Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 05:37 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 05:37

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 16 May 2013
Posts: 15
Own Kudos [?]: 166 [43]
Given Kudos: 13
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Status:Far, far away!
Posts: 859
Own Kudos [?]: 4891 [9]
Given Kudos: 219
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2011
Posts: 53
Own Kudos [?]: 232 [0]
Given Kudos: 15
Send PM
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Status:Far, far away!
Posts: 859
Own Kudos [?]: 4891 [0]
Given Kudos: 219
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Send PM
Re: Until the European Convention on Human Rights came into effect in 2000 [#permalink]
swati007 wrote:
Hi zarralou i believe that option a is wrong because it is a sentence fragment


A clause is called a fragment if is a dependent clause without subject / verb, or is not connected to an IC (or a combination of those).

"A. no law of privacy was as yet acknowledged by British courts " this clearly has both a subject and a verb, so you're saying that is dependent clause... yes, I can agree with that, mostly because the sentence states "... yet ..." (when?) so its meaning is not complete on its own (hence is a DC).
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2013
Posts: 72
Own Kudos [?]: 95 [0]
Given Kudos: 42
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V28
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
Send PM
Re: Until the European Convention on Human Rights came into effect in 2000 [#permalink]
Between B and D, B is better because first clause is in active so it make sense to go with active in 2nd clause...
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 Apr 2013
Posts: 98
Own Kudos [?]: 66 [0]
Given Kudos: 17
Send PM
Re: Until the European Convention on Human Rights came into effect in 2000 [#permalink]
Hi All,

What is wrong in (E)? The verb "acknowledged" should precede "came". Hence should it not be "had been no acknowledged"?



Regards

Argha
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 580
Own Kudos [?]: 4324 [0]
Given Kudos: 197
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
Send PM
Re: Until the European Convention on Human Rights came into effect in 2000 [#permalink]
argha wrote:
Hi All,

What is wrong in (E)? The verb "acknowledged" should precede "came". Hence should it not be "had been no acknowledged"?



Regards

Argha


hi argha,

option E is wrong because itcompletely changes the intended meaningof the original question.

Until the European Convention on Human Rights came into effect in 2000, no law of privacy was as yet acknowledged by British courts.
intended meaning:==until 2000,british courts dindnt pass any law of privacy

opton E:
E. there had been no acknowledged law of privacy in Britain===>UNTIL 2000 THERE WAS NO LAW IN BRITAIN ON PRIVACY.
USE OF HAD IS ALSO WRONG HERE.YOU CAN EXPRESS WITH SIMPLE PAST ALSO
...

I didnt understand what you meant to say with this:

The verb "acknowledged" should precede "came". Hence should it not be "had been no acknowledged"?


hope it helps.
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Jul 2012
Posts: 3
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
GMAT Date: 03-16-2013
GPA: 3
Send PM
Re: Until the European Convention on Human Rights came into effect in 2000 [#permalink]
1
Kudos
hi dears
in (B)....>british court=may be consume as a type of court
in (c)......>the court in britain is clear than another
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 Apr 2013
Posts: 98
Own Kudos [?]: 66 [0]
Given Kudos: 17
Send PM
Re: Until the European Convention on Human Rights came into effect in 2000 [#permalink]
Hi Shailesh,

If option (E) is plugged into the original question:

Until the European Convention on Human Rights came into effect in 2000, there had been no acknowledged law of privacy in Britain

Between the two highlighted verbs above, the second one precedes the first. Hence the tense of the second should be PP.

But I presume, when the sequence of events is clear by the usage of "until", then both the verbs should be simple past.

My bad, as I was not aware of this.

Thanks for the explanation anyways.



Regards

Argha
Director
Director
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 530
Own Kudos [?]: 523 [0]
Given Kudos: 916
Send PM
Re: Until the European Convention on Human Rights came into effect in 2000 [#permalink]
main error with a is
as yet, redundant

the correct answer must
logic
not ambiguous'
not redundant

all 3 aspects is in meaning point.
Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2163
Own Kudos [?]: 1180 [0]
Given Kudos: 236
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE:General Management (Transportation)
Send PM
Re: Until the European Convention on Human Rights came into effect in 2000 [#permalink]
agree...b seems the best...C is a nice trap though...
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Oct 2016
Posts: 4
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
Send PM
Re: Until the European Convention on Human Rights came into effect in 2000 [#permalink]
Hi,

Since you are using two simple past tenses because of the presence of "Until", shouldn't we use two simple past tenses when "before/after is used" as before/ater also clarifies what happened first?

For Example : I had eaten before I went to office

Shouldn't it be "I ate before I went to office" as "before" suggests the sequence of events?

Please let me know.

Regards,
Rohit
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Mar 2016
Posts: 448
Own Kudos [?]: 117 [0]
Given Kudos: 103
Send PM
Re: Until the European Convention on Human Rights came into effect in 2000 [#permalink]
koolgmat wrote:
Until the European Convention on Human Rights came into effect in 2000, no law of privacy was as yet acknowledged by British courts.

A. no law of privacy was as yet acknowledged by British courts
B. British courts did not acknowledge a law of privacy
C. the courts in Britain had not acknowledged a law of privacy
D. a law of privacy was not acknowledged by the courts in Britain
E. there had been no acknowledged law of privacy in Britain


very close between B and C...

yes past perfect is optional.. but eventhough PP is there,,nothing rong..

to me,,"the courts in britain" sounds better than british courts...

any expert opinion please,,,
Manager
Manager
Joined: 03 Jul 2017
Status:IF YOU CAN DREAM IT, YOU CAN DO IT
Posts: 147
Own Kudos [?]: 33 [1]
Given Kudos: 27
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
Send PM
Re: Until the European Convention on Human Rights came into effect in 2000 [#permalink]
Why is option D incorrect?? Since the Sentence talks about the past action , using the verb DID which is in present context is incorrect . Am I right??
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Mar 2018
Posts: 30
Own Kudos [?]: 15 [0]
Given Kudos: 16
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V34
Send PM
Re: Until the European Convention on Human Rights came into effect in 2000 [#permalink]
can somebody explain why other options are wrong?
especially E
Manager
Manager
Joined: 29 May 2018
Posts: 93
Own Kudos [?]: 124 [0]
Given Kudos: 52
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V38
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 4
Send PM
Re: Until the European Convention on Human Rights came into effect in 2000 [#permalink]
What does the sentence mean anyway? Until the Human rights convention, British courts did not acknowledge a single law on human rights.

Job of courts is to decide on the basis of established laws not to pass laws.
The sentence does not make sense to me. Which court refuses to acknowledge a passed law?

E, although, not perfect is the only sentence which makes sense. Prior to an event, there had been no acknowledged law in the country.

What do you think GMATNinja

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 Apr 2020
Posts: 10
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 11
GMAT 1: 200 Q1 V1
Send PM
Re: Until the European Convention on Human Rights came into effect in 2000 [#permalink]
Why c is wrong? Can somebody please explain

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Nov 2016
Posts: 122
Own Kudos [?]: 21 [0]
Given Kudos: 599
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.12
Send PM
Re: Until the European Convention on Human Rights came into effect in 2000 [#permalink]
Hi experts,
Please help to explain why each choice is either right or wrong. Thank you.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 17 May 2018
Posts: 159
Own Kudos [?]: 22 [0]
Given Kudos: 105
Location: India
Schools: IIM
Send PM
Re: Until the European Convention on Human Rights came into effect in 2000 [#permalink]
egmat please explain this
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Until the European Convention on Human Rights came into effect in 2000 [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne