Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 19:57 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 19:57

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Apr 2004
Posts: 110
Own Kudos [?]: 5428 [181]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Corea
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4342
Own Kudos [?]: 30776 [42]
Given Kudos: 634
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 392
Own Kudos [?]: 468 [33]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: New York NY 10024
Concentration: Finance
Schools:Haas, MFE; Anderson, MBA; USC, MSEE
Send PM
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Jul 2003
Posts: 380
Own Kudos [?]: 450 [24]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers [#permalink]
17
Kudos
7
Bookmarks
kpadma wrote:
Another vote for A


E is out because the devastation and enslavement is singular.
"The X and Y" is singular, whereas "the X and the Y" is plural.

For example,
The CEO and chairman is in the office today.
Means: one person holding both the positions. Thus, this sentence warrents singular verb.

On the other hand,
The CEO and the chairman are in the office today.
Means: there are two people in the office. Therefore, this sentence
warrents plural verb.
General Discussion
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 192
Own Kudos [?]: 23 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: US
Send PM
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers [#permalink]
1
Kudos
A is the best.


E has a subject-verb agreement problem.
"the devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that have .."

Progress here in singular and should have the singular verb "has" as shown in A.
User avatar
CEO
CEO
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 2876
Own Kudos [?]: 1649 [4]
Given Kudos: 781
Send PM
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers [#permalink]
3
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
marine wrote:
1.For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to personify <<devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.>>

A. devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere
B. devastation and enslavement in the name of progress by which native peoples of the Western Hemisphere decimated
C. devastating and enslaving in the name of progress those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere which in the name of progress are decimated.
D. devastating and enslaving those native peoples of the western Hemisphere which in the name of progress are decimated.
E. the devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that have decimated the native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.


Marine, can you tell us the source of this SC?

IMO, the best answer is E.

1. Devastation and enslavement is a compound subject...and needs "have" to agree with it.
2. Also, E resolves the issue of what "that" refers to with the plural verb have.

Sincerely
Praet
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 899
Own Kudos [?]: 373 [3]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: NewJersey USA
Send PM
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Well this sentence is as ambiguous as it can get.
From the meaning point of view E looks the best as progress cannot be desimated ( it sounds awkward )
The sentence would be very clear if it had following construction

For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to personify in the name of progress the devastation and the enslavement that have decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.

or

For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to personify in the name of progress the devastation and the enslavement that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.

It is hard to say whether "devastation and enslavement " is singular or
plural. It depends on how it is used. Both are acceptable. For this reason I stick to A.

Let us hear the OA.
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Status:Retaking after 7 years
Posts: 864
Own Kudos [?]: 4467 [0]
Given Kudos: 221
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.75
Send PM
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers [#permalink]
But Shraddha, don't you feel that "the devastation and enslavement" is singular?
Example- Mahendra Singh Dhoni, the captain and wicketkeeper of the Indian cricket team, is a joker.:P
This sentence is absolutely correct and doesn't requires a plural verb.
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4342
Own Kudos [?]: 30776 [4]
Given Kudos: 634
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers [#permalink]
2
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Hi @Marcab

Mahendra Singh Dhoni, the captain and wicketkeeper of the Indian cricket team, is a joker.

In this sentence Mahendra Singh Dhoni is the subject. Hence we have singular verb “is” here. This verb has nothing to do with the modifiers that have been added in the sentence.

In the SC problem you have posted, “that” is the subject that refers to two individual entities – devastation and enslavement in the name of progress. These entities in general are not used as one subject. They are two different entities. Generally, those two entities are treated as singular that are generally used together. For example:

Bread and butter is my favorite breakfast.
Bat and ball is needed to play cricket.

In both the sentences above, “bread and butter” and “bat and ball” cannot be used independently for breakfast and cricket respectively. Hence these items make a pair. However, this is not the case with “devastation and enslavement in the name of progress”. That is why they are two separate entitiues and need plural verb.

Hope this helps. :)
Thanks.
Shraddha
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Status:Retaking after 7 years
Posts: 864
Own Kudos [?]: 4467 [0]
Given Kudos: 221
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.75
Send PM
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers [#permalink]
egmat wrote:
Hi @Marcab

Mahendra Singh Dhoni, the captain and wicketkeeper of the Indian cricket team, is a joker.

In this sentence Mahendra Singh Dhoni is the subject. Hence we have singular verb “is” here. This verb has nothing to do with the modifiers that have been added in the sentence.

In the SC problem you have posted, “that” is the subject that refers to two individual entities – devastation and enslavement in the name of progress. These entities in general are not used as one subject. They are two different entities. Generally, those two entities are treated as singular that are generally used together. For example:

Bread and butter is my favorite breakfast.
Bat and ball is needed to play cricket.

