Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 14:37 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 14:37

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4346
Own Kudos [?]: 30782 [18]
Given Kudos: 635
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4346
Own Kudos [?]: 30782 [4]
Given Kudos: 635
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 23 Oct 2010
Posts: 235
Own Kudos [?]: 1111 [2]
Given Kudos: 73
Location: Azerbaijan
Concentration: Finance
Schools: HEC '15 (A)
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V38
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 57 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Send PM
Re: The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain reaction. On [#permalink]
1
Kudos
In my opinion, this a conditional logic type question.

From my perspective:

The first sentence is an initial statement. Then the conditional logic comes into play:

IF Manufacturing outsourced, then Process engineering can't be maintained
MO--> not PEM

If no PEM--> not next generation process technologies
not PEM--> not NGPT

If not Next Generation Technologies--> Not new products
not NGPT--> not new products

Putting it all together you have, and must follow the arrow.


Manufacturing Outsourcing--> No/difficult Process Engineering-->No Next Generation Process Technologies--->No New Products


A. In the long term, an economy with a deteriorating infrastructure for advanced process engineering and with declining manufacturing activity will likely lose its ability to innovate.
Seems Correct. Difficult Process Engineering is touched upon, and declining manufacturing activity. Both lead to No new products, which can inferred to be "innovation"
B. To develop new products, a company must never cut down on its manufacturing.
If new products for a company, then never lower manufacturing? We don't know this. A company could hypothetically lower it, all we know based on the question is a "region"
C. An increase in the manufacturing activity in a region leads to increase in innovation within the region
This is speculation, we just know about the decline, we don't know about the increase
D. To develop new products, a company needs to frequently change its processes. WE know nothing about changing processes
E. An economy that has growing manufacturing capabilities will churn out more new products than other economies. No. There is nothing alluding toward that in the question.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 67
Own Kudos [?]: 385 [0]
Given Kudos: 62
Location: India
GMAT Date: 10-25-2012
WE:Consulting (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain reaction. On [#permalink]
The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain reaction. Once manufacturing is outsourced, process-engineering expertise can’t be maintained, since it depends on daily interactions with manufacturing. Without process-engineering capabilities, companies find it increasingly difficult to conduct advanced research on next-generation process technologies. Without the ability to develop such new processes, they find they can no longer develop new products.

decline in manufacturing initiates chain reaction
Manufacturing outsourcing -> decline process Eng expertise -> decline adv research new process tech -> new prod dev decline


Which of the following is best supported by the passage?

A. In the long term, an economy with a deteriorating infrastructure for advanced process engineering and with declining manufacturing activity will likely lose its ability to innovate. incorrect- passage does not talks about infrastructure for advanced process engineering
B. To develop new products, a company must never cut down on its manufacturing. correct- pass fact test
C. An increase in the manufacturing activity in a region leads to increase in innovation within the region not necessarily true
D. To develop new products, a company needs to frequently change its processes. not supported by the passage
E. An economy that has growing manufacturing capabilities will churn out more new products than other economies. not supported by the passage
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Status:Time to apply!
Posts: 95
Own Kudos [?]: 440 [0]
Given Kudos: 166
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 600 Q48 V25
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V29
GMAT 3: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.2
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain reaction. On [#permalink]
I vote for (B).

(A) talks about economy. But in the passage, nothing about economy is discussed in general
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Oct 2012
Status:Final Lap
Posts: 190
Own Kudos [?]: 1284 [0]
Given Kudos: 85
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.54
WE:Project Management (Retail Banking)
Send PM
Re: The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain reaction. On [#permalink]
egmat wrote:
The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain reaction. Once manufacturing is outsourced, process-engineering expertise can’t be maintained, since it depends on daily interactions with manufacturing. Without process-engineering capabilities, companies find it increasingly difficult to conduct advanced research on next-generation process technologies. Without the ability to develop such new processes, they find they can no longer develop new products.

Which of the following is best supported by the passage?

A. In the long term, an economy with a deteriorating infrastructure for advanced process engineering and with declining manufacturing activity will likely lose its ability to innovate.
B. To develop new products, a company must never cut down on its manufacturing.
C. An increase in the manufacturing activity in a region leads to increase in innovation within the region
D. To develop new products, a company needs to frequently change its processes.
E. An economy that has growing manufacturing capabilities will churn out more new products than other economies.


The conclusion is : Without the ability to develop such new processes, they find they can no longer develop new products.

I think that D is best supported by the conclusion since changing its processes is the same as bringing new processes. Hence, a company needs to frequently change its processes in order to develop new products ..
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Status:Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Posts: 734
Own Kudos [?]: 1857 [1]
Given Kudos: 70
Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Send PM
Re: The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain reaction. On [#permalink]
1
Kudos
I think the answer is straight A...

Options d is totally out.
B,c and E all mean the same thing...so we can eliminate all 3 on the basis if one is correcct why not the rest 2.
Only remaining answer is A and IMO its the best answer.

If we want proper reasoning for selecting A ...here it is:-
Manufacturing decline----.> Outsourcing -------> Process eng looses expertises i.e quality -----> No more innovation in r & D--------> No more innovation.....

Read the it in conjunction with A ....
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4346
Own Kudos [?]: 30782 [0]
Given Kudos: 635
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
Re: The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain reaction. On [#permalink]
Expert Reply
anshunadir wrote:
The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain reaction. Once manufacturing is outsourced, process-engineering expertise can’t be maintained, since it depends on daily interactions with manufacturing. Without process-engineering capabilities, companies find it increasingly difficult to conduct advanced research on next-generation process technologies. Without the ability to develop such new processes, they find they can no longer develop new products.

decline in manufacturing initiates chain reaction
Manufacturing outsourcing -> decline process Eng expertise -> decline adv research new process tech -> new prod dev decline


Which of the following is best supported by the passage?

A. In the long term, an economy with a deteriorating infrastructure for advanced process engineering and with declining manufacturing activity will likely lose its ability to innovate. incorrect- passage does not talks about infrastructure for advanced process engineering
B. To develop new products, a company must never cut down on its manufacturing. correct- pass fact test
C. An increase in the manufacturing activity in a region leads to increase in innovation within the region not necessarily true
D. To develop new products, a company needs to frequently change its processes. not supported by the passage
E. An economy that has growing manufacturing capabilities will churn out more new products than other economies. not supported by the passage


Hi,

Your reasoning is mostly correct. However, option B talks about a company while the passage just talk about "regions". Therefore, B is incorrect.

Also, refer the detailed explanations to see why A is correct.

Happy learning! :)

Thanks.
Chiranjeev
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4346
Own Kudos [?]: 30782 [0]
Given Kudos: 635
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
Re: The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain reaction. On [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Practicegmat wrote:
I vote for (B).

(A) talks about economy. But in the passage, nothing about economy is discussed in general


Hi,

"Economy" term is very commonly used to refer to regions e.g. You need to have solid infrastructure for an economy to succeed. Here, "economy" refers to a region.

Hope this helps :)

Thanks,
Chiranjeev
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4346
Own Kudos [?]: 30782 [0]
Given Kudos: 635
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
Re: The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain reaction. On [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Rock750 wrote:
egmat wrote:
The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain reaction. Once manufacturing is outsourced, process-engineering expertise can’t be maintained, since it depends on daily interactions with manufacturing. Without process-engineering capabilities, companies find it increasingly difficult to conduct advanced research on next-generation process technologies. Without the ability to develop such new processes, they find they can no longer develop new products.

Which of the following is best supported by the passage?

A. In the long term, an economy with a deteriorating infrastructure for advanced process engineering and with declining manufacturing activity will likely lose its ability to innovate.
B. To develop new products, a company must never cut down on its manufacturing.
C. An increase in the manufacturing activity in a region leads to increase in innovation within the region
D. To develop new products, a company needs to frequently change its processes.
E. An economy that has growing manufacturing capabilities will churn out more new products than other economies.


The conclusion is : Without the ability to develop such new processes, they find they can no longer develop new products.

I think that D is best supported by the conclusion since changing its processes is the same as bringing new processes. Hence, a company needs to frequently change its processes in order to develop new products ..


Hi,

You got into a trap :wink:

This option could have been a very close option choice without the word "frequently". This word spoils the game :)

Refer to the detailed solution posted above to understand the nuances of this.

Thanks :)
Chiranjeev
Retired Moderator
Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Posts: 1015
Own Kudos [?]: 4054 [0]
Given Kudos: 156
Send PM
Re: The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain reaction. On [#permalink]
egmat wrote:
Rock750 wrote:
egmat wrote:
The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain reaction. Once manufacturing is outsourced, process-engineering expertise can’t be maintained, since it depends on daily interactions with manufacturing. Without process-engineering capabilities, companies find it increasingly difficult to conduct advanced research on next-generation process technologies. Without the ability to develop such new processes, they find they can no longer develop new products.

Which of the following is best supported by the passage?

A. In the long term, an economy with a deteriorating infrastructure for advanced process engineering and with declining manufacturing activity will likely lose its ability to innovate.
B. To develop new products, a company must never cut down on its manufacturing.
C. An increase in the manufacturing activity in a region leads to increase in innovation within the region
D. To develop new products, a company needs to frequently change its processes.
E. An economy that has growing manufacturing capabilities will churn out more new products than other economies.


The conclusion is : Without the ability to develop such new processes, they find they can no longer develop new products.

I think that D is best supported by the conclusion since changing its processes is the same as bringing new processes. Hence, a company needs to frequently change its processes in order to develop new products ..


Hi,

You got into a trap :wink:

This option could have been a very close option choice without the word "frequently". This word spoils the game :)

Refer to the detailed solution posted above to understand the nuances of this.

Thanks :)
Chiranjeev


Hi Chiranjeev
Even had the option D not used 'frequently', still it couldn't have been a close contender of A for the same reason you've stated in OE for B - talks about 'company' whereas the argument is all about a region/economy.

Please let me know your thoughts on this.
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4346
Own Kudos [?]: 30782 [0]
Given Kudos: 635
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
Re: The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain reaction. On [#permalink]
Expert Reply
bagdbmba wrote:

Hi Chiranjeev
Even had the option D not used 'frequently', still it couldn't have been a close contender of A for the same reason you've stated in OE for B - talks about 'company' whereas the argument is all about a region/economy.

Please let me know your thoughts on this.


Interesting doubt!

However, the reasoning given in the detailed solution is correct.

Look - if a company is spread out in multiple regions, then it can cut production in one region and maintain production in other regions. In such a case, it will still be able to develop new products (in other regions). So, option B is incorrect.

Let's look at modified version of option D (without the word "frequently"):

D. To develop new products, a company needs to change its processes

Now, this must be true. Why? Because it follows directly from the last line of the passage:

"Without the ability to develop such new processes, they find they can no longer develop new products".

What does "they" refer to? "they" refers to "companies".

So, companies cannot develop new products without new processes.

This is what option D says.

Does it help?

Thanks,
Chiranjeev
Retired Moderator
Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Posts: 1015
Own Kudos [?]: 4054 [0]
Given Kudos: 156
Send PM
Re: The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain reaction. On [#permalink]
egmat wrote:
bagdbmba wrote:

Hi Chiranjeev
Even had the option D not used 'frequently', still it couldn't have been a close contender of A for the same reason you've stated in OE for B - talks about 'company' whereas the argument is all about a region/economy.

Please let me know your thoughts on this.


Interesting doubt!

However, the reasoning given in the detailed solution is correct.

Look - if a company is spread out in multiple regions, then it can cut production in one region and maintain production in other regions. In such a case, it will still be able to develop new products (in other regions). So, option B is incorrect.

Let's look at modified version of option D (without the word "frequently"):

D. To develop new products, a company needs to change its processes

Now, this must be true. Why? Because it follows directly from the last line of the passage:

"Without the ability to develop such new processes, they find they can no longer develop new products".

What does "they" refer to? "they" refers to "companies".

So, companies cannot develop new products without new processes.

This is what option D says.

Does it help?

Thanks,
Chiranjeev


Hi Chiranjeev,
Got your point...! Thanks..

So,basically the word 'frequently' throws D out of the game here. Isn't it something similar concept I was trying to make in your another question https://gmatclub.com/forum/inference-vs-assumption-146758.html#p1265147 regrading the scope of the argument...?

Anything too narrow or too broad in the context of the scope of the argument should be eliminated...! Let me know please whether this analogy is proper?
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4346
Own Kudos [?]: 30782 [0]
Given Kudos: 635
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
Re: The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain reaction. On [#permalink]
Expert Reply
bagdbmba wrote:
Hi Chiranjeev,
Got your point...! Thanks..

So,basically the word 'frequently' throws D out of the game here. Isn't it something similar concept I was trying to make in your another question https://gmatclub.com/forum/inference-vs-assumption-146758.html#p1265147 regrading the scope of the argument...?

Anything too narrow or too broad in the context of the scope of the argument should be eliminated...! Let me know please whether this analogy is proper?


I don't think the word "frequently" here makes option D either too narrow or too broad here.

-Chiranjeev
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Posts: 404
Own Kudos [?]: 1833 [1]
Given Kudos: 370
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Health Care)
Send PM
Re: The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain reaction. On [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
ESMT Berlin School Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2018
Status:The darker the night, the nearer the dawn!
Posts: 245
Own Kudos [?]: 448 [0]
Given Kudos: 104
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GMAT 1: 640 Q50 V25
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
Send PM
Re: The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain reaction. On [#permalink]
egmat wrote:
The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain reaction. Once manufacturing is outsourced, process-engineering expertise can’t be maintained, since it depends on daily interactions with manufacturing. Without process-engineering capabilities, companies find it increasingly difficult to conduct advanced research on next-generation process technologies. Without the ability to develop such new processes, they find they can no longer develop new products.

Which of the following is best supported by the passage?

A. In the long term, an economy with a deteriorating infrastructure for advanced process engineering and with declining manufacturing activity will likely lose its ability to innovate.
B. To develop new products, a company must never cut down on its manufacturing.
C. An increase in the manufacturing activity in a region leads to increase in innovation within the region
D. To develop new products, a company needs to frequently change its processes.
E. An economy that has growing manufacturing capabilities will churn out more new products than other economies.

Hi egmat,
I am skeptical about the said answer choice-A.

OptionA:
    In the long term, an economy with a deteriorating infrastructure for advanced process engineering and with declining manufacturing activity will likely lose its ability to innovate.
'A' states that the ability to innovate will reduce/lose.

Argument states:
    The decline in manufacturing sets off a chain reaction.
    The decline in manufacturing ---> Non-maintenance of Process-engineering expertise ---> Difficulty in conducting research on next-generation process technologies ---> Inability to develop new products.

The argument states that they can no longer develop new products.
    Meaning: They CANNOT develop new products. They can NO longer innovate.
    However, It does NOT mean that they will NECESSARILY lose the ability to innovate.
    They CAN still maintain the same ability with which they were already innovating products.
      Ex: Let's say, Apple is developing new products with an innovation level of 90/100. - I'm quantifying innovation to ease the communication.
      Now, because of the exodus of highly skilled technocrats, Apple will NOT be able to develop new products, i.e., raise the innovation level beyond 90.
      However, Apple can still develop products at the current level of 90. - I agree the innovation level would not cross 90.
      Why should the ability to innovate necessarily reduce?

Analogy
    Let's say - The argument states: the stock price of Uber will not increase in the coming quarter.
    To infer, Just because the price won't increase ----------> It should fall, seems more likely an inference mistake of the two possible outcomes:
    The stock price can either stay the same or decrease.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2013
Posts: 267
Own Kudos [?]: 167 [1]
Given Kudos: 201
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GRE 1: Q163 V155
GPA: 3.95
Send PM
Re: The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain reaction. On [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Bunuel - please highlight the correct option in the choices
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92900
Own Kudos [?]: 618804 [0]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
Re: The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain reaction. On [#permalink]
Expert Reply
saurabh9gupta wrote:
Bunuel - please highlight the correct option in the choices

___________________
Added the OA. Thank you.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17213
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain reaction. On [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain reaction. On [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne