Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 23:24 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 23:24

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Poor Qualityx      
Show Tags
Hide Tags
CEO
CEO
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 2887
Own Kudos [?]: 1117 [39]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
CEO
CEO
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 2887
Own Kudos [?]: 1117 [15]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 971
Own Kudos [?]: 769 [7]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 55
Own Kudos [?]: 37 [3]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: If a number is drawn at random from the first 1000 positive [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
GMATT73 wrote:
If a number is drawn at random from the first 1000 positive integers, what is the probability of selecting a refined number?

1. Any refined number must be divisible by 22
2. A refined number is any even multiple of 11


I think it should be D

1. you can find the number of numbers divisible by 22 and less than 1000 ----> sufficient

2. you can find the number of numbers divisible by 11 and less than 1000 ----> sufficient
CEO
CEO
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 2887
Own Kudos [?]: 1117 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: If a number is drawn at random from the first 1000 positive [#permalink]
Sorry guys, OA is not D. Any other guesses?
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jun 2004
Posts: 492
Own Kudos [?]: 1122 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: CA
Re: If a number is drawn at random from the first 1000 positive [#permalink]
B?

Somehow I think the wordings are a little tricky.........
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 2004
Own Kudos [?]: 1899 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Singapore
Send PM
Re: If a number is drawn at random from the first 1000 positive [#permalink]
1
Kudos
GMATT73 wrote:
1. Statement 1 tells us that a refined number must be a multiple of 22. This is a necessary, but not sufficient condition for a refined number. While every refined number is a multiple of 22, every multiple of 22 is not necessarily a refined number. Since we have no other info about the definition of a refined number, we cannot determine how many integers from 1-1000 fit that definition. Insuff.

2. Statement 2 provides us with a definition of a refined number- an even multiple of 11. We can find the number of even multiples of 11 in the set, so this is sufficient.

OA is (B)


Isn't (2) just a repetition of (1)?
(2) says the refined number must be an even multiple of 11. So a refined number can be 22, 44, 66, 88, 110,... etc... All these are multiples off 22, which is given in (1).
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 55
Own Kudos [?]: 37 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: If a number is drawn at random from the first 1000 positive [#permalink]
GMATT73 wrote:
1. Statement 1 tells us that a refined number must be a multiple of 22. This is a necessary, but not sufficient condition for a refined number. While every refined number is a multiple of 22, every multiple of 22 is not necessarily a refined number. Since we have no other info about the definition of a refined number, we cannot determine how many integers from 1-1000 fit that definition. Insuff.

2. Statement 2 provides us with a definition of a refined number- an even multiple of 11. We can find the number of even multiples of 11 in the set, so this is sufficient.

OA is (B)


GMATT73 I see the point.
..this question has a very good trap.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Mar 2005
Posts: 69
Own Kudos [?]: 21 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Basel
Send PM
Re: If a number is drawn at random from the first 1000 positive [#permalink]
good question. I think it is B. I is just a condition but does not define refined numbers.
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 1581
Own Kudos [?]: 642 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Location: New York City
Concentration: Social Enterprise
Schools:Wharton'11 HBS'12
Send PM
Re: If a number is drawn at random from the first 1000 positive [#permalink]
what is the point?
I dont get it...(1) and (2) are saying the same thing...I would say such a twisted question will never appear on the GMAT!



believe2 wrote:
GMATT73 wrote:
1. Statement 1 tells us that a refined number must be a multiple of 22. This is a necessary, but not sufficient condition for a refined number. While every refined number is a multiple of 22, every multiple of 22 is not necessarily a refined number. Since we have no other info about the definition of a refined number, we cannot determine how many integers from 1-1000 fit that definition. Insuff.

2. Statement 2 provides us with a definition of a refined number- an even multiple of 11. We can find the number of even multiples of 11 in the set, so this is sufficient.

OA is (B)


GMATT73 I see the point.
..this question has a very good trap.
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 687
Own Kudos [?]: 1448 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Germany
Send PM
Re: If a number is drawn at random from the first 1000 positive [#permalink]
fresinha12 wrote:
what is the point?
I dont get it...(1) and (2) are saying the same thing...I would say such a twisted question will never appear on the GMAT!



believe2 wrote:
GMATT73 wrote:
1. Statement 1 tells us that a refined number must be a multiple of 22. This is a necessary, but not sufficient condition for a refined number. While every refined number is a multiple of 22, every multiple of 22 is not necessarily a refined number. Since we have no other info about the definition of a refined number, we cannot determine how many integers from 1-1000 fit that definition. Insuff.

2. Statement 2 provides us with a definition of a refined number- an even multiple of 11. We can find the number of even multiples of 11 in the set, so this is sufficient.

OA is (B)


GMATT73 I see the point.
..this question has a very good trap.


the diff b/w 1) and 2) is that in 1) 22 and 44 may be refined numbers. we can calc the prob. 22 44 66 may be refinded numbers as well. the prob to the former example is different but both satisfy 1). in 2) its certain that every mutiple off 22 is a refined number. there is only one value for the prob.
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Status:Retaking after 7 years
Posts: 864
Own Kudos [?]: 4468 [0]
Given Kudos: 221
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.75
Send PM
Re: If a number is drawn at random from the first 1000 positive [#permalink]
Sorry for starting this old thread, but can anyone please elaborate on this ancient problem? I am still not able to distinguish 1 and 2, apart from considering that one is definition and the other is not. Need examples for clarification.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 20 Dec 2012
Posts: 16
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [2]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
Re: If a number is drawn at random from the first 1000 positive [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Marcab wrote:
Sorry for starting this old thread, but can anyone please elaborate on this ancient problem? I am still not able to distinguish 1 and 2, apart from considering that one is definition and the other is not. Need examples for clarification.


I would say it's more about the wording than the math.

Let's make it simple.

1. Any refined number must be divisible by 22

If refined numbers were 44n then (1) would give us wrong numbers. 44, 88, 132 = refined. But (1) doesn't tell us that 22, 44, 110 is not refined.

2. A refined number is any even multiple of 11.

Here we're told the actual definition of refined numbers. They're the even multiples of 11.

11*2
11*4
11*6
and so on.

This doesn't leave any blind spots or confusion.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 05 Mar 2014
Posts: 3
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 16
Send PM
Re: If a number is drawn at random from the first 1000 positive [#permalink]
Hello Guys,
This is my first post, I hope you find it helpful.

Now in the question they have asked a no. Is drawn from first 1000 positive integers, and its probability. Def. Of refined no, is given in respective statements. Its all about wordings.

Now,
S1.) Any refined no must be divisible by 22, this include 22, 44, 242, 110, 198,.... and the list goes on, there are definite nos. and nos can be found, but the statement says ANY, which is absurd.
INSUFFICIENT.

S2.) A refined no is any even multiple of 11. This includes 22, 44, 66, 88, 286,484, 968..... and on, here also no can be found but A REFINED NO. IS MENTIONED. This makes it clear a definite no particularly even multiple of 11.
SUFFICIENT.
BASICALLY ITS ALL ON WORDING, YOU DONT NEED TO SOLVE.

ANS B.


WHAT YOU THINK, YOU BECOME.
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1015
Own Kudos [?]: 2755 [6]
Given Kudos: 79
Location: India
Send PM
Re: If a number is drawn at random from the first 1000 positive [#permalink]
4
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
If a number is drawn at random from the first 1000 positive integers, what is the probability of selecting a refined number?

(1) Any refined number must be divisible by 22
(2) A refined number is any even multiple of 11

Well...........I thought to represent my solution in a humorous way.

The villain here in this problem(Or clever wordplay formally) is the word Any :evil:



Statement 1: Any refined number must be divisible by 22

I imagine a scenario where a top dreaded villain came to know that he can be attacked by some one.

He asks who is he?(kaun hai woh?)

Clue he gets is He is a human being.(Woh ek insaan hai :wink: )

Does that give him any proper info other than that it is not a creature or animal. Where will he search for that person? Can each and every person be that special one? No right. A bit similar scenario of Kans.......Isnt it.

So Any refined number must be divisible by 22 indicates that Refined number may include 22 and may not include 44 and still be correct.

Hence we have no idea what multiples of 22 it does include and what it doesn't and is not sufficient.




Statement 2: A refined number is any even multiple of 11............22

Here the refined number includes every multiple of 22 under 1000.

We don't have to list all of them but we know that they are finite.

Hence the statement 2 is sufficient.


one more such problem where this misguiding clue concept is used.
what-is-the-probability-of-selecting-a-clean-number-from-a-s-139647.html

This Question is Locked Due to Poor Quality
Hi there,
The question you've reached has been archived due to not meeting our community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Looking for better-quality questions? Check out the 'Similar Questions' block below for a list of similar but high-quality questions.
Want to join other relevant Problem Solving discussions? Visit our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum for the most recent and top-quality discussions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: If a number is drawn at random from the first 1000 positive [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92900 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne