Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 00:07 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 00:07

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Oct 2011
Posts: 179
Own Kudos [?]: 2544 [10]
Given Kudos: 23
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 19 Oct 2011
Posts: 87
Own Kudos [?]: 1235 [9]
Given Kudos: 33
Location: India
Send PM
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92901
Own Kudos [?]: 618866 [1]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 11 Dec 2010
Posts: 93
Own Kudos [?]: 97 [2]
Given Kudos: 50
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: On average, the number of speeding tickets issued in County X every ye [#permalink]
2
Kudos
On average, the number of speeding tickets issued in County X every year is three times greater than the number of speeding tickets issued in County Y during the same period.
Therefore, the number of people who exceed the speed limit must be higher in County X than in County Y.

Which of the following describes a flaw in the reasoning above?

A) The argument fails to take into account that the speed limit may be different in the two
counties. IRRELEVANT - Immediately eliminate

b) The argument fails to take into account that the number of tickets issued in County X may
reflect a lower proportion of drivers overall in that county. Last option to be eliminated - This would be relevant if the conclusion was "People are country X are drive rashly as compared to people in country Y" or something similar to this.

c) The argument fails to take into account that a single driver can receive more than one ticket
in a given year.CORRECT ANSWER - If a single driver receives more than 1 ticket then the conclusion may not be true. For eg-
Number of Tickets - Country X = 10
Number of Tickets - Country Y = 5
Number of People who got Tickets in Country X - 1 (same person got ticket 10 times)
Number of People who got Tickets in Country Y - 5 (all tickets to different people)
In this case, the conclusion will not be true and this option points out this flaw.


d) The argument fails to take into account that residents of County Y may be more law-abiding
overall. - IRRELEVANT - Immediately eliminate

e) The argument fails to take into account that residents of County X may not be aware of the
speed limit in that county. - IRRELEVANT - Immediately eliminate
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 07 Feb 2015
Posts: 36
Own Kudos [?]: 78 [1]
Given Kudos: 76
Send PM
Re: Weaken Revision: On average, the number of speeding tickets [#permalink]
1
Kudos
IMO - (c)
the flaw that jumps out in this is :
number of speeding tickets = number of people speeding
and that is only possible if a driver gets ticketed only once a year
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Nov 2015
Status:Aspiring GMAT Assassin
Posts: 8
Own Kudos [?]: 12 [0]
Given Kudos: 19
Location: United States (CO)
GPA: 3.3
WE:Law (Military & Defense)
Send PM
Re: Weaken Revision: On average, the number of speeding tickets [#permalink]
On average, the number of speeding tickets issued in County X every year is three times greater than the number of speeding tickets issued in County Y during the same period. Therefore, the number of people who exceed the speed limit must be higher in County X than in County Y. Which of the following describes a flaw in the reasoning above?

A. The argument fails to take into account that the speed limit may be different in the two counties. Doesn't matter. Speeding is speeding and we're only comparing the number of speeding tickets.
B. The argument fails to take into account that the number of tickets issued in County X may reflect a lower proportion of drivers overall in that county. Close but not quite. If drivers in County X received tickets in a much higher proportion than County Y, than there may be fewer total drivers receiving tickets. This states the reverse.
C. The argument fails to take into account that a single driver can receive more than one ticket in a given year. Bingo! There could be one person in County X that gets all the tickets!
D. The argument fails to take into account that residents of County Y may be more law-abiding overall. Doesn't matter. They could be saints that get speeding tickets.
E. The argument fails to take into account that residents of County X may not be aware of the speed limit in that county. Doesn't matter. You still get a ticket even if you didn't know what the speed limit was.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17215
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: On average, the number of speeding tickets issued in County X every ye [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: On average, the number of speeding tickets issued in County X every ye [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne