It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 17:53

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 215

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 May 2007, 03:22
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

93% (01:04) correct 7% (00:00) wrong based on 65 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, is finding uses in medicine, archaeology, and criminology.
(A) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,
(B) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, having the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, a technique called proton induced x-ray emission
(C) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,
(D) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying it,
(E) A technique that was originally developed for detecting air pollutants and has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying the substance, called proton-induced x-ray emission,

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 May 2007
Posts: 152

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 May 2007, 06:48
(A) for the second vote :)

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 13 Mar 2007
Posts: 542

Kudos [?]: 90 [0], given: 0

Schools: MIT Sloan
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 May 2007, 07:51
Juggled between A and C - sticking with A

C - modifier error -- 'air pollutants,called proton' ..

Kudos [?]: 90 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Nov 2014
Posts: 66

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 21

Re: Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Apr 2015, 03:05
Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, is finding uses in medicine, archaeology, and criminology.

(A) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,
Correct
(B) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, having the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, a technique called proton induced x-ray emission
Usage of having is wrong + last sentence after comma must be placed after first sentence.
(C) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,
Usage of commas after first sentence is wrong + second sentence is fragmented sentence
(D) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying it,
same as C
(E) A technique that was originally developed for detecting air pollutants and has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying the substance, called proton-induced x-ray emission
Usage of was + has is ambuguous

Hence A
Ans!

Regards
SG

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 21

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Dec 2013
Posts: 304

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 113

Re: Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Apr 2015, 14:21
Yes. my choice answer A. Only option A reads well.

apache wrote:
Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, is finding uses in medicine, archaeology, and criminology.
(A) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,
(B) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, having the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, a technique called proton induced x-ray emission
(C) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,
(D) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying it,
(E) A technique that was originally developed for detecting air pollutants and has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying the substance, called proton-induced x-ray emission,

_________________

Kudos to you, for helping me with some KUDOS.

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 113

Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 18 May 2014
Posts: 35

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 204

GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V35
Reviews Badge
Re: Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Apr 2015, 06:29
Why is c) wrong? It is not distorting the meaning!
Is it because it is violating the noun touch rule? and that 'proton-induced x-ray emission' should be preceded by 'technology'?

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 204

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 24 Jan 2015
Posts: 67

Kudos [?]: 140 [1], given: 1

GMAT 1: 590 Q39 V31
GPA: 4
WE: Consulting (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Apr 2015, 18:25
1
This post received
KUDOS
Anu26 wrote:
Why is c) wrong? It is not distorting the meaning!
Is it because it is violating the noun touch rule? and that 'proton-induced x-ray emission' should be preceded by 'technology'?


Yes. The modifier "called proton-induced x-ray emission" must touch the noun "technique". (C) (D) (E) can all be eliminated by this one rule .

Option (B) is out because the modifier "Originally developed for detecting air pollutants" does not touch the noun "technique".

So Option (A) it is !

Kudos [?]: 140 [1], given: 1

1 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2015
Posts: 444

Kudos [?]: 238 [1], given: 39

Re: Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Apr 2015, 22:21
1
This post received
KUDOS
AVRonaldo wrote:
Anu26 wrote:
Why is c) wrong? It is not distorting the meaning!
Is it because it is violating the noun touch rule? and that 'proton-induced x-ray emission' should be preceded by 'technology'?


Yes. The modifier "called proton-induced x-ray emission" must touch the noun "technique". (C) (D) (E) can all be eliminated by this one rule .

Option (B) is out because the modifier "Originally developed for detecting air pollutants" does not touch the noun "technique".

So Option (A) it is !


Hi,

I think the reason is because in option C the technique ie. "proton-induced x-ray emission" should follow immediately after the clause "A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants"

In option A the technique rightly follows the first clause which is getting modified.

Regards,
Dom.

Kudos [?]: 238 [1], given: 39

Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 18 May 2014
Posts: 35

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 204

GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V35
Reviews Badge
Re: Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Apr 2015, 07:12
dominicraj wrote:
AVRonaldo wrote:
Anu26 wrote:
Why is c) wrong? It is not distorting the meaning!
Is it because it is violating the noun touch rule? and that 'proton-induced x-ray emission' should be preceded by 'technology'?


Yes. The modifier "called proton-induced x-ray emission" must touch the noun "technique". (C) (D) (E) can all be eliminated by this one rule .

Option (B) is out because the modifier "Originally developed for detecting air pollutants" does not touch the noun "technique".

So Option (A) it is !


Hi,

I think the reason is because in option C the technique ie. "proton-induced x-ray emission" should follow immediately after the clause "A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants"

In option A the technique rightly follows the first clause which is getting modified.

Regards,
Dom.



Thanks guys! Kudos to both of you! :)

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 204

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2012
Posts: 110

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 90

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 May 2015, 10:48
Anu26 wrote:
Why is c) wrong? It is not distorting the meaning!
Is it because it is violating the noun touch rule? and that 'proton-induced x-ray emission' should be preceded by 'technology'?



Called in option c also attempts to modify air pollutants.. As if air pollutants are called proton induced x- Ray emission! Clearly incorrect :)

Kudos.. If you like :)
_________________

Impossibility is a relative concept!!

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 90

VP
VP
avatar
S
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1403

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 916

Re: Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jul 2015, 21:59
this is hard problem.
this situation, one noun, many modifiers, can not explained in grammar books.

we should learn from og

when there is 3 modifer, we can not arrange them so that onn modifier have to jump over 2 modifers. SO, C,D and E are out

between B and A.
maybe gmat prefer that "which"clause should be a far modifier because is is full clause and is consider long. I do not know for sure.

if which clause touch the noun, another modifier must be far from the noun. far modifier which is not which clause is not prefered.

I find this hard to know the preference of gmat
_________________

visit my facebook to help me.
on facebook, my name is: thang thang thang

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 916

BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
B
Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Posts: 1437

Kudos [?]: 1309 [0], given: 819

Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.35
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2015, 00:47
(A) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,
Correct
(B) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, having the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, a technique called proton induced x-ray emission
By the touch rule for the modifiers, Originally developed should touch a technique
(C) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,
Modifier issue. It seems the air pollutants are called proton induced x-ray emission
(D) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying it,
Modifier issue. It seems the air pollutants are called proton induced x-ray emission
(E) A technique that was originally developed for detecting air pollutants and has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying the substance, called proton-induced x-ray emission,
Was and has do not depict the same tense, hence wrong. Plus this option is very clumsy as compared to option A
_________________

ISB Preparation Kit | GMAT Debrief

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Kudos [?]: 1309 [0], given: 819

Re: Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a   [#permalink] 16 Jul 2015, 00:47
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.