Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 16:05 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 16:05

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Difficulty: 505-555 Levelx   Absolute Values/Modulusx                           
Show Tags
Hide Tags
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 Jun 2015
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 911 [211]
Given Kudos: 142
Schools: ISB '18
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Posts: 6820
Own Kudos [?]: 29930 [61]
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Send PM
SVP
SVP
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Posts: 2362
Own Kudos [?]: 3626 [25]
Given Kudos: 816
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE:Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Send PM
General Discussion
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 10161
Own Kudos [?]: 16598 [4]
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.82
Send PM
Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t) ? [#permalink]
2
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution.


If p,s, and t are positive integer, is |ps-pt| > p(s-t)?

(1) p < s
(2) s < t

When you modify the condition and the question, |ps-pt| > p(s-t)?--> ps-pt<0?, therefore p(s-t)<0?. Since p>0, you need to find out s-t<0?. In 2), s-t<0, which is yes and sufficient. Therefore, the answer is B.


-> Once we modify the original condition and the question according to the variable approach method 1, we can solve approximately 30% of DS questions.
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Status:Math and DI Expert
Posts: 11178
Own Kudos [?]: 31932 [16]
Given Kudos: 290
Send PM
If p, s, and t are positive integer, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t) ? [#permalink]
8
Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
ajayvyavahare wrote:
If p,s, and t are positive integer, is |ps-pt| > p(s-t)

(1) p < s
(2) s < t

need help to solve this one.


Hi,
The equation is \(|ps-pt| > p(s-t)\).
or \(p|s-t| > p(s-t)\)

Since all numbers are positive , p cannot be 0..

Thus two cases..
1) \(|s-t|\) will never be smaller than \(s-t\) as |s-t| will always be positive while s-t will depend on relative values of s and t..
2) If s and t are equal both will be 0..

So our answer for \(|ps-pt| > p(s-t)\) will be
a) NO if s>t or s=t and
b) YES if s<t...

So we are just looking for the relation between s and t

lets see the statements..
(1) p < s...
nothing between s and t.. insuff

(2) s < t
answer is YES.. suff
ans B
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2015
Posts: 238
Own Kudos [?]: 360 [3]
Given Kudos: 144
Location: Canada
Concentration: Leadership, Accounting
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
GPA: 3
WE:Accounting (Accounting)
Send PM
Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t) ? [#permalink]
3
Kudos
AJ1012 wrote:
If p,s, and t are positive integer, is |ps-pt| > p(s-t)

(1) p < s
(2) s < t

need help to solve this one.


Excellent question, this one looks a lot tricker than it actually is. Took me for a ride until I saw the "only positive integers". So let's look at |ps - pt| > P(s-t) or re-write it as | p(s-t)| > p (s-t).

Now let's consider a possibility where P(s-t) is greater than | p(s-t)| , think about this one. I can't come up with one. So there's no way | p(s-t | < p (s-t). We know that |p(s-t)| is always positive. So if p (s-t) is negative then, lets call P (s-t) x, so |x| > x is equal when both positive and |x| < x when x is negative correct?

Since all of them are positive, to make P (s-t) negative, T has to be bigger than S. That's the only option. No other way to make it negative since they're all positive. T > s is necessary. 1) insufficient. 2) sufficient !

Here's a easy way: re-write : |p (s-t)| > p(s-t) let call inside X. |x| > x only if X is negative. so if all are positive, (s-t) has to be negative. for that T has to be bigger than S. Bam!
Current Student
Joined: 02 Jul 2017
Posts: 235
Own Kudos [?]: 291 [5]
Given Kudos: 70
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V38
Send PM
Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t) ? [#permalink]
2
Kudos
3
Bookmarks
If p,s, and t are positive integer, is |ps-pt| > p(s-t)
=> Find is |p(s-t)| > p(s-t)

As we know |x| > x only when x is -ve . When x is positive |x| =x

So here we have to check if product p*(s-t) is -ve or not. => either p is -ve or (s-t) is -ve. If both -ve, than product will become +ve => |x|=x

given in question stem that all variables are +ve. So we have to find if (s-t) is -ve or not. => we have to find is s<t or not.

(1) p < s
This just tell value of p is less than s . Not sufficient.

(2) s < t
This directly gives us equation that we are looking for.
=> s<t => (s-t) is -ve => p(s-t) is -ve => |p(s-t)| > p(s-t)
Sufficient

Answer: B
Intern
Intern
Joined: 26 Jul 2020
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 35
Send PM
Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t) ? [#permalink]
BrentGmatPrepNow wrote " if x = 5 and y = 2, then we get: |5 - 2| = 5 - 2. In this case |x - y| = x - y
CONVERSELY, if x = 4 and y = 6, then we get: |4 - 6| = 4 - 6. In this case |x - y| ≠ x - y"

My question is if x = 5 and y = 2, then we get: |5 - 2| = 5 - 2. In this case |x - y| = x - y
Then why not if x = 4 and y = 6, then we get: |4 - 6| = 4 - 6. In this case |x - y| = x - y ? since |x - y| can be thought as the DISTANCE between x and y on the number line?
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Status:Math and DI Expert
Posts: 11178
Own Kudos [?]: 31932 [1]
Given Kudos: 290
Send PM
Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t) ? [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
NirjonS wrote:
BrentGmatPrepNow wrote " if x = 5 and y = 2, then we get: |5 - 2| = 5 - 2. In this case |x - y| = x - y
CONVERSELY, if x = 4 and y = 6, then we get: |4 - 6| = 4 - 6. In this case |x - y| ≠ x - y"

