It is currently 19 Nov 2017, 07:30

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Over the past twenty-five years the introduction of

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2009
Posts: 322

Kudos [?]: 157 [0], given: 0

Over the past twenty-five years the introduction of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Mar 2010, 12:18
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

51% (01:46) correct 49% (01:53) wrong based on 300 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Over the past twenty-five years the introduction of labor-saving technologies has greatly reduced the average amount of time a worker needs to produce a given output, potentially both reducing the number of hours each worker works each week and increasing workers’ leisure time correspondingly. The average amount of leisure time per worker, however, has increased at only half the rate at which the average hourly output per worker has grown.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following is most strongly supported by them?

(A) Workers on average spend more money on leisure activities today than they did twenty-five years ago.

(B) Labor-saving technologies have created fewer jobs than they have eliminated.

(C) The percentage of the population that is in the work force has grown over the past twenty-five years.

(D) The average hourly output per worker has not risen as much as had been anticipated when modern labor-saving technologies were first introduced.

(E) Twenty-five years ago the average weekly output per worker was less than it is today.

Source : LSAT PrepTest 15 Q9
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 157 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Posts: 44

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 4

Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Healthcare
GMAT 1: 600 Q49 V25
GMAT 2: 650 Q49 V32
GPA: 3.5
WE: Pharmaceuticals (Consulting)
Re: Over the past twenty-five years the introduction of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Mar 2010, 12:35
E

A B & C are out of Scope
D is not correct (as the stimuli doesn't mention Anticipation any where)

Left with E.

Even if you don't use elimination, only E seems to be in line with the stimuli, all others seem out of context.

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 4

Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2009
Posts: 196

Kudos [?]: 111 [1], given: 12

Concentration: General Management, Sustainability
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Re: Over the past twenty-five years the introduction of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Mar 2010, 13:19
1
KUDOS
IMO it is E.
A) Workers on average spend more money on leisure activities today than they did twenty-five years ago.
>> Money out of scope.
(B) Labor-saving technologies have created fewer jobs than they have eliminated.
>> Less jobs out of scope.
(C) The percentage of the population that is in the work force has grown over the past twenty-five years.
>> Number of people is out of scope.
(D) The average hourly output per worker has not risen as much as had been anticipated when modern labor-saving technologies were first introduced.
>> At first I thought this could be one. But the passage mentions "twenty-five years the introduction of labor-saving technologies has greatly reduced the average amount of time a worker needs to produce a given output" .. that means it still is working. So D can not be the answer.
(E) Twenty-five years ago the average weekly output per worker was less than it is today.
>> Yes it is. This will be stongly supported by the above argument.

Kudos [?]: 111 [1], given: 12

Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2009
Posts: 322

Kudos [?]: 157 [0], given: 0

Re: Over the past twenty-five years the introduction of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Mar 2010, 22:12
OA is indeed E.

Kudos [?]: 157 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 13 Dec 2009
Posts: 248

Kudos [?]: 257 [0], given: 13

Re: Over the past twenty-five years the introduction of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Mar 2010, 02:46
_________________

My debrief: done-and-dusted-730-q49-v40

Kudos [?]: 257 [0], given: 13

Forum Moderator
Status: mission completed!
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 1391

Kudos [?]: 963 [0], given: 621

GPA: 3.77
Re: Over the past twenty-five years the introduction of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jul 2010, 02:57
E.

Guys , but what is interesting here so much ? )
_________________

Audaces fortuna juvat!

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 963 [0], given: 621

Intern
Joined: 14 Apr 2010
Posts: 30

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 1

Re: Over the past twenty-five years the introduction of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2011, 09:54
The stimulus,however,talks about numbers and averages and instinctively you think in terms of number and percentages chapter in Powerscore, the answer choices seems pretty easy and ONLY E is left out as every other AC seems out of scope.
Thanks,
-V

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 1

Retired Moderator
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1628

Kudos [?]: 1120 [0], given: 109

Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Re: Over the past twenty-five years the introduction of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2011, 15:47
+1 E

Remember that Must be true questions don't accept new information in the answer choices.
The correct answer must be an inference based on the estimulus.
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1120 [0], given: 109

Intern
Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 21

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: Over the past twenty-five years the introduction of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Feb 2011, 01:57
shd be E

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 14 Dec 2010
Posts: 202

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 5

Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 680 Q44 V39
Re: Over the past twenty-five years the introduction of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Feb 2011, 03:54
Easy E.

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 5

Manager
Status: Still Struggling
Joined: 03 Nov 2010
Posts: 135

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 8

Location: India
GMAT Date: 10-15-2011
GPA: 3.71
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Over the past twenty-five years the introduction of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Feb 2011, 05:28
+1 for E
no other options are even remotely related.
_________________

Knewton Free Test 10/03 - 710 (49/37)
Princeton Free Test 10/08 - 610 (44/31)
Kaplan Test 1- 10/10 - 630
Veritas Prep- 10/11 - 630 (42/37)
MGMAT 1 - 10/12 - 680 (45/34)

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 8

Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2672

Kudos [?]: 431 [0], given: 200

Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Re: Over the past twenty-five years the introduction of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 May 2016, 19:55
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
angel2009 wrote:
Over the past twenty-five years the introduction of labor-saving technologies has greatly reduced the average amount of time a worker needs to produce a given output, potentially both reducing the number of hours each worker works each week and increasing workers’ leisure time correspondingly. The average amount of leisure time per worker, however, has increased at only half the rate at which the average hourly output per worker has grown.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following is most strongly supported by them?

(A) Workers on average spend more money on leisure activities today than they did twenty-five years ago.
(B) Labor-saving technologies have created fewer jobs than they have eliminated.
(C) The percentage of the population that is in the work force has grown over the past twenty-five years.
(D) The average hourly output per worker has not risen as much as had been anticipated when modern labor-saving technologies were first introduced.
(E) Twenty-five years ago the average weekly output per worker was less than it is today.

only E makes sense.
A - out of scope
B - not discussed so no
C - not discussed so no
D - what was anticipated is out of scope.
E - last sentence says that the average hourly output per worker has grown.

E it is.

Kudos [?]: 431 [0], given: 200

Director
Joined: 04 Jun 2016
Posts: 647

Kudos [?]: 377 [0], given: 36

GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V43
Re: Over the past twenty-five years the introduction of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2016, 05:37

25 YEARS AGO :-Total hours available to a worker each week = 7 Days X 24 Hours = 168 Hours
Off course the worker will not work for all 24 hours a day. He would finish his job and relax. Those Relaxing hours are called Leisure hours.
Mathematically speaking :- Total hours in a week (Work hours in a week + Leisure hours in a week)
Lets assume 25 YEARS AGO worker works all 7 days for 10 hours a day (70 hours per week) and his rate was 10 toys an hour==> 10 toys per hour X 70 hours a week = 700 toys per week
Total weekly hours available= 168 hours
His weekly work hours = 70 hours
Weekly leisure time available to worker = (168-70)= 98 Hours
25 years ago Weekly output ===> 700 toys per week.

Now statements tells us that TODAY weekly output has grown by X amount But leisure time has grown by only X/2 amount.
Since the weekly production has definitely increased, lets assume it has increased 10 times. (it can be 2 times, 200 times, 1.8 times.. How many times it doesn't matter but the sure thing is that "hourly" output has increased and by extension the "weekly" output has also increased) so now the worker makes 10 times of 700 toys = 10 X 700==> 7000 toys
But his leisure time has increased only half the original leisure time= 98 hours + half of 98 hours= 98+49=147 hours (This statement is not totally useless by the way, as it will be used to calculate TODAYS working hours )

Today Worker works 168-147=21 hours .. WHATTTTT !! Today the worker works only 21 hours in a whole week and still produces 7000 toys a week
His weekly Production ===> 7000 TOYS per week

So , we can see that 25 years ago a worker produced 700 toys and today he produces 7000 toys. It means 25 years ago his weekly production was less compared to today.

What answer choice is reconfirming the math. It's E

(E) Twenty-five years ago the average weekly output per worker was less than it is today.
_________________

Posting an answer without an explanation is "GOD COMPLEX". The world doesn't need any more gods. Please explain you answers properly.
FINAL GOODBYE :- 17th SEPTEMBER 2016. .. 16 March 2017 - I am back but for all purposes please consider me semi-retired.

Kudos [?]: 377 [0], given: 36

Senior Manager
Status: You have to have the darkness for the dawn to come
Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Posts: 319

Kudos [?]: 219 [0], given: 159

Daboo: Sonu
GMAT 1: 590 Q49 V20
GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V38
Re: Over the past twenty-five years the introduction of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Nov 2016, 09:40
(E) Twenty-five years ago the average weekly output per worker was less than it is today.
it might be that workers are working for longer hours twenty five years ago, so may be output worker may be equal to or larger 25 years ago.
_________________

You have to have the darkness for the dawn to come.

Give Kudos if you like my post

Kudos [?]: 219 [0], given: 159

Re: Over the past twenty-five years the introduction of   [#permalink] 07 Nov 2016, 09:40
Display posts from previous: Sort by