Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 08:24 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 08:24

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92914
Own Kudos [?]: 618955 [2]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 Jun 2018
Posts: 50
Own Kudos [?]: 65 [2]
Given Kudos: 1
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, General Management
Schools: Other Schools
GPA: 2.88
WE:Science (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 14 Oct 2017
Posts: 192
Own Kudos [?]: 271 [0]
Given Kudos: 385
GMAT 1: 710 Q44 V41
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 Jun 2018
Posts: 50
Own Kudos [?]: 65 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, General Management
Schools: Other Schools
GPA: 2.88
WE:Science (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Re: At a medical convention attended only by pediatricians and general sur [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Masterscorp wrote:
I think you made a mistake when looking at statement (2).

If you select answer D it means that both statement can answer the question independently from each other. So the calculations from statement (1) are not relevant for statement (2).

Hence, if we analyze statement (2) seperately we see that we don't have any information about the number of male surgeons and hence are unable to answer the question.

In conclusion, answer A is correct.

Hope that helps :-)


Hi Masterscorp, yes each statement should be considered alone, and be sufficient, for the answer to be D. Generally what we get from one statement cannot be applied to the other statement. It was just that statement (2) in this case resulted in an intermediate that was part of the calculations for statement (1), and following those exact same calculations for this particular case it turns out to be sufficient.

For statement (2), we know that 60% of the general surgeons were male, and hence 40% must be female. Thus given that we know the number of female general surgeons in attendance (150) from statement (2), we can work out that there are 375 general surgeons that attended. Given that we know there were 250 pediatricians, we can figure out that the total number of attendees was 625. This is exactly the same calculation as for statement (1), from after we figured out the number of female general surgeons based on the 2:3 ratio given. It is merely a time-saving strategy to recognize the calculations to result in the answer was the same from that point for both statements, and hence save time, rather than having to calculate the answer for statement (2) all over again.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 14 Oct 2017
Posts: 192
Own Kudos [?]: 271 [0]
Given Kudos: 385
GMAT 1: 710 Q44 V41
Send PM
Re: At a medical convention attended only by pediatricians and general sur [#permalink]
Azedenkae wrote:
Masterscorp wrote:
I think you made a mistake when looking at statement (2).

If you select answer D it means that both statement can answer the question independently from each other. So the calculations from statement (1) are not relevant for statement (2).

Hence, if we analyze statement (2) seperately we see that we don't have any information about the number of male surgeons and hence are unable to answer the question.

In conclusion, answer A is correct.

Hope that helps :-)


Hi Masterscorp, yes each statement should be considered alone, and be sufficient, for the answer to be D. Generally what we get from one statement cannot be applied to the other statement. It was just that statement (2) in this case resulted in an intermediate that was part of the calculations for statement (1), and following those exact same calculations for this particular case it turns out to be sufficient.

For statement (2), we know that 60% of the general surgeons were male, and hence 40% must be female. Thus given that we know the number of female general surgeons in attendance (150) from statement (2), we can work out that there are 375 general surgeons that attended. Given that we know there were 250 pediatricians, we can figure out that the total number of attendees was 625. This is exactly the same calculation as for statement (1), from after we figured out the number of female general surgeons based on the 2:3 ratio given. It is merely a time-saving strategy to recognize the calculations to result in the answer was the same from that point for both statements, and hence save time, rather than having to calculate the answer for statement (2) all over again.

Yeah you're right, I overread the statement that 60% of all surgeons are male. However, I will not delete my post so perhaps someone else can learn from my mistake.

Kudos to you :-)
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Feb 2017
Posts: 130
Own Kudos [?]: 45 [0]
Given Kudos: 11
Send PM
Re: At a medical convention attended only by pediatricians and general sur [#permalink]
(1) 100/(0.4x) = 2/3
Sufficient

(2) 0.4x = 150
Sufficient

Answer D
Attachments

4square.jpg
4square.jpg [ 54.3 KiB | Viewed 1286 times ]

GMAT Club Bot
Re: At a medical convention attended only by pediatricians and general sur [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92914 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne