Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 17:14 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 17:14

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 19 Jun 2012
Posts: 13
Own Kudos [?]: 435 [53]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 23 Oct 2013
Posts: 143
Own Kudos [?]: 868 [20]
Given Kudos: 9
Send PM
General Discussion
SVP
SVP
Joined: 06 Nov 2014
Posts: 1798
Own Kudos [?]: 1367 [3]
Given Kudos: 23
Send PM
Moderator
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1090
Own Kudos [?]: 1970 [2]
Given Kudos: 200
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Send PM
Re: Sociologist: Romantics who claim that people are not [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Sociologist: Romantics who claim that people are not born evil but may be made evil by the imperfect institutions that they form cannot be right, for they misunderstand the causal relationshipbetween people and their institutions. After all,institutions are merely collections of people.

Which one of the following principles, if valid, would most help to justify the sociologist’s argument?

(A) People acting together in institutions can do more good or evil than can people acting individually. -Out of scope

(B) Institutions formed by people are inevitably imperfect. -Imperfect doesn't mean that the people will become evil in an institution

(C) People should not be overly optimistic in their view of individual human beings. -optimistic? out of scope

(D) A society’s institutions are the surest gauge of that society’s values. -This will strengthen romantics' view point

(E) The whole does not determine the properties of the things that compose it. -Correct. This gives a relation between the people and institutions in a way that is opposite to the explanation given by Romantics
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Oct 2019
Posts: 18
Own Kudos [?]: 62 [1]
Given Kudos: 48
Location: India
GPA: 4
Send PM
Re: Sociologist: Romantics who claim that people are not [#permalink]
1
Kudos
creativeminddu wrote:
Sociologist: Romantics who claim that people are not born evil but may be made evil by the imperfect institutions that they form cannot be right, for they misunderstand the causal relationshipbetween people and their institutions. After all,institutions are merely collections of people.

Which one of the following principles, if valid, would most help to justify the sociologist’s argument?

(A) People acting together in institutions can do more good or evil than can people acting individually.

(B) Institutions formed by people are inevitably imperfect.

(C) People should not be overly optimistic in their view of individual human beings.

(D) A society’s institutions are the surest gauge of that society’s values.

(E) The whole does not determine the properties of the things that compose it.

Source: LSAT


The argument tells us that Sociologists believe that Romantics should not be identified by their institutions (group of people). This is exactly what option E tells us.
A- Whether people do more good or evil than an individual is irrelevant to the argument.
B-Whether the institutions are perfect or not is not relevant.
C- Talks about optimism, which is not relevant.
D- This provides a reverse relationship (weakens the conclusion) and hence can be eliminated.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 07 Jan 2012
Posts: 48
Own Kudos [?]: 16 [0]
Given Kudos: 72
Location: Canada
Concentration: International Business, Entrepreneurship
GMAT Date: 04-30-2012
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: Sociologist: Romantics who claim that people are not [#permalink]
Why are we getting LSAT ones in GMAT forum?
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Nov 2020
Posts: 119
Own Kudos [?]: 25 [0]
Given Kudos: 96
Send PM
Re: Sociologist: Romantics who claim that people are not [#permalink]
This was a relatively easy one we have to figure ouut a reason as of why the institutions are creating the desired value and therefore if the properties are different then it can lead different end results which if proven correct can lend support for the same therefore IMO E
Manager
Manager
Joined: 31 May 2015
Posts: 215
Own Kudos [?]: 180 [0]
Given Kudos: 218
Location: Fiji
Schools: IE
GPA: 1
Send PM
Sociologist: Romantics who claim that people are not [#permalink]
It is hard to agree with the sociologist because most babies are not evil but become evil through the influence of other people throughout their uprising.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17206
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Sociologist: Romantics who claim that people are not [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Sociologist: Romantics who claim that people are not [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne