Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 24 May 2017, 04:03

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2005
Posts: 117
Location: Bangalore, India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 90 [18] , given: 0

One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Oct 2005, 05:44
18
KUDOS
64
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

63% (02:38) correct 37% (01:45) wrong based on 4963 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique, commonly called "benchmarking", permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.

Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather that against competitors EXCEPT:

(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to fous on practices that the manager making the comparisions already employs
(B) Getting "inside" information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult
(C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have cpmparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors
(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry
(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products of markets
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Director
Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 988
Location: South Korea
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 173 [4] , given: 0

Show Tags

30 Oct 2005, 05:55
4
KUDOS
(A) says that it is of no use to benchmark competitors.

(B) says that it is very difficult to benchmark competitors.

(C) says that it is of no use to benchmark competitors.

(D) says that it is of little use to benchmark competitors.

(E) says that much of the success comes from the adoption of good practices of the same industry(=special circumstances of their products of markets)

I vote for (E).
_________________

Auge um Auge, Zahn um Zahn !

Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 105
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

30 Oct 2005, 12:16
E it is.
Since, every other choice seems to favor benchmarking companies that are not in direct competition.
Director
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 558
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

31 Oct 2005, 03:41
(E) too
Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5222
Followers: 26

Kudos [?]: 402 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

31 Oct 2005, 06:54
Sure, E. All other answer choices give reasons not to benchmark against competitors.
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 454
Location: New York
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

31 Oct 2005, 07:36
The question stem really confused me with the negatives, but I finally got E.

What is the OA?
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 285
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 42 [1] , given: 3

One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Mar 2008, 07:28
1
KUDOS
One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique, commonly called “benchmarking,” permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.
Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT:
(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that the manager making the comparisons already employs.
(B) Getting “inside” information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult.
(C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors.
(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry.
(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products of markets.
Director
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 943
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 302 [0], given: 0

Re: CR : Bench Mark [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Mar 2008, 07:47
I will go wth B. As it is really tough to get insider information of competitors so it is better to bench mark against industry stadnards. Moreover even if you have inside information from competitor, it might be copy righted and so it will be illegal to use such information in any manner.
VP
Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Posts: 1438
Schools: Chicago Booth '11
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 192 [2] , given: 12

Re: CR : Bench Mark [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Mar 2008, 08:11
2
KUDOS
Ill go with E , it goes with the theory that you should benchmark against your competitors

B is wrong because it is a reason why companies should benchmark against companies outside of competitors, because they do not have access to competitive info
SVP
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1562
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 2

Re: CR : Bench Mark [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Mar 2008, 17:19
E for me as well
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 252
Schools: Chicago Booth
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 0

Re: CR : Bench Mark [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Mar 2008, 21:31
E

E is suggesting to adopt practices specific to products.. which means advocating against benchmarking against companies that don't make similar products.
Intern
Joined: 21 Feb 2008
Posts: 26
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Re: CR : Bench Mark [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Mar 2008, 23:50
Please somebody tell whether E is correct or not?
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 285
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 3

Re: CR : Bench Mark [#permalink]

Show Tags

14 Mar 2008, 00:21
Hello All,

E is the OA.

Earlier i didnt get it but now i got it .
IT says that benchmarking at competitors wud help and benchmarking against non competitors wouldnot help. [:)]
Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2009
Posts: 153
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 197 [0], given: 4

One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Nov 2009, 08:30
One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique, commonly called "benchmarking", permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.

Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather that against competitors EXCEPT:

(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to fous on practices that the manager making the comparisions already employs
(B) Getting "inside" information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult
(C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have cpmparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors
(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry
(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products of markets
Joined: 20 Aug 2009
Posts: 307
Location: Tbilisi, Georgia
Schools: Stanford (in), Tuck (WL), Wharton (ding), Cornell (in)
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 150 [0], given: 69

Re: One way to judge the performance of a company [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Nov 2009, 09:49
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products or markets

This statement emphasizes importance of holding focus on specific product and specific market the company is currently operating in. So it is an argument against using non-competitor companies as benchmarks
Manager
Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 222
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 277 [1] , given: 1

Re: One way to judge the performance of a company [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Nov 2009, 23:15
1
KUDOS
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to fous on practices that the manager making the comparisions already employs
-No use to compare with competitors, as the company already employees the methods

(B) Getting "inside" information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult
- No use to compare with competitors, as it is hard to get inside information.

(C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have cpmparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors
- No use to compare with competitors, as benchmarking against noncompetitors would to reveal practices that would beat competitors

(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry
- No use to compare with competitors, as Managers are receptive to ideas outside the industry

(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products of markets
-The comparison with the competitors is important in this case, as practices that are adopted in similar markets are important.

Hence the answer should be E
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2009
Posts: 325
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 109 [0], given: 0

Re: One way to judge the performance of a company [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Nov 2009, 05:19
its E
Manager
Joined: 24 Jun 2009
Posts: 59
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 82 [4] , given: 2

Re: One way to judge the performance of a company [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Nov 2009, 09:37
4
KUDOS
bsv180985 wrote:
One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique, commonly called "benchmarking", permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.

Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather that against competitors EXCEPT:

(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to fous on practices that the manager making the comparisions already employs
(B) Getting "inside" information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult
(C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have cpmparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors
(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry
(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products of markets

Was between A and E for me and my final choice is E

(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to fous on practices that the manager making the comparisions already employs

This is saying benchmarking with competitors is not that helpful - but the question is which one of these isn't an argument against benchmarking with non-competitors. (A) is a good reason that companies should benchmark with non-competitors.

(B) Getting "inside" information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult

This is effectively saying that it requires too much effort to benchmark against the competitors, so the better option is to benchmark with non-competitors. Not an argument against benchmarking with non-competitors.

(C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have cpmparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors

This is promoting benchmarking with non-competitors.

(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry

Promoting benchmarking with non-comptitors.

(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products of markets

This is suggesting that knowledge of their product markets is what makes a company successful - so in this case the company would have to benchmark with competitors - which is obviously not an argument for benchmarking with non-competitors. This is my choice.
Manager
Joined: 08 Jul 2008
Posts: 146
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 1

Re: One way to judge the performance of a company [#permalink]

Show Tags

27 Nov 2009, 01:30
Isn't it E ?
Intern
Joined: 11 Jul 2010
Posts: 34
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 6

One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

Show Tags

04 Sep 2010, 05:54
One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique, commonly called “benchmarking,” permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.
Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT:
(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that the manager making the comparisons already employs.
(B) Getting “inside” information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult.
(C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors.
(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry.
(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products of markets.
One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare   [#permalink] 04 Sep 2010, 05:54

Go to page    1   2   3   4    Next  [ 72 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 An electronics company’s two divisions showed consistent performance o 3 16 Jan 2017, 22:35
One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare 1 25 Apr 2013, 08:13
One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare 0 08 Nov 2012, 02:12
2 The two divisions of a high-tech company have performed 11 15 Aug 2013, 05:35
8 A company s two divisions performed with remarkable 15 05 Sep 2015, 20:50
Display posts from previous: Sort by