Skywalker18 wrote:
Oscar Charleston was a hitter so feared that even when he came to bat with the bases loaded he was routinely walked.
(A) a hitter so feared that even when he came- Correct
(B) the hitter so much feared that even when coming- usage of 'the hitter' seems incorrect as we are not talking about a specific hitter
(C) the hitter of such fearsomeness that even when he had come - same as B, the usage of past perfect tense 'had come'
(D) a hitter of such fearsomeness that even when he had come - the usage of past perfect tense 'had come', verb feared is better than adjective fearsomeness
(E) a hitter so much feared that even when coming- when coming does not tell us who did the action
...
please enlighten with the POE for this question
(B) "the hitter" is OK, but possibly adds an unnecessary dimension by conveying that there was only one such hitter. Not a strong decision point, as it could be the case that there was only one such hitter.
"so much feared" is not a great way to express "so feared." He wasn't "so much feared." He was "so feared."
"when coming" does not make sense. A batter is walked once the batter is at bat. "when coming" seems to convey that this person was walked while still coming to bat.
(C) "the hitter" is OK, but possibly adds an unnecessary dimension by conveying that there was only one such hitter. Not a strong decision point, as it could be the case that there was only one such hitter.
"of such fearsomeness" does not as clearly as "so feared" connect his being walked to how others felt about him.
"had come" is not as good as "came" because the sentence is about something that occurred "routinely." "had come" would make more sense in a sentence about what occurred on one occasion when he "had come" to bat. This sentence is about what would happen when "he came to bat." This is an interesting subtle difference.
(D) "of such fearsomeness" does not as clearly as "so feared" connect his being walked to how others felt about him.
"had come" is not as good as "came" because the sentence is about something that occurred "routinely." "had come" would make more sense in a sentence about what occurred on one occasion when he "had come" to bat. This sentence is about what would happen when "he came to bat." This is an interesting subtle difference.
(E) "so much feared" is not a great way to express "so feared." He wasn't "so much feared." He was "so feared."
"when coming" does not make sense. A batter is walked once the batter is at bat. "when coming" seems to convey that this person was walked while still coming to bat.
The best choice is (A).
_________________
Marty Murray | Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
See why Target Test Prep is the top rated GMAT course on GMAT Club.
Read Our Reviews