zoezhuyan wrote:
Hi
mikemcgarry,
carolyn, or other
Magoosh experts,
I just encountered a sentence from
Magoosh,
1)
Had the United States allowed the California Republic to remain independent after the Bear Flag Revolt rather than annexing it with military force, this “California nation” might have become the wealthiest nation in North America.
(A) Had the United States allowed the California Republic to remain independent after the Bear Flag Revolt rather than annexing it with military force, this “California nation” might have become
(B) With the United States annexing the California Republic after the Bear Flag Revolt instead of allowing it to remain independent, this “California nation” didn’t become
(C) The United States annexed the California Republic after the Bear Flag Revolt and didn’t allow it to remain independent, to prevent it to become
(D) The United States didn’t allow the California Republic to remain independent after the Bear Flag Revolt, it annexed it with military force instead, and this “California nation” didn’t become
(E) The United States, by not allowing the California Republic to remain independent after the Bear Flag Revolt and, instead, by annexing it, it prevented this “California nation” from becoming
The OA is A,
the word "
annexing", follows "
rather than", is a participle of "
annex", and I thought "
annex" here is a verb, obviously,
annexing is not a subjunctive form,
Would you please clarify what the difference is between "
annexing" in the sentence and
annex that is a subjunctive form as your above explanation #1
Waiting for your reply
Have a nice day
Hi
zoezhuyan!
Glad to help!
Sorry for not clarifying this -- I guess my statement was a bit too general! "Rather than" is tricky, because it can be used in a few different ways (as you have seen!!). The key to keep in mind is that we use the subjunctive when the statement is
hypothetical. So, if the verb after "rather than" is referring to the hypothetical action, then it needs to be in the subjunctive. But if the OTHER verb is the hypothetical one, and the "rather than" verb is not hypothetical, then it should be in the regular tense. That first blog post that you mentioned only deals with the case where the "rather than" verb is the hypothetical one, I believe.
So here, it's the first statement that's hypothetical, and the second (starting with "rather than") which is not. That means that the first verb should be subjunctive. Let's compare the two:
Rather than
invade the Italian peninsula by sea, as all previous aggressors had done, Hannibal
travelled over the Alps to invade by land from the north.
Had the United States
allowed the California Republic to remain independent after the Bear Flag Revolt rather than
annexing it with military force, this “California nation” might have become the wealthiest nation in North America.
The verbs in pink are
hypothetical scenarios, and so are subjunctive. The verbs in blue describe things that actually happened, and so are not in the subjunctive. So the key is just to look for the hypothetical scenario, which is not necessarily always the clause starting with "rather than", and that's the one that needs to be in the subjunctive. For a detailed breakdown of this sentence, check out
Mike's blog post.
I hope that helps!
-Carolyn
_________________