It is currently 19 Nov 2017, 23:18

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Over the last century, paleontologists have used small

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 266

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Location: Chennai,India
Over the last century, paleontologists have used small [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Feb 2006, 23:30
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Over the last century, paleontologists have used small differences between fossil specimens to classify triceratops into sixteen species. This classification is unjustified, however, since the specimens used to distinguish eleven of the species come from animals that lived in the same area at the same time.
Which of the following, if true, would enable the conclusion of the argument to be properly drawn?
(A) Not every species that lived in a given area is preserved as a fossil.
(B) At least one individual of every true species of triceratops has been discovered as a fossil specimen.
(C) No geographical area ever supports more than three similar species at the same time.
(D) In many species, individuals display quite marked variation.
(E) Differences between fossil specimens of triceratops that came from the same area are no less distinctive than differences between specimens that came from different areas.
_________________

vazlkaiye porkalam vazltuthan parkanum.... porkalam maralam porkalthan maruma

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 01 Feb 2006
Posts: 98

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Feb 2006, 00:13
C is the right choice. It proves that the classification is unjustified.

My choice was E at first but it strenghtens the unjustified classification.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2892

Kudos [?]: 336 [0], given: 0

Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008

### Show Tags

10 Feb 2006, 01:55
Is it C???

I was stuck between C and E. But C strengthens properly saying that even though no geographical area supports different species at the same time, then how the fossils found at one place can be classified in different species.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Kudos [?]: 336 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 788

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 0

Location: BULGARIA

### Show Tags

10 Feb 2006, 03:51
Think that E) is correct

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 27 Jan 2006
Posts: 103

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Location: Barcelona

### Show Tags

10 Feb 2006, 05:10
(A) Not every species that lived in a given area is preserved as a fossil.
Does not pertain to the argument being made at large. "Fossils are being classified and the differences between each one of them is being used as a parameter".
(B) At least one individual of every true species of triceratops has been discovered as a fossil specimen. Would weaken the conclusion by justifying the classification.
(C) No geographical area ever supports more than three similar species at the same time. Negate it and it will weaken the conclusion. A geographical area will support more than three similar species at the same time. (D) In many species, individuals display quite marked variation.
Generic argument. While in many species individuals display quite marked variation there is a possibility that in the triceratops there might be variations between individuals. (E) Differences between fossil specimens of triceratops that came from the same area are no less distinctive than differences between specimens that came from different areas.

Diffrences are no less distinctive irrespective of the area they come from. This strengthens the argument that the classification is just.
_________________

...................................................................

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Posts: 3281

Kudos [?]: 476 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Feb 2006, 05:51
If you step back from the passage, C emerges as the clear answer.

Kudos [?]: 476 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 266

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Location: Chennai,India

### Show Tags

11 Feb 2006, 09:41
good job guys OA is C
_________________

vazlkaiye porkalam vazltuthan parkanum.... porkalam maralam porkalthan maruma

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 474

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Feb 2006, 13:08
Late but its C.

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5201

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Feb 2006, 02:05
Even though (C) uses extreme language, it is the clear reason why 16 species cannot exist.

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 0

12 Feb 2006, 02:05
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Over the last century, paleontologists have used small

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.