Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 10:38 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 10:38

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92914
Own Kudos [?]: 618971 [3]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Aug 2015
Posts: 28
Own Kudos [?]: 63 [2]
Given Kudos: 368
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
WE:Brand Management (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Retired Moderator
Joined: 22 Jun 2014
Posts: 971
Own Kudos [?]: 3803 [0]
Given Kudos: 182
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 540 Q45 V20
GPA: 2.49
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2163
Own Kudos [?]: 1180 [1]
Given Kudos: 236
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE:General Management (Transportation)
Send PM
Re: If x is a positive integer, is x^(1/2) greater than 20? [#permalink]
1
Kudos
x can't be 0
1 - divisible by 30, x can be 30 - in this case, sqrt 30 is not greater than 20, if x = 900 = yes, is greater. NS
2 - divisible by 50, x can be 50 -> in this case, sqrt 50 is 5 sqrt 2 - not greater than 20. if x = 2500 - yes, is greater. NS
1+2 -> x can be 150, sqrt of 150 can be 5 sqrt 6 -> not greater than 20. x can be 1500 - and sqrt of 1500 is greater than 20. both are insufficient. E.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Posts: 43
Own Kudos [?]: 91 [0]
Given Kudos: 23
Send PM
Re: If x is a positive integer, is x^(1/2) greater than 20? [#permalink]
Sqrt(X)>20
Squaring on both sides X>400

i)factors of 30=2x3x5
30,300,420 are also divisible by 30 So we dont have single value.So not sufficient

ii)factors of 50=2x5x5
50,240,500 are also divisible by 50 and So we dont have single value.So not sufficient

Combining i) & ii)

common factors = 2x3x5x5 =150
150,450 is also divisible by 150.we dont have single value.So not sufficient.

therefore the answer is E

Originally posted by iikarthik on 01 Nov 2015, 14:20.
Last edited by iikarthik on 01 Nov 2015, 14:31, edited 3 times in total.
Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2163
Own Kudos [?]: 1180 [0]
Given Kudos: 236
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE:General Management (Transportation)
Send PM
Re: If x is a positive integer, is x^(1/2) greater than 20? [#permalink]
iikarthik wrote:
Sqrt(X)>20
Squaring on both sides X>400

i)factors of 30=2x3x5
30 is also divisible by 30 and <400.So not sufficient

ii)factors of 50=2x5x5
50 is also divisible by 30 and <400.So not sufficient

Combining i) & ii)

common factors = 2x3x5x5 =150
150 is still <400.So not sufficient.

therefore the answer is E



mate, there are some serious flaws in your way of thinking.
first of all, when analyzing statement 2, do not, do not, do not use any information from statement 1.
second, as you have pointed out, 150 is <400. This is a Yes/No DS type of question. IF you can clearly say Yes or No, then the information is sufficient. From your msg, you say that 150 is less than 400, that's why it is not sufficient. That's not true.
third, 50 is not divisible by 30, since the prime factorization is different. 30 has 3 distinct factors 2, 3, and 5, while 50 has only 2 distinct factors: 2 and 5.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Posts: 43
Own Kudos [?]: 91 [0]
Given Kudos: 23
Send PM
Re: If x is a positive integer, is x^(1/2) greater than 20? [#permalink]
mvictor wrote:
iikarthik wrote:
Sqrt(X)>20
Squaring on both sides X>400

i)factors of 30=2x3x5
30 is also divisible by 30 and <400.So not sufficient

ii)factors of 50=2x5x5
50 is also divisible by 30 and <400.So not sufficient

Combining i) & ii)

common factors = 2x3x5x5 =150
150 is still <400.So not sufficient.

therefore the answer is E



mate, there are some serious flaws in your way of thinking.
first of all, when analyzing statement 2, do not, do not, do not use any information from statement 1.
second, as you have pointed out, 150 is <400. This is a Yes/No DS type of question. IF you can clearly say Yes or No, then the information is sufficient. From your msg, you say that 150 is less than 400, that's why it is not sufficient. That's not true.
third, 50 is not divisible by 30, since the prime factorization is different. 30 has 3 distinct factors 2, 3, and 5, while 50 has only 2 distinct factors: 2 and 5.



Thanks Mvictor for pointing out the typo and logical flaws.Hope it si correct now.

I have edited my post
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 05 Apr 2015
Posts: 9
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
Re: If x is a positive integer, is x^(1/2) greater than 20? [#permalink]
orig condition is x>400?

1. x divisibly by 30, i.e. x=30,600etc..
not suff
2. x divisible by 50 i.e. x =50,500 etc.
not suff
combining both, x= 150, 1500 etc..
so not suff.
ANS :E
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 10161
Own Kudos [?]: 16598 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.82
Send PM
Re: If x is a positive integer, is x^(1/2) greater than 20? [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution.

If x is a positive integer, is x √ greater than 20?

(1) x is divisible by 30
(2) x is divisible by 50

If we modify the original condition by squaring both sides, we get x>20^2 or x>400. There is one variable (x) and 2 equations are given from the conditions, so there is high chance (D) will be our answer.

From condition 1, the answer is 'no' for x=30 but 'yes' for 1500. This is insufficient.
For condition 2, the answer is 'no' for x=50 but 'yes' for 1500. This is insufficient.
Looking at the conditions together, the answer is 'no' for x=150 but 'yes' for 1500. So the answer becomes (E).

For cases where we need 1 more equation, such as original conditions with “1 variable”, or “2 variables and 1 equation”, or “3 variables and 2 equations”, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 59 % chance that D is the answer, while A or B has 38% chance and C or E has 3% chance. Since D is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition. Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, C or E.
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 12 Jul 2017
Posts: 14
Own Kudos [?]: 37 [1]
Given Kudos: 61
Schools: Boston U '20
Send PM
Re: If x is a positive integer, is x^(1/2) greater than 20? [#permalink]
1
Kudos
:arrow: lcm of 50 and
30 is 150

it can be 150 ,300
,450 ,600


150^ is close to 13

600^ is greater than 20 .. so not sufficient :x

:arrow: Answer is E
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 32674
Own Kudos [?]: 821 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: If x is a positive integer, is x^(1/2) greater than 20? [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: If x is a positive integer, is x^(1/2) greater than 20? [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92914 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne