Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 23 May 2017, 22:32

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Over the past 5 years, Company X has posted double-digit

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Posts: 70
Location: India
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 138 [3] , given: 18

Over the past 5 years, Company X has posted double-digit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Oct 2010, 21:05
3
KUDOS
7
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

67% (01:53) correct 33% (01:06) wrong based on 591 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Over the past 5 years, Company X has posted double-digit growth in annual revenues, combined with a substantial improvement in operating margins. Since this growth is likely to persist in the future, the stock of Company X will soon experience dramatic appreciation.

The argument above is based on which of the following assumptions?

A)Company X has a large market share in its industry.
B)Prior to the last 5 years, Company X had experienced similarly dramatic growth in sales associated with stable or improving operating margins.
C)The growth of Company X is likely to persist in the future.
D)The current price of the stock of Company X does not fully reflect the promising growth prospects of the firm.
E) The stock of Company X will outperform other stocks in the same industry.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Spread some happiness..Press Kudos!

If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Manager
Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Posts: 173
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 90 [0], given: 25

Re: Assumption CR (500-600 level) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Oct 2010, 21:41
Use POE.

A)Company X has a large market share in its industry.
Irrelevant. Does not tell us how the value of the company's stocks will appreciate.

B)Prior to the last 5 years, Company X had experienced similarly dramatic growth in sales associated with stable or improving operating margins.
This tells us that the Sales increased when the operating margins improved. Does not say anything about stock value.

C)The growth of Company X is likely to persist in the future.
Restatement. Does not say anything about stock value.

E) The stock of Company X will outperform other stocks in the same industry.
Comparison with stocks of other companies is irrelevant.

D)The current price of the stock of Company X does not fully reflect the promising growth prospects of the firm.
Correct answer. Author is assuming that the price of the stock should be/will be higher due to the growth in revenues and improvement in operating margins.
_________________

Give [highlight]KUDOS [/highlight] if you like my post.

Always do things which make you feel ALIVE!!!

Senior Manager
Status: Can't give up
Joined: 20 Dec 2009
Posts: 315
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 35

Re: Assumption CR (500-600 level) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2010, 14:30
Isn't it too hard to assume D....any better explanation?
Manager
Joined: 12 Aug 2010
Posts: 65
Schools: UNC Kenan-Flagler, IU Kelley, Emory GSB
WE 1: 5 yrs
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 50

Re: Assumption CR (500-600 level) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Nov 2010, 05:43
amma4u wrote:
Isn't it too hard to assume D....any better explanation?

Negate D.

The answer choice becomes:
The current price of the stock of Company X [strike]does not[/strike] fully reflects the promising growth prospects of the firm.

So it means that the growth and increasing OPM has already been factored in. So no more scope of growth in share value.

D is clearly the answer.
_________________

The night is at its darkest just before the dawn... never, ever give up!

Intern
Joined: 09 Oct 2010
Posts: 12
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Assumption CR (500-600 level) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Nov 2010, 11:15
Agree with yossarian84. Negation works best here.
Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2010
Posts: 94
Location: Hanoi, Vietnam
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 18

Re: Assumption CR (500-600 level) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jan 2011, 10:02
D is correct. But this is a really good question.
_________________

Hung M.Tran
Faculty of Banking and Finance,
National Economics University of Vietnam

Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2010
Posts: 194
Location: Prague
Schools: University of Economics Prague
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 15

Re: Assumption CR (500-600 level) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Jan 2011, 08:23
D, straight, easy... wish all GMAT questions were like this one
_________________

You want somethin', go get it. Period!

Manager
Joined: 08 Dec 2010
Posts: 206
WE 1: 4 yr IT
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 26

Re: Assumption CR (500-600 level) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2011, 07:20
D. good question
_________________

this time, we play for keeps

Manager
Joined: 27 Oct 2010
Posts: 185
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 20

Re: Assumption CR (500-600 level) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2011, 13:56
D. easy one. No more than 1 contender for OA.
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Mar 2010
Posts: 312
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 33

Re: Assumption CR (500-600 level) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2011, 14:45
for those using negation technique- keep in mind that it is logical negation that works all the time and not the exact opposite. Check out the Powerscore Bible for more on that technique
Manager
Joined: 12 Sep 2010
Posts: 224
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 24

Re: Assumption CR (500-600 level) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2011, 16:44
What is the source of the question?

Posted from GMAT ToolKit
Manager
Joined: 14 Nov 2008
Posts: 69
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 23 [1] , given: 1

Re: Over the past 5 years, Company X has posted double-digit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Aug 2013, 06:21
1
KUDOS
The argument concludes that the stock of the firm will experience rapid growth.
The basis for this claim is that the firm has shown strong historical performance
that is likely to continue in the future. The stock will appreciate dramatically in the
future as a result only if it has not already appreciated in anticipation of the
company's expected growth.
(A) The argument focused on the potential for stock appreciation rather than
company weight in the industry. A company with a large market share may well
experience poor stock performance, while a company with a small market share
may continue to grow and increase in value.
(B) Since the conclusion of the argument is made regarding the future outlook, it
is not necessary to assume that the company had been growing, or had even
existed, prior to the past 5 years. A new firm that has been in existence for only 5
years may well present an excellent investment opportunity.
(C) This statement is explicitly stated in the argument and therefore does not
have to be assumed.
(D) CORRECT. If this assumption were not true, i.e. if the current stock price
already reflects future growth prospects, then the premise that the company will
experience high growth is certainly insufficient to warrant future stock price
appreciation, since all of this growth would already be reflected in the current
price. It is necessary to assume that the current price of Company X stock does
not yet reflect the promising growth prospects of the firm, allowing the possibility
that the stock price will rise further.
(E) Note that the argument makes a claim about the absolute return of stock X
rather than its return relative to the industry. Therefore, to justify the rapid growth
in the stock price, it is not necessary to assume that the company will outperform
its competitors. For example, if the industry itself is growing very rapidly, other
companies in the industry can experience just as rapid appreciation in stock
prices.
CEO
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2501
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: Stanford '19 (D)
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Followers: 26

Kudos [?]: 341 [0], given: 167

Re: Over the past 5 years, Company X has posted double-digit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Mar 2016, 19:56
samark wrote:
Over the past 5 years, Company X has posted double-digit growth in annual revenues, combined with a substantial improvement in operating margins. Since this growth is likely to persist in the future, the stock of Company X will soon experience dramatic appreciation.

ok, let's understand the argument:
last 5y -> XX increase in R.
improvement in operating margins.

growth will continue in the future -> conclusion - stock will increase in value.

what assumptions are made?
1. the price of the stock can be influenced by the increase in R and/or improvement in operating margins
2. the price of the stock does not reflect future increases in revenues (which is kind of unlikely if you think about )

The argument above is based on which of the following assumptions?

A)Company X has a large market share in its industry.
this one is out of scope.

B)Prior to the last 5 years, Company X had experienced similarly dramatic growth in sales associated with stable or improving operating margins.
growth prior the 5 years mentioned is out of scope.

C)The growth of Company X is likely to persist in the future.
this is an inference, and is actually stated in the argument. so can't be the assumption.

D)The current price of the stock of Company X does not fully reflect the promising growth prospects of the firm.
AHA! this is the 2 assumption identified by me. If you negate this answer choice - you see how the conclusion is shattered.

E) The stock of Company X will outperform other stocks in the same industry.
comparing with other stocks is out of scope.

D seems to be the best.
Manager
Joined: 03 Dec 2014
Posts: 130
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V27
GPA: 1.9
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 391

Re: Over the past 5 years, Company X has posted double-digit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Mar 2016, 21:21
siyer wrote:
Use POE.

A)Company X has a large market share in its industry.
Irrelevant. Does not tell us how the value of the company's stocks will appreciate.

B)Prior to the last 5 years, Company X had experienced similarly dramatic growth in sales associated with stable or improving operating margins.
This tells us that the Sales increased when the operating margins improved. Does not say anything about stock value.

C)The growth of Company X is likely to persist in the future.
Restatement. Does not say anything about stock value.

E) The stock of Company X will outperform other stocks in the same industry.
Comparison with stocks of other companies is irrelevant.

D)The current price of the stock of Company X does not fully reflect the promising growth prospects of the firm.
Correct answer. Author is assuming that the price of the stock should be/will be higher due to the growth in revenues and improvement in operating margins.

I think if we negate the option C , conclusion falls. IMO, answer shloud be C. How D can be the answer. pls. explain.
Manager
Joined: 25 Dec 2012
Posts: 135
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [1] , given: 148

Re: Over the past 5 years, Company X has posted double-digit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Mar 2016, 22:15
1
KUDOS
robu wrote:
siyer wrote:
Use POE.

A)Company X has a large market share in its industry.
Irrelevant. Does not tell us how the value of the company's stocks will appreciate.

B)Prior to the last 5 years, Company X had experienced similarly dramatic growth in sales associated with stable or improving operating margins.
This tells us that the Sales increased when the operating margins improved. Does not say anything about stock value.

C)The growth of Company X is likely to persist in the future.
Restatement. Does not say anything about stock value.

E) The stock of Company X will outperform other stocks in the same industry.
Comparison with stocks of other companies is irrelevant.

D)The current price of the stock of Company X does not fully reflect the promising growth prospects of the firm.
Correct answer. Author is assuming that the price of the stock should be/will be higher due to the growth in revenues and improvement in operating margins.

I think if we negate the option C , conclusion falls. IMO, answer shloud be C. How D can be the answer. pls. explain.

Option C already stated in the argument.

"Over the past 5 years, Company X has posted double-digit growth in annual revenues, combined with a substantial improvement in operating margins. Since this growth is likely to persist in the future, the stock of Company X will soon experience dramatic appreciation."

Assumption is an unstated premise which should support the conclusion. But option C is the repetition of what has been already stated in the argument.
Jamboree GMAT Instructor
Status: GMAT Expert
Affiliations: Jamboree Education Pvt Ltd
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 286
Location: India
Followers: 76

Kudos [?]: 274 [0], given: 1

Re: Over the past 5 years, Company X has posted double-digit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Mar 2016, 23:10
"C" cannot be the answer since it is clearly stated in the argument that the growth is likely to persist in the future. Assumptions are unstated facts. Assumptions are always implicit never directly stated. Hence "C" can't be the assumption. It is stated that there has been a double digit growth in revenues and the author says that if this growth continues the stocks will experience dramatic appreciation. Hence the author assumes that stocks will appreciate further or in other words the current price of the stocks of company X does not fully reflect the promising growth prospects of the firm. Hence the answer is "D."
_________________

Aryama Dutta Saikia
Jamboree Education Pvt. Ltd.

Math Forum Moderator
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 1161
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Followers: 51

Kudos [?]: 550 [0], given: 60

Re: Over the past 5 years, Company X has posted double-digit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jan 2017, 11:05
The argument concludes that the stock of the firm will experience rapid growth. The basis for this claim is that the firm has shown strong historical performance that is likely to continue in the future. The stock will appreciate dramatically in the future as a result only if it has not already appreciated in anticipation of the company's expected growth.

(A) The argument focused on the potential for stock appreciation rather than company weight in the industry. A company with a large market share may well experience poor stock performance, while a company with a small market share may continue to grow and increase in value.
(B) Since the conclusion of the argument is made regarding the future outlook, it is not necessary to assume that the company had been growing, or had even existed, prior to the past 5 years. A new firm that has been in existence for only 5 years may well present an excellent investment opportunity.
(C) This statement is explicitly stated in the argument and therefore does not have to be assumed.
(D) CORRECT. If this assumption were not true, i.e. if the current stock price already reflects future growth prospects, then the premise that the company will experience high growth is certainly insufficient to warrant future stock price appreciation, since all of this growth would already be reflected in the current price. It is necessary to assume that the current price of Company X stock does not yet reflect the promising growth prospects of the firm, allowing the possibility that the stock price will rise further.
(E) Note that the argument makes a claim about the absolute return of stock X rather than its return relative to the industry. Therefore, to justify the rapid growth in the stock price, it is not necessary to assume that the company will outperform its competitors. For example, if the industry itself is growing very rapidly, other companies in the industry can experience just as rapid appreciation in stock
prices.
_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Intern
Joined: 13 Apr 2017
Posts: 49
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 2

Re: Over the past 5 years, Company X has posted double-digit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 May 2017, 00:47
agourav wrote:
The argument concludes that the stock of the firm will experience rapid growth.
The basis for this claim is that the firm has shown strong historical performance
that is likely to continue in the future. The stock will appreciate dramatically in the
future as a result only if it has not already appreciated in anticipation of the
company's expected growth.
(A) The argument focused on the potential for stock appreciation rather than
company weight in the industry. A company with a large market share may well
experience poor stock performance, while a company with a small market share
may continue to grow and increase in value.
(B) Since the conclusion of the argument is made regarding the future outlook, it
is not necessary to assume that the company had been growing, or had even
existed, prior to the past 5 years. A new firm that has been in existence for only 5
years may well present an excellent investment opportunity.
(C) This statement is explicitly stated in the argument and therefore does not
have to be assumed.
(D) CORRECT. If this assumption were not true, i.e. if the current stock price
already reflects future growth prospects, then the premise that the company will
experience high growth is certainly insufficient to warrant future stock price
appreciation, since all of this growth would already be reflected in the current
price. It is necessary to assume that the current price of Company X stock does
not yet reflect the promising growth prospects of the firm, allowing the possibility
that the stock price will rise further.
(E) Note that the argument makes a claim about the absolute return of stock X
rather than its return relative to the industry. Therefore, to justify the rapid growth
in the stock price, it is not necessary to assume that the company will outperform
its competitors. For example, if the industry itself is growing very rapidly, other
companies in the industry can experience just as rapid appreciation in stock
prices.

How can you think in a right way? I mean how you expect to find an option that will talks about the unawareness of people of the true value or the potential growth of the stock?
Re: Over the past 5 years, Company X has posted double-digit   [#permalink] 03 May 2017, 00:47
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Over the past ten years 0 08 Jun 2015, 06:44
Over the past ten years, the population of Dismaston has gro 0 05 Jan 2015, 03:51
34 Over the past ten years, the population of Dismaston has grown five ti 34 05 Nov 2016, 18:41
19 Over the past 5 years, Company X has posted double-digit 14 21 Mar 2016, 23:20
20 Owner of JavaJoint: Over the past year, the coffee store has 64 03 Mar 2017, 13:42
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Over the past 5 years, Company X has posted double-digit

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.