Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Are you attending an MBA or Masters program outside in the US or Europe and wondering how to finance your studies? In this exclusive conversation, we discuss the collateral-free non-cosigner education loans...
Solve 30 high quality GMAT Focus practice questions in timed conditions. Take this GMAT practise test live with peers, analyze your GMAT study progress, and see where you stand in the GMAT student pool.
Join us in a comprehensive talk about the F1 Student Visa process with Travis Feuerbacher, former U.S. Visa Officer and licensed U.S. immigration attorney having expertise working for the U.S. Department of State
Ready to skyrocket your career with an MBA? Get ahead with our curated list of FREE courses and resources to kickstart your journey into business education!
For more than a decade, Target Test Prep has been helping GMAT students clear seemingly impossible hurdles and achieve MASSIVE score increases on test day. Our students prove time and time again that there is no “ceiling”...
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies, Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence, and Excel in timed test environment
Join us for an exclusive one-day event focused on mastering the GMAT and maximizing your preparation resources! Here's what you can expect: Don't miss out on this invaluable opportunity to supercharge your GMAT preparation journey.
In the year 2005 alone, about one-third of the coral reefs in
[#permalink]
31 May 2017, 06:14
2
Kudos
12
Bookmarks
Show timer
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
39%
(02:00)
correct
61%
(02:06)
wrong
based on 517
sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
In the year 2005 alone, about one-third of the coral reefs in the Caribbean died. The Caribbean coral are more fortunate than those in the Indian and Pacific Oceans, where death rates are near 90 percent. Scientist say that warm ocean temperatures are the cause of the unprecedented devastation. Coral may appear to be a hard, rocky substance, but coral reefs are actually huge colonies of living animals. Living reefs teem with fish and provide areas for fish and other sea life to reproduce. Living reefs are colorful and vibrant, while dead reefs are bleached white and devoid of life. Coral reefs grow only a fraction of an inch per year. Once a reef dies, it will probably never recover. Ocean temperatures are expected to continue to rise, and most of the remaining coral reefs in the world will probably begin to die within the next decade.
Which of the following is the most appropriate conclusion for these premises?
(A) Therefore, if you ever want the chance to see a healthy coral reef, go soon. (B) Thus, rising ocean temperatures will have no impact on fish populations. (C) Once the coral dies, it will be bleached white and devoid of life. (D) SCUBA and snorkeling tourism is big business for many Caribbean nations. (E) Coral reefs in the cooler waters at the edge of the tropics will probably survive the longest.
This Question is Locked Due to Poor Quality
Hi there,
The question you've reached has been archived due to not meeting our community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Looking for better-quality questions? Check out the 'Similar Questions' block below
for a list of similar but high-quality questions.
Want to join other relevant Problem Solving discussions? Visit our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
for the most recent and top-quality discussions.
Re: In the year 2005 alone, about one-third of the coral reefs in
[#permalink]
31 May 2017, 08:01
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Which of the following is the most appropriate conclusion for these premises? Before we begin trying to find an answer, a conclusion is a statement(Main Point) why the argument has been written. This argument has been written in order to talk about the decreasing coral reefs all around the world.
(A) Therefore, if you ever want the chance to see a healthy coral reef, go soon. This is the correct option as it matches our pre-thinking (B) Thus, rising ocean temperatures will have no impact on fish populations. The fish population is not what we are concerned with in the argument. (C) Once the coral dies, it will be bleached white and devoid of life. This cannot be a appropriate option for a conclusion since its a fact stated in the argument. (D) SCUBA and snorkeling tourism is big business for many Caribbean nations. This is an out of scope option, as the businesses in Caribbean nations are not within the scope of the argument. (E) Coral reefs in the cooler waters at the edge of the tropics will probably survive the longest. Which coral reefs survive the longest is not why the argument is written
Re: In the year 2005 alone, about one-third of the coral reefs in
[#permalink]
24 Jan 2018, 19:32
1
Kudos
A is really correct? This seems like a stretch of a conclusion to jump to. We're talking about coral reefs in specific parts of the world where ocean temperatures are rising at a rate that the reefs cannot adapt to. This is not the case everywhere in the world. If you want to see a healthy coral reef, don't go to those in the Indian and Pacific oceans.
E is straight up truth, and it contrasts the two facts given right from the onset.
Re: In the year 2005 alone, about one-third of the coral reefs in
[#permalink]
27 Jan 2018, 08:57
E) is clearly not the answer.The tropics may have some other issue associated with corals other than temperature itself.For Ex.the pollution there might be more.
Clearly A)
I was actually tempted a little with C).Conclusions can be rephrases of the premises in the argument.Hence....
Re: In the year 2005 alone, about one-third of the coral reefs in
[#permalink]
27 Jan 2018, 09:10
A says the coral reefs might probably die, its nt completely sure right. It's kinda too extreme. Kindly correct me wherever I was wrong. Regards, Karthik
Re: In the year 2005 alone, about one-third of the coral reefs in
[#permalink]
20 Feb 2018, 23:58
A) Therefore, if you ever want the chance to see a healthy coral reef, go soon. - correct since it’s mentioned in the passage that ocean temperatures will increase. (B) Thus, rising ocean temperatures will have no impact on fish populations.— not talking of ...impact on fish population (C) Once the coral dies, it will be bleached white and devoid of life.— it’s mentioned in the passage and it is not a conclusion (D) SCUBA and snorkeling tourism is big business for many Caribbean nations. — not concerned with this (E) Coral reefs in the cooler waters at the edge of the tropics will probably survive the longest. - close option but here it is comparing the survival of normal reefs and reefs at edge , which is not mentioned in the passage and also the use of probably and will making this option more of a theoretical situation.
Re: In the year 2005 alone, about one-third of the coral reefs in
[#permalink]
24 Mar 2018, 22:10
1
Kudos
Not sure I agree that A is the right choice here. Here's why:
If you want to see a healthy coral reef, go soon.
1. Go where, though? The passage talks about different geographies w.r.t where the coral reefs are dying and where they presumably might live longer. Where one should go to is not stated in this answer. 2. How soon is "soon" meant to be? 5 years, 7 years? Who decides what "soon" is?
Can someone correct my train of thought and/or show me a different way to think about the right answer?
Re: In the year 2005 alone, about one-third of the coral reefs in
[#permalink]
08 Aug 2021, 22:30
JakeRockwell wrote:
E) is clearly not the answer.The tropics may have some other issue associated with corals other than temperature itself.For Ex.the pollution there might be more.
Clearly A)
I was actually tempted a little with C).Conclusions can be rephrases of the premises in the argument.Hence....
c is not the correct answer because coral and coral reef ae two different things , coral is a stone where as coral reefs is a living organism , statement c is talking about coral mixing it with reefs hence wrong.
Re: In the year 2005 alone, about one-third of the coral reefs in
[#permalink]
10 Aug 2021, 03:49
Although I chose E to be the answer, I am trying to devise a school of thought which would help convince myself why E could be wrong.
Clearly I have no idea where the Caribbean islands are situated, whether it’s the edge of tropics or somewhere else. Same for Indian and pacific oceans. selecting option E requires outside knowledge which I believe is not tested here. Moreover this might be a trap answer since almost everyone is aware that the tropics are hot, so naturally this would seem to be the obvious answer as anything away from tropics (including the edges) would be cooler and thus reefs could survive longer there.
B, C, D are clearly incorrect. Still don’t understand why option A is correct😂