It is currently 19 Oct 2017, 13:38

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# One variety of partially biodegradable plastic beverage

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 17 Sep 2005
Posts: 901

Kudos [?]: 112 [2], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Jun 2006, 10:16
2
KUDOS
24
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

74% (01:40) correct 26% (01:56) wrong based on 1812 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

One variety of partially biodegradable plastic beverage container is manufactured from small bits of plastic bound together by a degradable bonding agent such as cornstarch. Since only the bonding agent degrades, leaving the small bits of plastic, no less plastic refuse per container is produced when such containers are discarded than when comparable nonbiodegradable containers are discarded.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument above?

(A) Both partially biodegradable and nonbiodegradable plastic beverage containers can be crushed completely flat by refuse compactors.
(B) The partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers are made with more plastic than comparable nonbiodegradable ones in order to compensate for the weakening effect of the bounding agents.
(C) Many consumers are ecology-minded and prefer to buy a product sold in the partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers rather than in nonbiodegradable containers, even if the price is higher.
(D) The manufacturing process for the partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers results in less plastic waste than the manufacturing process for nonbiodegradable plastic beverage containers.
(E) Technological problems with recycling currently prevent the reuse as food or beverage containers of the plastic from either type of plastic beverage container.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 112 [2], given: 0

Director
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 524

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 0

Location: US

### Show Tags

12 Jun 2006, 10:31
B it is...

any point that proves that biodegradable containers will yield as much as or more plastic than non-bio... container will be the answer.

The other answers are either out of scope and unrelated or contradictory.

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 02 Jun 2006
Posts: 1257

Kudos [?]: 106 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Jun 2006, 11:24
Should be B.

Kudos [?]: 106 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2892

Kudos [?]: 323 [0], given: 0

Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008

### Show Tags

12 Jun 2006, 12:22
B clear winner...
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Kudos [?]: 323 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 628

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Jun 2006, 18:46
Can anyone pls explain..How 'B' strengthens the argument...

B - is an assumption.

The argument talks about 'plastic refuse'

no less plastic refuse per container is produced when such containers are discarded than when comparable nonbiodegradable containers are discarded.

I will go for 'D'. It reinstates the above argument with a more clearer definition.

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 24 Apr 2006
Posts: 14

Kudos [?]: 15 [6], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Jun 2006, 19:16
6
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
The conclusion of the argument says : you do not throw less plastic away with the bio one than with the normal when you discard them. But to explain this it only says that plastic and cornstarch are used, it does not say that more plastic is actually in the bottle. But B tells us that !
So B does strengthens the argument.

I also did not have the right vision before Veritas prepcourse, but a very important point is that an assumption strengthens an argument. Even if it only strengthens it a little bit, if it is the one which stengthens it the more compared to the other 4, it is enough.

D tells us about the waste of plastic during the manufacturing process, not about the plastic of the bottle itself, on which you should focus, as the argument focuses on the refuse (=garbage) => D is out of scope.

Kudos [?]: 15 [6], given: 0

Director
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 628

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Jun 2006, 19:39
Hi marclopato,

Thank you for your explanation and the tip assumption strengthens an argument .

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Apr 2006
Posts: 270

Kudos [?]: 240 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

12 Jun 2006, 21:22
B is the correct answer that strenthens the argument.

Kudos [?]: 240 [0], given: 2

Director
Joined: 16 Aug 2005
Posts: 937

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

Location: France

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2006, 06:41
If I remember correctly, I think the OA is B because even though product is partially biodegradable, more plastic was used to make it
_________________

I believe its yogurt!

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 176

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2006, 08:29
yup,

It's B.

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 628

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2006, 18:42

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 17 Sep 2005
Posts: 901

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Jun 2006, 09:33
Thanks guys.

OA is B.

OE:

The information that strengthens the arguement will be about the subjects of the arguement, not about tangential issues. In this case, discovering that the partially biodegradable containers use more plastic than comparable non-biodegradable one in order to compensate for the weakness of the biodegradable bonding agent would strengthen the arguement.

Regards,
Brajesh

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 628

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Jun 2006, 21:59
Thank you for posting the OE..

We also get to hear the original questionares explanation..

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

Manager
Status: struggling with GMAT
Joined: 06 Dec 2012
Posts: 205

Kudos [?]: 435 [0], given: 46

Concentration: Accounting
GMAT Date: 04-06-2013
GPA: 3.65

### Show Tags

13 Apr 2013, 12:02
b14kumar wrote:
One variety of partially biodegradable plastic beverage container is manufactured from small bits of plastic bound together by a degradable bonding agent such as cornstarch. Since only the bonding agent degrades, leaving the small bits of plastic, no less plastic refuse per container is produced when such containers are discarded than when comparable nonbiodegradable containers are discarded.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument above?

(A) Both partially biodegradable and nonbiodegradable plastic beverage containers can be crushed completely flat by refuse compactors.
(B) The partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers are made with more plastic than comparable nonbiodegradable ones in order to compensate for the weakening effect of the bounding agents.
(C) Many consumers are ecology-minded and prefer to buy a product sold in the partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers rather than in nonbiodegradable containers, even if the price is higher.
(D) The manufacturing process for the partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers results in less plastic waste than the manufacturing process for nonbiodegradable plastic beverage containers.
(E) Technological problems with recycling currently prevent the reuse as food or beverage containers of the plastic from either type of plastic beverage container.

Need help in understanding the content of the argument & also explain every answer choice.

Kudos [?]: 435 [0], given: 46

Intern
Status: London UK GMAT Consultant / Tutor
Joined: 30 Oct 2012
Posts: 47

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Apr 2013, 12:58
The difficulty here is that the argument stresses that there is NO INHERENT BENEFIT to this type of bottle.

Thus, STRENGTHENING is something to say that this type of bottle is BAD (B).

Weakening would be to say that it is good (D).

A) is Out of Scope because it talks about being crushed flat, not waste per bottle as in the argument.

C) is Out of Scope because it is about customer preference, not about amount of waste per bottle.

E) is Out of Scope because it is about HOW the bottle will be reused, not the amount of waste per bottle.
_________________

Learn the Top 3 GMAT Arithmetic Techniques with this free PDF guide!

https://yourgmatcoach.withcoach.com/free-pdf-guide-top-3-700-level-gmat-arithmetic-shortcuts

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10119

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Jul 2014, 16:12
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 593

Kudos [?]: 460 [2], given: 200

Location: Germany
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 580 Q46 V24
GPA: 3.88
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)

### Show Tags

16 Feb 2015, 03:37
2
KUDOS
Premise: Since only the bonding agent degrades, leaving the small bits of plastic
Conclusion: no less plastic refuse per container is produced when such containers are discarded than when comparable nonbiodegradable containers are discarded. --> So, we need an asnwer choice that says Plastic in Bio => Plastic in NON-Bio -> (B) gives us such Information.

B) The partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers are made with more plastic than comparable nonbiodegradable ones in order to compensate for the weakening effect of the bounding agents.
_________________

When you’re up, your friends know who you are. When you’re down, you know who your friends are.

800Score ONLY QUANT CAT1 51, CAT2 50, CAT3 50
GMAT PREP 670
MGMAT CAT 630
KAPLAN CAT 660

Kudos [?]: 460 [2], given: 200

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10119

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Mar 2016, 16:19
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 19 Mar 2014
Posts: 935

Kudos [?]: 219 [0], given: 186

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.5

### Show Tags

13 Sep 2017, 11:41
Straight B - Gives us a reason that partially biodegradable plastic bvg. container uses more plastic.

All other options can be eliminated by POE
_________________

"Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not: nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not: the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent."

Worried About IDIOMS? Here is a Daily Practice List: https://gmatclub.com/forum/idiom-s-ydmuley-s-daily-practice-list-250731.html#p1937393

Best AWA Template: https://gmatclub.com/forum/how-to-get-6-0-awa-my-guide-64327.html#p470475

Kudos [?]: 219 [0], given: 186

Re: One variety of partially biodegradable plastic beverage   [#permalink] 13 Sep 2017, 11:41
Display posts from previous: Sort by