It is currently 23 Nov 2017, 21:07

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Only those students who maintain 2.5 grade point averages

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Mar 2009
Posts: 302

Kudos [?]: 598 [0], given: 22

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2009, 11:07
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

89% (00:59) correct 11% (01:28) wrong based on 338 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Only those students who maintain 2.5 grade point averages are allowed to participate in school sports. Amy is captain of the school's tennis team, so she must have at least a 2.5 GPA.

Which of the following statements best summarizes the main point of the above argument?

A) Students who don't maintain a 2.5 GPA can't participate in sports.

B) Amy is a good tennis player.

C) The school should only require a minimum GPA of 2.0 to participate in sports.

D) Amy has earned at least the minimum GPA required to participate on a school sports team.

E) Amy wouldn't be captain of the tennis team if her GPA were lower.

OA:
[Reveal] Spoiler:
D

Kudos [?]: 598 [0], given: 22

Intern
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 3

Kudos [?]: 6 [3], given: 1

Schools: McCombs '17

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2009, 12:37
3
KUDOS
The first step for any main point question, CR or RC, is to identify the main point. You can identify a main point by fact that other sentences in the statement will support the main point.

The first sentence gives us the GPA requirement. The second sentence's statement that Amy is the tennis captain and therefore must have a 2.5 doesn't support the GPA requirement for participation. Rather the fact that Amy must have at least a 2.5 is a result of the GPA requirement in the first sentence.

As such, the main point will be the second sentence. All we need now is a restatement of the second sentence.

A) Restates first sentence
B) Outside the scope of the question. Being the tennis captain may mean Amy is a good tennis player but, as Amy's skill is never mentioned in the question, this choice will be wrong.
C) Outside the scope. Lowering the GPA requirement is never mentioned in the question.
D) Summarizes the second sentence.
E) Leaves open multiple outcomes. We are never given the reason Amy was made captain in the question. All we know is that Amy's GPA is 2.5 or above. If her GPA is 2.6 and it falls to 2.5, then she is still eligible for the team and would not lose her position. If it is 2.5 and it falls to 2.49, then she would lose the position. Whenever there is multiple possibilities from an CR answer choice, the answer will almost always be wrong.

As a result, D is the correct answer. For CR questions, the idea to remember is that the answer will be reinforced within the question statement. Any answer choice that can't be tied back to information in the question statement will be wrong.

Kudos [?]: 6 [3], given: 1

Current Student
Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Posts: 1436

Kudos [?]: 1317 [1], given: 820

Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.35
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)

### Show Tags

11 Jun 2013, 08:44
1
KUDOS
WarriorGmat wrote:
I still dint understood why 'E' is wrong

Consider the following scenario:

The GPA of Amy is 4 and she is the captain
Now lets lower the GPA of Amy to 3.5

Still she has a GPA above the cut off, hence lowering the GPA does not have any effect on her being the captain until and uness her GPA does not go below 2.5

Hence we cannot conclude anything form this statement

Hope it helps!
_________________

ISB Preparation Kit | GMAT Debrief

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Kudos [?]: 1317 [1], given: 820

Manager
Joined: 09 May 2013
Posts: 54

Kudos [?]: 15 [1], given: 12

### Show Tags

12 Jun 2013, 08:30
1
KUDOS
ankurgupta03 wrote:
WarriorGmat wrote:
I still dint understood why 'E' is wrong

Consider the following scenario:

The GPA of Amy is 4 and she is the captain
Now lets lower the GPA of Amy to 3.5

Still she has a GPA above the cut off, hence lowering the GPA does not have any effect on her being the captain until and uness her GPA does not go below 2.5

Hence we cannot conclude anything form this statement

Hope it helps!

In 'A'

" Students who don't maintain a 2.5 GPA can't participate in sports."

I have negated above option because it is mentioned "sports" whereas argument talking about school sports..
is these correct reasoning to eliminate option 'A' ?

Kudos [?]: 15 [1], given: 12

Intern
Joined: 28 Jun 2009
Posts: 8

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2009, 11:16
option D

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 21 Jun 2009
Posts: 151

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2009, 21:14
Yes, D. And the explanation is good.

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2009
Posts: 181

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 5

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2009, 21:40
IMO......D

Since it restates the conclusion of the passage.

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 5

Director
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 807

Kudos [?]: 383 [0], given: 106

WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2009, 00:55
Yep D.
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ...
My debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Kudos [?]: 383 [0], given: 106

Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Jul 2009
Posts: 285

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 9

Concentration: Nonprofit, Strategy
GPA: 3.42
WE: Engineering (Computer Hardware)

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2009, 18:24
the original question can be written to be:

because school requires all sports players to have at least a 2.5 gpa, and because amy is on the tennis team, she must have a 2.5 gpa.

thus conclusion: she must have a 2.5 gpa. (aka D, she has earned the gpa required to .....)

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 9

Manager
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 54

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2009, 03:33

Main point have to have fundamental of meaning that appears in argument so that

A) It restates that first premise
B) It don't tell Amy is good tennis player although Amy must be good.
C) Nothing to tell this point
D) ==> right point
E) it revert the main point
_________________

Remember to give kudos if it's useful for you !!!

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Mar 2009
Posts: 302

Kudos [?]: 598 [0], given: 22

### Show Tags

16 Aug 2009, 02:28
thanks for you guys for the explanation...

Kudos [?]: 598 [0], given: 22

Director
Joined: 01 Apr 2008
Posts: 872

Kudos [?]: 861 [0], given: 18

Name: Ronak Amin
Schools: IIM Lucknow (IPMX) - Class of 2014

### Show Tags

16 Aug 2009, 07:28
Classic example. A refresher for basic CR concepts
For main point questions repeat of premise is a wrong answer however repeat of conclusion is a valid answer.

From choices, A restates the premise and D restates major part of the conclusion. Hence D is correct.

Kudos [?]: 861 [0], given: 18

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jul 2009
Posts: 343

Kudos [?]: 125 [0], given: 32

### Show Tags

16 Aug 2009, 20:32
Agree, back to basics. Sometimes CR questions get too twisted.

Kudos [?]: 125 [0], given: 32

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 May 2009
Posts: 305

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 13

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2009, 00:34
D it is

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 13

Intern
Joined: 07 Aug 2009
Posts: 7

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2009, 13:24
I too go with option D

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Status: mba here i come!
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 261

Kudos [?]: 1248 [0], given: 48

### Show Tags

24 Feb 2012, 14:05
conclusion: so she must have at least a 2.5 GPA.

therefore, D.
Amy has earned at least the minimum GPA required to participate on a school sports team.
_________________

press +1 Kudos to appreciate posts

Kudos [?]: 1248 [0], given: 48

VP
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1378

Kudos [?]: 1706 [0], given: 62

Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75

### Show Tags

29 Oct 2012, 03:30
closed down to D and E
E is incorrect because if we assume her GPA to be 3.0, then also she could have participated. On reducing her GPA by anything between 0.1 to 0.4, then also she could have participated. Hence Incorrect. Nice trap though.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 1706 [0], given: 62

Manager
Joined: 09 May 2013
Posts: 54

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 12

### Show Tags

11 Jun 2013, 05:57
I still dint understood why 'E' is wrong

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 12

Current Student
Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Posts: 1436

Kudos [?]: 1317 [0], given: 820

Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.35
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)

### Show Tags

12 Jun 2013, 11:12
WarriorGmat wrote:

In 'A'

" Students who don't maintain a 2.5 GPA can't participate in sports."

I have negated above option because it is mentioned "sports" whereas argument talking about school sports..
is these correct reasoning to eliminate option 'A' ?

Ya thats perfectly correct ... the premise talks about school sports specifically, whereas A talks about sports as a whole ... nice reasoning ... kudos to you
_________________

ISB Preparation Kit | GMAT Debrief

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Kudos [?]: 1317 [0], given: 820

Manager
Joined: 23 Jan 2012
Posts: 75

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 40

### Show Tags

22 May 2014, 07:21
Hello. I apologize for reopening this thread, but I dont see that anybody has taken into consideration the difference between 'earning a GPA' and 'maintaining a GPA'...Amy could have probably earned the min 2.5 GPA for one semester, but neither the premises nor the conclusion provide any information on whether she successfully could maintain that GPA....can anybody throw some light on this point?

Thanks.

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 40

Re: Only those students who maintain 2.5 grade point averages   [#permalink] 22 May 2014, 07:21

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 22 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by