Only seven people this century have been killed by the great : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC) - Page 2
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 22 Feb 2017, 06:32

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Only seven people this century have been killed by the great

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 24 May 2013
Posts: 31
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 16

Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2013, 16:14
mikemcgarry wrote:
akijuneja wrote:
Hi mike,
I read in Magoosh's idiom book that for comparison less is preferred, so in this case shouldn't less be correct?

Dear akijuneja,
I have no idea what passage you might be citing from the idiom ebook, but this is a fundamental Diction issue ---- we use "less" for continuous uncountable items ---
less water, less air, less freedom, less democracy, less justice, less time, less space, less money
and we use "fewer" for countable items:
fewer people, fewer houses, fewer cards, fewer court cases, fewer hours, fewer inches, fewer dollars
See:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-gramm ... -vs-fewer/

This is a very important issue, which the GMAT frequently tests. It's very good to be clear on this.

Mike

Dear mike
I read that when we compare numbers and numbers decrease we use less.
For eg: the melting point of zinc is less than that of copper.
Here melting point is a number and countable, so shouldn't fewer be used?
Second eg. I have fewer/less flowers than he has?
Please explain which form is correct on second example?

Posted from my mobile device
 Magoosh Discount Codes Optimus Prep Discount Codes EMPOWERgmat Discount Codes
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 3825
Followers: 1327

Kudos [?]: 6095 [1] , given: 71

Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2013, 16:34
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
akijuneja wrote:
Dear mike
I read that when we compare numbers and numbers decrease we use less.
For eg: the melting point of zinc is less than that of copper.

Dear akijuneja,
You must distinguish between three different scenarios
(a) uncountable items
(b) countable items
(c) numbers

There's a difference between, say, a melting point or price of something --- that's a number, as opposed to seven cars or ten newspapers, which are counts of countable items. The rules for countable items is not the same as the rules for numbers. See:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-sente ... ve-idioms/

more time vs. less time (uncountable)
more justice vs. less justice (uncountable)
more people vs. fewer people (countable)
more barrels vs. fewer barrels (countable)
a higher melting point vs. a lower melting point (number)
a higher price vs. a lower price (number)
the price of A is greater/higher than the price of B (number)
the price of B is less/lower than the price of A (number)

Does all this make sense?
Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 336
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 685 [0], given: 136

Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Sep 2013, 08:44
Dear Mike,

I can confirm that the OA is indeed B. I have verified it from GMAT PREP,as I encountered this question while taking test.

I'm producing a part of question in which I'm having doubt.

Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies—less than those killed by bee stings.

B. movies—fewer than have been
In option B, I wanted to understand the construction of the sentence. Can we say that the blue colored part is Clause.? if yes, then what is the subject?

E. movies, fewer than the ones
Again, what is highlighted portion depicting? Is it a modifier, if yes, then what kind of modifier is this? Appositive, and what is it modifying? Movies..?
_________________

+1 Kudos me, Help me unlocking GMAT Club Tests

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 3825
Followers: 1327

Kudos [?]: 6095 [1] , given: 71

Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Sep 2013, 13:45
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
imhimanshu wrote:
Dear Mike,

I can confirm that the OA is indeed B. I have verified it from GMAT PREP,as I encountered this question while taking test.

I'm producing a part of question in which I'm having doubt.
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies—less than those killed by bee stings.

B. movies — fewer than have been
In option B, I wanted to understand the construction of the sentence. Can we say that the blue colored part is Clause.? if yes, then what is the subject?

E. movies, fewer than the ones
Again, what is highlighted portion depicting? Is it a modifier, if yes, then what kind of modifier is this? Appositive, and what is it modifying? Movies..?

Dear imhimanshu,
I'm happy to help. Thank you for verifying the OA.

Here's the full (B) version:
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies—fewer than have been killed by bee stings.
Remember that one of the qualities of parallel structure --- in some sense, the very point of parallelism --- is that we can omit a large number of common words as assumed. In the first clause, the subject is "seven people", or somewhat more formally, [number] people or "the number of people" --- those words are assumed in the second part of the sentence--- "fewer than the number of people that have been killed by bee stings", with the green part showing the common words that were properly omitted in the parallel structure. One could say --- the very point of parallelism is to omit such words.

Technically, I guess we would say --- the first part, up to "movies", is an independent clause. Then we get "fewer than [a number]" --- here, "than" serves as a preposition, and the omitted noun "number of people" is the object of the preposition, and the verb "have been killed" is the verb of a "that" clause modifying the object of the preposition.

Here's the full (E) version:
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movie, fewer than the ones killed by bee stings.
Again, "than" is a preposition, and the indefinite pronoun "the ones" is the object of the preposition, and this object is modified by a participial phrase "killed by bee stings." For more on participial phrases, see:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/participle ... -the-gmat/
I guess the GMAT prefers (B), because in (E) we are setting a full verb of a full close in parallel to participial phrase, instead of a full verb inside a noun-modifying "that" clause, which is what (B) does. Hmmm.

Does all this make sense?
Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 336
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 685 [0], given: 136

Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Sep 2013, 19:18
pqhai wrote:
Hi imhimanshu. I'm glad to help.
Hi gmatter0913. I'd like to confirm OA is E. Please refer to my explanation below.

The OA is B. I can post screen print as well, if you like.
_________________

+1 Kudos me, Help me unlocking GMAT Club Tests

Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2010
Posts: 384
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 174 [1] , given: 87

Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Sep 2013, 02:20
1
KUDOS
Yes Mike, you're right. I think GMATPrep seems to have two answers for this.

I re-checked the answer from GMATPrep twice and the OA is B. (I checked the option too)
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Mar 2013
Posts: 277
Location: United States
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Marketing
GPA: 3.5
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 101

Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Oct 2013, 06:57
E...

initially i was struck with D,E...

meaning: 7 people killed by shark.... fewer than 7 are killed by strings
error analysis: 1. . those is plural... used for far away from things/speaker...
2. less...uncountable
3. fewer.... countable....
so, AC,
D... people cannot be lower....
so E....
_________________

I welcome analysis on my posts and kudo +1 if helpful. It helps me to improve my craft.Thank you

Manager
Status: folding sleeves up
Joined: 26 Apr 2013
Posts: 157
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 530 Q39 V23
GMAT 2: 560 Q42 V26
GPA: 3.5
WE: Consulting (Computer Hardware)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 87 [0], given: 39

Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Oct 2013, 12:06
Even if the man eater of the movies is not there this sentence still makes sense, hence it is a non-essential modifier. These kind of modifiers should be bounded by comma. Fewer is countable. hence E

C is wrong because we see that which is modifying movies while it should modify white(adj) shark. A noun and its modifier should always touch each other.
Current Student
Joined: 30 Mar 2013
Posts: 96
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V35
GMAT 2: 690 Q50 V34
GMAT 3: 700 Q46 V40
GMAT 4: 730 Q50 V40
GPA: 3.41
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 131

Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Nov 2013, 03:37
akijuneja wrote:
Dear mike
I read that when we compare numbers and numbers decrease we use less.
For eg: the melting point of zinc is less than that of copper.

Posted from my mobile device

When we say "melting point", it is uncountable. Its is like , the "level of water" in a pool. It can be less not fewer.
Thats why, "fewer" is appropriate here because we are counting the number of people.
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 3825
Followers: 1327

Kudos [?]: 6095 [0], given: 71

Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Nov 2013, 10:39
avik629 wrote:
akijuneja wrote:
Dear mike
I read that when we compare numbers and numbers decrease we use less.
For eg: the melting point of zinc is less than that of copper.

Posted from my mobile device

When we say "melting point", it is uncountable. Its is like , the "level of water" in a pool. It can be less not fewer.
Thats why, "fewer" is appropriate here because we are counting the number of people.

Dear avik629,
Just to be clear, "melting point" is neither countable nor uncountable --- it is a third category: numbers themselves. If I ask, "what is the melting point of zinc?", the correct answer to that question is a number.

For uncountable nouns, we use "more" and "less".
For countable nouns, we use "more" and "fewer".
For numbers, we use "greater" and "less", or "higher" and "lower", or something along those lines.

It would be 100% wrong to use "fewer" for "melting point". We could use "less" or "lower", as in:
The melting point of zinc is less than that of copper.
The melting point of copper is greater than that of zinc.
Zinc has a lower melting point than does copper.
Copper has a higher melting point than does zinc.

See this post:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-compa ... -vs-fewer/

Does all this make sense?
Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Manager
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 95
Schools: Haas '16, AGSM '16
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 13

Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Mar 2015, 19:28
the sentence compare between the people killed by white shark and people killed by bee stings.

"Less" is used only for countable nouns, so A and C go out.

B compare between people killed by white shark and how be killed by sting bee. Hence, B goes out also.

D wordy and akward

E is correct
Manager
Joined: 11 Sep 2013
Posts: 115
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 26

Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2015, 18:03
stallone wrote:
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies—less than those killed by bee stings.
A. movies—less than those
B. movies—fewer than have been
C. movies, which is less than those
D. movies, a number lower than the people
E. movies, fewer than the ones

How exactly is "," & "-" should be used ??

OA is B. PLease recheck. "THE ONES" in E is ambigious, is it "movies" or "people"???
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 3825
Followers: 1327

Kudos [?]: 6095 [0], given: 71

Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2015, 12:58
camlan1990 wrote:
stallone wrote:
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies—less than those killed by bee stings.
A. movies—less than those
B. movies—fewer than have been
C. movies, which is less than those
D. movies, a number lower than the people
E. movies, fewer than the ones

How exactly is "," & "-" should be used ??

OA is B. PLease recheck. "THE ONES" in E is ambigious, is it "movies" or "people"???

Dear camlan,
I'm happy to respond. First of all, I corrected the OA: you are indeed correct that the OA of this official question is (B).

Nevertheless, I wouldn't say that "the ones" is entirely ambiguous in (E). Here's (E):
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies, fewer than the ones killed by bee stings.
The presence of the same verb, "killed," is enough to signal the parallelism of the subjects. Admittedly, something is funny about the modifying phrase after the comma coming so far from its target word, "seven." The dash works better than the comma here, to make it clear that we are referring to the whole of the sentence before the dash. Also, (E) is wordy and flaccid and indirect.

...fewer than have been killed... = sleek & elegant & sophisticated
...fewer than the ones killed.. = clunky, like something from a substandard middle school student

Does all this make sense?
Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Intern
Joined: 17 Jul 2015
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2015, 08:29
It would be E.

There are two points to make note of in this question.
1. use of comma and hyphen.
2. use of less or fewer.

we use FEWER for something we can count. Since here it refers to number of persons so it will be FEWER and not less.

we use a pair of parantheses or a pair of comma or a pair of hyphen to include an interrupting thought. An interrupting thought can be a clause or a fragment which doesn't has any effect on the sentence even if its is removed.
Since here the interrupting thought starts with a comma, it should end with a comma. Remember its pair of comma. Not a comma and a hyphen. You can use any one pair but not a mixture.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 544
Concentration: Technology, Other
GMAT 1: 0 Q47 V29
Followers: 34

Kudos [?]: 402 [0], given: 606

Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2015, 04:51
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
A few good pointers on B Vs E:

http://www.beatthegmat.com/gmatprep-pro ... tml#376566
http://www.beatthegmat.com/comma-with-e ... tml#380374
http://www.beatthegmat.com/only-seven-p ... tml#257319
_________________

--------------------------------------------------------
Regards

Manager
Joined: 14 Apr 2015
Posts: 83
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 48

Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2015, 22:41
abhishekv wrote:
I think the answer boils down to E.

Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies—less than those killed by bee stings.
A. movies—less than those
B. movies—fewer than have been
C. movies, which is less than those
D. movies, a number lower than the people
E. movies, fewer than the ones

Well, generally (I believe so) "-" is used when the clause following the hyphen is either an independent clause.

A,C,D are out. Between B and E, E is incorrect. What is 'ones' here? 'ones' is people. So was the number fewer than people?? No sense. ANSWER = B.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10622
Followers: 941

Kudos [?]: 207 [0], given: 0

Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2016, 04:49
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Joined: 03 Aug 2016
Posts: 106
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GPA: 4
WE: Design (Transportation)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 46

Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Oct 2016, 02:45
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies—less than those killed by bee stings.
A. movies—less than those
B. movies—fewer than have been
C. movies, which is less than those
D. movies, a number lower than the people
E. movies, fewer than the ones
Always read the non underlined part more carefully. It will give you some clue.

have been killed by the great white shark must be correct hence XXXXXX killed by bee stings. XXXXXX should have some thing + have been
A. is wrong for not having have been & also less is uncountable. INCORRECT
B. seems correct
C. Movies, which( movies has nothing to do with bee stings) the man-eater of the movies is used to define sharks. INCORRECT
D. movies, a number lower than the people. Which number it is talking about. The only number is in the clause Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark - INCORRECT
E. movies, fewer than the ones - INCORRECT same reason as D

Hence B is also correct

Also between Comma and Dash Here Dash is preferable.
Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great   [#permalink] 05 Oct 2016, 02:45

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 38 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great 10 20 Apr 2008, 10:33
6 Only seven people this century have been killed by the great 8 27 Jan 2008, 01:49
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great 12 11 Oct 2007, 07:54
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great 5 22 Apr 2007, 23:51
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great 10 27 Mar 2007, 09:28
Display posts from previous: Sort by