast the word or words expressing that particular idea are passing into common usage. Professional opinions of whether or not words can indeed be said to have passed into common usage are available from dictionary editors, who are vitally concerned with this question.

The method described above for determining how quickly a new idea is taking hold relies on which one of the following assumptions?

(A) Dictionary editors are not professionally interested in words that are only rarely used.
(B) Dictionary editors have exact numerical criteria for telling when a word has passed into common usage.
(C) For a new idea to take hold, dictionary editors have to include the relevant word or words in their dictionaries.
(d) As a word passes into common usages, its meaning does not undergo any severe distortions in the process.
(E) Words denoting new ideas tend to be used before the ideas denoted are understood.
If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 19 May 2008
Posts: 52
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Dictionary Editors Importance [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2008, 03:51
A
Assumption is that dictionnary editors are interested in words that are also commonly used

abhijit_sen wrote:
One sure way you can tell how quickly a new idea—for example, the idea of “privatization”—is taking hold among the population is to monitor how fast the word or words expressing that particular idea are passing into common usage. Professional opinions of whether or not words can indeed be said to have passed into common usage are available from dictionary editors, who are vitally concerned with this question.

The method described above for determining how quickly a new idea is taking hold relies on which one of the following assumptions?

(A) Dictionary editors are not professionally interested in words that are only rarely used.
(B) Dictionary editors have exact numerical criteria for telling when a word has passed into common usage.
(C) For a new idea to take hold, dictionary editors have to include the relevant word or words in their dictionaries.
(d) As a word passes into common usages, its meaning does not undergo any severe distortions in the process.
(E) Words denoting new ideas tend to be used before the ideas denoted are understood.
Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 317
Location: Hungary
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 3

Re: CR: Dictionary Editors Importance [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2008, 05:12
Ohh, This question is too difficult for me.

I cannot see how A can be an assumption. However, I cannot see which answer could be an assumption.
Intern
Joined: 23 Jul 2008
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Dictionary Editors Importance [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2008, 06:28
IMO B

New ideas take hold if they pass into common usage.
Common usage is determined by dictionary editors.

Assumption is that dictionary know exactly when ideas pass into common usage
Intern
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Dictionary Editors Importance [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2008, 08:12
A) Dictionary editors are not professionally interested in words that are only rarely used.

The best way to tackle assumption question is to negate their arg
ie Dictoray editors are very much interested in words that are rarely used. If this is true, then they will try to add
those words to the dictionary even though these words are not popular .So the newly added word is not a true reflection of the popularty
and the argument falls down. Hene this assumption must be true .
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Apr 2008
Posts: 449
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 1

Re: CR: Dictionary Editors Importance [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2008, 09:39
IMO A
Director
Joined: 12 Jul 2008
Posts: 518
Schools: Wharton
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 154 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Dictionary Editors Importance [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2008, 10:36
abhijit_sen wrote:
One sure way you can tell how quickly a new idea—for example, the idea of “privatization”—is taking hold among the population is to monitor how fast the word or words expressing that particular idea are passing into common usage. Professional opinions of whether or not words can indeed be said to have passed into common usage are available from dictionary editors, who are vitally concerned with this question.

The method described above for determining how quickly a new idea is taking hold relies on which one of the following assumptions?

(A) Dictionary editors are not professionally interested in words that are only rarely used.
(B) Dictionary editors have exact numerical criteria for telling when a word has passed into common usage.
(C) For a new idea to take hold, dictionary editors have to include the relevant word or words in their dictionaries.
(d) As a word passes into common usages, its meaning does not undergo any severe distortions in the process.
(E) Words denoting new ideas tend to be used before the ideas denoted are understood.

I would go with D.

A: Dictionary editors could be interested in both common and rare words and still know if a word has passed into common usage.

B: Exact numbers may not be how common usage is determined.

C: Doesn't mean they won't know if they don't have to include these words.

D: This relates the concept of idea to the word in the first sentence: "One sure way you can tell how quickly a new idea...is taking hold" is to "monitor how fast the word or words...are passing into common usage"

E: Not related to the stimulus at all...
VP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1397
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 299 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Dictionary Editors Importance [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2008, 11:25
abhijit_sen wrote:
One sure way you can tell how quickly a new idea—for example, the idea of “privatization”—is taking hold among the population is to monitor how fast the word or words expressing that particular idea are passing into common usage. Professional opinions of whether or not words can indeed be said to have passed into common usage are available from dictionary editors, who are vitally concerned with this question.

The method described above for determining how quickly a new idea is taking hold relies on which one of the following assumptions?

(A) Dictionary editors are not professionally interested in words that are only rarely used. -> its not the assumption.its out of scope
(B) Dictionary editors have exact numerical criteria for telling when a word has passed into common usage. ->this is too specific.No mention of numeric data anywhere
(C) For a new idea to take hold, dictionary editors have to include the relevant word or words in their dictionaries. -> irrelevant
(d) As a word passes into common usages, its meaning does not undergo any severe distortions in the process. -> by just judging common usage of a word author judges propagation of ideas. what if words get distorted then argument falls apart. -> this is the assumption that words do not get distorted
(E) Words denoting new ideas tend to be used before the ideas denoted are understood. -> this is not clear as no where author say ideas are understood by others

_________________

cheers
Its Now Or Never

Intern
Joined: 18 Feb 2008
Posts: 29
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Dictionary Editors Importance [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2008, 22:51
abhijit_sen wrote:
One sure way you can tell how quickly a new idea—for example, the idea of “privatization”—is taking hold among the population is to monitor how fast the word or words expressing that particular idea are passing into common usage. Professional opinions of whether or not words can indeed be said to have passed into common usage are available from dictionary editors, who are vitally concerned with this question.

The method described above for determining how quickly a new idea is taking hold relies on which one of the following assumptions?

(A) Dictionary editors are not professionally interested in words that are only rarely used.
(B) Dictionary editors have exact numerical criteria for telling when a word has passed into common usage.
(C) For a new idea to take hold, dictionary editors have to include the relevant word or words in their dictionaries.
(d) As a word passes into common usages, its meaning does not undergo any severe distortions in the process.
(E) Words denoting new ideas tend to be used before the ideas denoted are understood.

IMO its B can we have the official ans plz !
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Apr 2008
Posts: 449
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 1

Re: CR: Dictionary Editors Importance [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2008, 23:20
abhijit_sen wrote:
One sure way you can tell how quickly a new idea—for example, the idea of “privatization”—is taking hold among the population is to monitor how fast the word or words expressing that particular idea are passing into common usage. Professional opinions of whether or not words can indeed be said to have passed into common usage are available from dictionary editors, who are vitally concerned with this question.

The method described above for determining how quickly a new idea is taking hold relies on which one of the following assumptions?

(A) Dictionary editors are not professionally interested in words that are only rarely used.
(B) Dictionary editors have exact numerical criteria for telling when a word has passed into common usage.
(C) For a new idea to take hold, dictionary editors have to include the relevant word or words in their dictionaries.
(d) As a word passes into common usages, its meaning does not undergo any severe distortions in the process.
(E) Words denoting new ideas tend to be used before the ideas denoted are understood.

IMO A)

If (B) was true then Dictionary editors would not have been "vitally concerned" with question whether words have passed into common usage.
Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 62
Location: Houston TX
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 2

Re: CR: Dictionary Editors Importance [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2008, 23:22
At first I went with D. But when I negate the choices, A makes sense.
I think A is the best ans.
_________________

haveaniceday

Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2007
Posts: 285
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Dictionary Editors Importance [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2008, 23:23
agree with spriya on this.. i will wait for the OA.
Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 317
Location: Hungary
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 3

Re: CR: Dictionary Editors Importance [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2008, 00:10
I checked the official answer of this question. OA=D
Director
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 947
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 290 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Dictionary Editors Importance [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2008, 05:13
OA is D.
VP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1397
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 299 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Dictionary Editors Importance [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2008, 06:56
abhijit_sen wrote:
OA is D.

thank u
_________________

cheers
Its Now Or Never

Intern
Joined: 19 Jul 2008
Posts: 24
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Dictionary Editors Importance [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2008, 11:57
Can somebody please help to expalin what is wrong with choice (A)? If you negate this, then the argument falls apart ...
VP
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1367
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 625 [0], given: 10

Re: CR: Dictionary Editors Importance [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jul 2008, 10:34
gmatcraze wrote:
Can somebody please help to expalin what is wrong with choice (A)? If you negate this, then the argument falls apart ...

Conclusion:One sure way you can tell how quickly a new idea is taking hold among the population is to monitor how fast the word or words expressing that particular idea are passing into common usage

In simple words - If the words that express the idea are commonly used by people then the idea is getting popular.

Premise: Dicitionary editors have a list of words that show if the word has passed or not passed into the common usage.

The method described above for determining how quickly a new idea is taking hold relies on which one of the following assumptions?

(A) Dictionary editors are not professionally interested in words that are only rarely used.
>>>Dictionary editors are professionally interested in words that are only rarely used.

So what? This statement doesnot tells us whether the word is on the list? Its doesnot break the argument

(B) Dictionary editors have exact numerical criteria for telling when a word has passed into common usage.
>>>OOS. We sticking to words.

(C) For a new idea to take hold, dictionary editors have to include the relevant word or words in their dictionaries.
>>>For a new idea to take hold, dictionary editors doesnot have to include the relevant word or words in their dictionaries.
Irrelevant becuase the scope is limited to the list of words that indicate common usage not all words in the dictionary

(d) As a word passes into common usages, its meaning does not undergo any severe distortions in the process.
>>> As a word passes into common usages, its meaning undergoes severe distortions in the process.

This statement breaks teh conclusion. If the meaning is lost the idea is no longer what it is supposed to be. Something else is getting popular.

(E) Words denoting new ideas tend to be used before the ideas denoted are understood.
>>>OOS
Re: CR: Dictionary Editors Importance   [#permalink] 25 Jul 2008, 10:34
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Most young employees move quickly from one company to 1 14 Aug 2013, 09:25
The new agriculture bill will almost surely fail to pass. 5 10 Apr 2011, 22:27
CR: Privitization One sure way you can tell how quickly a 1 30 Jul 2008, 00:49
Public health will improve more quickly in the wake of new 6 13 Nov 2007, 12:01
Can someone tell me if this is correct? This statement was 5 31 Jul 2007, 04:01
Display posts from previous: Sort by