It is currently 18 Oct 2017, 02:55

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare

  post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

21 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2005
Posts: 117

Kudos [?]: 111 [21], given: 0

Location: Bangalore, India
One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Oct 2005, 05:44
21
This post received
KUDOS
74
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Edit: This discussion has retired. Find the new thread HERE


One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique, commonly called "benchmarking", permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.

Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather that against competitors EXCEPT:

(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to fous on practices that the manager making the comparisions already employs
(B) Getting "inside" information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult
(C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have cpmparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors
(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry
(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products of markets

Kudos [?]: 111 [21], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Feb 2014
Posts: 40

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 81

GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 610 Q46 V28
Premium Member
Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Mar 2016, 18:30
I always get confused with these double negatives ... how do you all handle it?

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 81

Expert Post
Jamboree GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Status: GMAT Expert
Affiliations: Jamboree Education Pvt Ltd
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 285

Kudos [?]: 315 [0], given: 1

Location: India
Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Mar 2016, 23:10
The question is basically asking you to choose an answer which indicates the company is in competition with competitors. Four answer choices indicate that the company is in competition with non competitors and only one would indicate it is in competition with a competitor. That one would be your answer. If I give an example say: " She is not against him." It translates into " She is in his favor.". Double negatives translate into positives.
_________________

Aryama Dutta Saikia
Jamboree Education Pvt. Ltd.

Kudos [?]: 315 [0], given: 1

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Sep 2015
Posts: 54

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 14

Location: United Kingdom
GMAT 1: 640 Q42 V38
GPA: 3.1
Reviews Badge
Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Apr 2016, 02:51
The question can be rephrased :- Why should one benchmark a similar industry company.

The only one there is E

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 14

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 31 Mar 2016
Posts: 406

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 197

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V34
GPA: 3.8
WE: Operations (Commercial Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jun 2016, 14:06
E it is since all others would favour benchmarking with non-competitors.

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 197

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 28 Feb 2016
Posts: 20

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 26

Schools: Wharton '19 (A)
Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jun 2016, 13:25
Can someone please change the "that" in the question stem to "than"? And the "of" in the correct answer choice E to "or"? The poor transcription threw me off when doing this problem since I didn't know what the question was asking or what the right answer choice meant.

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 26

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 18 Jun 2016
Posts: 268

Kudos [?]: 176 [0], given: 102

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Olin '19 (A)
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.7
WE: General Management (Other)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Aug 2016, 06:21
GinGMAT wrote:
Can someone please change the "that" in the question stem to "than"? And the "of" in the correct answer choice E to "or"? The poor transcription threw me off when doing this problem since I didn't know what the question was asking or what the right answer choice meant.

This question was posted in 2005. I don't think that the user is still active on the forums.
_________________

I'd appreciate learning about the grammatical errors in my posts

Please hit Kudos If my Solution helps

My Debrief for 750 - https://gmatclub.com/forum/from-720-to-750-one-of-the-most-difficult-pleatues-to-overcome-246420.html

My CR notes - https://gmatclub.com/forum/patterns-in-cr-questions-243450.html

Rest of the Notes coming soon.

Kudos [?]: 176 [0], given: 102

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2015
Posts: 262

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 165

GMAT 1: 540 Q39 V26
GMAT 2: 680 Q46 V37
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Sep 2016, 04:47
Find an option the either undermines competing with companies in the same industry or talks about whether black holes exist. Option E is entirely out of context. others seem to pit the company in argument against companies in different industries, and derive value from this non industry comparison.

Option E
_________________

Fais de ta vie un rêve et d'un rêve une réalité

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 165

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 01 Sep 2016
Posts: 9

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 24

CAT Tests
Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Sep 2016, 07:04
rgtiwari wrote:
One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique, commonly called “benchmarking,” permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.
Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT:
(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that the manager making the comparisons already employs.
(B) Getting “inside” information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult.
(C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors.
(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry.
(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products of markets.


I don't understand what the question says, please can anyone elaborate...

Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather that against competitors EXCEPT:

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 24

1 KUDOS received
Math Forum Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 1524

Kudos [?]: 945 [1], given: 72

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Sep 2016, 12:32
1
This post received
KUDOS
PadmajaH wrote:
rgtiwari wrote:
One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique, commonly called “benchmarking,” permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.
Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT:
(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that the manager making the comparisons already employs.
(B) Getting “inside” information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult.
(C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors.
(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry.
(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products of markets.


I don't understand what the question says, please can anyone elaborate...

Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather that against competitors EXCEPT:


Hi PadmajaH ,
The question stem says that there are some valid reasons that the performance of a company should be benchmarked against non-competitors rather than competitors. Since , this is an except question , 4 of the answers will provide reasons to benchmark the performance of companies against non-competitors .
The correct answer will not .

Hope this helps!! :)
_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Kudos [?]: 945 [1], given: 72

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 May 2015
Posts: 15

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 29

Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Nov 2016, 00:18
One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique, commonly called "benchmarking", permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.

Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather that against competitors EXCEPT:

(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to fous on practices that the manager making the comparisions already employs
(B) Getting "inside" information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult
(C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have cpmparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors
(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry
(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products of markets

I think the difficulty of the question comes from the question stem, at least for me.
The simple version is 'one of the choises will not be a good reason for benchmarking non competition companies. Choose'

A. will be a good reason to benchmark non competiton companies. So this is out.
B. Again, good reason to benchmark non competition comp.
C. Same as above.
D. Same as above.
E. This is it. Not about benchmarking non competition companies.

Hope this helps.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 29

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2016
Posts: 3

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 3

Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Nov 2016, 00:33
gamjatang wrote:
(A) says that it is of no use to benchmark competitors.

(B) says that it is very difficult to benchmark competitors.

(C) says that it is of no use to benchmark competitors.

(D) says that it is of little use to benchmark competitors.

(E) says that much of the success comes from the adoption of good practices of the same industry(=special circumstances of their products of markets)

I vote for (E).

the option `E` does not say same industry, IT can be non competitor.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 3

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 07 Dec 2016
Posts: 13

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 74

Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Mar 2017, 07:15
Initially marked D option but later after the official answer realised the "real" meaning of question. The Qs is asking us the need for using the benchmark i.e. why should we use the benchmark and why its important for the company against its competitor.

Option E certainly elaborates the need of benchmarking as to take advantage of the product and market scenario in a way to make their product competitive in the market.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 74

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 345

Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 64

WE: Engineering (Transportation)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Aug 2017, 05:56
Clearly E is answer

We do not have to look for 4 answer choice which says ( no comparision with competitors and comparing with non competitors)
we have to select remaining one.

A) It says comparison with competitors has no benefit as managers already employ practices. so no need to compare with competitor , OUT
B) Getting inside info is difficult , OUT
C) It favours Benchmarking with Non competitors - OUT
D) Managers are generally open to new ideas outside their industry, OUT
E) is our answer choice.
_________________

Give Kudos for correct answer and/or if you like the solution.

Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 64

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 481

Kudos [?]: 121 [0], given: 126

Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Aug 2017, 14:02
One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique, commonly called "benchmarking", permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.

Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather that against competitors EXCEPT:

(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to fous on practices that the manager making the comparisions already employs -If the practices being compared are already employed, then the manager won't get any new insight. Thus, comparison with non competitor will be more beneficial.
(B) Getting "inside" information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult -If getting the inside information of the competitor is difficult, then valid comparisons can't be made. Thus, comparison with non competitor will be more beneficial.
(C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have cpmparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors -This is a direct strengthener.
(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry -If the managers are receptive of new ideas, then going through the strategies employed by non competitors will be fruitful. Thus, comparison with non competitor will be more beneficial.
(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products of markets -This is option says that the manager takes advantage of the product present in the market. It is out of context.
_________________

Kudos if my post helps!

Helpful links:
1. e-GMAT's ALL SC Compilation

Kudos [?]: 121 [0], given: 126

Re: One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare   [#permalink] 19 Aug 2017, 14:02

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4   [ 74 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare

  post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.