Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

One week a certain vehicle rental outlet had a total of 40 [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Jun 2006, 03:05

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

One week a certain vehicle rental outlet had a total of 40 cars, 12 trucks, 28 vans and 20 SUVs available. Andre and Barbara went to the vehicle rental outlet and chose 2 vehicles at random, with the condition that Andre and Barbara would not select two of the same type of vehicle (in other words, if one of them has an SUV, the other won't take an SUV, so the second person doesn't even consider the SUVs). What is the probability that, of the two vehicles, one of them is a car of van?

I was told that I should find the probability of them not choosing a car or van:

20/100*12/80 + 12/100*20/88 This equals 63/1100. Now, subtract 63/1100 from 1. Your answer is 1037/1100.

Can anyone explain why I should find the probability of them not choosing a car or van in order to solve. I was told this is the "1-x probability method". Is anyone familiar with this?

Re: One week a certain vehicle rental outlet had a total of 40 [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Jun 2006, 04:12

I think that way is not correct. I likely solve the problem this way
The number of ways you can collect 2 car depends on the condition is:
(40*60+12*88+28*72+20*80)=7072
And the ways you collect 2 cars without any car or van is
12*20=240
So the needed probability must be
1-240/7072=427/442
What do u think?

Re: One week a certain vehicle rental outlet had a total of 40 [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Jun 2006, 15:44

ggarr wrote:

One week a certain vehicle rental outlet had a total of 40 cars, 12 trucks, 28 vans and 20 SUVs available. Andre and Barbara went to the vehicle rental outlet and chose 2 vehicles at random, with the condition that Andre and Barbara would not select two of the same type of vehicle (in other words, if one of them has an SUV, the other won't take an SUV, so the second person doesn't even consider the SUVs). What is the probability that, of the two vehicles, one of them is a car of van?

Prob that A picks a van and B doesn't if A picks first is 28/100 = 7/25. Doesn't matter what B picks.

Prob that A does not pick a van and B does = 72/100 * 28/99 =56/275

Prob that either A or B picks a van = 7/25 + 56/275 = 133/275

Re: One week a certain vehicle rental outlet had a total of 40 [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Jun 2006, 16:00

One week a certain vehicle rental outlet had a total of 40 cars, 12 trucks, 28 vans and 20 SUVs available. Andre and Barbara went to the vehicle rental outlet and chose 2 vehicles at random, with the condition that Andre and Barbara would not select two of the same type of vehicle (in other words, if one of them has an SUV, the other won't take an SUV, so the second person doesn't even consider the SUVs). What is the probability that, of the two vehicles, one of them is a car or van?

In order to solve, I tried:

40/100*28/60 + 28/100+40/72
This is incorrect.

I was told that I should find the probability of them not choosing a car or van:

20/100*12/80 + 12/100*20/88
This equals 63/1100.
Now, subtract 63/1100 from 1.
Your answer is 1037/1100.

Can anyone explain why I should find the probability of them not choosing a car or van in order to solve. I was told this is the "1-x probability method". Is anyone familiar with this?

Re: One week a certain vehicle rental outlet had a total of 40 [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Jun 2006, 03:22

Quote:

One week a certain vehicle rental outlet had a total of 40 cars, 12 trucks, 28 vans and 20 SUVs available. Andre and Barbara went to the vehicle rental outlet and chose 2 vehicles at random, with the condition that Andre and Barbara would not select two of the same type of vehicle (in other words, if one of them has an SUV, the other won't take an SUV, so the second person doesn't even consider the SUVs). What is the probability that, of the two vehicles, one of them is a car or van?

According to Manhattan Gmat the correct answer is 1037/1100.
This is arrived at by:

1) finding the prob of them not choosing the car or van
20/100*12/80 + 12/100*20/88.

2) then subtracting the solution, 63/1100, from 1100/1100.

3) Your answer is 1037-1100.

Does anyone have any idea why I need to find the probability of them not choosing a car or van in order to solve? Again, Manhattan Gmat names this method the "1-x probability trick". Has anyone heard of this method?

There’s something in Pacific North West that you cannot find anywhere else. The atmosphere and scenic nature are next to none, with mountains on one side and ocean on...

This month I got selected by Stanford GSB to be included in “Best & Brightest, Class of 2017” by Poets & Quants. Besides feeling honored for being part of...

Joe Navarro is an ex FBI agent who was a founding member of the FBI’s Behavioural Analysis Program. He was a body language expert who he used his ability to successfully...