In both the sentences above, “bread and butter” and “bat and ball” cannot be used independently for breakfast and cricket respectively. Hence these items make a pair. However, this is not the case with “devastation and enslavement in the name of progress”. That is why they are two separate entitiues and need plural verb.

Hope this helps. :)
Thanks.
Shraddha


Thanks for the reply shraddha.
So the "the" has no significance? Would it have been the same effect, if it were without "the"?
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4342
Own Kudos [?]: 30776 [3]
Given Kudos: 634
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers [#permalink]
3
Kudos
Expert Reply
Marcab wrote:

Thanks for the reply shraddha.
So the "the" has no significance? Would it have been the same effect, if it were without "the"?


Hi there,

Well, the usage of "the" has not been tested exclusively on GMAT. Also, in my first post, I did mention that "the" is ellipsed or understood before "enslavement" because the already appears before "devastation", the first entity in the parallel list. Hence, it is not needed to repeat it before "enslavement". If we remove "the" before "devastation" in choice E, then also it would stand correct because of the SV agreement, which is a deterministic issue in selecting the correct answer.

Hope this helps.
Shraddha
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2013
Posts: 51
Own Kudos [?]: 64 [3]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers [#permalink]
3
Kudos
Quite tough, but this just underscores "that" can modify whatever makes "logical sense".
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 May 2014
Posts: 116
Own Kudos [?]: 339 [2]
Given Kudos: 28
Send PM
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers [#permalink]
2
Kudos
This is a tough question but the answer is a clear E.

When you cut the fluff, the simple story reads:
"Columbus has come to personify the devastation and enslavement that have decimated the native peoples"
So the devastation and enslavement decimated the native peoples; not the progress.

The phrase "in the name of progress" does make this sentence more confusing. However, you must know that relative clauses can be an exception to the "Modifier Touch Rule".

For example,
"The rain in the province of Santa Monica that has caused a severe impact will continue for 2 more days."
- The simple story reads: "The rain that has caused a severe impact will continue for 2 more days"
- The phrase "in the province of Santa Monica" is actually a modifier modifying the noun rain.

Therefore, "that" actually modifies the more distant noun "rain" and not the immediately preceding noun phrase "in the province of Santa Monica".
In other words, the "rain" caused the severe impact; not the province of Santa Monica.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Oct 2013
Posts: 108
Own Kudos [?]: 58 [0]
Given Kudos: 129
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers [#permalink]
between A and E

Has vs Have

I thought "progress" is being referred and marked A as Progress is singular.
How will i know to what is this has or have are referring to ? "devastation and enslavement" or "progress" ? Experts pleas explain
CEO
CEO
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 3675
Own Kudos [?]: 3528 [1]
Given Kudos: 149
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Send PM
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
deepthit wrote:
I thought "progress" is being referred and marked A as Progress is singular.
How will i know to what is this has or have are referring to ? "devastation and enslavement" or "progress" ? Experts pleas explain

Hi deepthit, this is because from a logic (intended meaning) perspective, clearly devastation and enslavement (and not progress) have decimated the native peoples.

p.s. Our book EducationAisle Sentence Correction Nirvana discusses the usage of that, its application and examples in significant detail. If someone is interested, PM me your email-id; I can mail the corresponding section.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 09 Apr 2016
Posts: 28
Own Kudos [?]: 21 [1]
Given Kudos: 600
Send PM
Re: For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Marcab wrote:
For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to personify devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.


A. devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere
B. devastation and enslavement in the name of progress by which native peoples of the Western Hemisphere decimated
C. devastating and enslaving in the name of progress those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere which in the name of progress are decimated.
D. devastating and enslaving those native peoples of the western Hemisphere which in the name of progress are decimated.
E. the devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that have decimated the native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.

MODERATORS: Please note that since the question was originally posted in 2004, no correct answer has been provided yet. This post is just to ensure that I, in addition to all other members of the club, get the correct answer.


Please correct the flaws in B) and C)
Attachments

Screen Shot 2016-11-18 at 10.08.35 AM.png
Screen Shot 2016-11-18 at 10.08.35 AM.png [ 547.48 KiB | Viewed 44585 times ]

Founder
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 37300
Own Kudos [?]: 72861 [0]
Given Kudos: 18857
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Send PM
For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers [#permalink]
Expert Reply

!
Please note that this question is from 2004 and is a slightly different version of the question included in the EP1.
The updated question can be found here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/for-many-rev ... 60640.html

This discussion is currently locked.



Edit: This discussion has retired. Find the new thread HERE
GMAT Club Bot
For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to pers [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne