GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 21 Jun 2018, 01:37

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare

  post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

32 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2005
Posts: 114
Location: Bangalore, India
One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Oct 2005, 05:44
32
71
Edit: This discussion has retired. Find the new thread HERE


One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique, commonly called "benchmarking", permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.

Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather that against competitors EXCEPT:

(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to fous on practices that the manager making the comparisions already employs
(B) Getting "inside" information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult
(C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have cpmparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors
(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry
(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products of markets
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Aug 2010
Posts: 237
Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Dec 2010, 17:59
One way to judge the performance of a company is
to compare it with other companies. This technique,
commonly called "benchmarking," permits the manager
of a company to discover better industrial practices
and can provide a justification for the adoption of
good practices.

Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for
benchmarking the performance of a company
against companies with which it is not in competi-
tion rather than against competitors EXCEPT:
(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely
to focus on practices that the manager making
the comparisons already employs.
(B) Getting "inside" information about the unique
practices of competitors is particularly difficult.
(C) Since companies that compete with each other are
likely to have comparable levels of efficiency, only
benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to
reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors.
(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new
ideas that they find outside their own industry.
(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to
their adoption of practices that take advantage of
the special circumstances of their products of markets.

I am having some trouble with 'except' questions, please can someone provide some pointers in dealing with such questions efficiently. thanks.
_________________

Verbal:new-to-the-verbal-forum-please-read-this-first-77546.html
Math: new-to-the-math-forum-please-read-this-first-77764.html
Gmat: everything-you-need-to-prepare-for-the-gmat-revised-77983.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ajit

2 KUDOS received
Manhattan Prep Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 184
Schools: MBA, Thunderbird School of Global Management / BA, Wesleyan University
Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Dec 2010, 20:25
2
1
ajit257,

In general, I'd suggest the following for EXCEPT questions:

Before you get to the answer choices, be explicit with yourself about what you expect to see in the answer choices and rephrase the question to make that clear to yourself.

For example, if the question is: "All of the following, if true, weaken the conclusion EXCEPT" then you'll expect to see 4 answer choices that weaken the conclusion and 1 that either has no bearing at all or in fact strengthens the conclusion. Tell yourself: "I'm looking for something that strengthens the conclusion or is totally irrelevant."

If the question is similar to yours posted below, you'd expect to see four answer choices that are completely logical and valid rationale for benchmarking against non-competitors and one that either provides justification for benchmarking against competitors or is irrelevant. Tell yourself: "I'm looking for an answer that would make me want to benchmark my performance against competitors or is totally irrelevant to the issue."

If you can rephrase the question to be explicit, you'll be much less likely to fall for trap answers.

Does that help? Do you have specific concerns about this particular CR question?

Brett
_________________


Brett Beach-Kimball | Manhattan GMAT Instructor

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Director
Director
avatar
Status: Up again.
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 514
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V40
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V42
Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Dec 2010, 21:30
All option choices except E clearly give reasons for 2 things:(i) Why there shouldn't be benchmarking against competitors and (ii) Why there should be benchmarking against non competitors..

E neither talks about benchmarking nor about competitors/ non competitors and so does not have any impact whatsoever on the argument. Hence E is the best answer choice.

Often, in an "except" question, the correct answer choice does not have any impact on the argument. Its just a cold statement of facts, as it is in this case.
_________________

My GMAT debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/from-620-to-710-my-gmat-journey-114437.html

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 18 Nov 2010
Posts: 35
Location: Richmond VA
Schools: ISB, IIMA (PGPX), IIMB (EMBA) & IIMC..
Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Dec 2010, 06:44
gmatpapa wrote:
All option choices except E clearly give reasons for 2 things:(i) Why there shouldn't be benchmarking against competitors and (ii) Why there should be benchmarking against non competitors..

E neither talks about benchmarking nor about competitors/ non competitors and so does not have any impact whatsoever on the argument. Hence E is the best answer choice.

Often, in an "except" question, the correct answer choice does not have any impact on the argument. Its just a cold statement of facts, as it is in this case.


well said. IMO E. Question was bit twisting..but straight E...I wud say.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 18 Nov 2010
Posts: 35
Location: Richmond VA
Schools: ISB, IIMA (PGPX), IIMB (EMBA) & IIMC..
Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Dec 2010, 11:00
ankitranjan wrote:
One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique,
commonly called “benchmarking,” permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices
and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.
Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against
companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT:
(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that the manager making the
comparisons already employs.
(B) Getting “inside” information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult.
(C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency, only
benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors.
(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry.
(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the
special circumstances of their products or markets.

OA will be given tomorrow.

If u like the question consider giving KUDOS


IMO E.

This is from OG11. All choices except E talk the adv of gathering info about non-competing companies. So straight E....
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Oct 2010
Posts: 393
Reviews Badge
Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Feb 2011, 12:53
Another one:

One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique,
commonly called “benchmarking,” permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial
practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.

Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against
companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT:

(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that the manager making the
comparisons already employs.
(B) Getting “inside” information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult
(C)Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency,
only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in
beating competitors.
(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry.
(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take
advantage of the special circumstances of their products or markets
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Oct 2010
Posts: 137
Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Feb 2011, 13:59
1
E. If the company takes advantage of the special circumstances, then benchmarking won't help.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Oct 2010
Posts: 393
Reviews Badge
Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Feb 2011, 14:39
intcan wrote:
E. If the company takes advantage of the special circumstances, then benchmarking won't help.

got it, thanks :)
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Nov 2010
Posts: 86
Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Feb 2011, 14:28
E does not relate to benchmarking or the advantage/disadvantage of benchmarking against the competitor or non-competitor. It's completely irrevelent.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Oct 2010
Posts: 393
Reviews Badge
Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Feb 2011, 19:20
bellcurve wrote:
E does not relate to benchmarking or the advantage/disadvantage of benchmarking against the competitor or non-competitor. It's completely irrevelent.
Are you saying that the OA is wrong? what is the correct answer in your opinion?
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Up again.
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 514
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V40
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V42
Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Feb 2011, 08:27
heygirl wrote:
Another one:

One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique,
commonly called “benchmarking,” permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial
practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.

Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against
companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT:

(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that the manager making the
comparisons already employs.
(B) Getting “inside” information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult
(C)Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency,
only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in
beating competitors.
(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry.
(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take
advantage of the special circumstances of their products or markets


A. Valid. It could broaden the manager's perspective.
B. Valid.
C. Valid.
D. Valid
E. Only this answer choice doesn't differentiate between competitors and non competitors and talks about special circumstances. Clearly, this statement does not give any valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors.

Answer E.
_________________

My GMAT debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/from-620-to-710-my-gmat-journey-114437.html

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 550
Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Apr 2011, 09:31
kimball thanks for the suggestion. paraphrasing the expectation definitely helps in Except question, otherwise under time pressure such questions can easily go wrong.

i chose E but it took me 3 minutes +
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

VP
VP
avatar
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1140
Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 May 2011, 07:21
clean E here giving no reason at all.
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Jun 2011
Posts: 31
Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Aug 2011, 02:48
shanewyatt wrote:
bsv180985 wrote:
One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique, commonly called "benchmarking", permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.

Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather that against competitors EXCEPT:

(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to fous on practices that the manager making the comparisions already employs
(B) Getting "inside" information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult
(C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have cpmparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors
(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry
(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products of markets


Was between A and E for me and my final choice is E

(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to fous on practices that the manager making the comparisions already employs

This is saying benchmarking with competitors is not that helpful - but the question is which one of these isn't an argument against benchmarking with non-competitors. (A) is a good reason that companies should benchmark with non-competitors.

(B) Getting "inside" information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult

This is effectively saying that it requires too much effort to benchmark against the competitors, so the better option is to benchmark with non-competitors. Not an argument against benchmarking with non-competitors.

(C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have cpmparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors

This is promoting benchmarking with non-competitors.

(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry

Promoting benchmarking with non-comptitors.

(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products of markets

This is suggesting that knowledge of their product markets is what makes a company successful - so in this case the company would have to benchmark with competitors - which is obviously not an argument for benchmarking with non-competitors. This is my choice.


Thanks for good explanation..this is the only explanation that I can really understand.... :P
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: MBAing!!!!
Joined: 24 Jun 2011
Posts: 263
Location: United States (FL)
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate
GPA: 3.65
WE: Project Management (Real Estate)
Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Oct 2011, 12:26
I picked E...understanding the question was very hard. Paraphrasing was warranted for me. "which one was not necessarily a valid reason for benchmarking against non competitors??"
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 51
Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jul 2012, 09:35
1
One way to judge the performance of a company is
to compare it with other companies. This technique,
commonly called "benchmarking," permits the
manager of a company to discover better industrial
practices and can provide a justification for the
adoption of good practices.
Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for
benchmarking the performance of a company against
companies with which it is not in competition rather
than against competitors EXCEPT:

(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to
focus on practices that the manager making the
comparisons already employs.

(B) Getting "inside" information about the unique
practices of competitors is particularly difficult.

(C) Since companies that compete with each other
are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency,
only benchmarking against noncompetitors is
likely to reveal practices that would aid in
beating competitors.

(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new
ideas that they find outside their own industry.

(E) Much of the success of good companies is due
to their adoption of practices that take
advantage of the special circumstances of their
products or markets.
Board of Directors
User avatar
P
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3423
Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jul 2012, 11:03
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2012
Posts: 15
GPA: 3.71
Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jul 2012, 11:17
I would go with E.

All other options are in favor of benchmarking against non – competitors. Only E favors benchmarking against competitors
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Aug 2011
Posts: 361
Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Oct 2012, 12:02
took...2:37 minutes to solve :(..

bt chose rite ans E..
_________________

Bole So Nehal.. Sat Siri Akal.. Waheguru ji help me to get 700+ score !

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 175
Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Nov 2012, 02:12
E all the way. Took 1.30 mins to get the answer.
Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare   [#permalink] 08 Nov 2012, 02:12

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4    Next  [ 65 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare

  post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.