Hospital executive: At a recent conference on nonprofit

I will go with B.
Computers expert, though knowing a lot about IT and security, are probably not the best experts on what the "highest priority" of hospital execs should be. The priorities should be based on business strategies, trial runs, experience etc which certainly is much more convoluted.
Whats the OA?
_________________

The OA here is B ...

The correct choice reads : The argument relies on the testimony of experts whose expertise is not shown to be sufficiently broad to support their general claim.

The stimulus mentions COMPUTER EXPERTS.. Although it is not unreasonable to assume that computer experts would be well versed with computer problems, it is inaccurate to assume that the computer experts would also be specialists in the field of hospital and university management...nor is it shown anywhere that these COMPUTER experts are credible experts on what constitutes the biggest threats to these institutes. If these computer experts were shown to be experts in HEALTHCARE IT, or any allied discipline the argument may well have been more logical, but in the absence of any proof of them (the computer experts) having any expertise regarding hospitals and universities we cannot take their knowledge about computers in general to cover all aspects of all industries where computers might be useful. That is akin to asking a computer expert who is a master at fixing computer hardware to evaluate the problems with Walmart's IT based supply chain ... Clearly his/her opinion will not be considered credible unless he could show his expertise in the field of retail based logistics & IT..
_________________

+1 for B

Pre-phrase : As souvik101990 mentioned General Computer experts need not be experts in specified Data Securities..


(B) The argument relies on the testimony of experts
whose expertise is not shown to be sufficiently
broad to support their general claim.
-- Correct ---

OA posted is strange. first time seen that the capability of experts/critics/some or anyone making claim is challenged. DO you have OE ?

They are computer experts, not hospital experts. Their opinion is not being challenged; the hospital executive’s is.
B is correct.
_________________

Hospital Executive is drawing conclusion on the recommendations of computer experts , without justifying the applicability of the issue the the Hospital in question...

It may be such that the general applicability of unauthorized access to confidential data may not be a matter of concern for the Hospital ( Perhaps it has state of the art technology to protect such data)...

Thus the Hospital executive blindly relies on the testimony of Computer experts , without considering the applicability in this context... Hence answer will be (B)..
_________________

D can't be correct.

Some may think:

the argument is jumping from large institutions such as universities and hospitals to "clients".
how do we know whats true for universities and hospitals is true for CLIENTS also. We know nothing about industry client belong to.

But this is said by Hospital executive so client must be relevant to hospital industry.

But why B is correct:
when we see computer expert so that means they know what they are doing. why do the argument has to prove their expertise. THEIR EXPERTISE IS NOT IN THE QUESTION. You have to accept the premises at face-value and not attack the premise but conclusion.

adkikani
gmatexam439
nightblade354

Can you share your thoughts on B vs D?

D says that the argument makes a conclusion about a group (hospital clients/Hospitals) based on unrepresentative sample of that group

If the conclusion is drawn on a very small set of hospitals, then the conclusion may be incorrectly drawn

This is also a possible weakener. Can you help me identify wwhere I am going wrong?
_________________

pikolo2510,

As far as I can tell, the reason B is wrong is because of the following: (D) The argument draws a general conclusion about a group based on data about an unrepresentative sample of that group.

How do we know the data isn't representative? All we know is that there are a few experts talking about certain ideas. Their data could be every hospital in the world, it could be just one. Because we don't know, this answer must be eliminated. Does this help?
_________________

Hi pikolo2510,

Hospital executive: At a recent conference on nonprofit management, several computer experts maintained that the most significant threat faced by large institutions such as universities and hospitals is unauthorized access to confidential data. In light of this testimony, we should make the protection of our clients’ confidentiality our highest priority.

The hospital executive’s argument is most vulnerable to which one of the following objections?

(B) The argument relies on the testimony of experts whose expertise is not shown to be sufficiently broad to support their general claim.
--This sounds good because the argument is talking about computer experts. Since I am an It guy I can relate to this because even though I might have explicit IT knowledge I am not an expert in Networking and Security. Thus, the argument needs to substantiate that the experts are "security" experts.

(D) The argument draws a general conclusion about a group based on data about an unrepresentative sample of that group.
--This is irrelevant in the question at hand. The argument states nothing about the sample of universities. Neither the argument is about a scenario that might require sampling.

You might want to look at this question from another angle. The conclusion is "we should make the protection of our clients’ confidentiality our highest priority" and you need to weaken this. How can you do that? Even if the sample isn't correct the conclusion may or may not stand. Thus "D" is a neutral statement. On the other hand, option "B" is true would definitely weaken the analysis put forth by the "experts".

I hope that helps !!

Hospital executive: At a recent conference on nonprofit management, several computer experts maintained that the most significant threat faced by large institutions such as universities and hospitals is unauthorized access to confidential data. In light of this testimony, we should make the protection of our clients’ confidentiality our highest priority.

The hospital executive’s argument is most vulnerable to which one of the following objections?

(A) The argument confuses the causes of a problem with the appropriate solutions to that problem. - WRONG. Passage rightly does so - to the point conclusion, whether right or wrong its a different case.

(B) The argument relies on the testimony of experts whose expertise is not shown to be sufficiently broad to support their general claim. - CORRECT. Computer experts'expertise can be one of the factors to take such a decision but not the sole one.

(C) The argument assumes that a correlation between two phenomena is evidence that one is the cause of the other. - WRONG. Not inferable.

(D) The argument draws a general conclusion about a group based on data about an unrepresentative sample of that group. - WRONG. Which group does it refers to? If its computer experts then several may stand for large number also.

(E) The argument infers that a property belonging to large institutions belongs to all institutions.

Answer B.
_________________

D is incorrect as the speaker is hospital executive and it is mentioned in the argument about large inst. like universities and hospitals

pl help in understanding why D id wrong

Several posts in this thread answer your question but if it's still unclear below is a video explanation of this question:



Hope it helps.
_________________

Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________