Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 26 May 2017, 14:39

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 25 Oct 2008
Posts: 601
Location: Kolkata,India
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 902 [1] , given: 100

Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Oct 2009, 22:33
1
This post received
KUDOS
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

45% (02:08) correct 55% (01:33) wrong based on 344 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

[url]Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it[/url], is finding uses in medicine, archaeology, and criminology.

(A) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,

(B) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, having the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, a technique called proton induced x-ray emission

(C) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,

(D) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying it,

(E) A technique that was originally developed for detecting air pollutants and has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying the substance, called proton-induced x-ray emission,
_________________

http://gmatclub.com/forum/countdown-beginshas-ended-85483-40.html#p649902

If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Manager
Joined: 01 Sep 2009
Posts: 64
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 82 [4] , given: 3

Re: proton-induced x-ray emission [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Oct 2009, 00:22
4
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Hi,

You can refer to Stacey's discussion here http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/og- ... t1277.html
I found it to be a nice explanation of this problem.
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Mar 2009
Posts: 305
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 517 [0], given: 22

Re: proton-induced x-ray emission [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Oct 2009, 03:21
IMO A
a technique called X, X must be near to 'a technique'
Manager
Joined: 14 Dec 2008
Posts: 166
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 39

Re: proton-induced x-ray emission [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Oct 2009, 11:03
A is the best, considering modifier placement, and verb agreement.
SVP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1536
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 44

Kudos [?]: 1198 [0], given: 2

Re: proton-induced x-ray emission [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 May 2010, 01:02
but in A, which is modifying emission, and that is incorrect, isnt it?

thanks.
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Manager
Joined: 09 Apr 2010
Posts: 79
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 3

Re: proton-induced x-ray emission [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 May 2010, 02:36
yeh agree with A ....

C) the modifier "called proton-induced X-ray emission" should be placed closer to "A technique"
SVP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1536
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 44

Kudos [?]: 1198 [0], given: 2

Re: proton-induced x-ray emission [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2010, 09:45
noboru wrote:
but in A, which is modifying emission, and that is incorrect, isnt it?

thanks.

nobody is going to clarify this?
thanks
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Retired Moderator
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1673
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 103

Kudos [?]: 992 [0], given: 109

Re: proton-induced x-ray emission [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2010, 10:34
noboru wrote:
noboru wrote:
but in A, which is modifying emission, and that is incorrect, isnt it?

thanks.

nobody is going to clarify this?
thanks

Hi noboru,
"Which" is not modifying emission, it is modifying "proton-induced x-ray emission". That's the noun.
"Which" gives more detail abou the technique. That's why A is correct.

Hope it helps
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

SVP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1536
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 44

Kudos [?]: 1198 [0], given: 2

Re: proton-induced x-ray emission [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2010, 12:04
metallicafan wrote:
noboru wrote:
noboru wrote:
but in A, which is modifying emission, and that is incorrect, isnt it?

thanks.

nobody is going to clarify this?
thanks

Hi noboru,
"Which" is not modifying emission, it is modifying "proton-induced x-ray emission". That's the noun.
"Which" gives more detail abou the technique. That's why A is correct.

Hope it helps

Actually I think that "which" modifies "technique", which would make sense to me. In that case, "called proton-induced x-ray emission" is kind of an adjective that gives more detail to "technique".
What do you think about that?
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Director
Status: No dream is too large, no dreamer is too small
Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 633
Followers: 44

Kudos [?]: 973 [0], given: 39

Re: proton-induced x-ray emission [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 May 2011, 07:11
thesfactor wrote:
Why is E not the answer

Because "Called proton induced x-ray emission" is not place after technique.
_________________

Collections:-
PSof OG solved by GC members: http://gmatclub.com/forum/collection-ps-with-solution-from-gmatclub-110005.html
DS of OG solved by GC members: http://gmatclub.com/forum/collection-ds-with-solution-from-gmatclub-110004.html
100 GMAT PREP Quantitative collection http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-prep-problem-collections-114358.html
Collections of work/rate problems with solutions http://gmatclub.com/forum/collections-of-work-rate-problem-with-solutions-118919.html
Mixture problems in a file with best solutions: http://gmatclub.com/forum/mixture-problems-with-best-and-easy-solutions-all-together-124644.html

Manager
Joined: 13 Nov 2009
Posts: 119
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 4
WE: General Management (Insurance)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 16

Re: proton-induced x-ray emission [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 May 2011, 19:27
A is the answer.As the introductory phrase refers to proton-induced x-ray emission and technique correctly modifies it.
Manager
Joined: 13 Nov 2009
Posts: 119
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 4
WE: General Management (Insurance)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 16

Re: proton-induced x-ray emission [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Jun 2011, 19:41
C is wordy and awkward construction. In Gmat sentences which are concise and clear are preferred.
Manager
Joined: 06 Feb 2011
Posts: 57
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 1

Re: proton-induced x-ray emission [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Jun 2011, 04:21
A for me too...
C and D distort the meaning by saying that the technique was originally developed....
B has issues with modifiers... The first dependent clause does not hav any connection with the rest of the clause...
E is incorrect because it has 'run-on' sentences.. Moreover it is wordy...

Senior Manager
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 250
Schools: UNC Duke Kellogg
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 4

Re: proton-induced x-ray emission [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2011, 16:46
The link to the MGMAT site w/ the explanation was excellent!
Manager
Joined: 09 Jun 2011
Posts: 144
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 1

Re: proton-induced x-ray emission [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Sep 2011, 00:35
WHICH in A and C both refer to emission. But as per OG A is correct and C is incorrect.

Can anyone elaborate on this one?
SVP
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Posts: 2069
Location: New York, NY
Followers: 394

Kudos [?]: 1441 [0], given: 8

Re: Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2013, 17:06
To keep it simple, here's how we look at it:

Originally developed for [X], [a particular technique]...is finding uses in x, y, and z.

This is a lot easier to comprehend and work with. Thinking like this will cut down the potential for stupid, overlooked mistakes.

Pay attention to "prepositional phrases" - keywords like "for" "in" etc...or just general phrases.

In the above example, I read:

"which can quickly analyze the chemical elements"

as "which can blah blah blah"

I read: "in almost any substance without destroying"
as: "in blah...without destroying it"

I read: "Originally developed for detecting air pollutants"
as
"Originally developed for blah..."

I read: "a technique called proton-induced X-ray remission"
as
"a technique called blah.."

Get used to using "blah" to replace fancy parts of the sentence and you'll be surprised at how simple a lot of these GMAT questions actually are.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10366
Followers: 999

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 0

Re: Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Apr 2015, 02:49
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Joined: 13 Nov 2014
Posts: 95
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GPA: 3.1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 28

Re: Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Apr 2015, 05:56
Quote:

Actually I think that "which" modifies "technique", which would make sense to me. In that case, "called proton-induced x-ray emission" is kind of an adjective that gives more detail to "technique".
What do you think about that?

I agree that "which" modifies technique. I just started studying SC seriously so this may not be 100% correct, but I would agree with noboru's second point that "called proton-induced x-ray emission" is an adjectival phrase.
_________________

Gmat prep 1 600
Veritas 1 650
Veritas 2 680
Gmat prep 2 690 (48Q 37V)
Gmat prep 5 730 (47Q 42V)
Gmat prep 6 720 (48Q 41V)

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10366
Followers: 999

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 0

Re: Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jun 2016, 04:09
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Director
Joined: 18 Oct 2014
Posts: 908
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.98
Followers: 98

Kudos [?]: 300 [1] , given: 69

Re: Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jun 2016, 05:48
1
This post received
KUDOS
tejal777 wrote:
[url]Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it[/url], is finding uses in medicine, archaeology, and criminology.

(A) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,

(B) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, having the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, a technique called proton induced x-ray emission

(C) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,

(D) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying it,

(E) A technique that was originally developed for detecting air pollutants and has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying the substance, called proton-induced x-ray emission,

-ed form modifies the closest noun. So 'called' must modify 'technique'. C, D and E are out.

'Originally developed for detecting air pollutants' and 'having the ability to analyze the chemical elements' are two modifies of 'a technique'. Either both should be closer to 'technique' or must be connected with a proper conjunction. It is lacking in option B.

Hence A is the answer
_________________

I welcome critical analysis of my post!! That will help me reach 700+

Re: Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a   [#permalink] 24 Jun 2016, 05:48

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 22 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 However a minimal role in causing air pollution, trash pollutes both 2 02 Feb 2017, 20:56
Originally developed by ancient Hawaiians 2 29 Jun 2014, 23:29
Originally developed by ancient Hawaiians, 0 07 Jul 2013, 06:39
128 Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a 50 17 May 2017, 19:30
4 Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a 17 23 Mar 2017, 12:24
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.