My question is if x = 5 and y = 2, then we get: |5 - 2| = 5 - 2. In this case |x - y| = x - y
Then why not if x = 4 and y = 6, then we get: |4 - 6| = 4 - 6. In this case |x - y| = x - y ? since |x - y| can be thought as the DISTANCE between x and y on the number line?


|x-y| is the distance and distance is always positive, so |4-6|=|-2|=2, but x-y=4-6=-2.
2 is not equal to-2
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Status:Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Posts: 18761
Own Kudos [?]: 22052 [5]
Given Kudos: 283
Location: United States (CA)
Send PM
Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t) ? [#permalink]
2
Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
AJ1012 wrote:
If p, s, and t are positive integer, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t) ?

(1) p < s
(2) s < t

Solution:

Question Stem Analysis:


We need to determine whether |ps - pt| > p(s - t). Notice that ps - pt = p(s - t). Since |x| > x if and only if x is negative, we need to determine whether p(s - t) is negative. Lastly, since p is positive, we really need to determine whether s - t is negative.

Statement One Alone:

Since we don’t know anything about t (except that it’s positive), statement one alone is not sufficient.

Statement Two Alone:

Since s < t, then s - t < 0, i.e., s - t is negative. Therefore, p(s - t) < 0 and |ps - pt| > p(s - t). Statement two alone is sufficient.

Answer: B
Tutor
Joined: 14 Jun 2019
Status:MBA, Columbia Business School
Posts: 30
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [0]
Given Kudos: 16
Send PM
If p, s, and t are positive integer, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t) ? [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Please see below for the full solution. The problem simplifies after opening up the modulus sign and a little bit of reasoning.



Apologies, had linked to incorrect video initially.
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Nov 2018
Posts: 538
Own Kudos [?]: 436 [0]
Given Kudos: 229
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 590 Q49 V22
WE:Other (Retail)
Send PM
If p, s, and t are positive integer, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t) ? [#permalink]
chetan2u sir

If it were not given that p,s, and t are +ve intergers, but only that they are some number not equal to zero. Is the below approach valid?

Q: If p, s, and t are integers, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t)?

We can re arrange the ineq. as:

Case: 1
ps - pt > ps - pt
0 > 0
It is not possible, hence we can discard this case.

Case: 2
ps - pt > -(ps - pt)
ps - pt > pt - ps
2ps - 2pt > 0
ps - pt > 0
p(s-t)>0

In this case we will check whether both, p and (s-t), are either +ve or -ve.
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Status:Math and DI Expert
Posts: 11178
Own Kudos [?]: 31932 [0]
Given Kudos: 290
Send PM
If p, s, and t are positive integer, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t) ? [#permalink]
Expert Reply
rocky620 wrote:
chetan2u sir

If it were not given that p,s, and t are +ve intergers, but only that they are some number not equal to zero. Is the below approach valid?

Q: If p, s, and t are integers, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t)?

We can re arrange the ineq. as:

Case: 1
ps - pt > ps - pt
0 > 0
It is not possible, hence we can discard this case.

Case: 2
ps - pt > -(ps - pt)

ps - pt > pt - ps
2ps - 2pt > 0
ps - pt > 0
p(s-t)>0

In this case we will check whether both, p and (s-t), are either +ve or -ve.


You are correct in the approach but there is an error in the red portion.

You have to take negative of the mod.
So -(ps-pt)>ps-pt
p(t-s)>0

You can also look at it in the following manner
1) If ps>pt
Both sides will be positive and equal…….Answer will be NO
2) If pt >ps
|ps-pt|>0, but ps-pt <0…. Answer will be YES
3) If ps=pt
0=0…. Answer will be NO

So if we can find the relation between ps and Pt, we will get our answer.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 May 2020
Posts: 97
Own Kudos [?]: 10 [0]
Given Kudos: 1531
Send PM
Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t) ? [#permalink]
Hi BrentGMATPrepNow

I am Curios to understand why squaring on both sides of the original equation doesn't work to solve this question. Can you please help explain?
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92915
Own Kudos [?]: 619022 [1]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t) ? [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Vegita wrote:
Hi BrentGMATPrepNow

I am Curios to understand why squaring on both sides of the original equation doesn't work to solve this question. Can you please help explain?


We can only square inequality when both sides are non-negative, which is not the case for |s - t| > (s - t). By the ways |s - t| > (s - t) is true ONLY when s - t < 0, so we cannot square.

When dealing with inequalities, it's important to remember that we can only square both sides of the inequality if both sides are non-negative. However, this condition is not met in cases such as |s - t| > (s - t) because the inequality |s - t| > (s - t) is only true when the value of s - t is negative. Therefore, attempting to square both sides of the inequality in this case would not be valid.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 07 Apr 2023
Posts: 9
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Location: India
Send PM
Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t) ? [#permalink]
|ps-pt| => |p(s-t)|
|p(s-t)| > p(s-t)
if s< t then only the above condition will hold. if s=t then both side will become 0 hence inequality will not hold. if s > t then then both the side on inequality will become equal hence the condition will not hold.

Hence B is the answer
GMAT Club Bot
Re: If p, s, and t are positive integer, is |ps - pt| > p(s - t) ? [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92915 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne